欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (08): 1377-1385.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01377

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

用GGE双标图分析燕麦区域试验品系产量稳定性及试点代表性

张志芬,付晓峰*,刘俊青,杨海顺   

  1. 内蒙古农牧业科学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010031
  • 收稿日期:2009-12-21 修回日期:2010-04-16 出版日期:2010-08-12 网络出版日期:2010-06-11
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家燕麦产业技术体系项目（nycytx-14)资助。

Yield Stability and Testing-Site Representativeness in National Regional Trials for Oat Varieties Based on GGE-Biplot Analysis

ZHANG Zhi-Fen,FU Xiao-Feng*,LIU Jun-Qing,YANG Hai-Shun   

  1. Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Husbandry Sciences, Huhhot 010031, China
  • Received:2009-12-21 Revised:2010-04-16 Published:2010-08-12 Published online:2010-06-11

PDF

1705

被引次数

78

摘要： 为准确评价燕麦品种(系)的稳产性和适应性，采用GGE双标图对2006—2008年国家燕麦区域试验10个试点的12个裸燕麦品系及6个参试地点的6个皮燕麦品系试验数据进行分析。结果显示，坝莜8号、坝莜3号和张燕2号属于高产、稳产性较好的品系；科燕1号和保罗具有特殊适应性，在局部地区有推广价值。在10个裸燕麦试点中，河北张北最具有代表性，吉林白城、新疆乌鲁木齐、河北崇礼、宁夏固原和内蒙古武川的鉴别力较好，而甘肃会宁和山西右玉的鉴别力较差。在6个皮燕麦试点中，内蒙古武川最具有代表性，青海西宁的鉴别力最好，河北张北的鉴别力较差。本研究为客观评价燕麦参试品种(系)的高产性及稳产性提供了简便、有效的分析手段，也为国家燕麦品种鉴定与推广提供了依据。

关键词: GGE双标图, 燕麦, 产量稳定性, 品种适应性

Abstract: Atpresent, arithmetic mean method is commonly used to evaluate the yield stability and adaptability of oat (Avena sativa) varieties, and analysis of variance is used to estimate the error in national regional trials. However, it is difficult to evaluate the varieties accurately, because of the discrepancies across tests and years. In this study, GGE-biplot method was used to analyze the date from the national regional trials for oat from 2006 to 2008. Twelve lines of naked oat were tested in ten sites, and six lines of oat were tested in six sites. The results showed that Bayou 8, Bayou 3, and Zhangyan 2 had higher yield and better yield stability than other lines. Keyan-1 and Baoluo possessed special adaptabilities. For naked oat, Zhangbei of Hebei province, was the best representative testing site; Baicheng of Jilin, Wuchuan of Inner Mongolia, Urumchi of Xinjiang, Chongli of Hebei, and Guyuan of Gansu had better discrimination than other sites, where as, Huining of Gansu and Youyu of Shanxi were the worst. For the oat test, Wuchuan of Inner Mongolia had the best representative; Xining of Qinghai had the best discrimination, but Zhangbei of Hebei was the worst. This article provides a simple and effective method for analyzing data, and evaluating the yield stability and adaptability of oat varieties involved in national regional trials oat and favorite test sites.

Key words: GGE biplot, Oat, Variety stability, Variety adaptability

[1]Ren C-Z(任长忠), Hu X-Z(胡新中), Guo L-C(郭来春), Wang C-L(王春龙). Status of oat industry in China and overseas countries. World Agric (世界农业), 2009, (9): 62-64 (in Chinese)
[2]Gao J-F(高金锋). Analysis and Assessment of Stability and Adaptability of Buckwheat Variety. MS Dissertation of Northwest A&F University, 2008 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Jin W-L(金文林). The rank analysis model of evaluating crop varieties yield stability in regional trials. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2000, 26(6): 925-930 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Jin W-L(金文林), Bai Q-Y(白琼岩). The analysis based on ranks of crop varieties in regional trials. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1999, 25(5): 632-638 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Zhang Z(张泽), Lu C(鲁成), Xiang Z-H(向仲怀). Analysis of varieties stability based on AMMI model. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1998, 24(3): 304-309 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Yan W K, Molnar S J, Fregeau-Reid J, McElroy A, Tinker N A. Associations among oat traits and their responses to the environment in North America
[J].J Crop Improve
[7]Yan W K. GGE biplot—a Windows application for graphical analysis of multi environment trial data and other types of two-way data
[J].Agron J
[8]Yan W K. Singular-value partitioning in biplot analysis of multi environment trial data
[J].Agron J
[9]Yan W K, Tinker N A. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Can J Plant Sci, 2006, 86 623-645
[10]Yan W K, Tinker N A. A biplot approach for investigating QTL-by-environment patterns
[J].Mol Breed
[11]Yan W K, Kangb M S, Ma B L, Woods S, Cornelius P L. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci, 2007, 47: 641-653
[12]Yan W-K(严威凯), Sheng Q-L(盛庆来), Hu Y-G(胡跃高), Hunt L A. GGE biplot: an ideal tool for studying genotype by environment interaction of regional yield trial data. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2001, 27(1): 21-27 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Zhang Y(张勇), He Z-H(何中虎), Zhang A-M(张爱民). GGE-biplot for studying paste property of Chinese Spring wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(2): 245-251 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Chen S-L(陈四龙), Li Y-R(李玉荣), Cheng Z-S(程增书), Liu J-S(刘吉生). GGE-Biplot analysis of effects of planting density on growth and yield components of high oil peanut
[J].Acta Agron Sin (作物学报.2009, 35(7):1328-1335
[15]Shang Y(尚毅), Li S-Q(李少钦), Li D-R(李殿荣), Tian J-H(田建华). GGE-biplot analysis of diallel cross of B. napus L. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(2): 243-248 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Yan W K, Rajcan I. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario
[J].Crop Sci
[17]Li B-G(李本贵), Yan J(阎俊), He Z-H(何中虎), Li Z-L(李仲来). Analyzing site discrimination in crop regional yield trials by AMMI model. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(6): 593-596 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 叶夕苗,程鑫,安聪聪,袁剑龙,余斌,文国宏,李高峰,程李香,王玉萍,张峰. 马铃薯产量组分的基因型与环境互作及稳定性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 354-364.
[2] 陈晓晶,刘景辉,杨彦明,赵洲,徐忠山,海霞,韩宇婷. 盐胁迫对燕麦叶片生理指标和差异蛋白组学的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1431-1439.
[3] 周萍萍,颜红海,彭远英. 基于高通量GBS-SNP标记的栽培燕麦六倍体起源研究[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(10): 1604-1612.
[4] 冯福学,慕平,赵桂琴,柴继宽,刘欢,陈国栋. 西北绿洲灌区水氮耦合对燕麦品种陇燕3号耗水特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(09): 1370-1380.
[5] 冯晓敏, 杨永, 任长忠, 胡跃高, 曾昭海. 豆科-燕麦间作对作物光合特性及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(09): 1426-1434.
[6] 罗俊,许莉萍,邱军,张华,袁照年,邓祖湖,陈如凯,阙友雄. 基于HA-GGE双标图的甘蔗试验环境评价及品种生态区划分[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(02): 214-227.
[7] 许乃银,李健. 棉花区试中品种多性状选择的理想试验环境鉴别[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(11): 1936-1945.
[8] 许乃银,李健. 利用GGE双标图划分长江流域棉花纤维品质生态区[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(05): 891-898.
[9] 萨如拉,刘景辉,刘伟,白健慧,王占海. 燕麦对碱胁迫的阳离子响应机制[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(02): 362-368.
[10] 罗俊，张华，邓祖湖，许莉萍，徐良年，袁照年，阙友雄. 应用GGE双标图分析甘蔗品种(系)的产量和品质性状[J]. 作物学报, 2013, 39(01): 142-152.
[11] 许乃银，张国伟，李健，周治国. 基于HA-GGE双标图的长江流域棉花区域试验环境评价[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(12): 2229-2236.
[12] 林叶春，曾昭海，任长忠，李志坚，郭来春，杨学超，王春龙，钱欣，胡跃高. 局部根区灌溉对裸燕麦光合特征曲线及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(06): 1062-1070.
[13] 陈恭, 郭丽梅, 任长忠, 郭来春, 赵国军, 胡跃高, 曾昭海. 行距及间作对箭筈豌豆与燕麦青干草产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(11): 2066-2074.
[14] 林伟静, 吴广枫, 李春红, 王燕, 周素梅. 品种与环境对我国裸燕麦营养品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(06): 1087-1092.
[15] 吴斌, 张宗文. 燕麦葡聚糖合酶基因AsCSLH的克隆及特征分析[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(04): 723-728.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2