欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (03): 549-556.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00549

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于SNP标记的玉米株高及穗位高QTL定位

郑德波1,2,5,杨小红2,李建生2,严建兵3,张士龙4,贺正华4,黄益勤4,*   

  1. 1 广西大学农学院,广西南宁530005;2 中国农业大学国家玉米改良中心,北京100193;3 华中农业大学作物遗传改良国家重点实验室,湖北武汉430070;4 湖北省农业科学院粮食作物研究所,湖北武汉430071;5 广西农业科学院玉米研究所,广西南宁530227
  • 收稿日期:2012-07-23 修回日期:2012-11-16 出版日期:2013-03-12 网络出版日期:2013-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 黄益勤,E-mail: hyqhzau@163.com,Tel: 027-87389897
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2010AA10A106)和湖北省农业科技创新中心项目资助。

QTL Identification for Plant Height and Ear Height Based on SNP Mapping in Maize (Zea mays L.)

ZHENG De-Bo1,2,5,YANG Xiao-Hong2,LI Jian-Sheng2,YAN Jian-Bing3,ZHANG Shi-Long4,HE Zheng-Hua4,HUANG Yi-Qin4,*   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China; 2 National Maize Improvement Center of China, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 3 National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 4 Food Crops Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China; 5 Maize Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530227, China?
  • Received:2012-07-23 Revised:2012-11-16 Published:2013-03-12 Published online:2013-01-04
  • Contact: 黄益勤,E-mail: hyqhzau@163.com,Tel: 027-87389897

摘要:

为进一步弄清玉米株高和穗位高的遗传机理,为育种生产提供服务,本研究以K22×CI7、K22×Dan3402个F2群体为作图群体,利用覆盖玉米10条染色体的SNP标记构建了2个连锁图谱。并将这2个F2群体衍生的分别含237和218个家系的F2:3群体用于田间性状的鉴定。用复合区间作图模型对2个群体的株高、穗位高表型进行QTL定位分析,结果显示,在武汉和南宁两种环境条件下共定位到21个株高QTL和27个穗位高QTL;单个QTL表型变异贡献率的变幅为4.9%~17.9%;株高和穗位高QTL的作用方式以加性和部分显性为主;第7染色体上可能存在控制株高和穗位高的主效QTL。

关键词: SNP, 数量性状位点(QTL), 连锁图谱, 株高, 穗位高, 玉米

Abstract:

In order to learn more about the genetic machanism of plant height and ear height, two linkage maps were constructed by SNP markers using two F2:3 families derived from K22 × CI7 and K22 × Dan340 respectively. These two maps included 429 and 344 polymorphic SNP markers respectively and their total lengths were 1 389.3 cM and 1 567.5 cM respectively. The phenotypic data of plant height (PH) and ear height (EH) of two populations were used to detect QTLs in two environments (2010 in Nanning and 2011 in Wuhan) by using the Composite Interval Mapping (CIM) model of WinQTLCart2.5. In total, 21 QTLs for plant height and 27 QTLs for ear height were identified. The phenotypic variance explained by each QTL ranged from 4.9% to 17.9%. The results showed that the additive and partial dominant effects were the main genetic basis for plant height and ear height in maize in this study, and the main QTLs for PH and EH were both found on chromosome 7.

Key words: SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism), QTL (quantitative trait locus), Linkage map, Plant height, Ear height, Zea mays

[1]Zhang Y, Li Y X, Wang Y, Liu Z Z, Liu C, Peng B, Tan W W, Wang D, Shi Y S, Sun B C, Song Y C, Wang T Y, Li Y. Stability of QTL across environments and QTL-by-Environment interactions for plant and ear height in maize. Agric Sci China, 2010, 9(10): 1400–1412

[2]Duvick D N. Genetic progress in yield of United States maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica, 2005, 50: 193–202

[3]Lan J-H(兰进好), Chu D(褚栋). Study on the genetic basis of plant height and ear height in maize (Zea mays L.) by QTL dissection. Hereditas (遗传), 2005, 27(6): 925–934 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4]Paterson A H, Lander E S, Hewitt J D, Peterson S, Lincoln S E, Tanksley S D. Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature, 1988, 335: 721–726

[5]Doebley J, Stec A, Hubbard L. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature, 1997, 386: 485–488

[6]Salvi S, Sponza G, Morgante M, Tomes D, Niu X M, Fengler K A, Meeley R, Ananiev E V, Svitashev S, Bruggemann E, Li B L, Hainey C F, Radovic S, Zaina G, Rafalski J A, Tingey S V, Miao G H, Phillips R L, Tuberosa R. Conserved non-coding genomic sequences associated with a flowering-time quantitative trait locus in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 11376–11381

[7]Wang H, Nussbaum-Wagler T, Li B, Zhao Q, Vigouroux Y, Faller M, Bomblies K, Lukens L, Doebley J F. The origin of the naked grains of maize. Nature, 2005, 436 : 714–719

[8]Zheng P Z, Allen W B, Roesler K, Williams M E,  Zhang S R, Li J M, Glassman K, Ranch J, Nubel D, Solawetz W, Bhattramakki D, Llaca V, Deschamps S, Zhong G Y, Tarczynsk  M C,Shen B. A phenylalanine in DGAT is a key determinant of oil content and composition in maize. Nat Genet, 2008, 40: 367–372

[9]Li L, Li H, Li Q, Yang X H, Zheng D B, Warburton M, Chai Y C, Zhang P, Guo Y Q, Yan J B, Li J S. An 11-bp insertion in Zea mays fatb reduces the palmitic acid content of fatty acids in maize grain. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(9): 1–12

[10]Gallavotti A, Zhao Q, Kyozuka J, Meeley R B, Ritter M K, Doebley J F, Pè M E, Schmidt R J. The role of barren stalk1 in the architecture of maize. Nature, 2004, 432: 630–635

[11]Thornsberry J M, Goodman M M, Doebley J, Kresovich S, Nielsen D , Buckler E S. Dwarf8 polymorphisms associate with variation in flowering time. Nat Genet, 2001, 28: 286–289

[12]Guan Q(关强), Zhang Y-X(张月学), Xu X-L(徐香玲), Sun D-Q(孙德全), Li S-Y(李绥艳), Lin H(林红), Pan L-Y(潘丽艳), Ma Y-H(马延华). Development of DNA molecular marker and several new types of molecular markers. Heilongjiang Agric Sci (黑龙江农业科学), 2008, (1): 102–104 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]Zou Y-P(邹喻苹), Ge S(葛颂). A novel molecular marker—SNPs and its application. Biodiversity Sci (生物多样性), 2003, 11(5): 370–382 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Buckler E S, Holland J B, Bradbury P J, Acharya C B, Brown P J, Browne C, Ersoz E, Flint-Garcia S, Garcia A, Glaubitz J C, Goodman M M, Harjes C, Guill K, Kroon D E, Larsson S, Lepak N K, Li H H, Mitchell S E, Pressoir G, Peiffer J A, Rosas M O, Rocheford T R, Romay M C, Romero S, Salvo S, Villeda H S, Silva H S, Sun Q, Tian F, Upadyayula N, Ware D, Yates H, Yu J M, Zhang Z W, Kresovich S, McMullen M D. The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science, 2009, 325: 714–719

[15]Li H H, Bradbury P, Ersoz E, Buckler E S, Wang J K. Joint QTL linkage mapping for multiple-cross mating design sharing one common parent. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6(3): 1–12 (e17573)

[16]Wang L-M(汪黎明), Wang Q-C(王庆成), Meng Z-D(孟昭东). Corn Varieties and Their Pedigrees in China (中国玉米品种及其系谱). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2010. pp 467–602 (in Chinese)

[17]Li F-M(李发民), Mao J-C(毛建昌), Li X-T(李向拓). The breeding of maize inbred line K22 and the analysis on the combine ability. J Gansu Agric Univ (甘肃农业大学学报), 2004, 39(3): 312–315 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]Fan J B, Gunderson K L, Bibikova M, Yeakyley J M, Chen J, Garcia E W, Lebruska L L, Laurent M, Shen R, Barker D. Illumina Universal Bead Arrays. Methods Enzymol, 2006, 410: 57–73

[19]Yan J B, Yang X H, Trushar S, Hector S V, Li J S, Marilyn W, Zhou Y, Crouch J H, Xu Y B. High-throughput SNP genotyping with the Golden Gate assay in maize. Mol Breed, 2010, 25: 441–451

[20]Lander E C, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly M J, Lincoln S E, Newberg L. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for construction primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics, 1987, 1: 174–181

[21]Voorrips R E. MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered, 2002, 93: 77–78

[22]Wang S, Basten C J, Zeng Z B. Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5 Department of Statistics. Raleigh: North Carolina State University, 2006. (http://statgen.ncsu.edu/ qtlcart/WQTLCart.htm)

[23]Stuber C W, Edwards M D, Wendel J F. Molecular marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. Ⅱ. Factors influencing yield and its component traits. Crop Sci, 1987, 27(3): 639-648

[24]Chen Y-S(陈玉水), Lu C-B(卢川北). Correlation analysis on plant height and ear height in maize (Zea mays L.). Guangxi Agric Sci (广西农业科学), 2004, 35(2): 111 (in Chinese)

[25]Sun Z-C(孙志超), Jing S-L(荆绍凌), Zhang Z-J(张志军), Zhou X-H(周小辉), Yue Y-H(岳尧海), Zhang J-X(张建新), Ren J(任军). Analysis on genetic variations and correlation of the main agronomic traits in corn hybrids. Anhui Agric Sci Bull (安徽农学通报), 2008, 14(20): 54–55 (in Chinese)

[26]Zhang Z-M(张志明), Zhao M-J(赵茂俊), Rong T-Z(荣廷昭), Pan G-T(潘光堂). SSR linkage map construction and QTL identification for plant height and ear height in maize (Zea mays L.). Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(2): 341–344 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[27]Yang X-J(杨晓军), Lu M(路明), Zhang S-H(张世煌), Zhou F(周芳), Qu Y-Y(曲延英), Xie C-X(谢传晓). QTL mapping of plant height and ear position in maize (Zea mays L.). Hereditas (Beijing)(遗传), 2008, 30(11): 1477–1486 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[28]Xing Y-Z(邢永忠), Xu C-G(徐才国). Advance in crop quantitative trait loci. Hereditas (Beijing) (遗传), 2001, 23(5): 498–502 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[29]Schön C C, Lee M, Melchinger A E, Guthrie W D, Woodman W L. Mapping and characterization of quantitative trait loci affecting resistance against second-generation European corn borer in maize with the aid of RFLPs. Heredity, 1993, 70: 648–659

[30]Schön C C, Melchinger A E, Boppenmaier J, Brunklaus-Jung E, Herrmann R G, Seitzer J F. RFLP mapping in maize: quantitative trait loci affecting testcross performance of elite European flint lines. Crop Sci, 1994, 37: 378–389

[31]Veldboom L R, Lee M, Woodman W L. Molecular marker-facilitated studies in an elite maize population: I. Linkage analysis and determination of QTL for morphological traits. Theor Appl Genet, 1994, 88: 7–16

[32]Veldboom L R, Lee M. Molecular-marker-facilitated studies of morphological traits in maize: II. Determination of QTLs for grain yield and yield components. Theor Appl Genet, 1994, 89: 451-458

[33]Beavis W D, Smith O S, Grant D, Fincher R. Identification of quantitative trait loci using a small sample of topcrossed and F4 progeny from maize. Crop Sci, 1994, 34: 882–896

[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[4] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[5] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[6] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[7] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[8] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[9] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[10] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[11] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[12] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[13] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[14] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
[15] 李新浩, 邢梦柯, 周梓惠, 李思烨, 任昊, 王洪章, 赖华江. 外源褪黑素通过协调光反应与暗反应增强玉米苗期的耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 839-856.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!