欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (02): 214-227.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00214

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于HA-GGE双标图的甘蔗试验环境评价及品种生态区划分

罗俊1,许莉萍1,邱军2,张华1,袁照年1,邓祖湖1,陈如凯1,阙友雄1,*   

  1. 1福建农林大学 / 农业部福建甘蔗生物学与遗传育种重点实验室 / 国家甘蔗产业技术研发中心, 福建福州 350002; 2 全国农业技术推广服务中心, 北京 100125
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-02 修回日期:2014-12-19 出版日期:2015-02-12 网络出版日期:2014-12-29
  • 通讯作者: 阙友雄, E-mail: queyouxiong@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代农业(甘蔗)产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-20), 国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201003009-2)和国家农作物品种区域试验项目(农财发[2012]21号)资助。

Evaluation of Sugarcane Test Environments and Ecological Zone Division in China Based on HA-GGE Biplo

LUO Jun1,XU Li-Ping1,QIU Jun2,ZHANG Hua1,YUAN Zhao-Nian1,DENG Zu-Hu1,CHEN Ru-Kai1,QUE You-Xiong1,*   

  1. 1 Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University / Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture / Sugarcane Research & Development Center, China Agriculture Research System, Fuzhou 350002, China; 2 National Agricultural Technology Extension and Service Center, Beijing 100125, China
  • Received:2014-04-02 Revised:2014-12-19 Published:2015-02-12 Published online:2014-12-29
  • Contact: 阙友雄, E-mail: queyouxiong@126.com

RichHTML

PDF

1025

被引次数

10

摘要：

采用遗传力校正的GGE双标图(heritability adjusted GGE, HA-GGE), 分析基因型(G)、环境(E)、基因型与环境互作效应(GE)对产量变异的影响, 对14个试验点的分辨力、代表性和理想指数进行分析, 并对这些试验点的生态区进行划分。结果表明, 甘蔗试验环境对产量变异的影响大于基因型和基因型与环境互作; 互作因素中以环境×基因型的互作效应最大, 基因型×年份的互作效应最小。广东遂溪(E3)和广西崇左(E6)为最理想试验环境, 对筛选广适性新品种和鉴别理想品种的效率最高; 福建福州(E1)、福建漳州(E2)、广东湛江(E4)、云南保山(E11)、云南临沧(E13)、云南瑞丽(E14)为理想试验环境；广西百色(E5)、广西河池(E7)、海南临高(E10)、云南开远(E12)为较理想试验环境; 广西来宾(E8)、广西柳州(E9)为不太理想的试验环境。根据HA-GGE双标图分析结果, 可将我国甘蔗生态区划分为3个, 即以广西百色、河池、来宾和柳州为代表的华南内陆甘蔗品种生态区, 以云南保山、开远、临沧、瑞丽为代表的西南高原甘蔗品种生态区, 涵盖福建福州、漳州、广东湛江、遂溪、广西崇左等试点的华南沿海甘蔗品种生态区。

关键词: 甘蔗, 产量, 基因型×环境交互作用, HA-GGE双标图, 生态区划分

Abstract:

The yield data of 24 sugarcane cultivars grown at 14 test locations were analyzed by combining analysis of variance and heritability-adjusted GGE (HA-GGE) biplot to study the genotype (G), environment (E), and genotype×environment (GE) effects on yield variation. Besides, the 14 test locations were evaluated for their discriminating ability, representative ability and desirability index, and grouped into ecological zones based on the GGE biplot patterns. The results showed that the effect of environments on yield was higher than that of G and GE, and the genotype by location interaction was the greatest while genotype by year interaction the least within GE. The GGE biplot analysis revealed that Suixi of Guangdong Province and Chongzuo of Guangxi Province were the two most ideal test locations for developing and/or recommending cultivars for the whole region. In contrast, Laibin and Liuzhou of Guangxi Province were undesirable for selection and variety recommendation for the whole region. The other relatively desirable test locations included Fuzhou and Zhangzhou of Fujian Province, Zhanjiang of Guangdong Province, Baoshan, Lincang, and Ruili of Yunnan Province, followed by the four less desirable test environments, Baise and Hechi of Guangxi Province, Lingao of Hainan Province and Kaiyuan of Yunnan Province. According to the results from HA-GGE analysis, the sugarcane ecological zones in China could be divided into three subregions, the first is the ecological zone of southern China inland, represented by Baise, Hechi, Laibin and Liuzhou of Guangxi Province, the second one is the ecological zone of southwest plateau, represented by Baoshan, Kaiyuan, Lincang and Ruili of Yunnan Province, and the third one is the ecological zone of coastal southern China, represented by Fuzhou and Zhangzhou of Fujian Province, Zhanjiang and Suixi of Guangdong Province, and Chongzuo of Guangxi Province. The present study fully displayed the successful application of HA-GGE biplot in trial environment evaluation and also provided the theoretical basis for the decision-making in ecological zone division.

Key words: Sugarcane, Yield, Genotype×environment (GE) effects, Heritability adjusted GGE, Ecological zone division

[1]罗俊, 张华, 邓祖湖, 阙友雄. 用GGE双标图分析甘蔗品种性状稳定性及试点代表性. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23: 1319–1325

Luo J, Zhang H, Deng Z H, Que Y X. Trait stability and test site representativeness of sugarcane cultivars based on GGE-biplot analysis. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2012, 23: 1319–1325

[2]罗俊, 张华, 邓祖湖, 许莉萍, 徐良年, 袁照年, 阙友雄. 应用GGE双标图分析甘蔗品种(系)的产量和品质性状, 作物学报, 2013, 39: 142–152

Luo J, Zhang H, Deng Z H, Xu L P, Xu L N, Yuan Z N, Que Y X. Analysis of yield and quality traits in sugarcane cultivars (lines) with GGE-biplot. Acta Agon Sin, 2013 39: 142–152 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3]Giauffret C, Lothrop J, Dorvillez D, Gouesnard B, Derieux M. Genotype × environment interactions in maize from temperate or high land tropical origin. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1004–1012

[4]Haussmann B I, Hess D E, Reddy B V, Mukuru S Z, Kayentao M, Welz H G, Geiger. Pattern analysis of genotype × environment interaction for striga resistance and grain yield in African sorghum trials. Genetic Res Crop Evol, 2001, 122: 297–308

[5]许乃银, 张国伟, 李健, 周治国. 基于GGE双标图的棉花品种生态区划分. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24: 771–776

Xu N Y, Zhang G W, Li J, Zhou Z G. Ecological regionalization of cotton varieties based on GGE biplot. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2013, 24: 771–776 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Gauch H G, Zobel R W. AMMI analysis of yield trails. In: Kang M S, Gauch G H, eds. Genotype-by-Environment Interaction. Boca Raton Florida: CRC Press, 1996. pp 85–122

[7]Romagosa I, Fox P N. Genotype×environment interaction and adaptation. In: Hayward M D, Bosemark N O, Romagosa I, eds. Plant Breeding: Principle and Prospects. London: Chapman and Hall, 1993. pp 373–390

[8]Epinat-Le Signor C, Dousse S, Lorgeou J, Denis J B, Bonhomme R, Carolo P, Charcosset A. Interpretation of genotype × environment interactions for early maize hybrids over 12 years. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 663–669

[9]Gauch H G, Zobel R W. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci, 1997, 37: 311–326

[10]许乃银, 张国伟, 李健, 周治国. 基于HA-GGE 双标图的长江流域棉花区域试验环境评价. 作物学报, 2012, 38: 2229–2236

Xu N Y, Zhang G W, Li J, Zhou Z G. Evaluation of cotton regional trial environments based on HA-GGE biplot in the Yangtze river valley. Acta Agon Sin, 2012, 38: 2229–2236 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11]Yan W K, Hant L A. Biplot analysis of diallel data. Crop Sci, 2002, 42: 21–30

[12]严威凯. 双标图分析在农作物品种多点试验中的应用. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 1?16

Yan W K. Optimal use of biplots in the analysis of multi?environment variety trial data. Acta Agon Sin, 2010, 36: 1?16 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]de Oliveira R L, Von Pinho R G, Ferreira D F, Pires L P M, Melo W M C. Selection index in the study of adaptability and stability in maize. Sci World J, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/360570

[14]Yan W, Frégeau-Reid J A, Pageau D, Martin R, Mitchell-Fetch J, Etienne M, Rowsell J, Scott P, Price M, de Haan B, Cummiskey A, Lajeunesse J, Durand J, Sparry E. Identifying essential test locations for oat breeding in eastern Canada. Crop Sci, 2010, 50: 504?515

[15]Crossa J, Fox P N, Pfeiffer W H, Rajaram S, Gauch Jr H G. AMMI adjustment for statistical analysis of an internal wheat yield trial. Theor Appl Genet, 1991, 81: 27–37

[16]常磊, 柴守玺. AMMI模型在旱地春小麦稳定性分析中的应用. 生态学报, 2006, 26: 3677–3684

Chang L, Chai S X. Application of AMM I model in the stability analysis of spring wheat in rainfed area. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006, 26: 3677–3684 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17]刘文江,李浩杰, 汪旭东, 周开达. 用AMMI模型分析杂交水稻基本性状的稳定性. 作物学报, 2002, 28: 569–573

Liu W J, Li H J, Wang X D, Zhou K D. Stability analysis for elementary characters of hybrid rice by AMMI model. Acta Agon Sin, 2002, 28: 569–573 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]刘旭云, 谢永俊, 杨德, 张锡顺. AMMI模型应用于油菜区域试验的分析研究. 西南农业学报, 2001, 14(2): 27–30

Liu X Y, Xie Y J, Yang D, Zhang X S. Analysis and research of AMMI model for rape varieties regional trials. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2001, 14(2): 27–30 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]罗俊, 袁照年, 张华, 陈由强, 陈如凯.宿根甘蔗产量性状的稳定性分析. 应用与环境生物学报, 2009, 15: 488–494

Luo J, Yuan Z N, Zhang H, Chen Y Q, Chen R K. Stability analysis on yield characters of sugarcane ratoon. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2009, 15: 488–494 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]Gauch H G Jr, Piepho H P, Annicchiarico P. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: further considerations. Crop Sci, 2008, 48: 866?889

[21]Yan W, Kang M S, Ma B L, Woods S, Cornelius P L. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci, 2007, 47: 643?655

[22]严威凯, 盛庆来, 胡跃高, Hun L A. GGE叠图法-分析品种×环境互作模式的理想方法. 作物学报, 2001, 27: 21–27

Yan W K, Sheng Q L, Hu Y G, Hun L A. GGE biplot: all ideal tool for studying genotype by environment interaction of regional yield trial data. Acta Agon Sin, 2001, 27: 21–27 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Yan W, Hunt L A, Sheng Q L, Szlavnics Z. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 596?605

[24]Yan W, Holland J B. A heritability-adjusted GGE biplot for test environment evaluation. Euphytica, 2010, 171: 355–369

[25]张志芬, 付晓峰, 刘俊青, 杨海顺. 用GGE双标图分析燕麦区域试验品系产量稳定性及试点代表性. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 1377–1385

Zhang Z F, Fu X F, Liu J Q, Yang H S. Yield stability and testing-site representativeness in national regional trials for oat variety based on GGE-biplot analysis. Acta Agon Sin, 2010, 36: 1377–1385 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[26]陈四龙, 李玉荣, 程增书, 刘吉生. 用GGE双标图分析种植密度对高油花生生长和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2009, 35: 1328–1335

Chen S L, Li Y R, Cheng Z S, Liu J S. GGE-biplot analysis of effects of planting density n growth and yield components of high oil peanut. Acta Agon Sin, 2009, 35: 1328–1335 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[27]尚毅, 李少钦, 李殿荣. 用双标图分析油菜双列杂交试验. 作物学报, 2006, 32: 243?248

Shang Y, Li S Q, Li D R. GGE biplot analysis of diallelcross of B. napus L. Acta Agon Sin, 2006, 32: 243?248 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[28]周长军, 田中艳, 李建英. 双标图法分析大豆多点试验中品系产量稳定性及试点代表性. 大豆科学, 2011, 30: 318?322

Zhou C J, Tian Z Y, Li J Y. GGE-biplot analysis on yield stability and testing-site representativeness of soybean lines in multi-environment trials. Soybean Sci, 2011, 30: 318?322 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[29]常磊, 柴守玺. GGE双标图在我国旱地春小麦稳产性分析中的应用. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18: 988?994

Chang L, Chai S X. Application of GGE biplot in spring wheat yield stability analysis in rainfed areas of China. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2010, 18: 988?994 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[30]许乃银, 金石桥. 应用GGE双标图筛选理想棉花区域试验点. 江西棉花, 2010, 32(3): 7?12

Xu N Y, Jin S Q. Identifying discriminating and representative locations in cotton regional trials using GGE biplot. Jiangxi Cotton, 2010, 32(3): 7?12 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[31]孙敏, 蒋文敏, 李慧英, 刘壮. 应用GGE双标图进行向日葵杂交种产量稳定性分析. 黑龙江农业科学, 2010, (9): 11?13

Sun M, Jiang W M, Li H Y, Liu Z. Analysis of stable-production character by GGE biplot on sunflower hybrids. Heilongjiang Agric Sci, 2010, (9): 11?13 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[32]Tang Q Y, Zhang C X, Data Processing System (DPS) software with experimental design, statistical analysis and data mining developed for use in entomological research. Insect Sci, 2013, 20: 254?260

[33]唐启义, 冯明光. DPS数据处理系统----实验设计、统计分析及数据挖掘. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010

Tang Q Y, Feng M G. DPS Data Processing System: experimental design, statistical analysis, and data mining. Beijing: Science Press, 2010

[34]金石桥, 许乃银. GGE双标图在中国农作物品种试验中应用的必要性探讨. 种子, 2012, 31(12): 89?92

Jin S Q, Xu N Y. The discuss of necessity about GGE double labeling chart applied in crop variety experiment in china. Seed, 2012, 31(12): 89?92 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[35]Luo J, Pan Y B, Xu L P, Zhang H, Yuan Z N, Deng Z H, Chen R K, Que Y X. Cultivar evaluation and essential test locations identification for sugarcane breeding in China. Sci World J, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/302753

[36]Luo J, Que Y X, Zhang H, Xu L P. Seasonal variation of the canopy structure parameters and its correlation with yield-related traits in sugarcane. Sci World J , 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/801486
[1] 崔致远, 秦晨展, 刘星雨, 张海, 曾康, 黄国强, 徐景升. 甘蔗类四跨膜蛋白ScTSPAN18与6K2互作应答SCMV侵染研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1618-1630.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[4] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[5] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[6] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[7] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[8] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[9] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[10] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[11] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[12] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[13] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[14] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[15] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2