欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (08): 1233-1246.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.01233

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同高粱品种萌发期抗旱性筛选与鉴定

吴奇1,周宇飞1,高悦1,张姣1,陈冰嬬1,2,许文娟1,黄瑞冬1,*   

  1. 1沈阳农业大学农学院，辽宁沈阳110866；2吉林省农业科学院作物资源研究所，吉林公主岭130124
  • 收稿日期:2015-12-10 修回日期:2016-05-09 出版日期:2016-08-12 网络出版日期:2016-05-11
  • 通讯作者: 周宇飞, E-mail:zhouyufei2002@aliyun.com;黄瑞冬,E-mail: r_huang@126.com, Tel: 024-88487135
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-06-02-02)，辽宁省教育厅一般项目(L2014271)和沈阳农业大学博士后基金项目(139173)资助。

Screening and Identification for Drought Resistance during Germination in Sorghum Cultivars

WU Qi1,ZHOU Yu-Fei1,*,GAO Yue1,ZHANG Jiao1,CHEN Bing-Ru1,2,XU Wen-Juan1,HUANG Rui-Dong1,*   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang110866, China; 2 Institute of Crop Resources, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Gongzhuling 130124, China
  • Received:2015-12-10 Revised:2016-05-09 Published:2016-08-12 Published online:2016-05-11
  • Contact: 周宇飞, E-mail:zhouyufei2002@aliyun.com;黄瑞冬,E-mail: r_huang@126.com, Tel: 024-88487135
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-06-02-02), the General Fund of Department of Education of Liaoning Province(L2014271), and the Postdoctoral Fund of Shenyang Agricultural University (139173).

RichHTML

PDF

2858

被引次数

14

摘要：

萌发期是高粱表现抗旱性的关键阶段之一。选用54份高粱品种(组合)为供试材料，采用人工气候箱培养，以水势为–0.4MPa的PEG-6000水溶液模拟干旱胁迫环境，萌发10 d后测定发芽势、发芽率、萌发抗旱指数等8个萌发性状。基于主成分分析的综合因子得分函数能够对萌发期高粱品种的抗旱性综合评定，各品种(组合)综合因子得分(Y值)经聚类分析后，将54份高粱品种(组合)按萌发期抗旱性的强弱分为四大类，13218A×20982R是一个抗旱性极强的杂交组合，吉杂133等13个品种(组合)为抗旱品种(组合)，苏马克等23个品种为干旱敏感品种，辽杂35等17个品种为高度干旱敏感品种。萌发抗旱指数、发芽率和根长等性状可作为高粱品种萌发期抗旱性鉴定的主要指标。

关键词: 高粱, 萌发期, 抗旱性, 主成分分析, 聚类分析

Abstract:

Germination is a key stage showing drought resistance in sorghum. The present study was conducted to investigate the responses of 54 different sorghum cultivars (hybrid combinations) to drought stress during germination and screen sorghum cultivars suitable for growing in arid environment. PEG-6000 (–0.4 MPa) was used to simulate the typical drought stress environment in artificial climate chamber. Eight parameters including germination potential, germination rate, germination drought resistance index were measured. The results indicated that the comprehensive factor score functions were suitable for the comprehensive assessment of drought resistance during germination of sorghum cultivars based on principal component analysis (PCA). Based on comprehensive factor scores (Y-value), 54 sorghum cultivars (hybridized combinations) were clustered into four groups, in which 13218A×20982R was the highest drought resistant hybrid, 13 cultivars (hybridized combinations) were drought resistant, e.g. Jiza 133, 23 cultivars were drought sensitive, e.g. Sumac, and 17 cultivars were highly drought sensitive, e.g. Liaoza 35. Results of PCA showed that germination drought resistance index, germination rate and root length can be used to screen a large number of sorghum cultivars with drought resistance.

Key words: Sorghum, Germination, Drought resistance, Principal component analysis, Cluster analysis

[1]山仑, 邓西平, 康绍忠. 我国半干旱地区农业用水现状及发展方向. 水利学报, 2002, 33(9): 27–31
Shan L, Deng X P, Kang S Z. Current situation and perspective of agricultural water used in semiarid area of China. J Hydraulic Engin, 2002, 33(9): 27–31 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]朴英华, 何文安. 高粱抗旱性研究进展. 安徽农业科学, 2009, 36: 7910–7913
Piao Y H, He W A. Research advance in drought resistance of sorghum. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2009, 36: 7910–7913 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Francois L E, Donovan T, Maas E V. Salinity effects on seed yield, growth, and germination of grain sorghum. Agron J, 1984, 76: 741–744
[4]Hsiao T C, Fereres E, Acevedo E, Henderson D W. Water stress and dynamics of growth and yield of crop plants. In: Lange O L, Kappen L, Schulze E D, eds. Water and Plant Life. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1976. pp 281–305
[5]张锡梅, 徐勇. 谷子、糜子、高粱、玉米抗旱品种气孔扩散阻力、蒸腾速率、叶水势关系的研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 1987, (3): 80–85
Zhang X M, Xu Y. A study of relation of leaf water potential with resistance of stomic diffusion and evapotranspiration rate of millet, broom corn millet, sorghum and corn. Agric Res Arid Areas, 1987, (3): 80–85 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]山仑, 徐炳成. 论高粱的抗旱性及在旱区农业中的地位. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 2342–2348
Shan L, Xu B C. Discussion on drought resistance of sorghum and Its status in agriculture in arid and semiarid regions. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 2342–2348 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]Ennajeh M, Vadel A M, Cochard H, Khemira H. Comparative impacts of water stress on the leaf anatomy of a drought-resistant and a drought-sensitive olive cultivar. J Hort Sci Biotechnol, 2010, 85: 289
[8]Tuberosa R, Salvi S. Genomics-based approaches to improve drought tolerance of crops. Trends Plant Sci, 2006, 11: 405–412
[9]Arjenaki F G, Dehaghi M A, Jabbari R, Arjenaki M A. Effects of priming on seed germination of marigold (Calendula officinalis L.). Adv Environ Biol, 2011, 5: 276–280
[10]刘自刚, 沈冰, 张雁. 桔梗种子萌发对低温、干旱及互作胁迫的响应. 生态学报, 2013, 33: 2615–2622
Liu Z G, Shen B, Zhang Y. Morphological responses to temperature，drought stress and their interaction during seed germination of Platycodon grandiflorum. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33: 2615–2622 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]裴帅帅, 尹美强, 温银元, 黄明镜, 张彬, 郭平毅, 王玉国, 原向阳. 不同品种谷子种子萌发期对干旱胁迫的生理响应及其抗旱性评价. 核农学报, 2014, 28: 1897–1904
Pei S S, Yin M Q, Wen Y Y, Huang J M, Zhang B, Guo P Y, Wang Y G, Yuan X Y. Physiological response of foxtail millet to drought stress during seed germination and drought resistance evaluation. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2014, 28: 1897–1904 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]陈新, 宋高原, 张宗文, 吴斌. PEG-6000胁迫下裸燕麦萌发期抗旱性鉴定与评价. 植物遗传资源学报, 2014, 15: 1188–1195
Chen X, Song G Y, Zhang Z W, Wu B. Identification and evaluation of drought resistance of naked oat (Aveua nuda L.) under PEG-6000 stress at germination stage. J Plant Genet Resourc, 2014, 15: 1188–1195 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]孙璐, 周宇飞, 汪澈, 肖木辑, 陶冶, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬. 高粱品种萌发期耐盐性筛选与鉴定. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 1714–1722
Sun L, Zhou Y F. Wang C, Tao Y, Xu W J, Huang R D. Screening and identification of sorghum cultivars for salinity tolerance during germination. Sci AgricSin, 2012, 45(9): 1714–1722 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]李丰先, 周宇飞, 王艺陶, 孙璐, 白薇, 闫彤, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬. 高粱品种萌发期耐碱性筛选与综合鉴定. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46: 1762–1771
Li F X, Zhou Y F, Wang Y T, Sun L, Bai W, Yan T, Xu W J, Huang R D. Screening and identification of sorghum cultivars for alkali tolerance during germination. Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 46: 1762–1771 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Berkat O, Briske D D. Water potential evaluation of three germination substrates utilizing polyethylene glycol 20,000. Agron J, 1982, 74: 518–521
[16]张立军, 樊金娟, 阮燕晔, 关义新. 聚乙二醇在植物渗透胁迫生理研究中的应用. 植物生理学通讯, 2004, 40: 361–364
Zhang L J, Fan J J, Ruan Y Y, Guan Y X. Application of polyethylene glycol in the study of plant osmotic stress physiology. Plant Physiol Commun, 2004, 40: 361–364 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]赫福霞, 李柱刚, 阎秀峰, 王秀君. 渗透胁迫条件下玉米萌芽期抗旱性研究. 作物杂志, 2014, (5): 144–147
He F X, Li Z G, Yan X F, Wang X J. Effect of osmotic stress on drought resistance of maize at germination stage. Crops, 2014, (5): 144–147 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]杨子光, 张灿军, 冀天会, 孟丽梅, 郭军伟, 张坷. 小麦抗旱性鉴定方法及评价指标研究Ⅳ萌发期抗旱指标的比较研究. 中国农学通报, 2008, 23(12): 173–176
Yang Z G, Zhang C J, Ji T H, Meng M L, Guo J W, Zhang K. Study on resistance drought identify method and evaluation index of wheat IV the comparative study on resistance drought index of wheat in germination. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2008, 23(12): 173–176 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]敬礼恒, 陈光辉, 刘利成, 何姝. 水稻种子萌发期的抗旱性鉴定指标研究. 杂交水稻, 2014, 3: 26
Jing H L, Chen G H, Liu L C, He S. Studies on identification indices of drought resistance of rice in deed germination. Hybrid Rice, 2014, 3: 26 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]刘桂红, 王珏, 杜金哲, 管延安. 谷子萌芽期抗旱性鉴定研究. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(3): 86–91
Liu G H, Wang J, Du J Z, Guan Y A. Study on drought resistance of millet in seeding emergence stage. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2013, 29(3): 86–91 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]安永平, 强爱玲, 张媛媛, 张文银, 曹桂兰, 韩龙植. 渗透胁迫下水稻种子萌发特性及抗旱性鉴定指标研究. 植物遗传资源学报, 2006, 4: 421–426
An Y P, Qiang A L, Zhang Y Y, Zhang W Y, Han L Z. Study on characteristics of germination and drought-resistance index by osmotic stress in rice. J PlantGenet Resourc, 2006, (4): 421–426 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]徐蕊, 王启柏, 张春庆, 吴承来. 玉米自交系抗旱性评价指标体系的建立. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42: 72–84
Xu R, Wang Q B, Zhang C Q, Wu C L. Drought-resistance evaluation system of maize inbred. Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42: 72–84 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]齐华, 许晶, 孟显华, 王晓波, 刘明, 管宏军. 水分胁迫下燕麦萌芽期抗旱指标的研究. 种子, 2009, (7): 7–10
Qi H, Xu J, Meng X H, Wang X B, Liu M, Guan H J. Studies on the drought resistance index of oat at germination stage under water stress. Seed, 2009, (7): 7––10 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]石永红, 万里强, 刘建宁, 王运琦, 郭锐, 吴欣明, 李向林. 多年生黑麦草抗旱性主成分及隶属函数分析. 草地学报, 2010, 18: 669–672
Shi Y H, Wan L Q, Liu J N, Wang Y Q, Guo R, Wu X M, Li X L. Analysis of the principal components and the subordinate function of Lolium perenne drought resistance. Acta Agrest Sin, 2010, 18: 669–672 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]周宇飞, 王德权, 陆樟镳, 王娜, 王艺陶, 李丰先, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬. 干旱胁迫对持绿性高粱光合特性和内源激素ABA, CTK含量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 47: 655–663
Zhou Y F, Wang D Q, Lu Z B, Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and endogenous hormone ABA and CTK contents in green-stayed sorghum. Sci Agric Sin, 2013, 47: 655–663 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]周宇飞, 王德权, 陆樟镳, 王娜, 王艺陶, 李丰先, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬. 干旱胁迫对持绿性高粱叶片渗透调节及叶绿体超微结构的影响. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24: 22
Zhou Y F, Wang D Q, Lu Z B, Wang N, Wang Y T, Li F X, Xu W J, Huang R D. Impacts of drought stress on leaf osmotic adjustment and chloroplast ultrastructure of stay-green sorghum. Chin Appl Ecol, 2013, 24: 2545–2550 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27]邵艳军, 山仑, 李广敏. 干旱胁迫与复水条件下高粱, 玉米苗期渗透调节及抗氧化比较研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2006, 14: 68–70
Shao Y J, Shan L, Li G M. Comparison of osmotic regulation and antioxidation between sorghum and maize seedlings under soil drought stress and water recovering conditions. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2006, 14: 68–70 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]张美俊, 杨武德, 乔治军, 冯美臣, 王冠, 段云, 陈凌. 不同糜子品种萌发期对干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性评价. 草地学报, 2013, 21: 302–307
Zhang M J, Yang W D, Qiao Z J, Feng M C, Wang G, Duan Y, Chen L. Resistance evaluation and response of 16 millet varieties at germination stage to drought stress. Acta Agres Sin, 2013, 21: 302–307 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]伏兵哲, 兰剑, 李小伟, 高雪芹. PEG-6000 干旱胁迫对16个苜蓿品种种子萌发的影响. 种子, 2012, 31(4): 10–14
Fu B Z, Lan J, Li X W, Gao X Q. Effects of PEG-6000 drought stress on seed germination of 16 varieties of alfalfa. Seed, 2012, 31(4): 10–14 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]罗音, 王玉军, 谢胜利, 赵新西, 杨兴洪, 王玮. 等渗水分与盐分胁迫对烟草种子萌发的影响及外源甜菜碱的保护作用. 作物学报, 2005, 31: 1029–1034
Luo Y, Wang Y J, Xie S L, Zhao X X, Yang, X H, Wang W. Effects of isotonic water and salt stress on seed germination of tobacco and protective function of exogenous glycine betaine. Acta Agron Sin, 2005, 31: 1029–1034 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]张玉梅, 林琪, 姜雯, 张延胜, 李忠. 渗透胁迫条件下不同抗旱性小麦品种萌发期生理生化指标的变化. 麦类作物学报, 2006, 26(6): 125–130
Zhang Y M, Lin Q, Jiang W, Zhang Y S, Li Z. Effect of osmotic stress on physiological and biochemical indices at germination Stage of different drought-resistant wheat. J Triticeae Crops, 2006, 26(6): 125–130 (in Chinese with English abstract)
 
[1] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[2] 黄丽霞, 张卫卫, 甄一越, 王秋宝, 田洪岭, 李国栋, 刘龙龙, 张丽君. 盐胁迫下苦荞萌发期耐盐碱性评价及种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 459-479.
[3] 王菲菲, 张胜忠, 杨贵华, 苗华荣, 胡晓辉, 张则林, 刘莎莎, 乔利仙, 单世华, 陈静. 331份花生种质苗期耐盐性综合评价和强耐盐种质鉴选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 279-294.
[4] 付江鹏, 柳发财, 闫宝琴, 王永栋, 李利利, 魏玮, 周英霞. 控释肥替代普通尿素对旱作高粱干物质积累分配、产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2501-2513.
[5] 尹丽娜, 张锐, 陈国欢, 白磊, 李俊, 郭华春, 杨芳. 不同马铃薯品种块茎创伤愈合能力的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2399-2411.
[6] 文璇, 钟秀丽, 王尚文, 金涛, 彭君, 刘恩科. 基于耐性指数的青稞苗期耐低氮种质筛选及不同氮效率类型综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1949-1958.
[7] 尹雨萌, 王雁楠, 康志河, 乔守晨, 卞倩倩, 李亚蔚, 曹郭郑, 赵国瑞, 徐丹丹, 杨育峰. 甘薯谷胱甘肽S-转移酶基因IbGSTU7的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1736-1746.
[8] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 李玉荣, 王瑾. 冀花系列高油酸花生抗旱性鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 797-811.
[9] 蒋优, 马雪融, 张博, 李陈建. 苏丹草种子萌发期耐盐性评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 835-844.
[10] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 张立异. 中国高粱株高和节间数全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 568-585.
[11] 王语新, 陈天羽, 翟红, 张欢, 高少培, 何绍贞, 赵宁, 刘庆昌. 甘薯激酶基因IbHT1的克隆及抗旱性功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 301-311.
[12] 何梅, 张佳蕾, 范士凯, 孟静静, 王建国, 郭峰, 李新国, 万书波, 杨莎. 花生抗旱基因AhCPK8及其互作蛋白GAPDH的克隆及分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2713-2726.
[13] 陈昊翔, 万鑫杰, 陈青, 王劲松, 董二伟, 王媛, 黄晓磊, 刘秋霞, 焦晓燕. 石灰性褐土条件下高粱与玉米耐瘠薄特性及对土壤肥力响应的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(10): 2775-2787.
[14] 聂波涛, 刘德泉, 陈健, 崔正果, 侯云龙, 陈亮, 邱红梅, 王跃强. 北方春大豆品种农艺和品质性状分析与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2248-2266.
[15] 闫锋, 董扬, 李清泉, 赵富阳, 侯晓敏, 刘洋, 李青超, 赵蕾, 范国权, 刘凯. 谷子育成品种萌芽期耐冷性综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2207-2218.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2