欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (07): 1213-1219.

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同水分供给对小麦叶与非叶器官叶绿体结构和功能的影响

张永平1,2;王志敏1,*;黄琴1;谢岷2   

  1. 1 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院, 北京100094; 2 内蒙古农业大学农学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特010018
  • 收稿日期:2008-01-07 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-07-12 网络出版日期:2008-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 王志敏

Changes of Chloroplast Ultramicrostructure and Function of Different Green Organs in Wheat under Limited Irrigation

ZHANG Yong-Ping12,WANG Zhi-Min1*,HUANG Qin1,XIE Min2   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy and Bio-technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094; 2 College of Agronomy, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhhot 010018, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2008-01-07 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-07-12 Published online:2008-07-12
  • Contact: WANG Zhi-Min

摘要: 在田间不同灌水条件(春季不灌水、春季灌2水和春季灌4水, 每次灌水750 m3 hm-2)下, 于灌浆后期对小麦叶片与非叶器官(穗颖、穗下节和叶鞘)叶绿体结构进行了电镜观察, 并对不同器官的净光合速率(Pn)和光化学效率(Fv/Fm)进行了测定, 以期探明小麦叶与非叶器官光合结构和功能对水分变化的适应性差异。结果表明, 在充足供水条件(春季灌4水)下, 叶片的叶绿体数目明显多于各非叶器官, 但护颖和外稃叶绿体含有较多的淀粉粒。在灌浆期上层土壤重度水分亏缺(春季不灌水)条件下, 植株各器官叶绿体均出现明显的衰老特征, 但衰老程度存在器官间显著差异, 旗叶叶片叶绿体受损程度明显大于非叶器官。在所测非叶器官中, 外稃叶绿体对干旱胁迫反应较为敏感, 而护颖、穗下节间和旗叶鞘叶绿体结构具有较强的稳定性。水分胁迫下各器官Pn和Fv/Fm值均降低, 叶片降低幅度最大, 且随灌浆进程其光合下降最快, 但穗下节间、旗叶鞘和穗器官较为稳定, 可能与其叶绿体结构的稳定性有关。说明小麦非叶绿色器官光合结构与功能对水分亏缺具有较强的耐性。

关键词: 小麦, 叶绿体结构, 非叶器官, 限水灌溉

Abstract: The green organs in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) consist of leaf and non-leaf organs including ear, culm, and sheath. Understanding the structures and functions of these non-leaf green organs under abiotic stresses will help to explore the potential of photosynthesis of the whole plant. In order to identify the photosynthetic adaptation of different green organs to drought stress in winter wheat, the changes of chloroplast ultra-microstructure and function of the organ above were studied in a field experiment in the 2002–2003 growth season (a medium rain fall growth season) using cultivar Shijiajuang 8 with water treatments of no irri-gation (control), irrigating twice at jointing and anthesis stages, and irrigating 4 times at pseudostem erecting, booting, anthesis, and grain-filling stages. Each irrigation received 750 m3 ha-1 water. Chloroplast ultramicrostructure of flag leaf blade and non-leaf organs (peduncle, flag leaf sheath, glume, and lemma) in response to different irrigation treatments were observed during late grain-filling period, and the net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and Fv/Fm values of different green organs were measured simultaneously. The results showed that the chloroplast number of non-leaf organs was less than that of leaf blade, and many starch grains were found in the chloroplasts of glume and lemma under sufficient water supplies (irrigating 4 times). Obvious senescence characteris-tics and differences in chloroplast ultramicrostructure were found in different organs of control, and the senescence was signifi-cantly severer in flag leaf than in non-leaf green organs. The chloroplast structure of flag leaf blade and lemma was destroyed under drought stress, while that of peduncle, sheath, and glume showed relatively stable in the late developmental stage under different irrigation regimes. Post-anthesis drought stress decreased Pn and Fv/Fm values in different green organs, but much less affected them in non-leaf organs (peduncle, sheath, and ear). The results indicated greater stability of chloroplast structure and photosynthetic activity in non-leaf green organs at the late grain-filling stage under water stress.

Key words: Wheat, Chloroplast structure, Non-leaf organ, Water stress

中图分类号: 

  • 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01213
[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!