欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (07): 1043-1056.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01043

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地9000 kg hm-2产量潜力小麦品种的花后冠层结构、生理及同化物分配特性

吴晓丽1,李朝苏1,汤永禄1,*,李俊1,马孝玲1,李式昭1,黄明波2   

  1. 1四川省农业科学院作物研究所,四川成都 610066;2四川广汉市生产力促进中心,四川广汉 618300
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-23 修回日期:2017-03-01 出版日期:2017-07-12 网络出版日期:2017-04-19
  • 通讯作者: 汤永禄, E-mail: ttyycc88@163.com, Tel: 028-84504601
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-3-1-23)和国家自然科学基金项目(31571590)资助。

Canopy Architecture, Physiological Characteristics and Assimilate Partitioning in Wheat Cultivars with 9000 kg hm?2 Yield Potential in Sichuan Basin

WU Xiao-Li1,LI Chao-Su1,TANG Yong-Lu1,*,LI Jun1,MA Xiao-Ling1,LI Shi-Zhao1,HUANG Ming-Bo2   

  1. 1Crop Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 610066 Chengdu, China; 2 Guanghan Productivity Promotion Center, Guanghan 618300, China
  • Received:2016-02-23 Revised:2017-03-01 Published:2017-07-12 Published online:2017-04-19
  • Contact: Tang Yonglu, E-mail: ttyycc88@163.com, Tel: 028-84504601
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-3-1-23) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571590).

摘要:

四川盆地小麦高产育种取得了突破性进展,但高产生理研究相对滞后。本研究2011—2015连续5年的田间试验,比较了高产和一般产量潜力品种花后群体冠层结构、主要生理指标和同化物的转运分配特性,旨在揭示四川小麦9000 kg hm?2高产品种的生理基础。选择代表性高产潜力品种和一般产量潜力品种各3个,高产潜力品种产量平均9422 kg hm-2,比一般产量潜力品种高14.3%,增产原因是生物量或收获指数的提高。相比一般产量潜力品种,高产潜力品种旗叶短且宽,长宽比低于10,开花初期至灌浆中期叶基角和开角增加明显。开花至灌浆后期,高产潜力品种顶三叶的SPAD值及花后0 d和20 d的群体光合速率显著高于一般产量潜力品种,群体光合速率以10:00–12:00的差异最大。此外,高产潜力品种在开花期茎鞘生物量所占比例较高,而成熟期籽粒所占比例较一般产量潜力品种高1~4个百分点。籽粒产量与小麦形态、生理参数关系密切,与灌浆期旗叶基角(r = 0.947, P < 0.01)和倒二叶基角(r = 0.963, P < 0.01)呈正相关,与旗叶长宽比(r = ?0.913, P < 0.01)和倒二叶长宽比(r = ?0.911, P < 0.01)呈负相关;与开花期顶三叶SPAD值呈正相关,r值分别为0.75、0.90和0.82 (P < 0.01);与成熟期穗轴干重比例呈负相关(r = ?0.956, P < 0.01)。本研究表明,株高适中、株型紧凑,花后冠层叶绿素含量和群体光合速率较高,以及合理的物质分配,是高产潜力品种获得高产的生理基础。

关键词: 小麦, 冠层结构, 群体光合速率, 干物质分配, 籽粒产量

Abstract:

In contrast to the outstanding breeding progress of high-yield wheat in Sichuan Basin of China, the physiological basis of high-yield-potential cultivars is unclear due to seldom studies. In this study, a five-year field experiment (2011–2015) was carried out to compare the differences of canopy structure after anthesis, canopy apparent photosynthesis (CAP), chlorophyll content (SPAD), and dry matter partitioning between high-yield and normal-yield potential cultivars. Three typical high-yield and three normal-yield potential cultivars were selected, and the average yield of the high-yield potential cultivars (9422 and kg ha-1) was 14.3% higher than that of the normal-yield potential cultivars owing to higher biomass or harvest index. Compared with the normal-yield potential cultivars, the high-yield potential cultivars had shorter and wider flag leaves (length-to-width ratio lower than 10) and showed obvious increases of basal and open angles of the topmost three leaves from early anthesis to mid-filling stage. From anthesis to late-filling stage, SPAD values of the topmost three leaves and CAP values at 0 and 20 days after anthesis were significantly higher in the high-yield potential cultivars than in the normal-yield potential cultivars, with the largest difference of CAP between 10:00 and 12:00 hour. In addition, the high-yield potential cultivars showed higher biomass proportion of stem and sheath at anthesis and higher (1–4 percentage points) biomass proportion of grain at maturity than the normal-yield potential cultivars. Grain yield was closely related to morphological and physiological parameters in wheat. For example, grain yield was positively correlated with basal angles of flag leaf (r = 0.947, P < 0.01) and the second leaf from top (r = 0.963, P < 0.01) at grain-filling stage and negatively correlated with leaf length-to-width ratios of flag leaf (r = -0.913, P < 0.01) and the second leaf from top (r = -0.911, P < 0.01). Grain yield was also positively correlated (P < 0.01) with SPAD values of the topmost three leaves (r = 0.75, 0.90, and 0.82), but negatively correlated with the proportion of spike rachis at maturity (r = ?0.956, P < 0.01). Our results indicate that moderate plant height, compact plant type, high SPAD and CAP values after anthesis, and proper dry matter partitioning are important factors in high-yielding physiology of wheat.

Key words: Wheat, Canopy architecture, Canopy apparent photosynthesis, Dry matter partitioning, Grain yield

[1]Fischer R A. Wheat physiology: a review of recent developments. Crop Pasture Sci, 2011, 62: 95–114 [2]张法全, 王小燕, 于振文, 王西芝, 白洪立. 公顷产10000 kg小麦氮素和干物质积累与分配特性. 作物学报, 2009, 35: 1086?1096 Zhang F Q, Wang X Y, Yu Z W, Wang X Z, Bai H L. Characteristics of accumulation and distribution of nitrogen and dry matter in wheat at yield level of ten thousand kilograms per hectare. Acta Agrono Sin, 2009, 35: 1086–1096 (in Chinese with English abstract) [3]Jaradat A A. Modeling biomass allocation and grain yield in bread and durum wheat under abiotic stress. Aust J Crop Sci, 2009, 3: 237–248 [4]Madani A, Rad A S, Pazoki A, Nourmohammadi G, Zarghami R. Wheat (Triticum aestrivum) grain filling and dry matter partitioning responses to source: sink modifications under post anthesis water and nitrogen deficiency. Acta Sci Agron, 2010, 32: 145–151 [5]Tian Z W, Jing Q, Dai T B, Jiang D, Cao W X. Effects of genetic improvements on grain yield and agronomic traits of winter wheat in the Yangtze River Basin of China. Field Crops Res, 2011, 124: 417–425 [6]Xiao Y G, Qian ZG, Wu K, Liu J J, Xia X C, Ji W Q, He Z H. Genetic gains in grain yield and physiological traits of winter wheat in Shandong province, China, from 1969 to 2006. Crop Sci, 2012, 52: 44–56 [7]Miralles D J, Slafer G A. Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of near-isogenic wheat lines with different height. Euphytica, 1997, 97: 201–208 [8]雷振生, 林作揖. 黄淮麦区冬小麦合理株型结构研究. 华北农学报, 1994, 9(4): 27–32 Lei Z S, Lin Z J. Studies on ideotype characters of winter wheat in Huang-Huai wheat region. Acta Agric Boreal-Sin, 1994, 9(4): 27–32 (in Chinese with English abstract) [9]Hansen K A, Martin J M, Lanning S P, Talbert L E. Correlation of genotype for agronomic and physiological traits in space-planted versus densely seeded conditions. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 1023–1028 [10]Blake N K, Lanning S P, Martin J M, Sherman J D, Talbert L E. Relationship of flag characteristics to economically important traits in two spring wheat crosses. Crop Sci, 2007, 47: 491–496 [11]Araus J L, Reynolds M P, Acevedo E. Leaf posture, grain yield, growth, leaf structure, and carbon isotope discrimination in wheat. Crop Sci, 1993, 33: 1273–1279 [12]Zhao C J, Wang J H, Huang W J, Zhou Q F. Spectral indices sensitively discriminating wheat genotypes of different canopy architectures. Precis Agric, 2010, 11, 557–567 [13]Rajaram S, van Ginkel M. Yield potential debate: germplasm vs. methodology, or both. In: Reynolds M P, Rajaram S, McNab A, eds. Increasing Yield Potential in Wheat: Breaking the Barriers. Mexico D.F.: CIMMYT, 1996. pp 101–133 [14]Liu Y K, Li M J, Li J Y, Li X J, Yang X H, Tong Y P, Zhang A M, Li B, Lin J X, Kuang T Y, Li Z S . Dynamic changes in flag leaf angle contribute to high photosynthetic capacity. Chin Sci Bull, 2009, 54: 3045–3052 [15]Long S P, Zhu X G, Naidu S L, Ort D R. Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant Cell Environ, 2006, 29: 315–330 [16]魏燮中. 小麦株型结构分析法与消光系数分布的基因型间差异. 南京农业大学学报, 1987, (3): 21–28 Wei X Z. Plant type architecture analysis (PTAA) and the differences of K vertical distribution in canopy among wheat genotypes. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 1987, (3): 21–28 (in Chinese with English abstract) [17]Leihner D E, Guillermo O F. Improvement of durum wheat-plant type, yield potential, and adaptation. Euphytica, 1978, 27: 785–799 [18]Fischer R A. Understanding the physiological basis of yield potential in wheat. J Agric Sci, 2007, 2007, 145: 99–113 [19]Sharma-Natu P, Ghildiyal M C. Potential targets for improving photosynthesis and crop yield. Curr Sci India, 2005, 88: 1918–1928 [20]Evans L T, Dunstone R L. Some physiological aspects of evolution in wheat. Aust J Biol Sci, 1970, 23: 725–741 [21]Reynolds M P, Delgado B. M I, Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, Larqué-Saavedra A. Photosynthesis of wheat in warm, irrigated environment: I. Genetic diversity and crop productivity. Field Crop Res, 2000, 66: 37–50 [22]董树亭. 高产冬小麦群体光合能力与产量关系的研究. 作物学报, 1991, 17: 461–469 Dong S T. Studies on the relationship between canopy apparent photosynthesis and grain yield in high-yielding winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 1991, 17: 461–469 (in Chinese with English abstract) [23]Tang Y L, Rosewarne G M, Li C S, Wu X L, Yang W Y, Wu C. Physiological Factors Underpinning Grain Yield Improvements of Synthetic-Derived Wheat in Southwestern China. Crop Sci, 2015, 55: 98–112 [24]Hafsi M, Hadji A, Guendouz A, Maamari K. Relationship between flag leaf senescence and grain yield in durum wheat growth under drought conditions. J Agron, 2013, 12: 69–77 [25]Kumari M, Pudake R N, Singh V P, Joshi A K. Association of staygreen trait with canopy temperature depression and yield traits under terminal heat stress in wheat (Triticum aestrivum L.). Euphytica, 2013, 190: 87–97 [26]Foulkes M J, Slafer G A, Davies W J, Berry PM, Sylvester-Bradley R, Martre P, Callerini D F, Griffiths S, Reynolds M P. Raising yield potential of wheat: III. Optimizing partitioning to grain while maintaining lodging resistance. J Exp Bot, 2011, 62: 469–486 [27]Abbate P E, Andrade F H, Lázaro L, Bariffi J H, Berardocco H G, Inza V H, Marturano F. Grain yield increase in recent argentine wheat cultivars. Crop Sci, 1998, 38: 1203–1209 [28]Giunta F, Motzo R, Pruneddu G. Has long-term selection for yield in durum wheat also induced changes in leaf and canopy traits? Field Crops Res, 2008, 106: 68–76 [29]Acreche M M, Briceńo-Félix G, Sánchez J A M, Slafer G A. Physiological bases of genetic gains in Mediterranean bread wheat yield in Spain. Eur J Agron, 2008, 28: 162–170 [30]Austin, R B, Bingham J, Blackwell R D, Evans LT, Ford M A, Morgan C L, Taylor M. Genetic improvement in winter wheat yield since 1900 and associated physiological changes. J Agric Sci (Camb), 1980, 94: 675–689 [31]Zhou Y, Zhu H Z, Cai S B, He Z H, Zhang X K, Xia X C, Zhang G S. Genetic improvement of grain yield and associated traits in the southern China winter wheat region: 1949–2000. Euphitica, 2007, 157: 465–473 [32]Li J, Wan H S, Yang W Y. Synthetic hexaploid wheat enhances variation and adaptive evolution of bread wheat in breeding processes. J Syst Evol, 2014, 52: 735–742 [33]魏燮中, 吴兆苏. 小麦植株高度的结构分析. 南京农学院学报, 1983, (1): 14–21 Wei X Z, Wu Z S. Analysis of plant height and structure. J Nanjing Agric Coll, 1983, (1): 14–21 (in Chinese with English abstract) [34]Parry M A J, Reynolds M, Salvucci M E, Raines C, Andralojc P J, Zhu X G, Price G D, Condon A G, Furbank R T. Raising yield potential of wheat: II. Increasing photosynthetic capacity and efficiency. J Exp Bot, 2011, 62: 453–467 [35]Aliyev J A. Photosynthesis, photorespiration and productivity of wheat and soybean genotypes. Proc ANAS (Biol Sci), 2010, 65: 7–48 [36]胡延吉, 兰进好, 赵坦方, 高法振. 不同穗型的两个冬小麦品种冠层结构及光合特性的研究. 作物学报, 2000, 26: 905–912 Hu Y J, Lan J H, Zhao T F, Gao F Z. Canopy architecture and photosynthetic characteristics in two winter wheat cultivars with different spike type. Acta Agron Sin, 2000, 26: 905–912 (in Chinese with English abstract) [37]李朴芳, 程正国, 赵鸿, 张小丰, 李冀南, 王绍明, 熊友才. 旱地小麦理想株型研究进展. 生态学报, 2011, 31: 2631–2640 Li P F, Cheng Z G, Zhao H, Zhang X F, Li J N, Wang S M, Xiong Y C. Current progress in plant ideotype research of dry land wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Ecol Sin, 2011, 31: 2631–2640 (in Chinese with English abstract) [38]Yildirim M, Ko? M, Akinci C, Barut?ular C. Variations in morphological and physiological traits of bread wheat diallel crosses under timely and late sowing conditions. Field Crops Res, 2013, 140: 9–17 [39]Rees D, Ibarra L R, Acevedo E, Mujeeb-Kazi A, Villareal R L. Photosynthetic Characteristics of Synthetic Bread Wheats. Wheat Special Report No. 28. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT, 1994 [40]Reynolds M P, Pellegrineschi A, Skovmand B. Sink-limitation to yield and biomass: a summary of some investigations in spring wheat. Ann Appl Biol, 2005, 146: 39–49 [41]Berry P M, Sylvester-Bradley R, Berry S. Ideotype design for lodging-resistant wheat. Euphytica, 2007, 154: 165–179 [42]Underdahl J L, Mergoum M, Ransom J K, Schatz B G. Agronomic traits improvement and associations in hard red spring wheat cultivars released in North Dakota from 1968 to 2006. Crop Sci, 2008, 48: 158–166 [43]Tang Y L, Li C S, Yang W Y, Wu Y Q, Wu X L, Wu C, Ma X L, Li S Z, Rosewarne G M. Quality potential of synthetic-derived commercial wheat cultivars in southwestern China. Crop Pasture Sci, 2016, 67: 583–593

[1] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[2] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[3] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[4] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[5] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[6] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1Pod-D1Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[7] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[12] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[13] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[14] 刘宁, 樊平, 王成, 陈琪琪, 成庆悦, 铁夏娜, 汤菁莎, 刘彬彬, 谢鸿堃, 王嘉悦, 施园青, 马均. 减氮配施有机肥对机插稻产量形成与氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 866-880.
[15] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!