欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2005, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 1344-1348.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同类型饲用作物营养成分的比较研究

张晓艳;董树亭;王空军;张吉旺;刘鹏   

  1. 山东农业大学农学院，山东泰安271018
  • 收稿日期:2004-07-29 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-10-12 网络出版日期:2005-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 董树亭

Comparison of Nutritive Composition in Different Types of Forage Crops

ZHANG Xiao-Yan;DONG Shu-Ting;WANG Kong-Jun;ZHANG Ji-Wang;LIU Peng   

  1. Agronomy College, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
  • Received:2004-07-29 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2005-10-12 Published online:2005-10-12
  • Contact: DONG Shu-Ting

PDF

875

被引次数

28

摘要：

对3种类型饲用作物杂交苏丹草皖草2号、墨西哥玉米和粮饲兼用玉米农大108进行了比较。结果表明，鲜、干物质产量以皖草2号最高，墨西哥玉米其次，农大108最低。皖草2号和墨西哥玉米叶片是干物质产量构成的主体，对农大108茎秆是主体。皖草2号粗蛋白(CP)、无氮浸出物(NFE)、酸性洗涤纤维(AWF)、粗脂肪(EE)、粗灰分(CA) 5大养分产量均显著高于墨西哥玉米和农大108，其粗蛋白和粗灰分含量均低于墨西哥玉米高于农大108。皖草2号总能量(GE)极显著高于墨西哥玉米和农大108，分别高出1 448.024×106 J·hm-2和2 339.687×106 J·hm-2。农大108干物质和粗蛋白降解率最高，分别为57.880%和12.424%。墨西哥玉米粗纤维的降解率显著高于皖草2号，但它们的干物质和粗蛋白降解率差异不显著。3种类型饲用作物营养价值差异来自其生物学特性的显著差异。

关键词: 饲用作物, 类型, 营养成分, 比较

Abstract:

Three kinds of forage crop, Sudan Grass—Wancao2, Euchlaena perennis Hitchc. and ND108 which is also used as food were used to compare the nutritive composition. Both fresh matter yield and dry matter yield of Wancao2 was the highest, that of E. perennis the median, and ND108 the lowest relatively. Main component of dry weight was leaves in Wancao2 and E. perennis, while stems in ND108. The yields of crude protein(CP), nitrogen-free extract(NFE), acid-washed fiber (AWF), ether extract (EE) and crude ashes (CA) were higher in Wancao2 than in E. perennis and ND108 significantly, however, the content of CP and CA was the highest in E. perennis and the lowest in ND108. In addition, the total energy (GE) of Wancao2 was 1 448.024×106 J·hm-2 and 2 339.687×106 J·hm-2 higher than that of E. perennis and ND108, respectively. The degradation rate of dry matter and CP were the highest in ND108, which was 57.880% and 12.424%. The degradation rate of crude fiber was higher in E. perennis than in Wancao2. The differences of degradation rate of CP and dry matter between E. perennis and Wancao2 are not significant. In conclusion, the difference of nutrition among the three kinds of forage crops results from their different biological characteristics.

Key words: Forage crop, Type, Nutritive composition, Comparison

中图分类号: 

  • S544
[1] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[2] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[3] 刘丹, 周彩娥, 王晓婷, 吴启蒙, 张旭, 王琪琳, 曾庆东, 康振生, 韩德俊, 吴建辉. 利用集群分离分析结合高密度芯片快速定位小麦成株期抗条锈病基因YrC271[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 553-564.
[4] 董明辉, 陈培峰, 江贻, 曹鹏辉, 宋云生, 顾俊荣, 谢裕林, 乔中英, 张文地, 黄丽芬. 江苏太湖地区不同生育类型粳稻品种产量对不同播期气候因子的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 952-963.
[5] 杨阳, 李淮琳, 胡利民, 范楚川, 周永明. 白菜型油菜srb多室性状的遗传分析与分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 385-393.
[6] 张久权, 闫慧峰, 褚继登, 李彩斌. 运用广义线性混合模型分析随机区组重复测量的试验资料[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 294-304.
[7] 王荣焕, 徐田军, 陈传永, 王元东, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘秀芝, 赵久然. 不同熟期类型玉米品种籽粒灌浆和脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 149-158.
[8] 李继洋,胡燕,姚瑞,代培红,刘晓东. 基于优化sgRNA系统提高海岛棉CRISPR/Cas9基因组编辑功效的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(10): 1522-1534.
[9] 李璐璐,明博,谢瑞芝,王克如,侯鹏,李少昆. 黄淮海夏玉米品种脱水类型与机械粒收时间的确立[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(12): 1764-1773.
[10] 薛志飞, 王夏, 李付鹏, 马朝芝. 甘蓝型油菜BnGS3和BnGhd7的同源克隆及其与油菜产量相关性状的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(02): 297-305.
[11] 苗永杰, 阎俊, 赵德辉, 田宇兵, 闫俊良, 夏先春, 张勇, 何中虎. 黄淮麦区小麦主栽品种粒重与籽粒灌浆特性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(02): 260-267.
[12] 魏海燕,李宏亮,程金秋,张洪程*,戴其根,霍中洋,许轲,郭保卫,胡雅杰,崔培媛. 缓释肥类型与运筹对不同穗型水稻产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(05): 730-740.
[13] 韦还和，孟天瑶，李超，张洪程，史天宇，马荣荣，王晓燕，杨筠文，戴其根，霍中洋，许轲，魏海燕，郭保卫. 籼粳交超级稻甬优538花后氮素积累模型与特征分析[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(04): 540-550.
[14] 韦还和,孟天瑶,李超,张洪程,史天宇,马荣荣,王晓燕,杨筠文,戴其根,霍中洋,许轲,魏海燕,郭保卫. 甬优籼粳杂交稻花后干物质积累模型与特征分析[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(02): 265-277.
[15] 韦还和,孟天瑶,李超,张洪程,史天宇,马荣荣,王晓燕,杨筠文,戴其根,霍中洋,许轲,魏海燕,郭保卫. 籼粳交超级稻甬优538的穗部特征及籽粒灌浆特性[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(12): 1858-1869.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2