欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (04): 591-600.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00591

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

灌浆期高温与干旱胁迫对小麦籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性及淀粉积累的影响

胡阳阳1,**(), 卢红芳1,**, 刘卫星1, 康娟1, 马耕1, 李莎莎1, 褚莹莹1, 王晨阳1,2,*()   

  1. 1河南农业大学, 河南郑州 450002
    2国家小麦工程技术研究中心, 河南郑州 450002
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-02 接受日期:2018-01-08 出版日期:2018-01-23 网络出版日期:2018-01-23
  • 通讯作者: 胡阳阳,卢红芳,王晨阳
  • 作者简介:

    18238802035@163.com

  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0300204), 国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAD26B01)和河南省小麦产业技术体系建设专项(S2010-01-G07)资助

Effects of High Temperature and Water Deficiency during Grain Filling on Activities of Key Starch Synthesis Enzymes and Starch Accumulation in Wheat

Yang-Yang HU1,**(), Hong-Fang LU1,**, Wei-Xing LIU1, Juan KANG1, Geng MA1, Sha-Sha LI1, Ying-Ying CHU1, Chen-Yang WANG1,2,*()   

  1. 1 Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
    2 National Wheat Engineering Research Center, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
  • Received:2017-07-02 Accepted:2018-01-08 Published:2018-01-23 Published online:2018-01-23
  • Contact: Yang-Yang HU,Hong-Fang LU,Chen-Yang WANG
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0300204), the National Key Technologies R&D Program of China (2015BAD26B01), and the earmarked fund for Modern Wheat Industrial Technology System of Henan Province (S2010-01-G07).

摘要:

高温与干旱是小麦灌浆期的主要胁迫逆境, 影响小麦同化物的生成及其在籽粒中的积累。本文以郑麦366为试验材料, 采用盆栽和人工气候室模拟相结合的方式, 研究了灌浆期高温(HT)、干旱(DS)和高温干旱复合胁迫(HT+DS)对小麦籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性、淀粉及其组分的影响。于花后10 d将长势均匀一致的盆栽小麦转移至人工气候室, 至小麦成熟。人工气候室设适温(昼25℃/夜15℃)和高温(昼32℃/夜22℃)两种温度模式, 每种温度模式下又设置正常水分(土壤相对含水量75%左右)和轻度干旱胁迫(土壤相对含水量50%左右)两个土壤水分处理, 以适温、正常水分处理为对照。与对照相比, HT、DS及HT+DS条件下籽粒可溶性淀粉合酶(SSS)和结合态淀粉合酶(GBSS)活性在胁迫初期显著升高, 之后迅速下降; 淀粉分支酶(SBE)、ADPG焦磷酸化酶(AGPase)和蔗糖合酶(SS)活性在小麦籽粒整个灌浆过程中均低于对照; 上述酶活性还受高温与干旱互作的显著影响。HT、DS及HT+DS逆境下, 小麦籽粒淀粉积累速率减小, 籽粒直、支链淀粉和总淀粉含量下降, 生育期缩短, 粒重和产量降低。其中, HT的影响大于DS, 复合胁迫的影响大于单一胁迫。相关分析表明, SSS和GBSS活性与籽粒直、支链淀粉和总淀粉含量在多数测定时期呈正相关(P<0.01), AGPase、SBE和SS活性在灌浆后期(花后22~26 d)与籽粒直、支链淀粉和总淀粉含量呈正相关(P<0.01)。表明高温干旱胁迫通过淀粉合成关键酶而影响籽粒淀粉的合成与积累, 最终影响小麦产量和品质。

关键词: 冬小麦, 复合胁迫, 高温, 干旱, 淀粉合成酶, 淀粉积累

Abstract:

High temperature and drought, the major abiotic stresses during grain filling of winter wheat, have great influence on photosynthate accumulation in grains. In this study, we evaluated the effects of high temperature, drought and the compound stress at grain-filling stage on the activities of key starch synthesis enzymes and the contents of starch and its components in grains of winter wheat cultivar ‘Zhengmai 366’. The pot-grown plants were moved from field to the climate chamber at 10 days after anthesis and exposed to the stresses until maturity. The climate chamber was desired with the normal growth condition (25°C/15°C, day/night) and high temperature (HT) stress (32°C/22°C, day/night) treatments. Under each temperature treatment, the soil moisture was adjusted to ~75% (normal) and ~50% (drought stress, DS), respectively. The normal temperature and soil moisture condition was taken as the control. Compared with the control, HT, DS, and HT+DS significantly increased activities of soluble starch synthase (SSS) and granule bound starch synthase (GBSS) at early period of stress and rapidly declined them subsequently. However, all stress treatments reduced the activities of starch branching enzymes (SBE), ADPG pyrophosphorylase (AGPase) and sucrose synthase (SS) during the whole grain-filling stage. The interaction between HT and DS was significant on all enzyme activities. Under HT, DS and HT+DS conditions, starch accumulation rate of grain, and the contents of amylose, amylopectin and total starch decreased and growth duration shortened, leading to reduced grain weight and yield at maturity. HT showed greater influence than DS, and the effect of compound stress was larger than that of each individual stress. Correlation analysis revealed that the activities of SSS and GBSS were positively correlated with the contents of amylose, amylopectin and total starch at most stages (P < 0.01), whereas, those of SBE, AGPase and SS at late grain-filling stage (22-26 days after anthesis) (P < 0.01). These results indicate that high temperature and drought stresses cause yield loss and degrade grain quality by affecting activities of key starch synthesis enzymes and starch accumulation in wheat grains.

Key words: winter wheat, compound stress, high temperature, drought, starch accumulation, starch synthesis enzymes

图1

灌浆期不同胁迫处理小麦籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性的变化 HT: 高温; DS: 干旱; HT+DS: 高温与干旱复合胁迫。"

表1

高温与干旱胁迫对小麦籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性影响的互作效应方差分析(F值)"


Enzyme
来源
Source
2015-2016 2016-2017
14DAA 18DAA 22DAA 26DAA 14DAA 18DAA 22DAA 26DAA
GBSS 高温HT 22.8** 12.7** 1290.8** 4956.8** 12.6** 19.8** 728.5** 3297.7**
干旱DS 1.5 142.6** 139.3** 5.0 0.3 46.6** 78.8** 40.5**
DS×HT 8.3* 301.4** 199.3** 134.1** 11.4** 63.1** 158.1** 147.6**
SSS 高温HT 319.1** 213.3** 216.0** 344.1** 113.7** 50.0** 277.7** 902.8**
干旱DS 9.1* 91.6** 42.9** 49.2** 10.0* 72.5** 0.3 130.2**
DS×HT 0.0 168.7** 50.4** 10.8* 2.2 148.7** 42.7** 11.6**
SBE 高温HT 0.6 141.4** 531.3** 116.6** 0.3 190.5** 174.8** 621.4**
干旱DS 46.5** 114.3** 560.8** 84.4** 17.9** 127.6** 186.2** 368.0**
DS×HT 20.9** 13.2** 99.8** 0.7 7.0** 7.6* 11.5** 9.2*
AGPase 高温HT 1.5 10.0* 433.4** 358.7** 0.3 6.3* 1682.4** 1390.1**
干旱DS 6.0* 98.0** 216.2** 223.9** 2.2 107.6** 194.6** 726.5**
DS×HT 15.0** 20.7** 3.3 26.2** 7.1* 20.7** 0.1 27.4**
SS 高温HT 174.0** 40.1** 449.2** 378.9** 154.8** 52.9** 66.0** 297.3**
干旱DS 13.3** 3.8 25.2** 51.0** 23.6** 9.6* 34.4** 146.4**
DS×HT 43.5** 5.6* 0.2 20.4** 99.2** 9.0* 1.1 11.5**

图2

不同处理籽粒直链淀粉(A)、支链淀粉(B)和总淀粉含量(C)的变化 HT: 高温; DS: 干旱; HT+DS: 高温与干旱复合胁迫。"

图3

不同处理小麦籽粒淀粉积累速率的变化 HT: 高温; DS: 干旱; HT+DS: 高温与干旱复合胁迫。"

表2

不同处理成熟期小麦籽粒淀粉及其组分含量"

处理
Treatment
2015-2016 2016-2017
直链淀粉Amylose
(%)
支链淀粉Amylopectin (%) 总淀粉
Total starch
(%)
直/支比
Amylose/ amylopectin
直链淀粉Amylose
(%)
支链淀粉Amylopectin (%) 总淀粉
Total starch
(%)
直/支比
Amylose/
amylopectin
对照CK 15.9 a 50.8 a 66.7 a 0.31 c 15.6 a 50.0 a 65.6 a 0.31 c
干旱DS 15.3 b 47.1 b 62.4 b 0.32 b 15.0 b 46.9 b 61.9 b 0.32 bc
高温HT 14.2 c 43.8 c 58.1 c 0.33 b 14.0 c 43.2 c 57.3 c 0.32 ab
HT+DS 13.6 d 40.8 d 54.4 d 0.33 a 13.3 d 40.6 d 53.9 d 0.33 a

表3

不同处理对成熟期小麦籽粒产量及其构成因素的影响"

处理
Treatment
2015-2016 2016-2017
SN (pot-1) GNP TGW (g) GY (g pot-1) SN (pot-1) GNP TGW (g) GY (g pot-1)
对照CK 35.7 a 45.5 a 48.1 a 72.6 a 43.0 a 46.0 a 42.9 a 67.7 a
干旱DS 37.0 a 43.3 a 41.5 b 59.3 b 42.3 a 46.6 a 36.7 b 55.4 b
高温HT 38.0 a 45.8 a 37.3 c 56.9 b 39.3 a 43.5 a 35.4 c 53.8 b
HT+DS 38.0 a 46.5 a 30.5 d 48.2 c 40.7 a 46.1 a 28.6 d 41.9 c

表4

小麦籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性与淀粉积累的相关系数"

淀粉
Amylose
淀粉合成关键酶
Key starch synthesis
enzymes
开花后天数 Days after anthesis (DAA)
花后14 d
14 DAA
花后18 d
18 DAA
花后22 d
22 DAA
花后26 d
26 DAA
2015-2016
支链淀粉含量
Amylopectin content
GBSS 0.792** 0.420 0.767** 0.830**
SSS 0.962** 0.668* 0.322 0.938**
SBE 0.031 -0.274 0.824** 0.941**
AGP -0.316 0.165 0.903** 0.943**
SS -0.792** -0.500 0.818** 0.939**
直链淀粉含量
Amylose content
GBSS 0.881** 0.516 0.552 0.825**
SSS 0.853** 0.852** 0.157 0.884**
SBE 0.133 -0.477 0.457 0.867**
AGP -0.314 0.174 0.547 0.883**
SS -0.685* -0.320 0.310 0.905**
总淀粉含量
Total starch content
GBSS 0.820** 0.530 0.812** 0.836**
SSS 0.953** 0.881** 0.291 0.934**
SBE 0.051 -0.417 0.818** 0.933**
AGP -0.320 0.189 0.916** 0.943**
SS -0.781** -0.546 0.744** 0.940**
2016-2017
支链淀粉含量
Amylopectin content
GBSS 0.711** 0.031 0.830** 0.909**
SSS 0.880** 0.637* 0.669* 0.953**
SBE 0.184 -0.305 0.914** 0.968**
AGP -0.099 0.274 0.884** 0.968**
SS -0.673* -0.531 0.925** 0.962**
直链淀粉含量
Amylose content
GBSS 0.829** 0.829** 0.550 0.791**
SSS 0.756** 0.756** 0.355 0.759**
SBE 0.309 0.309 0.456 0.836**
AGP -0.225 -0.225 0.380 0.809**
SS -0.463 -0.463 0.526 0.834**
总淀粉含量
Total starch content
GBSS 0.739** 0.042 0.821** 0.902**
SSS 0.864** 0.716** 0.643* 0.926**
SBE 0.209 -0.376 0.870** 0.959**
AGP -0.123 0.244 0.828** 0.951**
SS -0.640* -0.553 0.895** 0.953**
[1] 李永庚, 于振文, 姜东, 余松烈. 冬小麦旗叶蔗糖和籽粒淀粉合成动态及与其有关的酶活性的研究. 作物学报, 2001, 27: 658-664
Li Y G, Yu Z W, Jiang D, Yu S L.Studies on the dynamic changes of the synthesis of sucrose in the flag leaf and starch in the grain and related enzymes of high-yielding wheat.Acta Agron Sin, 2001, 27: 658-664 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] 闫素辉, 王振林, 戴忠民, 李文阳, 付国占, 贺明荣, 尹艳枰. 两个直链淀粉含量不同的小麦品种籽粒淀粉合成酶活性与淀粉积累特征的比较. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 84-89
Yan S H, Wang Z L, Dai Z M, Li W Y, Fu G Z, He M R, Yin Y P.Activity of enzymes involved in starch synthesis and accumulation in grains of two wheat cultivars with a different amylose content. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 84-89 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] Wang Z B, Li W H, Qi J C, Shi P C, Yin Y A.Starch accumulation, activities of key enzyme and gene expression in starch synthesis of wheat endosperm with different starch contents.J Food Sci Technol, 2014, 51: 419-429
[4] 李春燕, 封超年, 张影, 郭文善, 朱新开, 彭永欣. 氮肥基追比对弱筋小麦宁麦9号籽粒淀粉合成及相关酶活性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38: 1120-1125
Li C Y, Feng C N, Zhang Y, Guo W S, Zhu X K, Peng Y X.Effects of the ratio between basal N and top dressing N on grain starch formation in weak gluten wheat variety Ningmai 9 and its enzymes activities. Sci Agric Sin, 2005, 38: 1120-1125 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 王晨阳, 郭天财, 阎耀礼, 朱云集, 夏国军, 王化岑, 周继泽. 花后短期高温胁迫对小麦叶片光合性能的影响. 作物学报, 2004, 30: 88-91
Wang C Y, Guo T C, Yan Y L, Zhu Y J, Xia G J, Wang H C, Zhou J Z.Effects of short post-anthesis high temperature stress on leaf photosynthetic potential in winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.).Acta Agron Sin, 2004, 30: 88-91 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 张洪华, 贺明荣, 刘永环, 李飞, 吴翠平, 张宾, 王晓英. 氮、硫肥与灌浆后期高温胁迫对小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27: 162-166
Zhang H H, He M R, Liu Y H, Li F, Wu C P, Zhang B, Wang X Y.Effect of high temperature stress at late grain-filling stage and nitrogen and sulphur fertilization on wheat grain yield and quality.Chin J Ecol, 2008, 27: 162-166 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 刘祖贵, 孙景生, 张寄阳, 王景雷, 孟兆江, 李晓东, 刘小飞. 不同时期干旱对强筋小麦产量与品质特性的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2008, 28: 877-882
Liu Z G, Sun J S, Zhang J Y, Wang J L, Meng Z J, Li X D, Liu X F.Effect of drought at different growing stages on yield and quality characteristics of strong-gluten wheat.J Trit Crops, 2008, 28: 877-882 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 杨毅, 李昱, 康建宏, 刘萍. 花后高温胁迫对春小麦籽粒淀粉合成的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2015, 35: 1535-1541
Yang Y, Li Y, Kang J H, Liu P.Effect of heat stress after anthesis on starch synthesis in spring wheat.J Trit Crops, 2015, 35: 1535-1541 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 李亚婷, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 李昱, 姚珊. 花后水分胁迫对春小麦淀粉形成及相关酶活性的影响. 草业科学, 2016, 33: 917-925
Li Y T, Kang J H, Wu H L, Li Y, Yao S.Effect of water stress after anthesis on starch formation and the activity of associated enzymes in spring wheat.Pratacult Sci, 2016, 33: 917-925 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] 赵晶晶, 姚珊, 李昱, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 许强. 花后干旱对春小麦籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉形成关键酶活性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33: 104-110
Zhao J J, Yao S, Li Y, Kang J H, Wu H L, Xu Q.Effects of drought on the starch contents and activities of key enzymes after anthesis in spring wheat grains.Agric Res Arid Areas, 2015, 33: 104-110 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11] 苗建利, 王晨阳, 郭天财, 马冬云, 胡吉帮, 冯辉. 高温与干旱互作对两种筋力小麦品种籽粒淀粉及其组分含量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2008, 28: 254-259
Miao J L, Wang C Y, Guo T C, Ma D Y, Hu J B, Feng H.Effects of post-anthesis interactions of high temperature and drought stress on content and composition of grain starch in two wheat cultivars with different gluten strength. J Trit Crops, 2008, 28: 254-259 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] 岳鹏莉, 王晨阳, 卢红芳, 刘卫星, 马耕, 王强, 胡阳阳. 灌浆期高温干旱胁迫对小麦籽粒淀粉积累的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36: 1489-1496
Yue P L, Wang C Y, Lu H F, Liu W X, Ma G, Wang Q, Hu Y Y.Effect of heat and drought stress on starch accumulation during grain filling stage. J Trit Crops, 2016, 36: 1489-1496 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 卢红芳, 王晨阳, 郭天财, 尹云星. 灌浆前期高温和干旱胁迫对小麦籽粒蛋白质含量和氮代谢关键酶活性的影响. 生态学报, 2014, 34: 3612-3619
Lu H F, Wang C Y, Guo T C, Yin Y X.Effects of high- temperature and drought stress on protein concentration and keys enzymes activities in relation to nitrogen metabolism in wheat grains during the early stage of grain filling.Acta Ecol Sin, 2014, 34: 3612-3619 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 王晨阳, 苗建利, 张美微, 马冬云, 冯伟, 谢迎新, 郭天财. 高温、干旱及其互作对两个筋力小麦品种淀粉糊化特性的影响. 生态学报, 2014, 34: 4882-4890
Wang C Y, Miao J L, Zhang M W, Ma D Y, Feng W, Xie Y X, Guo T C.Effects of post-anthesis high temperature, drought stress and their interaction on the starch pasting properties of two wheat cultivars with different gluten strength. Acta Ecol Sin, 2014, 34: 4882-4890 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 何照范. 粮油籽粒品质及其分析技术. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1985. pp 144-150
He Z F.Analysis Technique for Grain Quality in Cereals and Oils. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1985. pp 144-150 (in Chinese)
[16] Rahman S, Regina A, Li Z Y, Mukai Y, Yamamoto M, Kosar- Hashemi B, Abrahams S, Morell M K.Comparison of starch branching enzyme genes reveals evolutionary relationships among isoform. Characterization of a gene for starch-branching enzymes IIa from the wheat D genome donorAegilops tauschii. Plant Physiol, 2001, 125: 1314-1324
[17] Nakamura Y, Yuki K, Park S Y, Ohya T.Carbohydrate metabolism in the developing endosperm of rice grains.Plant Cell Physiol, 1989, 30: 833-839
[18] 曹颖妮, 胡卫国, 王根平, 刘录祥, 王成社. 糯性和非糯性小麦灌浆期胚乳直/支链淀粉积累及其相关酶活性研究. 西北植物学报, 2010, 30: 1995-2001
Cao Y N, Hu W G, Wang G P, Liu L X, Wang C S.Dynamic changes of starch accumulation and enzymes relating to starch biosynthesis of kernel during grain filling in waxy and non-waxy winter wheat.Acta Bot Boreali-Occid Sin, 2010, 30: 1995-2001 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] 石慧清, 龚月桦, 张东武. 花后高温对持绿型小麦叶片衰老及籽粒淀粉合成相关酶的影响. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35: 769-778
Shi H Q, Gong Y H, Zhang D W.Effect of high temperature on leaf senescence and related enzymes of grain starch synthesis in stay-green wheat after anthesis.J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35: 769-778 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20] Dai Z M, Yin Y P, Wang Z L.Comparison of starch accumulation and enzyme activity in grains of wheat cultivars differing in kernel type. Plant Growth Regul, 2009, 57: 153-162
[21] Ahmadi A, Baker D A.The effect of water stress on the activities of key regulatory enzymes of the sucrose to starch pathway in wheat.Plant Growth Regul, 2001, 35: 81-91
[22] 包刚, 覃志豪, 周义, 包玉海, 萨楚拉. 气候变化对中国农业生产影响的模拟评价进展. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(2): 303-307
Bao G, Tan Z H, Zhou Y, Bao Y H, Sa C L.Advances of evaluation of climate changes impact on crop yield.Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2012, 28(2): 303-307 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 赵辉, 戴廷波, 荆奇, 姜东, 曹卫星, 陆玮, 田孝威. 灌浆期高温对两种品质类型小麦品种籽粒淀粉合成关键酶活性的影响. 作物学报, 2006, 32: 423-429
Zhao H, Dai T B, Jing Q, Jiang D, Cao W X, Lu W, Tian X W.Effects of high temperature during grain filling on key enzymes involved in starch synthesis in two wheat cultivars with different quality types.Acta Agron Sin, 2006, 32: 423-429 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 闫素辉, 尹燕枰, 李文阳, 梁太波, 李勇, 邬云海, 王平, 耿庆辉, 戴忠民, 王振林. 灌浆期高温对小麦籽粒淀粉的积累、粒度分布及相关酶活性的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 1092-1096
Yan S H, Yin Y P, Li W Y, Liang T B, Li Y, Wu Y H, Wang P, Geng Q H, Dai Z M, Wang Z L.Effect of high temperature during grain filling on starch accumulation, starch granule distribution, and activities of related enzymes in wheat grains.Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 1092-1096 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 王征宏, 郭秀璞, 吕淑芳, 李友军, 邓西平. 土壤干旱对不同小麦品种籽粒淀粉积累和相关酶活性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29: 67-74
Wang Z H, Guo X P, Lyu S F, Li Y J, Deng X P.Effects of soil drought on starch accumulation of grain and activity of corresponding starch synthesis enzymes in different winter wheat varieties.Agric Res Arid Areas, 2011, 29: 67-74 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] 孙立影, 苏玮, 吴宏亮, 李昱, 王雪, 康建宏. 花后不同时期高温对春小麦淀粉形成的影响. 农业科学研究, 2015, 36: 54-60
Sun L Y, Su W, Wu H L, Li Y, Wang X, Kang J H.Effects of the high temperature after the flowering period on starch formation in spring wheat.J Agric Sci, 2015, 36: 54-60 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 王月福, 于振文, 李尚霞, 余松烈. 小麦籽粒灌浆过程中有关淀粉合成酶的活性及其效应. 作物学报, 2003, 29: 75-81
Wang Y F, Yu Z W, Li S X, Yu S L.Activity of enzymes related to starch synthesis and their effect during the filling of winter wheat.Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29: 75-81 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] 李建敏, 王振林, 高荣岐, 李圣福, 蔡瑞国, 闫素辉, 于安玲, 尹艳枰. 强、弱筋小麦籽粒形成期蔗糖、淀粉合成相关酶活性及其与氮代谢的关系. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 1019-1026
Li J M, Wang Z L, Gao R Q, Li S F, Cai R G, Yan S H, Yu A L, Yin Y P.Activities of enzymes involved in sucrose and starch synthesis during grain filling and the relation to nitrogen metabolism in strong-and weak-gluten wheat cultivars. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 1019-1026 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] Panozzo J F, Eagles H A.Cultivar and environmental effects on quality characters in wheat: I. Starch.Aust J Agric Res, 1998, 49: 757-766
[30] Morris C F, Shackley B J, King G E, Kidwell K K.Genotypicand environmental variation for flour swelling volume in wheat.Cereal Chem, 1997, 74: 16-21
[31] Jenner C F.Starch synthesis in the kernel of wheat under high temperature conditions.Aust J Plant Physiol, 1994, 21: 791-806
[32] 许振柱, 于振文, 张永丽. 土壤水分对小麦籽粒淀粉合成和积累特性的影响. 作物学报, 2003, 29: 595-600
Xu Z Z, Yu Z W, Zhang Y L.The effects of soil moisture on grain starch synthesis and accumulation of winter wheat.Acta Agron Sin, 2003, 29: 595-600 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] 杨晓娟, 居辉, 王治世, 郭安廷, 杨佑明. 花后高温和干旱对冬小麦光合、抗氧化特性及粒重的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2015, 35: 958-963
Yang X J, Ju H, Wang Z S, Guo A T, Yang Y M.Effect of high temperature and drought after anthesis on photosynthesis, antioxidant properties and grain weight in winter wheat.J Trit Crops, 2015, 35: 958-963 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] 苏玮, 孙立影, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 李昱. 高温干旱对春小麦光合特性及产量的影响. 农业科学研究, 2015, 36: 49-53
Su W, Sun L Y, Kang J H, Wu H L, Li Y.Effect of high temperature and drought treatment on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of different varieties of spring wheat.J Agric Sci, 2015, 36: 49-53 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] Jenner C F.Effects of exposure of wheat ears to high temperature on dry matter accumulation and carbohydrate metabolism in the grain of two cultivars: II. Carry-over effects.Aust J Plant Physiol, 1991, 18: 179-190
[36] Rane J, Nagarajan S.High temperature index-for field evaluation of heat tolerance in wheat varieties.Agric Systems, 2004, 79: 243-255
[37] Shah N H, Paulsen G M.Interaction of drought and high temperature on photosynthesis and grain-filling of wheat.Plant Soil, 2003, 257: 219-226
[38] 胡吉帮, 王晨阳, 郭天财, 苗建利, 朱云集, 贺德先. 灌浆期高温和干旱对小麦灌浆特性的影响. 河南农业大学学报, 2008, 42: 597-601
Hu J B, Wang C Y, Guo T C, Miao J L, Zhu Y J, He D X.Effects of high temperature and drought stress on grain filling characteristics in wheat during grain filling period.J Henan Agric Univ, 2008, 42: 597-601 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[39] 李春艳, 付凯勇, 张润琪, 徐芳芳, 史晓艳, 朱永琪, 覃安祥, 李诚. 灌浆期高温对冬小麦淀粉粒发育的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2015, 35: 1395-1402
Li C Y, Fu K Y, Zhang R Q, Xu F F, Shi X Y, Zhu Y Q, Qin A X, Li C.Effect of high temperature post anthesis on the development of starch granules in winter wheat.J Trit Crops, 2015, 35: 1395-1402 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 陈松余, 丁一娟, 孙峻溟, 黄登文, 杨楠, 代雨涵, 万华方, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnCNGC基因家族鉴定及其在核盘菌侵染和PEG处理下的表达特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1357-1371.
[2] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[3] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[4] 李阿立, 冯雅楠, 李萍, 张东升, 宗毓铮, 林文, 郝兴宇. 大豆叶片响应CO2浓度升高、干旱及其交互作用的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1103-1118.
[5] 王霞, 尹晓雨, 于晓明, 刘晓丹. 干旱锻炼对B73自交后代当代干旱胁迫记忆基因表达及其启动子区DNA甲基化的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1191-1198.
[6] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
[7] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[8] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[9] 荐红举, 尚丽娜, 金中辉, 丁艺, 李燕, 王季春, 胡柏耿, Vadim Khassanov, 吕典秋. 马铃薯PIF家族成员鉴定及其对高温胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 86-98.
[10] 赵文青, 徐文正, 杨锍琰, 刘玉, 周治国, 王友华. 棉花叶片响应高温的差异与夜间淀粉降解密切相关[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1680-1689.
[11] 曹亮, 杜昕, 于高波, 金喜军, 张明聪, 任春元, 王孟雪, 张玉先. 外源褪黑素对干旱胁迫下绥农26大豆鼓粒期叶片碳氮代谢调控的途径分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1779-1790.
[12] 张明聪, 何松榆, 秦彬, 王孟雪, 金喜军, 任春元, 吴耀坤, 张玉先. 外源褪黑素对干旱胁迫下春大豆品种绥农26形态、光合生理及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1791-1805.
[13] 岳丹丹, 韩贝, Abid Ullah, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 干旱条件下棉花根际真菌多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1806-1815.
[14] 李洁, 付惠, 姚晓华, 吴昆仑. 不同耐旱性青稞叶片差异蛋白分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1248-1258.
[15] 李辉, 李德芳, 邓勇, 潘根, 陈安国, 赵立宁, 唐慧娟. 红麻非生物逆境胁迫响应基因HCWRKY71表达分析及转化拟南芥[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(6): 1090-1099.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!