欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (05): 799-804.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

遗传搭车与方差分析在水稻定向选择群体的抗旱性位点分析中的初步应用

郑天清1;徐建龙2;傅彬英2;高用明2;Satish Veruka3;Renee Lafitte3;翟虎渠2;万建民1,2;黎志康2,3,*   

  1. 1 南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室,江苏省植物基因工程研究中心,江苏南京210095;2 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081;3 国际水稻研究所,DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
  • 收稿日期:2006-04-07 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-05-12 网络出版日期:2007-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 黎志康

Application of Genetic Hitch-Hiking and ANOVA in Identification of Loci for Drought Tolerance in Populations of Rice from Directional Selection

ZHENG Tian-Qing1,XU Jian-Long2,FU Bing-Ying2,GAO Yong-Ming2,Satish VERUKA3,Renee LAFITTE3,ZHAI Hu-Qu2,WAN Jian-Min12,LI Zhi-Kang23*   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University,Research Center of Plant Gene Engineering, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu; 2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 3 International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box 7777, Metro Manila, Philippines
  • Received:2006-04-07 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-05-12 Published online:2007-05-12
  • Contact: LI Zhi-Kang

摘要:

水稻抗旱性属于复杂性状,近年的遗传研究日益关注胁迫下的产量相关位点。选用来自同一抗旱性较好的供体亲本(BG300),具有两种遗传背景(IR64和特青)和两种选择条件(低地和旱地)的4个水稻高代回交(BC2)抗旱性定向选择导入系群体。通过SSR分子标记,检测群体中供体等位基因的导入频率,分析了选择条件和遗传背景对供体等位基因导入频率的影响。在此基础上,利用基于遗传搭车原理的卡方检验对等位基因导入频率的偏离进行检测,同时结合表型-基因型方差分析(ANOVA)的方法,对上述群体进行了和抗旱性相关位点的QTL分析。共检测到显著位点24个,其中卡方检验发现20个,方差分析检测到8个。有4个被这两种方法都检测到,很可能是与胁迫下的产量直接相关的位点。同时也对非胁迫下的产量位点进行了检测,发现上述抗旱性位点与非胁迫下产量的关系不大。还就选择条件和遗传背景的效应等对目标性状QTL定位的影响进行了讨论。研究结果将为进一步的水稻抗旱性分子育种研究提供有用的信息和材料。

关键词: 水稻, 干旱, 产量, 遗传搭车效应, 方差分析

Abstract:

Drought tolerance (DT) in rice is a complicated trait. Recent genetic research has focused on yield under stress instead of physiological traits. Due to the limits from the huge labors required for both phenotyping and genotyping in traditional mapping work, progress in DT-QTL mapping is relatively slow. An attempt to identify DT-QTL based on genetic hitch-hiking theory in breeding population was described in this paper. With the combination of advanced backcrossing and artificial directional selection for yield under drought stresses of both rain-fed lowland (stress at the reproductive stage) and upland (stress through the whole life time), four sets of 43 introgression lines (ILs) with two relatively uniform genetic backgrounds (IR64 and Teqing) and the same donor of relatively good drought tolerances (BG300) were developed. Introgression of donor alleles in the DT ILs were characterized with 214 well distributed SSR markers representing 98 bins throughout the whole genome. A total of twenty-four significant loci (DT-QTL) were found, of which 20 belonged to allelic-frequency-deviation loci detected by chi-square test at the significant level of P<0.005 and 8 were detected by analysis of variances (ANOVA) with data from progeny test in replicated experiments at the significant level of P<0.01, respectively. Of the 20 loci detected by chi-square test, four (about 20%) were verified by ANOVA and supposed to be directly associated with yield under drought stress. The analysis for yield under irrigation for the same populations was also carried out; few overlap with the DT-QTL was found. The above DT-QTL as well as the DT ILs supposed to offer useful information and materials for the further rice DT molecular breeding. The genetic overlaps between the different selections and the effects of genetic backgrounds were discussed.

Key words: Rice (Oryza sativa L.), Drought, Yield, Genetic hitch-hiking, ANOVA

[1] 陈松余, 丁一娟, 孙峻溟, 黄登文, 杨楠, 代雨涵, 万华方, 钱伟. 甘蓝型油菜BnCNGC基因家族鉴定及其在核盘菌侵染和PEG处理下的表达特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1357-1371.
[2] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[3] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[4] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[5] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[6] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[7] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[8] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[9] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[10] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[11] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[12] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[13] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[14] 李阿立, 冯雅楠, 李萍, 张东升, 宗毓铮, 林文, 郝兴宇. 大豆叶片响应CO2浓度升高、干旱及其交互作用的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1103-1118.
[15] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!