欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (01): 150-156.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00150

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

大穗型小麦品种强、弱势籽粒淀粉积累和相关酶活性的比较

梁太波;尹燕枰;蔡瑞国;闫素辉;李文阳;耿庆辉;王平;王振林*   

  1. 山东农业大学农学院/作物生物学国家重点实验室/农业部小麦栽培生理与遗传改良重点开放实验室, 山东泰安271018

  • 收稿日期:2007-04-10 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-01-12 网络出版日期:2008-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 王振林

Starch Accumulation and Related Enzyme Activities in Superior and Inferior Grains of Large Spike Wheat

LIANG Tai-Bo,YIN Yan-Ping,CAI Rui-Guo,YAN Su-Hui,LI Wen-Yang,GENG Qing-Hui,WANG Ping,WANG Zhen-Lin*   

  1. Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University/ National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/ Key Laboratory of Wheat Cultivation Physio- logy and Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China

  • Received:2007-04-10 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-01-12 Published online:2008-01-12
  • Contact: WANG Zhen-Lin

摘要:

在大田条件下, 以两个大穗型小麦品种山农12和PH01-35为材料, 对籽粒发育过程中强、弱势籽粒淀粉积累及其相关酶活性变化进行了比较研究。结果表明, 两品种强势粒直链淀粉积累量和支链淀粉积累量均高于弱势粒。Logistic方程模拟淀粉积累过程, 强势粒淀粉积累起始势(C0)高, 活跃持续期长, 平均积累速率(Rmean)高, 最终淀粉积累量高。 籽粒蔗糖合酶(SS)、ADPG焦磷酸化酶(AGPase)、UDPG焦磷酸化酶(UGPase)、可溶性淀粉合酶(SSS)和束缚态淀粉合酶(GBSS)活性均呈单峰曲线变化, 强势粒上述酶活性均高于弱势粒。花后7~21 d, 弱势粒蔗糖含量明显高于强势粒, 表明弱势粒淀粉积累量低, 并不以其淀粉合成底物的供给为限制因子, 而主要与淀粉合成能力低有关, 同时与籽粒灌浆前期胚乳细胞的数量关系密切。

关键词:

小麦, 强势粒, 弱势粒, 淀粉合成, 大穗型

Abstract:

Starch, the major component of grain, consists of amylose and amylopectin. It is synthesized and accumulated during grain filling in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and regulated by many enzymes including sucrose synthase (SS), adenosine diphosphorate glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), uridine diphosphorate glucose pyrophosphorylase (UGPase), soluble starch synthase (SSS), granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS), starch branching enzyme (SBE) and so on. According to recent studies, AGPase, starch synthase, and SBE are the key enzymes controlling starch synthesis. Previous researches have revealed that the allocation of carbohydrate, grain weight, and the transformation of sucrose to starch were significantly different between superior and inferior grains of wheat. But to date, there are few reports about the differences of starch accumulation and the relationship between starch accumulation and related enzyme activities in superior and inferior grains. Therefore, a field experiment was carried out, and two large-spike type cultivars, SN 12 and PH01-35 were used to investigate the mechanism of starch accumulation and the relationship with related enzyme activities in superior and inferior grains. Forty spikes was sampled at 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35 d after anthesis, and partitioned into two groups, superior grain (the 1st and 2nd grains from the basal part of a spikelet) and inferior grain (the 3rd and 4th grains from the basal part of a spikelet). Half grains of each group were used to determine the enzyme activities, and the other half for starch content measurement. The result showed that the accumulation of amylose and amylopectin in superior grain were significantly higher than those in inferior grain. The simulation with Logistic equation showed that the accumulation rate and initial potential were higher, the accumulation duration was longer, so the starch final amount was higher in superior grain. The activities of SS, AGPase, UGPase, SSS, and GBSS changed in the pattern of a single-peak curve during grain filling. The related enzyme activities in superior grain, which had higher starch accumulation, were higher than those in inferior grain. The sucrose content in inferior grain was much higher than that in superior grain at 7–14 d after anthesis, indicating that the substrate of starch synthesis should not be the limiting factor for starch accumulation in inferior grain, which related to starch synthesis efficiency, also the number of endosperm cells at early grain filling stage.

Key words:

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Superior grain, Inferior grain, Starch synthesis, Large-spike type

[1] 陈云, 刘昆, 张宏路, 李思宇, 张亚军, 韦佳利, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 机插密度和穗肥减量对优质食味水稻品种籽粒淀粉合成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1540-1550.
[2] 鱼海跃,韩紫璇,张钰石,段留生,张明才,李召虎. 冠菌素对玉米籽粒灌浆特性与淀粉合成的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(10): 1535-1543.
[3] 胡阳阳, 卢红芳, 刘卫星, 康娟, 马耕, 李莎莎, 褚莹莹, 王晨阳. 灌浆期高温与干旱胁迫对小麦籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性及淀粉积累的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(04): 591-600.
[4] 徐云姬, 许阳东, 李银银, 钱希旸, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 干湿交替灌溉对水稻花后同化物转运和籽粒灌浆的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(04): 554-568.
[5] 吴秋红,陈永兴,李丹,王振忠,张艳,袁成国,王西成,赵虹,曹廷杰,刘志勇. 利用SNP芯片和BSA分析规模化定位小麦抗白粉病基因[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(01): 1-14.
[6] 赵立娜,刘子会,段硕楠,张园园,李国良,郭秀林. 小麦热激转录因子基因TaHsfB2d的克隆和特性及其对耐热性的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(01): 53-62.
[7] 李永辉,陈琳琳,孙炳剑,王利民,邢小萍,袁虹霞,丁胜利*,李洪连*. 假禾谷镰孢侵染小麦后3种植物激素相关基因的差异表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(11): 1632-1642.
[8] 卢媛,崔超凡,胡平,陈佩度,沈雪芳,韩晴,王义发,邢莉萍,曹爱忠. 矮秆基因Rht_NM9在小麦株高建成中对内源激素含量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(09): 1272-1279.
[9] 王志刚,梁红伟,高聚林,于晓芳,孙继颖,苏治军,胡树平,余少波,李雅剑,魏淑丽,杨哲. 玉米弱势粒库活性与籽粒内源激素及多胺含量的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(08): 1196-1204.
[10] 吴晓丽,李朝苏,汤永禄,李俊,马孝玲,李式昭,黄明波. 四川盆地9000 kg hm-2产量潜力小麦品种的花后冠层结构、生理及同化物分配特性[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(07): 1043-1056.
[11] 武炳瑾,简俊涛,张德强,马文洁,冯洁,崔紫霞,张传量,孙道杰*. 利用90k芯片技术进行小麦穗部性状QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(07): 1087-1095.
[12] 刘会云,王婉晴,李欣,王轲,王龙,杜丽璞,晏月明,叶兴国. 小麦突变体AS208中Glu-B1位点缺失对籽粒中蛋白体形成和储藏蛋白合成与加工相关基因表达的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(05): 691-700.
[13] 胡学旭,孙丽娟,周桂英,吴丽娜,陆伟,李为喜,王爽,杨秀兰,宋敬可,王步军. 2000—2015年北部、黄淮冬麦区国家区试品种的品质特征[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(04): 501-509.
[14] 赵佩,腾丽杰,王轲,杜丽璞,任贤,佘茂云,叶兴国. 小麦TaVIP1家族基因克隆、分子特性及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(02): 201-209.
[15] 付必胜,刘颖,张巧凤,吴小有,高海东,蔡士宾,戴廷波,吴纪中. 与小麦抗白粉病基因Pm48紧密连锁分子标记的开发[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(02): 307-312.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!