欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2006, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (08): 1121-1129.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

籼稻品种的氮素累积量与根系性状的关系

张岳芳;王余龙;张传胜;董桂春;杨连新;黄建晔;龙银成   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室,江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2005-06-30 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-08-12 网络出版日期:2006-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 王余龙

Relationship between N Accumulation and Root Traits in Conventional Indica Rice Varieties (Oryza sativa L.)

ZHANG Yue-Fang,WANG Yu-Long,ZHANG Chuan-Sheng,DONG Gui-Chun,YANG Lian-Xin,HUANG Jian-Ye,LONG Yin-Cheng   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2005-06-30 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2006-08-12 Published online:2006-08-12
  • Contact: WANG Yu-Long

摘要:

2001和2002年,在群体水培条件下,分别以国内外不同年代育成的籼稻代表品种88个和122个为材料,测定植株的干物重、全氮含量以及13个有关根系性状,采用组内最小平方和的动态聚类方法对供试籼稻品种成熟期的氮素累积量进行聚类,分析不同氮素累积量类型籼稻品种根系有关性状的差异以及影响籼稻品种氮素累积量的主要根系性状。结果表明:(1) 供试籼稻品种成熟期氮素累积量差异很大,2001年A、B、C、D、E、F类籼稻品种的氮素累积量分别为10.40、13.47、16.17、18.50、20.72、25.13 g·m-2,2002年分别为8.53、12.44、15.80、19.87、25.15、33.31 g·m-2,类型间的差异均达显著水平;(2)全生育期天数和每日氮素吸收量对品种成熟期氮素累积量均有显著影响(R2 = 0.960~0.996),并且后者显著大于前者;(3)成熟期氮素累积量与单株不定根数、单株根干重、单株不定根总长、单株根系总吸收面积、单株根系活跃吸收面积、单株根系α-NA氧化量等全株根系性状关系密切,与单条不定根长、单条不定根粗、单条不定根重等单条不定根性状和单位干重根系总吸收面积、单位干重根系活跃吸收面积等单位干重根系活性指标关系不密切;(4)多元逐步回归分析表明,单株根干重、冠根比、单株不定根数和单株不定根总长是影响籼稻品种氮素累积量的主要根系性状(R2=0.429~0.591)。

关键词: 籼型水稻, 品种, 氮素累积量, 根系形态性状, 根系活性

Abstract:

It is important in the long term to explore and exploit the potential of plant traits contributing to the nitrogen (N) absorption efficiency of rice. Root is primary organ for rice to explore and utilize N nutrient. However, little knowledge is known about the relationship between N accumulation and rice root traits. A solution culture experiment was conducted in 2001 and 2002, using eighty eight and one hundred and twenty two conventional indica rice varieties, respectively. A total of 13 traits responsible for morphology and physiological activity of rice roots was measured at heading stage while dry matter accumulation and N accumulation were determined both at heading and maturity. The tested rice varieties were classified into 6 types based on their N accumulation at maturity by the MinSSw method, and the differences of root traits between the types were analyzed to investigate the main root traits that significantly affected the N accumulation level. The average N accumulation of different types of rice varieties varied significantly, from 10.40 to 25.13 g·m-2 in 2001, and from 8.53 to 33.31 g·m-2 in 2002, respectively. Both whole growth duration and N uptake per day significantly affected N accumulation at maturity with the determinant coefficient ranged from 0.960 to 0.996, and the latter was more important than the former. N accumulation was closely correlated to number of adventitious roots per plant, root dry weight per plant, total length of adventitious roots per plant, total root absorption area per plant, root active absorption area per plant and total α-NA oxidizing amount of roots per plant, other than the traits for single adventitious root or root activity per unit dry weight. Polynomial stepwise regression analysis showed that N accumulation at maturity was significantly influenced by root dry weight per plant, ratio of shoot to root, number of adventitious roots per plant and total length of adventitious roots per plant (R2=0.429-0.591). Morphological and physiological evidence in this study provided some prospects for improvement of root traits to improve N accumulation in indica rice.

Key words: Indica rice, Varieties, N accumulation, Root morphological and physiological traits

中图分类号: 

  • S511
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[3] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[4] 闫岩, 张钰石, 刘础荣, 任丹阳, 刘洪润, 刘雪晴, 张明才, 李召虎. 冬小麦-夏玉米轮作“双晚”种植模式下的品种匹配与资源效率[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 423-436.
[5] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[6] 傅华英, 张婷, 彭文静, 段瑶瑶, 许哲昕, 林艺华, 高三基. 甘蔗新品种(系)苗期白条病人工接种抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1531-1539.
[7] 习玲, 王昱琦, 朱微, 王益, 陈国跃, 蒲宗君, 周永红, 康厚扬. 78份四川小麦育成品种(系)条锈病抗性鉴定与抗条锈病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1309-1323.
[8] 董明辉, 陈培峰, 江贻, 曹鹏辉, 宋云生, 顾俊荣, 谢裕林, 乔中英, 张文地, 黄丽芬. 江苏太湖地区不同生育类型粳稻品种产量对不同播期气候因子的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 952-963.
[9] 许乃银, 赵素琴, 张芳, 付小琼, 杨晓妮, 乔银桃, 孙世贤. 基于GYT双标图对西北内陆棉区国审棉花品种的分类评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 660-671.
[10] 董玉新, 韦炳奇, 吴强, 张永平. 内蒙古平原灌区“春麦冬播”种植效应及品种适应性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 481-493.
[11] 雷永, 王志慧, 淮东欣, 高华援, 晏立英, 李建国, 李威涛, 陈玉宁, 康彦平, 刘海龙, 王欣, 薛晓梦, 姜慧芳, 廖伯寿. 花生籽仁蔗糖含量近红外模型构建及在高糖品种培育中的应用[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 332-341.
[12] 张荣跃, 王晓燕, 杨昆, 单红丽, 仓晓燕, 李婕, 王长秘, 尹炯, 罗志明, 李文凤, 黄应昆. 甘蔗新品种及主栽品种对褐锈病抗性与Bru1基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 376-382.
[13] 刘少荣, 杨扬, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 康定明, 范亚明, 任洁, 江彬, 葛建镕, 成广雷, 王凤格. 基于农艺及品质性状与SSR标记的青贮玉米品种遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2362-2370.
[14] 吕国锋, 别同德, 王慧, 赵仁慧, 范金平, 张伯桥, 吴素兰, 王玲, 汪尊杰, 高德荣. 长江下游麦区新育成品种(系) 3种主要病害的抗性鉴定及抗病基因/ QTL的分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2335-2347.
[15] 仓晓燕, 夏红明, 李文凤, 王晓燕, 单红丽, 王长秘, 李婕, 张荣跃, 黄应昆. 甘蔗优良品种(系)对黑穗病的抗性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2290-2296.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!