作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (05): 911-917.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.00911
郭彦军1,倪郁2,郭芸江1,韩龙1,唐华1,玉永雄1
GUO Yan-Jun1,NI Yu2,GUO Yun-Jiang1,HAN Long1,TANG Hua1,YU Yong-Xiong1
摘要: 选用2个抗旱性不同的紫花苜蓿品种,敖汉(强抗旱)和三得利(弱抗旱),在水热胁迫条件下,调查其叶表皮蜡质含量及组分变化规律、蜡质含量与气体交换参数、脯氨酸及叶片相对含水量之间的关系。结果表明,紫花苜蓿叶表皮存在致密的蜡质层,蜡质晶体结构呈片状,无特殊的晶格方向。叶表皮蜡质主要由烷(1.98%~3.38%)、醇(79.97%~84.98%)、酯类(0.08%~0.24%)及其他少量未知物质组成(7.77%~13.38%)。品种类型、环境条件共同影响叶表皮蜡质的沉积。敖汉叶表皮蜡质含量显著高于三得利。水分胁迫后烷类比例增加(81.22%~108.16%),醇类比例下降(3.32%~12.54%),强抗旱品种叶表皮蜡质含量和气体交换参数无显著变化(除胞间二氧化碳浓度显著下降外),而弱抗旱品种蜡质含量和叶片光合速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度及胞间二氧化碳浓度均显著下降。说明表皮蜡质限制水分散失,蜡质组分中烷类物质可能主要具限制水分散失的功能。高温及水热互作胁迫处理下,紫花苜蓿叶片光合速率和蒸腾速率下降,水分利用效率提高,叶片脯氨酸含量增加,相对含水量下降,敖汉蜡质含量下降,三得利蜡质含量无显著变化。表明在严重胁迫条件下紫花苜蓿主要通过关闭气孔和渗透调节来限制水分散失。
| [1]Li D-Q(李德全), Guo Q-F(郭清福), Zhang Y-Q(张以勤), Zou Q(邹琦), Cheng B-S(程炳嵩). Studies on the physiological characteristics of drought resistance in winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1993, 19(2): 125–132 (in Chinese with English abstract) [2]Febrero A, Fernandez S, Molina-Cano J, Araus J. Yield, carbon isotope discrimination, canopy reflectance and cuticular conductance of barley isolines of differing glaucousness. J Exp Bot, 1998, 49: 1575–1581 [3]Sanchez F J, Manzanares M, Andres E F, Tenorio J L, Ayerbe L. Residual transpiration rate, epicuticular wax load and leaf colour of pea plants in drought conditions. Influence on harvest index and canopy temperature. Eur J Agron, 2001, 15: 57–70 [4]Ni Y(倪郁), Guo Y-J(郭彦军). Progress in the study on genes encoding enzymes involved in biosynthesis of very long chain fatty acids and cuticular wax in plants. Hereditas (遗传), 2008, 30(5): 561–567 (in Chinese with English abstract) [5]Bondada B R, Oosterhuis D M, Murph J B, Kyung S K. Effect of water stress on the epicuticular wax composition and ultra structure of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaf, bract, and boll. Environ Exp Bot, 1996, 36: 61–69 [6]Samdur M Y, Manivel P, Jain V K, Chikani B M, Gor H K, Desai S, Misra J B. Genotypic differences and water-deficit induced enhancement in epicuticular wax load in peanut. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 1294–1299 [7]Huang L(黄玲), Zhang Z-B(张正斌), Cui Y-T(崔玉亭), Liu M-Y(刘孟雨), Chai S-X(柴守玺), Chen Z-B(陈兆波). Relationship between wax content and water use efficiency of leaf and yield in wheat. J Triticeae Crops (麦类作物学报), 2003, 23(4): 41–44 (in Chinese with English abstract) [8]Zhang Z-F(张志飞), Rao L-Q(饶力群), Xiang Z-X(向佐湘), Hu X-M(胡晓敏), Wang X-J(王晓杰). Epidermis wax content and drought resistance among different tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) varieties. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin (西北植物学报), 2007, 27(7): 1417–1421 (in Chinese with English abstract) [9]Zhang Z-B(张正斌), Shan L(山仑). Studies on relationship between drought resistance physiological traits and leaf curl degree and wax of wheat. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1998, 24(5): 608–612(in Chinese with English abstract) [10]Zhang J(张娟), Zhang Z-B(张正斌), Xie H-M(谢惠民), Dong B-D(董宝娣), Hu M-Y(胡梦芸), Xu P(徐萍). The relationship between water use efficiency and related physiological traits in wheat leaves. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(12): 1593–1599 (in Chinese with English abstract) [11]Kim K S, Park S H, Jenks M A. Changes in leaf cuticular waxes of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) plants exposed to water deficit. J Plant Physiol, 2007, 164: 1134–1143 [12]Ristic Z, Jenks M A. Leaf cuticle and water loss in maize lines differing in dehydration avoidance. J Plant Physiol, 2002, 159: 645–651 [13]Goodwin S M, Jenks M A. Plant cuticle function as a barrier to water loss. In: Jenks M A, Hasegawa P M, eds. Plant Abiotic Stress. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005 [14]Mamrutha H M, Mogili T, Jhansi Lakshmi K, Rama N, Kosma D, Udaya Kumar M, Jenks M A, Nataraja K N. Leaf cuticular wax amount and crystal morphology regulate post-harvest water loss in mulberry (Morus species). Plant Physiol Biochem, 2010, 48: 690–696 [15]Koch K, Hartmann K D, Schreiberb L, Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. Influences of air humidity during the cultivation of plants on wax chemical composition, morphology and leaf surface wettability. Environ Exp Bot, 2006, 56: 1–9 [16]Kang J-M(康俊梅), Fan F-C(樊奋成), Yang Q-C(杨青川). Study of drought resistance appraisal on 41 different alfalfa cultivars. Acta Agrest Sin(草地学报), 2004, 12(1): 21–23 (in Chinese with English abstract) [17]Li H-S(李合生). Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiological Biochemical Experiment (植物生理生化实验原理和技术). Beijing: High Education Press, 2006. pp 250–256 (in Chinese) [18]Zou Q(邹琦). Instruction of Plant Physiological Biochemical Experiment (植物生理生化实验指导). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1995. pp 36–37 (in Chinese) [19]van Maarseveen C, Han H, Jetter R. Development of the cuticular wax during growth of Kalanchoe daigremontiana (Hamet et Perr. de la Bathie) leaves. Plant Cell Environ, 2009, 32: 73–81 [20]Barthlott W, Neinhuis C, Cutler D, Ditsch F, Meusel I, Theisen I, Wilhelmi H. Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Bot J Linn Soc, 1998, 26:237–260 [21]Oliveira A F M, Meirelles S T, Salatino A. Epicuticular waxes from caatinga and cerrado species and their efficiency against water loss. An Acad Bras Cienc, 2003, 75: 431–439 [22]Giese B N. Effects of light and temperature on the composition of epicuticular wax of barley leaves. Phytochemistry, 1975, 14: 921–929 [23]Maier C G A, Post-Beittenmiller D. Epicuticular wax on leek in vitro developmental stages and seedlings under varied growth conditions. Plant Sci, 1998, 134: 53–67 [24]Zhang J Y, Broeckling C D, Blancaflo E B, Sledge M, Sumne L W, Wang Z Y. Overexpression of WXP1, a putative Medicago truncatula AP2 domain-containing transcription factor gene, increases cuticular wax accumulation and enhances drought tolerance in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Plant J, 2005, 42: 689–707 [25]Kosma D K, Bourdenx B, Bernard A, Parsons E P, Lu S, Joubes J, Jenks M A. The impact of water deficiency on leaf cuticle lipids of Arabidopsis. J Plant Physiol, 2009, 151: 1918–1929 [26]Johnson D A, Richards R A, Turner N C. Yield relations, gas exchange, and surface reflectances of near-isogenic wheat differing in glaucousness. Crop Sci, 1983, 23: 318–325 [27]Burghardt M, Riederer M. Cuticular transpiration. Biol Plant Cuticle, 2006, 23: 292–311 [28]Svenningsson M, Liljenberg C. Changes in cuticular transpiration rate and cuticular lipids of oat (Avena sativa) seedlings induced by water stress. Physiol Plant, 1986, 66: 9–14 |
| [1] | 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572. |
| [2] | 李新浩, 邢梦柯, 周梓惠, 李思烨, 任昊, 王洪章, 赖华江. 外源褪黑素通过协调光反应与暗反应增强玉米苗期的耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 839-856. |
| [3] | 赵翔, 李佳宜, 李爽, 韩文辉, 黄俊霞, 姚兴东, 张惠君, 王海英, 谢甫绨. 高温对不同大豆品种干物质积累和糖代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 857-865. |
| [4] | 杨姝, 白伟, 蔡倩, 杜桂娟. 玉米‖紫花苜蓿间作群体光分布特征及对植物性状和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2514-2526. |
| [5] | 尹雨萌, 王雁楠, 康志河, 乔守晨, 卞倩倩, 李亚蔚, 曹郭郑, 赵国瑞, 徐丹丹, 杨育峰. 甘薯谷胱甘肽S-转移酶基因IbGSTU7的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1736-1746. |
| [6] | 王梦宁, 谢可冉, 高逖, 王飞, 任孝俭, 熊栋梁, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 崔克辉. 水稻幼穗分化期至抽穗期高温对籽粒形态和充实的影响及其与粒重的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1347-1362. |
| [7] | 孟凡琦, 房孟颖, 罗艺, 卢霖, 董学瑞, 王亚菲, 郭丽娜, 闫鹏, 董志强, 张凤路. 乙烯利-甜菜碱-水杨酸合剂对夏玉米耐热性和产量的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1299-1311. |
| [8] | 李培华, 李杰, 孟祥宇, 孙玉晨, 冯永佳, 李云丽, 刁邓超, 赵雯, 吴玮, 韩德俊, 张嵩午, 郑炜君. 高温胁迫下冷型小麦的抗逆性评估及其生理响应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1118-1130. |
| [9] | 李乔, 叶杨春, 常旭虹, 王德梅, 王艳杰, 杨玉双, 马瑞琦, 赵广才, 蔡瑞国, 张敏, 刘希伟. 花后高温干旱逆境对冬小麦光合特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1077-1090. |
| [10] | 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 李玉荣, 王瑾. 冀花系列高油酸花生抗旱性鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 797-811. |
| [11] | 王语新, 陈天羽, 翟红, 张欢, 高少培, 何绍贞, 赵宁, 刘庆昌. 甘薯激酶基因IbHT1的克隆及抗旱性功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 301-311. |
| [12] | 辛雨宁, 任昊, 王洪章, 梁明磊, 于涛, 刘鹏. 喷施6-苄氨基腺嘌呤(6-BA)对授粉后高温胁迫下夏玉米籽粒灌浆及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 418-431. |
| [13] | 何梅, 张佳蕾, 范士凯, 孟静静, 王建国, 郭峰, 李新国, 万书波, 杨莎. 花生抗旱基因AhCPK8及其互作蛋白GAPDH的克隆及分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2713-2726. |
| [14] | 李亚玮, 徐盈盈, 左春阳, 刘若男, 梁亚军, 孔杰, 张献龙, 闵玲. 棉花减数分裂进程鉴定体系构建及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2570-2580. |
| [15] | 刘波, 池明, 曹梦琦, 唐达, 杨恒照, 张卫华, 薛聪. 过表达马铃薯StuPPO9基因对烟草抗旱能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2237-2247. |
|
||