欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 1625-1629.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米单根吸水能力的杂种优势

刘小芳1,2;张岁岐1,3,*;山仑1,3;杨晓青1,2;吴安慧1,2   

  1. 1 中国科学院水土保持与生态环境研究中心黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室,陕西杨凌712100;2 中国科学院研究生院,北京100049;3 西北农林科技大学,陕西杨凌712100
  • 收稿日期:2007-01-29 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-10-12 网络出版日期:2007-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 张岁岐

The Heterosis of Water Uptake by Single Root of Maize

LIU Xiao-Fang 1,2;ZHANG Sui-Qi 1,3,*;SHAN Lun 1,3;YANG Xiao-Qing 1,2;WU An-Hui 1,2   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming of the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi; 2 Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049; 3 Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2007-01-29 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-10-12 Published online:2007-10-12
  • Contact: ZHANG Sui-Qi

摘要:

在人工气候室水培条件下,以玉米(Zea mays L.)杂交种F1户单4号及其亲本478和天四为材料,用根压力探针技术研究了正常供水和PEG-6000模拟-0.2 MPa水分胁迫条件下,玉米单根吸水能力及渗透吸水过程中水和溶质相互作用的基因型差异,结果表明,3个玉米品种在静水压驱动下的单根水流导度(包括径向导度和轴向导度)以及在渗透压驱动下的单根水流导度均为F1户单4号>母本天四>父本478,而水分胁迫普遍降低了单根水流导度;溶质NaCl存在条件下,根的透过系数为F1>母本>父本,而反射系数则趋势相反,水分胁迫并未显著降低根的透过系数,但显著提高了其反射系数。试验证明杂交种F1的单根吸水能力优于亲本,体现了杂种优势。

关键词: 根压力探针, 玉米, 杂种优势, 根系吸水

Abstract:

The mechanism of heterosis in maize (Zea mays L.) has been studied mainly on kernel character to increase the growth and yield, but whether roots have heterosis on water uptake was not clear. Pressure probe techniques were extensively used to study water utiligation of plants, however, the feasibility of applying this technique to investigate the difference of water relation parameters among varieties of the same plant species has not been reported. In this study, the root pressure probe was employed to study hydraulic properties and interactions between water and solute flows of single primary root of three maize genotypes, 478, T4 and F1 of hybrid HD4 (478×T4) under hydroponic conditions with two treatments (normal culture condition and water stress imitated by PEG-6000, ψs=-0.2 MPa). In the process of water flow across the single root, there are two different driving forces, hydrostatic pressure and osmotic pressure. Under hydrostatic pressure gradient, the pressure/time curves are monophasic, but in the presence of a permeable solution (50 mmol L-1 NaCl), the curves are biphasic (water phase and solute phase). Under both normal and water stress conditions, hydrostatic hydraulic conductivity (Lp) (radial Lp and Lx) of single root was different among genotypes, F1 was the highest and the male parent was the lowest. Osmotic Lp of single root in different genotypes showed the same trend with hydrostatic Lp and F1 was significantly higher than the parents, but the difference between the two parents was indistinctively both under the two water levels. Compared with osmotic Lp, hydrostatic Lp was 30–53 times higher. Permeability coefficient (Ps) and reflection coefficient (σs) are important parameters in describing the interactions between water and solute flows. Ps means solute uptake ability by plant roots, and σs (0≤σs≤1) implies the passive selectivity of roots for given solute. Ps represented as F1>the female parent>the male parent, and σs showed the reverse trend. Water stress reduced both the hydrostatic Lp and the osmotic Lp, reduced the Ps indistinctively and enhanced the σs significantly. The results indicated that F1 was prior to the parents to show the heterosis in water uptake ability by single root, and pressure probe techniques worked well in the study of genotype difference of water uptake by roots of plants. The above results also provide scientific references for breeding and selecting new genotypes of maize to improve the ability of water uptake by roots and drought-resistance.

Key words: Root pressure probe, Maize, Heterosis, Water uptake by roots

[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[6] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[7] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[8] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[9] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[10] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[11] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[12] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
[13] 郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664.
[14] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
[15] 李新浩, 邢梦柯, 周梓惠, 李思烨, 任昊, 王洪章, 赖华江. 外源褪黑素通过协调光反应与暗反应增强玉米苗期的耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 839-856.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!