欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (06): 1087-1092.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01087

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

品种与环境对我国裸燕麦营养品质的影响

林伟静1,吴广枫2,李春红1,王燕1,周素梅1,*   

  1. LIN Wei-Jing1,WU Guang-Feng2,LI Chun-Hong1,WANG Yan1,ZHOU Su-Mei1,*
  • 收稿日期:2010-09-30 修回日期:2011-01-06 出版日期:2011-06-12 网络出版日期:2011-04-12
  • 通讯作者: 周素梅, E-mail: zhousumei@yahoo.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由中国农业科学院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项和国家自然科学基金项目(31071516)资助。

Effects of Cultivar and Environment on Nutritional Quality of Chinese Naked Oats

1中国农业科学院农产品加工研究所 / 农业部农产品加工与质量控制重点开放实验室, 北京 100193; 2中国农业大学食品科学与营养工程学院, 北京 100083   

  1. 1 Institute of Agro-food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Processing and Quality Control, Beijing, 100193, China; 2 College of Food Science & Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing100083, China
  • Received:2010-09-30 Revised:2011-01-06 Published:2011-06-12 Published online:2011-04-12
  • Contact: 周素梅, E-mail: zhousumei@yahoo.com.cn

PDF

1670

被引次数

52

摘要： 为了解我国裸燕麦品种营养品质的整体表现，收集了2007—2009年间国内燕麦主产区产58个燕麦样品，比较了其重要营养组成及地区和年份间的差异，并初步筛选了燕麦优良品种。结果显示，在燕麦特征性营养指标中，各样品间以粗脂肪含量的差异最大，变异系数为21.38%；淀粉含量差异最小，变异系数仅6.23%；不饱和脂肪酸组成中以油酸与亚油酸为主，二者比例接近1∶1，品种间含量差异较小；氨基酸组成中以含硫氨基酸(蛋氨酸+半胱氨酸)含量差异最显著。对比所选取4个燕麦产区的品种表现，以甘肃产燕麦的综合品质较好，粗蛋白、β-葡聚糖、亚油酸及赖氨酸含量相对较高。相对于品种和产地，年份间燕麦营养品质的差异较不显著。

关键词: 燕麦, 品种, 产地, 营养品质, 变异性

Abstract: To understand the status of nutritional quality of Chinese naked oat (Avena sativa L.) cultivars used in oat production, we collected 58 samples of 38 cultivars from six major production areas in China, which were harvested from 2007 to 2009. The nutritional compositions, including grain moisture, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, β-glucan, and starch, were analyzed and compared among cultivars, planting sites, and harvest years. These quality parameters varied greatly among cultivars. The content of crude fat had the largest variation coefficient, which was 21.38%. In contrast, starch content had the least variation among cultivars with the variation coefficient of 6.23%. Oleic acid and linoleic acid were the main components of unsaturated fatty acids in oat oil and their proportions were similar, showing a roughly 1:1 ratio. Moreover, there were differences of contents of oleic acid and linoleic acid among cultivars. In the amino acid components, sulfur amino acids (consisted of methionine and cysteine) had the largest variations among cultivars. The integrated quality of oat samples from Gansu Province was higher than that form other planting sites due to its higher contents of protein, β-glucan, linoleic acid, and lysine. Planting year had less effect on nutritional quality of oats compared with cultivar and planting site. According to cluster analysis, a few cultivars with rich β-glucan, protein, linoleic acid, lysine, or sulfur amino acid were screened out, which were propitious to oat breeding and rough material selection in oat processing industry.

Key words: Oat, cultivars, Planting site, Nutritional quality, Variation

[1]Zhou S-M(周素梅), Shen R-L(申瑞玲). Nutrition and Processing of Oat (燕麦的营养及其加工利用). Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2009. pp 19–20 (in Chinese)
[2]Zheng D-X(郑殿先). Diversity of oat in China. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2010, 11(3): 249–252 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Wu X-M(吴学明), Du J-H(杜军华), Zeng Y(曾阳), Diao Z-M(刁治民). Analysis on the resources of the oat varieties in Qinghai Province. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin (西北植物学报), 2002, 22 (1): 158–162 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Ma Y-M(马艳明), Liu Z-Y(刘志勇), Bai Y-T(白玉亭), Wang W(王威), Wang H(王浩). Study on diversity of oats varieties in Xinjiang. Xinjiang Agric Sci (新疆农业科学), 2006, 43(6): 510–513 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]Liu Y-M(刘彦明). Breeding report of new naked oats variety Dingyou No.6. Gansu Agric Sci Technol (甘肃农业科技), 2006, (10): 7–8 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Mirmoghtadaie L, Kadivar M, Shahedi M. Effects of succinylation and deamidation on functional properties of oat protein isolate. Food Chem, 2009, 114: 127–131
[7]Aro H, Järvenpää E, Könkö K, Hietaniemi V. The characterisation of oat lipids produced by supercritical fluid technologies. J Cereal Sci, 2007, 45: 116–119
[8]Hoover R, Smith C, Zhou Y, Ratnayake R M W S. Physicochemical properties of Canadian oat starches. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2003, 52: 253–261
[9]Jin S(金山). Study current situation of main functional compositions of oat. China Sci Technol Inf (中国科技信息), 2010, (9): 114–115 (in Chinese)
[10]Zheng D-S(郑殿升), Lü Y-C(吕耀昌), Tian C-Y(田长叶), Zhao W(赵伟). Analysis on beta-glucan content of naked oat (Avena nuda L.) in China. J Plant Genet Resour (植物遗传资源学报), 2006, 7(1): 54–58 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Ren Y(任祎), Ping H(平华), Ren G-X(任贵兴). Antioxidant property of naked oat core collections. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2010, 36(6): 988–994 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Qu X-C(曲祥春), He Z-G(何中国), Hao W-Y(郝文媛), Luan T-H(栾天浩), Li Y-F(李玉发). Productive status and developing countermeasure of oat in China. Rain Fed Crops (杂粮作物), 2006, 26(3): 233–235 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Li M(李明), Li Y-G(李赟高), Gao H-Y(高红艳). Research on rich protein. Cereals Oils (粮食与油脂), 2006, (8): 3–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Deng W-H(邓万和), Wang Q(王强), Lü Y-C(吕耀昌), Zhou S-M(周素梅). Effect of cultivar and environment on β-glucan content in oats. J Chinese Cereals Oils Assoc (中国粮油学报), 2005, 20(2): 30–32 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Gong H(龚海), Li C-X(李成雄), Wang Y-L(王雁丽). Analysis of oat germplasm quality characters. J Shanxi Agric Sci (山西农业科学), 1999, 27(2): 16–19 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[3] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[4] 闫岩, 张钰石, 刘础荣, 任丹阳, 刘洪润, 刘雪晴, 张明才, 李召虎. 冬小麦-夏玉米轮作“双晚”种植模式下的品种匹配与资源效率[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 423-436.
[5] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[6] 傅华英, 张婷, 彭文静, 段瑶瑶, 许哲昕, 林艺华, 高三基. 甘蔗新品种(系)苗期白条病人工接种抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1531-1539.
[7] 习玲, 王昱琦, 朱微, 王益, 陈国跃, 蒲宗君, 周永红, 康厚扬. 78份四川小麦育成品种(系)条锈病抗性鉴定与抗条锈病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1309-1323.
[8] 董明辉, 陈培峰, 江贻, 曹鹏辉, 宋云生, 顾俊荣, 谢裕林, 乔中英, 张文地, 黄丽芬. 江苏太湖地区不同生育类型粳稻品种产量对不同播期气候因子的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 952-963.
[9] 许乃银, 赵素琴, 张芳, 付小琼, 杨晓妮, 乔银桃, 孙世贤. 基于GYT双标图对西北内陆棉区国审棉花品种的分类评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 660-671.
[10] 董玉新, 韦炳奇, 吴强, 张永平. 内蒙古平原灌区“春麦冬播”种植效应及品种适应性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 481-493.
[11] 雷永, 王志慧, 淮东欣, 高华援, 晏立英, 李建国, 李威涛, 陈玉宁, 康彦平, 刘海龙, 王欣, 薛晓梦, 姜慧芳, 廖伯寿. 花生籽仁蔗糖含量近红外模型构建及在高糖品种培育中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 332-341.
[12] 张荣跃, 王晓燕, 杨昆, 单红丽, 仓晓燕, 李婕, 王长秘, 尹炯, 罗志明, 李文凤, 黄应昆. 甘蔗新品种及主栽品种对褐锈病抗性与Bru1基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 376-382.
[13] 刘少荣, 杨扬, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 康定明, 范亚明, 任洁, 江彬, 葛建镕, 成广雷, 王凤格. 基于农艺及品质性状与SSR标记的青贮玉米品种遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2362-2370.
[14] 吕国锋, 别同德, 王慧, 赵仁慧, 范金平, 张伯桥, 吴素兰, 王玲, 汪尊杰, 高德荣. 长江下游麦区新育成品种(系) 3种主要病害的抗性鉴定及抗病基因/ QTL的分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2335-2347.
[15] 仓晓燕, 夏红明, 李文凤, 王晓燕, 单红丽, 王长秘, 李婕, 张荣跃, 黄应昆. 甘蔗优良品种(系)对黑穗病的抗性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2290-2296.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2