欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (03): 425-432.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

东乡普通野生稻全生育期抗旱性鉴定

胡标林;余守武;万勇;张铮;邱兵余;谢建坤*   

  1. 江西省水稻生理及遗传重点实验室/ 江西省农业科学院水稻研究所,江西南昌330200
  • 收稿日期:2006-05-22 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-03-12 网络出版日期:2007-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 谢建坤

Drought-resistance Identification of Dongxiang Common Wild Rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) in Whole Growth Period

HU Biao-Lin;YU Shou-Wu;WAN Yong;ZHANG Zheng;QIU Bing-Yu;<SPAN lang=EN-US style=   

  1. Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory for Rice Physiology and Genetics/ Institute of Rice Research, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang 330200, Jiangxi, China
  • Received:2006-05-22 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-03-12 Published online:2007-03-12
  • Contact: XIE Jian-Kun

摘要:

利用组合R974//东野/R974 BC1F5 BIL群体,设水分胁迫和非胁迫两种处理,在全生育期测定了株高、单株分蘖数、单株有效穗数、穗长、穗实粒数、穗总粒数、着粒密度、千粒重、结实率、单株产量、叶片相对含水量、卷叶级别等12个与抗旱相关的形态及生理性状,其中单株产量对水分胁迫影响最敏感。通过各性状旱、水相对值对抗旱系数分别进行单因素逐步回归、通径、灰色关联分析,结果表明,叶片相对含水量、单株分蘖数、穗实粒数、千粒重、株高、单株有效穗数等6个性状与水稻抗旱性相关显著,可作为全生育期抗旱鉴定指标。利用模糊隶属函数法对入选性状的抗旱D值进行抗旱性综合评价,更表明上述性状作为水稻全生育期的抗旱鉴定指标是可行的。同时对5种抗旱性评价方法进行比较指出,抗旱指数是最合适的抗旱性直接评价方法。

关键词: 东乡野生稻, 抗旱性, 抗旱指标, 全生育期

Abstract:

The drought and scarcity of water resource are more and more serious, and restrict agricultural development, specially rice production in China. Dongxiang common wild rice distributed in the most north region all over the world contains plentiful genetic diversity and excellent genes encoding drought resistance, cytoplasm male sterility (CMS), cold tolerance, fertility restoration, and so on. Screening drought resistance of dongxiang common wild rice is important for breeding rice with drought resistance and creating new drought resistance resource in current cultivated rice.
With the water stress and non-stress treatments designed, twelve morphological and physiological traits correlating with drought resistance were monitored in whole growth period for the back-cross inbred line population (R974//DongYe/R974) BC1F5, which were plant height (PH), tillers number per plant (TNP), effective tillers number per plant (ETNP), spikelets per panicle (SP), filled spikelets per panicle (FSP), length of panicle (LP), panicle density (PD), 1000-grain weight (TGW), seed setting rate (SR), grain weight per plant(GWP), leaf relative water content (LRWC), and level for rolling leaf (LRL). GWP is the most sensitive trait that is influenced by drought. Single variable stepwise regression, path analysis, gray correlative analysis, and multiple partial correlations analysis were conducted between the relative value of various traits and drought resistance coefficient. The results showed that six traits including LRWC, TNP, ETNP, TGW, PH, and ETNP significantly influenced the drought resistance and could be the indices to identify the drought resistance in rice. The D value of six traits elected was comprehensively used to evaluate the drought resistance by subordinate function values analysis, the results showed six index traits were feasible to predict the drought resistance in rice for whole growth stage. Four different drought resistance evaluated methods were compared, which indicated the drought resistance index is the best one for drought resistance direct evaluating.

Key words: Dongxiang wild rice, Drought resistance, Drought resistance index, Whole growth period

[1] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[2] 尹雨萌, 王雁楠, 康志河, 乔守晨, 卞倩倩, 李亚蔚, 曹郭郑, 赵国瑞, 徐丹丹, 杨育峰. 甘薯谷胱甘肽S-转移酶基因IbGSTU7的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1736-1746.
[3] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 李玉荣, 王瑾. 冀花系列高油酸花生抗旱性鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 797-811.
[4] 王语新, 陈天羽, 翟红, 张欢, 高少培, 何绍贞, 赵宁, 刘庆昌. 甘薯激酶基因IbHT1的克隆及抗旱性功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 301-311.
[5] 孙现军, 于太飞, 胡正, 申鑫萍, 戈文艺, 姜雪敏, 王世佳, 于思佳, 武书羽, 韩龙植, 张辉, 姜奇彦. 基于“标准差系数加权法”的水稻全生育期耐盐碱鉴定与资源筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3369-3376.
[6] 何梅, 张佳蕾, 范士凯, 孟静静, 王建国, 郭峰, 李新国, 万书波, 杨莎. 花生抗旱基因AhCPK8及其互作蛋白GAPDH的克隆及分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2713-2726.
[7] 刘波, 池明, 曹梦琦, 唐达, 杨恒照, 张卫华, 薛聪. 过表达马铃薯StuPPO9基因对烟草抗旱能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2237-2247.
[8] 范惠玲, 白生文, 路妍, 彭小星, 周仙莉, 张红岩, 滕长才, 武学霞, 刘玉皎. 155份蚕豆种质资源全生育期耐盐碱性鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(12): 3035-3045.
[9] 夏秀忠, 张宗琼, 农保选, 冯锐, 郭辉, 陈灿, 梁树辉, 荘洁, 廖祖宇, 宋国显, 杨行海, 李丹婷. 深水稻全生育期耐盐性状的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2493-2502.
[10] 朱旭东, 杨兰锋, 陈媛媛, 侯泽豪, 罗旖柔, 熊泽浩, 方正武. 甜荞FeSGT1基因克隆及抗旱功能解析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1573-1583.
[11] 孟雨, 田文仲, 温鹏飞, 丁志强, 张学品, 贺利, 段剑钊, 刘万代, 郭天财, 冯伟. 基于不同发育阶段协同的小麦品种抗旱性综合评判[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(2): 570-582.
[12] 周文期, 强晓霞, 李思雨, 王森, 卫万荣. 水稻卷叶等位突变体e202的鉴定和基因精细定位[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(11): 3029-3041.
[13] 沈庆庆, 王天菊, 王俊刚, 张树珍, 赵雪婷, 何丽莲, 李富生. 割手密转录因子SsWRKY1提高甘蔗品种抗旱能力的功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(10): 2654-2664.
[14] 王云奇, 高福莉, 李傲, 郭同济, 戚留冉, 曾寰宇, 赵建云, 王笑鸽, 高国英, 杨佳鹏, 白金泽, 马亚欢, 梁月馨, 张睿. 小麦花后穗部温度变化规律及其与产量的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(9): 2400-2408.
[15] 李佩婷, 赵振丽, 黄潮华, 黄国强, 徐良年, 邓祖湖, 张玉, 赵新旺. 基于转录组及WGCNA的甘蔗干旱响应调控网络分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(7): 1583-1600.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!