欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (08): 1377-1385.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01377

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

用GGE双标图分析燕麦区域试验品系产量稳定性及试点代表性

张志芬,付晓峰*,刘俊青,杨海顺   

  1. 内蒙古农牧业科学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010031
  • 收稿日期:2009-12-21 修回日期:2010-04-16 出版日期:2010-08-12 网络出版日期:2010-06-11
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家燕麦产业技术体系项目（nycytx-14)资助。

Yield Stability and Testing-Site Representativeness in National Regional Trials for Oat Varieties Based on GGE-Biplot Analysis

ZHANG Zhi-Fen,FU Xiao-Feng*,LIU Jun-Qing,YANG Hai-Shun   

  1. Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Husbandry Sciences, Huhhot 010031, China
  • Received:2009-12-21 Revised:2010-04-16 Published:2010-08-12 Published online:2010-06-11

PDF

2241

被引次数

78

摘要： 为准确评价燕麦品种(系)的稳产性和适应性，采用GGE双标图对2006—2008年国家燕麦区域试验10个试点的12个裸燕麦品系及6个参试地点的6个皮燕麦品系试验数据进行分析。结果显示，坝莜8号、坝莜3号和张燕2号属于高产、稳产性较好的品系；科燕1号和保罗具有特殊适应性，在局部地区有推广价值。在10个裸燕麦试点中，河北张北最具有代表性，吉林白城、新疆乌鲁木齐、河北崇礼、宁夏固原和内蒙古武川的鉴别力较好，而甘肃会宁和山西右玉的鉴别力较差。在6个皮燕麦试点中，内蒙古武川最具有代表性，青海西宁的鉴别力最好，河北张北的鉴别力较差。本研究为客观评价燕麦参试品种(系)的高产性及稳产性提供了简便、有效的分析手段，也为国家燕麦品种鉴定与推广提供了依据。

关键词: GGE双标图, 燕麦, 产量稳定性, 品种适应性

Abstract: Atpresent, arithmetic mean method is commonly used to evaluate the yield stability and adaptability of oat (Avena sativa) varieties, and analysis of variance is used to estimate the error in national regional trials. However, it is difficult to evaluate the varieties accurately, because of the discrepancies across tests and years. In this study, GGE-biplot method was used to analyze the date from the national regional trials for oat from 2006 to 2008. Twelve lines of naked oat were tested in ten sites, and six lines of oat were tested in six sites. The results showed that Bayou 8, Bayou 3, and Zhangyan 2 had higher yield and better yield stability than other lines. Keyan-1 and Baoluo possessed special adaptabilities. For naked oat, Zhangbei of Hebei province, was the best representative testing site; Baicheng of Jilin, Wuchuan of Inner Mongolia, Urumchi of Xinjiang, Chongli of Hebei, and Guyuan of Gansu had better discrimination than other sites, where as, Huining of Gansu and Youyu of Shanxi were the worst. For the oat test, Wuchuan of Inner Mongolia had the best representative; Xining of Qinghai had the best discrimination, but Zhangbei of Hebei was the worst. This article provides a simple and effective method for analyzing data, and evaluating the yield stability and adaptability of oat varieties involved in national regional trials oat and favorite test sites.

Key words: GGE biplot, Oat, Variety stability, Variety adaptability

[1]Ren C-Z(任长忠), Hu X-Z(胡新中), Guo L-C(郭来春), Wang C-L(王春龙). Status of oat industry in China and overseas countries. World Agric (世界农业), 2009, (9): 62-64 (in Chinese)
[2]Gao J-F(高金锋). Analysis and Assessment of Stability and Adaptability of Buckwheat Variety. MS Dissertation of Northwest A&F University, 2008 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Jin W-L(金文林). The rank analysis model of evaluating crop varieties yield stability in regional trials. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2000, 26(6): 925-930 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Jin W-L(金文林), Bai Q-Y(白琼岩). The analysis based on ranks of crop varieties in regional trials. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1999, 25(5): 632-638 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Zhang Z(张泽), Lu C(鲁成), Xiang Z-H(向仲怀). Analysis of varieties stability based on AMMI model. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1998, 24(3): 304-309 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Yan W K, Molnar S J, Fregeau-Reid J, McElroy A, Tinker N A. Associations among oat traits and their responses to the environment in North America
[J].J Crop Improve
[7]Yan W K. GGE biplot—a Windows application for graphical analysis of multi environment trial data and other types of two-way data
[J].Agron J
[8]Yan W K. Singular-value partitioning in biplot analysis of multi environment trial data
[J].Agron J
[9]Yan W K, Tinker N A. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Can J Plant Sci, 2006, 86 623-645
[10]Yan W K, Tinker N A. A biplot approach for investigating QTL-by-environment patterns
[J].Mol Breed
[11]Yan W K, Kangb M S, Ma B L, Woods S, Cornelius P L. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci, 2007, 47: 641-653
[12]Yan W-K(严威凯), Sheng Q-L(盛庆来), Hu Y-G(胡跃高), Hunt L A. GGE biplot: an ideal tool for studying genotype by environment interaction of regional yield trial data. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(1): 21-27 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Zhang Y(张勇), He Z-H(何中虎), Zhang A-M(张爱民). GGE-biplot for studying paste property of Chinese Spring wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(2): 245-251 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Chen S-L(陈四龙), Li Y-R(李玉荣), Cheng Z-S(程增书), Liu J-S(刘吉生). GGE-Biplot analysis of effects of planting density on growth and yield components of high oil peanut
[J].Acta Agron Sin (作物学报.2009, 35(7):1328-1335
[15]Shang Y(尚毅), Li S-Q(李少钦), Li D-R(李殿荣), Tian J-H(田建华). GGE-biplot analysis of diallel cross of B. napus L. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(2): 243-248 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Yan W K, Rajcan I. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario
[J].Crop Sci
[17]Li B-G(李本贵), Yan J(阎俊), He Z-H(何中虎), Li Z-L(李仲来). Analyzing site discrimination in crop regional yield trials by AMMI model. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(6): 593-596 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
[2] 郭颖, 张大效, 陈美霖, 陈冠宇, 刘建民, 杨晓虹, 韩冰. 野生燕麦和栽培燕麦的代谢组学分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 945-956.
[3] 王崇铭, 陆志峰, 闫金垚, 宋毅, 王昆昆, 方娅婷, 李小坤, 任涛, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 磷肥用量对油稻轮作系统作物产量与磷素吸收量及其稳定性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 447-458.
[4] 张辰煜, 葛军勇, 褚俊聪, 王星宇, 赵宝平, 杨亚东, 臧华栋, 曾昭海. 燕麦红芸豆带状间作的产量效应及根系形态与土壤酶活性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 459-469.
[5] 王彦婷, 逄蕾, 赵建华, 郑浩飞, 麻文浩. 玉米配置不同豆科作物对间作体系产量稳定性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3292-3303.
[6] 胡亮亮, 周洪妹, 王晓磊, 王素华, 李彩菊, 魏云山, 王丽侠, 程须珍, 陈红霖. 小豆产量相关性状的基因型与环境互作效应及稳定性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2581-2594.
[7] 陈敏, 贾蓉, 张金传, 张辰煜, 褚俊聪, 姚伟, 葛军勇, 王星宇, 杨亚东, 曾昭海, 臧华栋. 半干旱区燕麦与豆科作物带状复合种植的产量优势及氮素利用特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2727-2737.
[8] 韩丽, 汤胜胜, 李佳, 胡海斌, 刘龙龙, 吴斌. 燕麦SNP高密度遗传图谱构建及β-葡聚糖含量QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1710-1718.
[9] 许乃银, 金石桥, 晋芳, 刘丽华, 徐剑文, 刘丰泽, 任雪贞, 孙全, 许栩, 庞斌双. 基于SNP标记的小麦品种遗传相似度及其检测准确度分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 887-896.
[10] 王昀杰, 樊志龙, 张刁亮, 毛守发, 胡发龙, 殷文, 柴强. 不同灌水量下玉米的产量可持续性对间作绿肥的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2562-2574.
[11] 成华强, 侯青青, 朱敏, 杨轩. 气候变化与轮作制度对晋北饲用燕麦产草量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2599-2613.
[12] 邵扬, 郭延平, 周丙月, 张峰, 张兴民, 王玉萍. 蚕豆产量组分的基因型与环境互作及稳定性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 149-160.
[13] 南金生, 安江红, 柴明娜, 蒋屿潋, 朱志强, 杨燕, 韩冰. 淀粉特性及其表面结合蛋白与裸燕麦籽粒硬度的关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2552-2561.
[14] 张静, 高文博, 晏林, 张宗文, 周海涛, 吴斌. 燕麦种质资源耐盐碱性鉴定评价及耐盐碱种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1551-1561.
[15] 李娟, 周敬如, 储娜, 孙会东, 黄美婷, 傅华英, 高三基. 甘蔗ScPR10基因的克隆及其响应赤条病菌侵染的表达特征分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(1): 97-104.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2