欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 1840-1844.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦籽粒灌浆过程中淀粉去分支酶的类型、活性及其纯化

王云飞1;赵法茂2;李天骄1;鞠倩1;王宪泽1,*   

  1. 1 山东农业大学国家作物生物学重点实验室;2 泰山学院生物系,山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2007-01-18 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-11-12 网络出版日期:2007-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 王宪泽

Type, Activity, and Purification of Starch-Debranching Enzymes during Grain Filling Period in Wheat

WANG Yun-Fei1,ZHAO Fa-Mao2,LI Tian-Jiao1,JU Qian1,WANG Xian-Ze1*   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University; 2 Department of Biology, Taishan College, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
  • Received:2007-01-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-11-12 Published online:2007-11-12
  • Contact: WANG Xian-Ze

摘要:

以小麦品种鲁麦21和烟优361(低支链淀粉含量)、鲁麦1号和济宁13(中支链淀粉含量)、济南16和糯麦2号(高支链淀粉含量)为材料,采用分光光度、聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳和高效液相色谱法,对小麦籽粒灌浆成熟过程中异淀粉酶和极限糊精酶的活性变化、类型特征及酶解产物进行了分析,并利用硫酸铵沉淀、葡聚糖凝胶层析(G-100)和阴离子交换柱层析(DEAE)分别对两种淀粉去分支酶进行了分离纯化。结果表明,两种淀粉去分支酶均存在于淀粉合成过程中;在灌浆成熟过程中,6个品种的两种淀粉去分支酶活性都在15 d左右达最高值,且异淀粉酶活性呈单峰曲线,而极限糊精酶活性呈波浪形曲线,在25 d左右又出现另一峰值;纯化后的异淀粉酶和极限糊精酶分子量分别为83和100 kD。高效液相色谱图谱表明,以支链淀粉为底物时生成葡萄糖和糊精,以普鲁蓝为底物时只生成麦芽三糖。

关键词: 小麦, 淀粉去分支酶, 异淀粉酶, 极限糊精酶

Abstract:

Amylopectin is a major constituent of starch in plant tissues, physical and chemical analysis of granular starch have led to a widely accepted model for amylopectin structure called “cluster model”, in which amorphous and crystalline regions alternate with a defined periodicity. Within amylopectin the crystalline component is composed of parallel arrays of linear chains packed tightly in double helices. Branch linkages, which account for approximate 5% of the glucosyl linkages in amylopectin, are located at the root of each cluster in the amorphous region. This periodic clustering of branches allows for the alignment of the intervening linear chains and their dense packing into crystalline regions, thus providing an efficient mechanism for nutrient storage. Biochemical analysis of su-1 mutants of maize (Zea mays L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) endosperm indicate that debranching enzymes (DBE) are proposed to play an essential role in the final determination of amylopectin structure. The precise way in which debranching enzymes involved in amylopectin synthesis is difficult to assess because of the lack of information about the occurrence and nature of these enzymes in starch-synthesizing organs and relatively little is known about these enzymes in higher plants. To provide more information about the occurrence and possible role of debranching enzymes in starch synthesis, six wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars corresponding to Lumai 21 and Yanyou 361 (low amylopectin), Lumai 1 and Jining 13 (medium amylopectin), and Jinan16 and Nuomai 2 (high amylopectin) were used in the present study. Activity changes, activity difference and types of DBE were studied during grain filling period by using spectrophotometer, native-PAGE and HPLC. The DBEs were also purified by salting out with ammonium sulphate, DEAE-cellulose column chromatograthy, and gel filtration using sephadex G-100. The results showed that two types of DBE were identified during starch synthesis and they all reached the highest activity at the 15th day after anthesis, the activity changes of isoamylase appeared as a single-peak curve, but those of pullulanase appeared as an undulatory curve, with another high activity around the 25th day after flowering. The molecular weights of isoamylase and pullulanase were determined to be 83 and 100 kD by SDS-PAGE respectively. HPLC analysis showed that activities of starch debranching enzymes to amylopectin and pullulan were similar among the six wheat cultivars. Glucose and dextrin were identified as the major hydrolysis products of amylopectin by isoamylase and maltotriose was identified as a major hydrolysis product of pullulan by pullulanase.

Key words: Wheat, Starch Debranching-enzyme, Isoamylase, Pullulanase

[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[5] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[6] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[7] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[8] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[9] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
[12] 尚云秋, 赵竹, 陈欢, 丁永刚, 乔玉强, 李玮, 张向前, 曹承富, 杜世州. 长期定位耕作方式对雨养小麦籽粒灌浆和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1236-1250.
[13] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[14] 李灿, 张喜伟, 朱博涛, 张沛沛. 小麦GSK激酶TaSK41的功能分析及互作蛋白的筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 677-687.
[15] 侯洁, 付朵朵, 武海峰, 郝宇琼, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 周凯, 李晓华, 郑军, 赵佳佳. 山西省小麦地方品种的染色体多样性及遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 746-763.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!