欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 1625-1629.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米单根吸水能力的杂种优势

刘小芳1,2;张岁岐1,3,*;山仑1,3;杨晓青1,2;吴安慧1,2   

  1. 1 中国科学院水土保持与生态环境研究中心黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室,陕西杨凌712100;2 中国科学院研究生院,北京100049;3 西北农林科技大学,陕西杨凌712100
  • 收稿日期:2007-01-29 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-10-12 网络出版日期:2007-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 张岁岐

The Heterosis of Water Uptake by Single Root of Maize

LIU Xiao-Fang 1,2;ZHANG Sui-Qi 1,3,*;SHAN Lun 1,3;YANG Xiao-Qing 1,2;WU An-Hui 1,2   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming of the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi; 2 Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049; 3 Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2007-01-29 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-10-12 Published online:2007-10-12
  • Contact: ZHANG Sui-Qi

摘要:

在人工气候室水培条件下,以玉米(Zea mays L.)杂交种F1户单4号及其亲本478和天四为材料,用根压力探针技术研究了正常供水和PEG-6000模拟-0.2 MPa水分胁迫条件下,玉米单根吸水能力及渗透吸水过程中水和溶质相互作用的基因型差异,结果表明,3个玉米品种在静水压驱动下的单根水流导度(包括径向导度和轴向导度)以及在渗透压驱动下的单根水流导度均为F1户单4号>母本天四>父本478,而水分胁迫普遍降低了单根水流导度;溶质NaCl存在条件下,根的透过系数为F1>母本>父本,而反射系数则趋势相反,水分胁迫并未显著降低根的透过系数,但显著提高了其反射系数。试验证明杂交种F1的单根吸水能力优于亲本,体现了杂种优势。

关键词: 根压力探针, 玉米, 杂种优势, 根系吸水

Abstract:

The mechanism of heterosis in maize (Zea mays L.) has been studied mainly on kernel character to increase the growth and yield, but whether roots have heterosis on water uptake was not clear. Pressure probe techniques were extensively used to study water utiligation of plants, however, the feasibility of applying this technique to investigate the difference of water relation parameters among varieties of the same plant species has not been reported. In this study, the root pressure probe was employed to study hydraulic properties and interactions between water and solute flows of single primary root of three maize genotypes, 478, T4 and F1 of hybrid HD4 (478×T4) under hydroponic conditions with two treatments (normal culture condition and water stress imitated by PEG-6000, ψs=-0.2 MPa). In the process of water flow across the single root, there are two different driving forces, hydrostatic pressure and osmotic pressure. Under hydrostatic pressure gradient, the pressure/time curves are monophasic, but in the presence of a permeable solution (50 mmol L-1 NaCl), the curves are biphasic (water phase and solute phase). Under both normal and water stress conditions, hydrostatic hydraulic conductivity (Lp) (radial Lp and Lx) of single root was different among genotypes, F1 was the highest and the male parent was the lowest. Osmotic Lp of single root in different genotypes showed the same trend with hydrostatic Lp and F1 was significantly higher than the parents, but the difference between the two parents was indistinctively both under the two water levels. Compared with osmotic Lp, hydrostatic Lp was 30–53 times higher. Permeability coefficient (Ps) and reflection coefficient (σs) are important parameters in describing the interactions between water and solute flows. Ps means solute uptake ability by plant roots, and σs (0≤σs≤1) implies the passive selectivity of roots for given solute. Ps represented as F1>the female parent>the male parent, and σs showed the reverse trend. Water stress reduced both the hydrostatic Lp and the osmotic Lp, reduced the Ps indistinctively and enhanced the σs significantly. The results indicated that F1 was prior to the parents to show the heterosis in water uptake ability by single root, and pressure probe techniques worked well in the study of genotype difference of water uptake by roots of plants. The above results also provide scientific references for breeding and selecting new genotypes of maize to improve the ability of water uptake by roots and drought-resistance.

Key words: Root pressure probe, Maize, Heterosis, Water uptake by roots

[1] 肖颖妮, 于永涛, 谢利华, 祁喜涛, 李春艳, 文天祥, 李高科, 胡建广. 基于SNP标记揭示中国鲜食玉米品种的遗传多样性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1301-1311.
[2] 崔连花, 詹为民, 杨陆浩, 王少瓷, 马文奇, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平, 杨青华. 2个玉米ZmCOP1基因的克隆及其转录丰度对不同光质处理的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1312-1324.
[3] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 徐田军, 张勇, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 吕天放, 刘月娥, 蔡万涛, 刘宏伟, 陈传永, 王元东. 宜机收籽粒玉米品种冠层结构、光合及灌浆脱水特性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1526-1536.
[7] 单露英, 李俊, 李亮, 张丽, 王颢潜, 高佳琪, 吴刚, 武玉花, 张秀杰. 转基因玉米NK603基体标准物质研制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1059-1070.
[8] 许静, 高景阳, 李程成, 宋云霞, 董朝沛, 王昭, 李云梦, 栾一凡, 陈甲法, 周子键, 吴建宇. 过表达ZmCIPKHT基因增强植物耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 851-859.
[9] 刘磊, 詹为民, 丁武思, 刘通, 崔连花, 姜良良, 张艳培, 杨建平. 玉米矮化突变体gad39的遗传分析与分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 886-895.
[10] 闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
[11] 徐宁坤, 李冰, 陈晓艳, 魏亚康, 刘子龙, 薛永康, 陈洪宇, 王桂凤. 一个新的玉米Bt2基因突变体的遗传分析和分子鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 572-579.
[12] 宋仕勤, 杨清龙, 王丹, 吕艳杰, 徐文华, 魏雯雯, 刘小丹, 姚凡云, 曹玉军, 王永军, 王立春. 东北主推玉米品种种子形态及贮藏物质与萌发期耐冷性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 726-738.
[13] 渠建洲, 冯文豪, 张兴华, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 基于全基因组关联分析解析玉米籽粒大小的遗传结构[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 304-319.
[14] 张倩, 韩本高, 张博, 盛开, 李岚涛, 王宜伦. 控失尿素减施及不同配比对夏玉米产量及氮肥效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 180-192.
[15] 苏达, 颜晓军, 蔡远扬, 梁恬, 吴良泉, MUHAMMAD AtifMuneer, 叶德练. 磷肥对甜玉米籽粒植酸和锌有效性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 203-214.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!