欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 1840-1844.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

小麦籽粒灌浆过程中淀粉去分支酶的类型、活性及其纯化

王云飞1;赵法茂2;李天骄1;鞠倩1;王宪泽1,*   

  1. 1 山东农业大学国家作物生物学重点实验室;2 泰山学院生物系,山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2007-01-18 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-11-12 网络出版日期:2007-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 王宪泽

Type, Activity, and Purification of Starch-Debranching Enzymes during Grain Filling Period in Wheat

WANG Yun-Fei1,ZHAO Fa-Mao2,LI Tian-Jiao1,JU Qian1,WANG Xian-Ze1*   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University; 2 Department of Biology, Taishan College, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
  • Received:2007-01-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-11-12 Published online:2007-11-12
  • Contact: WANG Xian-Ze

摘要:

以小麦品种鲁麦21和烟优361(低支链淀粉含量)、鲁麦1号和济宁13(中支链淀粉含量)、济南16和糯麦2号(高支链淀粉含量)为材料,采用分光光度、聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳和高效液相色谱法,对小麦籽粒灌浆成熟过程中异淀粉酶和极限糊精酶的活性变化、类型特征及酶解产物进行了分析,并利用硫酸铵沉淀、葡聚糖凝胶层析(G-100)和阴离子交换柱层析(DEAE)分别对两种淀粉去分支酶进行了分离纯化。结果表明,两种淀粉去分支酶均存在于淀粉合成过程中;在灌浆成熟过程中,6个品种的两种淀粉去分支酶活性都在15 d左右达最高值,且异淀粉酶活性呈单峰曲线,而极限糊精酶活性呈波浪形曲线,在25 d左右又出现另一峰值;纯化后的异淀粉酶和极限糊精酶分子量分别为83和100 kD。高效液相色谱图谱表明,以支链淀粉为底物时生成葡萄糖和糊精,以普鲁蓝为底物时只生成麦芽三糖。

关键词: 小麦, 淀粉去分支酶, 异淀粉酶, 极限糊精酶

Abstract:

Amylopectin is a major constituent of starch in plant tissues, physical and chemical analysis of granular starch have led to a widely accepted model for amylopectin structure called “cluster model”, in which amorphous and crystalline regions alternate with a defined periodicity. Within amylopectin the crystalline component is composed of parallel arrays of linear chains packed tightly in double helices. Branch linkages, which account for approximate 5% of the glucosyl linkages in amylopectin, are located at the root of each cluster in the amorphous region. This periodic clustering of branches allows for the alignment of the intervening linear chains and their dense packing into crystalline regions, thus providing an efficient mechanism for nutrient storage. Biochemical analysis of su-1 mutants of maize (Zea mays L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) endosperm indicate that debranching enzymes (DBE) are proposed to play an essential role in the final determination of amylopectin structure. The precise way in which debranching enzymes involved in amylopectin synthesis is difficult to assess because of the lack of information about the occurrence and nature of these enzymes in starch-synthesizing organs and relatively little is known about these enzymes in higher plants. To provide more information about the occurrence and possible role of debranching enzymes in starch synthesis, six wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars corresponding to Lumai 21 and Yanyou 361 (low amylopectin), Lumai 1 and Jining 13 (medium amylopectin), and Jinan16 and Nuomai 2 (high amylopectin) were used in the present study. Activity changes, activity difference and types of DBE were studied during grain filling period by using spectrophotometer, native-PAGE and HPLC. The DBEs were also purified by salting out with ammonium sulphate, DEAE-cellulose column chromatograthy, and gel filtration using sephadex G-100. The results showed that two types of DBE were identified during starch synthesis and they all reached the highest activity at the 15th day after anthesis, the activity changes of isoamylase appeared as a single-peak curve, but those of pullulanase appeared as an undulatory curve, with another high activity around the 25th day after flowering. The molecular weights of isoamylase and pullulanase were determined to be 83 and 100 kD by SDS-PAGE respectively. HPLC analysis showed that activities of starch debranching enzymes to amylopectin and pullulan were similar among the six wheat cultivars. Glucose and dextrin were identified as the major hydrolysis products of amylopectin by isoamylase and maltotriose was identified as a major hydrolysis product of pullulan by pullulanase.

Key words: Wheat, Starch Debranching-enzyme, Isoamylase, Pullulanase

[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[3] 付美玉, 熊宏春, 周春云, 郭会君, 谢永盾, 赵林姝, 古佳玉, 赵世荣, 丁玉萍, 徐延浩, 刘录祥. 小麦矮秆突变体je0098的遗传分析与其矮秆基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 580-589.
[4] 冯健超, 许倍铭, 江薛丽, 胡海洲, 马英, 王晨阳, 王永华, 马冬云. 小麦籽粒不同层次酚类物质与抗氧化活性差异及氮肥调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 704-715.
[5] 刘运景, 郑飞娜, 张秀, 初金鹏, 于海涛, 代兴龙, 贺明荣. 宽幅播种对强筋小麦籽粒产量、品质和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 716-725.
[6] 马红勃, 刘东涛, 冯国华, 王静, 朱雪成, 张会云, 刘静, 刘立伟, 易媛. 黄淮麦区Fhb1基因的育种应用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 747-758.
[7] 王洋洋, 贺利, 任德超, 段剑钊, 胡新, 刘万代, 郭天财, 王永华, 冯伟. 基于主成分-聚类分析的不同水分冬小麦晚霜冻害评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 448-462.
[8] 陈新宜, 宋宇航, 张孟寒, 李小艳, 李华, 汪月霞, 齐学礼. 干旱对不同品种小麦幼苗的生理生化胁迫以及外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸的缓解作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 478-487.
[9] 徐龙龙, 殷文, 胡发龙, 范虹, 樊志龙, 赵财, 于爱忠, 柴强. 水氮减量对地膜玉米免耕轮作小麦主要光合生理参数的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 437-447.
[10] 马博闻, 李庆, 蔡剑, 周琴, 黄梅, 戴廷波, 王笑, 姜东. 花前渍水锻炼调控花后小麦耐渍性的生理机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 151-164.
[11] 孟颖, 邢蕾蕾, 曹晓红, 郭光艳, 柴建芳, 秘彩莉. 小麦Ta4CL1基因的克隆及其在促进转基因拟南芥生长和木质素沉积中的功能[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 63-75.
[12] 韦一昊, 于美琴, 张晓娇, 王露露, 张志勇, 马新明, 李会强, 王小纯. 小麦谷氨酰胺合成酶基因可变剪接分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 40-47.
[13] 李玲红, 张哲, 陈永明, 尤明山, 倪中福, 邢界文. 普通小麦颖壳蜡质缺失突变体glossy1的转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 48-62.
[14] 罗江陶, 郑建敏, 蒲宗君, 范超兰, 刘登才, 郝明. 四倍体小麦与六倍体小麦杂种的染色体遗传特性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1427-1436.
[15] 王艳朋, 凌磊, 张文睿, 王丹, 郭长虹. 小麦B-box基因家族全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1437-1449.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!