欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 795-801.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00795

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同水稻品种对褐飞虱的耐虫特性研究

陈建明1，俞晓平1，程家安2   

  1. 1浙江省农业科学院植物保护与微生物研究所，浙江杭州310021；浙江大学农业与生物技术学院，浙江杭州310029
  • 收稿日期:2008-09-10 修回日期:2008-12-13 出版日期:2009-05-12 网络出版日期:2009-03-23
  • 通讯作者: 陈建明
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由浙江省自然科学基金项目（301238），国家“十一五”科技支撑计划项目（2006BAD08A04）资助。

Evaluation for Tolerance Characteristics of Different Rice Varieties to Brown Planthopper(BPH),Nilaparvata lugens Stal

CHEN Jian-Ming1,YU Xiao-Ping1,CHENG Jia-An2   

  1. 1Institute of Plant Protection and Microbiology,Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Hangzhou 310021,China;2College of Agriculture and Biotechnology,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310029,China
  • Received:2008-09-10 Revised:2008-12-13 Published:2009-05-12 Published online:2009-03-23
  • Contact: CHEN Jian-Ming

PDF

1630

被引次数

28

摘要：

褐飞虱是中国水稻生产上最主要的害虫之一，以褐飞虱的耐虫性指数和抗生性指数以及F1代种群繁殖率评价10个水稻品种耐虫特性。结果显示，在水稻三叶期接入8头褐飞虱低龄(1~2龄)若虫为害时，品种间的耐虫性差异明显，汕优63、秀水11、培矮64S/32E、Triveni、Utri Rajapan、嘉育948、ASD7等品种的耐虫指数大于抗生性指数，尤其是汕优63品种；而IR64、Rathu Heenati品种的耐虫指数明显小于抗生性指数。若用高龄(3~4龄)若虫为害，多数品种的耐虫指数上升。同一品种，成株期的耐虫指数高于苗期。试验进一步表明，当TN1、秀水11稻株枯死时，汕优63、培矮64S/E32、嘉育948、Triveni、Utri Rajapan中等受害，ASD7和IR64轻度受害，Rathu Heenati无受害症状。从褐飞虱F1代数量来看，汕优63、培矮64S/E32与秀水11、TN1无显著差异，且均高于其他品种；嘉育948、Triveni、Utri Rajapan显著高于ASD7，后者又极显著高于IR64和Rathu Heenati。这些结果表明，汕优63、秀水11、TN1属感虫品种，无耐虫性和抗生性，培矮64S/E32、Triveni、Utri Rajapan属强耐虫性品种，IR64、Rathu Heenati属强抗生性品种，ASD7、嘉育948属耐虫性较强、抗生性较弱的品种。说明利用本文的评价方法基本上可以确定水稻品种的耐虫特性，这对耐虫品种的选育以及对褐飞虱可持续治理和保持品种抗性的稳定有着重要的现实意义。

关键词: 水稻品种, 褐飞虱, 耐虫特性, 种群参数

Abstract:

Brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens Stål, is one of the most serious insect pests of rice in China and other southeast Asia countries. In the paper, tolerance characteristics of 10 different rice varieties was analyzed using tolerance index, antibiosis index, functional plant loss index (FPLI) and population number of BPH F1 generation at rice seedling and adult stages. The results showed that when plants were infested by eight 1–2 instars and 3–4 instars BPH nymphs at seedling stage, respectively, the plants of different varieties expressed some difference in tolerance levels. Tolerance indexes of these varieties including Shanyou 63, Xiushui 11, Pei’ai 64S/E32, Triveni, Utri Rajapan, ASD7, and Jiayu 948 were greater than their antibiosis indexes, Especially for Shanyou 63. While tolerance index of IR64, Rathu Heenati was obviously less than antibiosis index. When rice plants were infected with 3–4 instar nymphs, its tolerance index increased. For the same variety, tolerance index at adult stage was obviously higher than that at seedling stage. Under the infection by same number of BPH, the plants of varieties Xiushui 11 and TN1 died (9 level), Pei’ai 64S/E32, Shanyou 63, Jiayu 948, Triveni and Utri Rajapan plants expressed middle damage level (3–5 level), ASD7 and IR64 less damage level (<3 level), Rathu Heenati no damage. Population number of BPH on Xiushui 11, Shanyou 63 and Pei’ai 64S/E32 had no obvious difference from that on TN1, and was significantly higher than that on other varieties, with that on Jiayu 948, Triveni, Utri Rajapan > that on ASD7 > that on Rathu Heenati. These results above mentioned indicated that TN1, Shanyou 63 and Xiushui 11 are susceptible, has no tolerance and antibiosis characteristics; Pei’ai 64S/E32, Triveni, Utri Rajapan belongs to the group of stronger tolerance; IR64, Rathu Heenati are of high antibiosis; ASD7 and Jiayu 948 belongs to the group of both tolerance and antibiosis. Therefore, it is concluded that tolerance characteristics of different rice varieties will be determined by the method using in the paper. This will provide a useful screening method in tolerant varieties breeding and be of important significance to sustainable management of BPH.

Key words:   Rice variety, Nilaparvata lugens, Tolerance characteristics, Population parameter


[1] Wang R-F(王荣富), Zhang C-L(张成林), Zou Y-D(邹运鼎), Lü L(吕亮), Cheng X-N(程遐年). Effect of rice variety resistance on population dynamics of Nilaparvata lugens and Sogatella furcifera. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2000, 11(6): 861–865 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2] Chen J-M(陈建明), Yu X-P(俞晓平), Cheng J-A(程家安), Lü Z-X(吕仲贤), Zheng X-S(郑许松), Xu H-X(徐红星). Resistance screening and evaluation of newly-bred rice varieties (lines) to the rice brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2005, 19(6): 573–576 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3] Chen F(陈峰), Fu Q(傅强), Gui L-Y(桂连友). Study progress on resistance of rice varieties to brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens St?l and its virulence variations. J Yangtze Univ (Nat Sci Edn) (长江大学学报×自然科学版), 2008, 5(1): 5–10 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4] Wang C-Z(王传之), Yu J(于洁), Fei Q-L(裴庆利), Liu P-Q(刘丕庆), Cai Z-Q(蔡中全), Zhang L(张磊), Wu S-M(吴世民). Research progress on breeding of rice varieties for resistance to brown planthopper. J Anhui Agric Sci (安徽农业科学), 2008, 36(8): 3170–3173 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5] Tao L-Y(陶林勇). Studies on screening techniqes of resistance of rice varieties to brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens St?l. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis (浙江农业学报), 1995, 7(6): 443–447 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6] Yu X-P(俞晓平), Wu G-R(巫国瑞), Hu C(胡萃). Studies on the tolerance and antibiosis nature of rice varieties to whitebacked planthopper. J Plant Prot (植物保护学报), 1990, 17(4): 327–330 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7] Kartohardjono A, Heinrichs E A. Populations of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (St?l) (Homoptera: Delphacidae), and its predators on rice varieties with differing levels of resistance. Environ Entomol, 1984, 13: 359–365

[8] Chen J-M(陈建明), Yu X-P(俞晓平), Cheng J-A(程家安). Study methods of plant tolerance to insect pests. Chin Bull Bot (植物学通报), 2005, 22(4): 449–455 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9] Chen J-M(陈建明), Yu X-P(俞晓平), Cheng J-A(程家安), Zheng X-S(郑许松), Xu H-X(徐红星), Lü Z-X(吕仲贤), Zhang J-F(张珏锋), Chen L-Z(陈列忠). Plant tolerance against insect pests and its mechanisms. Acta Entomol Sin (昆虫学报), 2005, 48(2): 262–272 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Panda N, Heinrichs E A. Levels of tolerance and antibiosis in rice varieties having moderate resistance to the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (St?l) (Homiptera: Delphacidae). Environ Entomol, 1983, 12: 1204–1214

[11]Chen J-M(陈建明), Yu X-P(俞晓平), Lü Z-X(吕仲贤), Zheng X-S(郑许松), Xu H-X(徐红星), Cheng J-A(程家安), Liu G-J(刘光杰). Tolerance of rice variety to whitebacked planthopper, Sogatella furcifera and variation of nutrient components in rice plants. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2003, 14(12): 2246–2250 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12] Cohen M B, Alam S N, Medina E B, Bernal C C. Brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (St?l), resistance in rice cultivar IR64: mechanism and role in successful N. lugens management in Central Luzon, Philippines. Entomol Exp Appl, 1997, 85: 221–229

[13]Tang Q-Y(唐启义), Feng M-G(冯明光). Practical Statistics Analysis and DPS Data Treatment System(实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统), 2nd. Beijing: Science Press, 2002 (in Chinese)

[14]Strauss S Y, Agrawal A A. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol, 1999, 14: 179–185

[15]Cheng J-A(程家安), Sun X-L(孙祥良). The effects of rice varieties on population dynamics of brown planthopper. J Plant Prot (植物保护学报), 1992, 19 (2): 146–151 (in Chinese with English abstract))

[16]Chen D-L(陈德利), Zhao S-X(赵士熙), Wu Z-F(吴中孚). The effect of the rice varieties with different resistance on the bionomics of brown planthopper. J Fujian Agric For Univ(Nat Sci Edn) (福建农学院学报·自然科学版), 1993, 22 (2): 168–172 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17] Li G-Q(李国清), Wang Y-C(王荫长), Han Z-J(韩召军), Gu Z-Y(顾正远), Xiao Y-F(肖英方). Studies on resistance of rice variety NJ 14 to brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (St?l)-I. Evaluation of the resistance with life table of laboratory population. J Nanjing Agric Univ (南京农业大学学报), 1994, 17(4): 131–133 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]Xiao H-X(肖汉祥), Zhang L-Y(张良佑). Resistance mechanism of Oryza minuta to Nilaparvata lugens. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2001, 15(1): 77–80 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Zhu L(朱麟), Gu D-X(古德祥), Zhang G-R(张古忍),You J-P(游金平). Behavioral responses of brown planthopper and white-backed planthopper to BPH-resistant rice varieties. J Plant Prot (植物保护学报), 2002, 29(2): 145–151 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]Huang S-S(黄所生), Huang F-K(黄凤宽), Wei S-M(韦素美), Long L-P(龙丽萍), Jiang X-B(蒋显斌), Cheng Z-X(程正新). Influence of various composing proportions of rice brown planthopper biotypes on resistance of rice varieties. Chin Agric Sci Bull (中国农学通报), 2006, 22(6): 301–303 (in Chinese)

[21]Ho D T, Heinrichs E A. Tolerance of the rice variety Triveni to the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (St?l). Environ Entomol, 1982, 11: 598–602

[22] Kohyani P T, Bossuyt B, Bonte D, Hoffmann M. Differential herbivory tolerance of dominant and subordinate plant species along gradients of nutrient availability and competition. Plant Ecol, 2009, 201: 611–619

[23] Pilson D. The evaluation of plant response to herbivory: Simultaneously considering resistance and tolerance in Brassica rapa. Evol Ecol, 2000, 14: 457–489

[24] González-Teuber M, Gianoli E. Tolerance to simulated herbivory in two populations of Convolvulus chilensis (Convolvulaceae). Acta Oecol, 2007, 32: 119–123
[1] 张安宁,刘毅,王飞名,谢岳文,孔德艳,聂元元,张分云,毕俊国,余新桥,刘国兰,罗利军. 节水抗旱稻恢复系的抗褐飞虱分子标记辅助选育及抗性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(11): 1764-1769.
[2] 邓钊**,石少阶**,王卉颖,上官欣欣,刘丙芳,荆胜利,杜波,陈荣智,祝莉莉,何光存*. 籼稻资源WD15515中抗褐飞虱QTL的定位研究[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(03): 353-360.
[3] 楼珏，杨文清，李仲惺，罗天宽，谢永楚，郑国楚，岳高红，徐建龙，卢华金. 聚合稻瘟病、白叶枯病和褐飞虱抗性基因的三系恢复系改良效果的评价[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(01): 31-42.
[4] 刘立军,王康君,卞金龙,熊溢伟,陈璐,王志琴,杨建昌. 水稻产量对氮肥响应的品种间差异及其与根系形态生理的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(11): 1999-2007.
[5] 唐志明,陈建酉,陆永法,周华成,莫雪娇,毛兴学,李晓方. 广东不同时期水稻主栽品种抗病基因同源序列多态性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(07): 1206-1213.
[6] 陈凯,张强,潘晓飚,李美,孟丽君,徐正进,徐建龙,黎志康. 三个中籼稻骨干恢复系对白叶枯病和褐飞虱抗性改良效果的评价[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(03): 409-422.
[7] 黄得润, 陈洁, 赖凤香, 刘光杰, 庄杰云. 东乡野生稻抗褐飞虱QTL分析[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(02): 210-214.
[8] 陈能;罗玉坤;谢黎虹;朱智伟;段彬伍;章林平. 我国水稻品种的蛋白质含量及与米质的相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32(08): 1193-1196.
[9] 张金锋;薛庆中. 籼稻恢复系对褐飞虱和白背飞虱的抗性遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(06): 800-804.
[10] 左示敏;张平;祝树德;陈宗祥;田文忠;朱祯;潘学彪. 水稻转GNA基因后代对褐飞虱的抗性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(04): 371-375.
[11] 徐晓燕;杨肖娥;赵红军;王能如;李章海. 不同耐缺锌水稻对HCO-3的生理反应[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(05): 633-637.
[12] 王增远; 徐雨昌; 李震;过益先;R Wassmann;H U Neue; R S Lan tin;L V Buendia. 稻田CH4排放及控制技术的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2001, 27(06): 757-768.
[13] 徐晓燕; 杨肖娥; 杨玉爱. 重碳酸氢根对水稻根区重要有机酸分布的影响与水稻品种耐缺Zn关系的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2001, 27(03): 387-391.
[14] 王增远;徐雨昌;李震;王步军;过益先;丁玉萍;王占珍. 水稻品种对稻田甲烷排放的影响[J]. 作物学报, 1999, 25(04): 441-446.
[15] 王人民;杨肖娥;杨玉爱. 不同Zn2+活度对水稻根和叶生长生理特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 1999, 25(04): 466-473.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2