欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12): 2296-2303.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.02296

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国水稻常用保持系穗期耐旱性测评及育性分析

陶龙兴，符冠富，宋建，乐明凯，王熹*   

  1. 中国水稻研究所水稻生物学国家重点实验室，浙江杭州310006
  • 收稿日期:2009-05-19 修回日期:2009-08-26 出版日期:2009-12-10 网络出版日期:2009-10-13
  • 通讯作者: 王熹,E-mail:wangxi359@sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由农业部农业给够调整重大技术研究专项（06-03-01B），国家公益性行业（农业）科研专项经费项目（NYHYZX07-001），浙江省重点项目（2008C22073，2009C32048），浙江省三农五方项目（SN200806），国家自然科学基金项目（30871473）资助

Evaluation of Drought Tolerance and Fertility Traits for Rice Maintainer Lines Extensively Used in China

TAO Long-Xing,FU Guan-Fu,SONG Jian,LE Ming-Kai,WANG Xi*   

  1. National Key Laboratory of Rice Biology，China National Rice Research Institute，Hangzhou 310006，China
  • Received:2009-05-19 Revised:2009-08-26 Published:2009-12-10 Published online:2009-10-13
  • Contact: WANG Xi,E-mail:wangxi359@sina.com

PDF

1432

被引次数

21

摘要：

以负压式土壤湿度计和取土烘干法双重监控盆栽试验的土壤水势变化，观测我国15个常用水稻保持系的穗期耐旱性和育性特征。结果表明，K22-B、金23-B及II-32-B等保持系为穗期干旱胁迫钝感材料，而珍汕97-B、中9-B及协青早-B等为穗期干旱胁迫敏感材料；参试保持系在开花期(花粉粒充实期到小穗灌浆初期)比孕穗期(花粉母细胞分裂期到花粉粒充实期，15 d)对干旱胁迫更敏感；保持系孕穗期干旱胁迫主要伤害颖花育性，其胁迫指数与空壳率正相关(r = 0.6988**), 开花期干旱胁迫不仅伤害颖花育性并影响小穗充实，其胁迫指数与空壳率正相关(r = 0.7660**)，也与秕谷率正相关(r = 0.5230)；穗期耐旱性与其正常生育条件下的穗部结实性状不具直接相关性。

关键词: 水稻保持系, 干旱胁迫, 胁迫指数, 开花期

Abstract:

By monitoring soil moisture using both soil moisture meter and soil sampling method, we evaluated the drought tolerance of maintainer lines at panicle stage. Results showedthat: (1) the maintainer lines K22-B, Jin 23-B, and II-32-B were drought-insensitive at panicle stage, while Zhenshan 97-B, Zhong 9-B, and Xieqingzao-B were drought-sensitive; (2) the tested maintainer lines were more sensitive to drought stress at flowering stage (from pollen filling stage to spikelets filling stage) than at booting stage (from meiosis stage of pollen mother cell to pollen filling stage); (3) drought stress at booting stage mainly injured the spikelet fertility and there was a positive correlation between stress index and percentage of unfilled grains (r = 6988**), and drought stress at flowering stage injured both the fertility and plumpness of spikelets, the percentage of unfilled grains and the percentage of non-fully filled grains exhibited a positive correlation with stress index (r = 0.7660** and r = 0.5230 respectively); (4) there was no correlation between drought tolerance at panicle stage and grain setting characteristics under normal condition．

Key words: Rice maintainer line, Drought stress, Stress index, Flowering stage

[1] He F(何方). Applied Ecology (应用生态学). Beijing: Science Press, 2003 (in Chinese)

[2] Wang Y-F(王一凡), Zhou Y-Y(周毓珩). Water Saving Rice Culture in Northern China (北方节水稻作). Shenyang: Liaoning Science and Technology Press, 2000 (in Chinese)

[3] Wang X(王熹), Tao L-X(陶龙兴), Tan H-J(谈惠娟), Cheng S-H(程式华). Innovating rice farming systems, ensuring food and environments safety. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2006, 39(10): 1984-1991 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4] Liang Y-C(梁永超), Hu F(胡锋), Yang M-C(杨茂成), Zhu X-L(朱遐亮), Wang G-P(王广平), Wang Y-L(王永乐). Mechanisms of high yield and irrigation water use efficiency of rice in plastic film mulched dryland. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1999, 32(1): 26-32 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5] Huang Y-D(黄义德), Zhang Z-L(张自立), Wei F-Z(魏凤珍). Eco-physiological effects of dry-cultivated and plastic film-mulched rice planting. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 1999, 10(3): 305-308 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6] Wang X(王熹), Tao L-X(陶龙兴), Huang X-L(黄效林), Min S-K(闵绍楷), Cheng S-H(程式华). Study on non-flooding farming technique in paddy field: technique specification and formation of yield components. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2004, 37(4): 502-509 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7] Wang X(王熹), Tao L-X(陶龙兴), Huang X-L(黄效林), Min S-K(闵绍楷), Cheng S-H(程式华). Study on non-flooding farming technique in irrigated paddy field—Physiological and developmental characteristics of rice. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2004, 37(9): 1274-1281(in Chinese with English abstract)

[8] Yang J-C(杨建昌), Wang Z-Q(王志琴), Liu L-J(刘立军). Growth and development characteristics and yield formation of dry-cultivated rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报),2002, 28(1): 11-17 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9] Zhu Q-S(朱庆森), Qiu Z-S(邱泽森), Jiang C-J(姜长鉴), Yang J-C(杨建昌), Jin Z-S(金兆森), Liu J-G(刘建国). Effect of low soil water potential on rice yield. Sci Agric Sin(中国农业科学), 1994, 27(6): 15-22 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10] Yang J-C(杨建昌), Wang Z-Q(王志琴), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森). Drought resistance and its physiological characteristics in rice varieties. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1995, 28(5): 65-72 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11] Ling Z-M(凌祖铭), Li Z-C(李自超), Yu R(余荣), Mu P(穆平). Comparison of yield and physiological characters between upland rice and paddy rice cultivars under submerged and rain-fed conditions. J China Agric Univ (中国农业大学学报), 2002, 7(3): 13-18 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12] Wang X(王熹), Tao L-X(陶龙兴), Yu M-Y(俞美玉), Huang X-L(黄效林). Physiological model of super hybrid rice Xieyou 9308. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2002, 16(1): 38-44 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13] Wang X(王熹), Tao L-X(陶龙兴), Huang X-L(黄效林), Yu M-Y(俞美玉). Seed setting characteristics and physiological bases of subspecies hybrid rice Xieyou29308. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(4): 530-533 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14] Tao L-X(陶龙兴), Tan H-J(谈惠娟), Wang X(王熹), Cao L-Y(曹立勇), Cheng S-H(程式华). Effects of high temperature stress on super hybrid rice Guodao 6 during flowering and filling phases. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2007, 21(5): 518-524 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15] Xu M-L(徐孟亮), Chen L-B(陈良碧). Comparative study on the drought tolerance between 4 high yield paddy rice varieties and brazil upland rice variety. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(6): 903-907 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16] Zhang R-Z(张瑞珍), Shao X-W(邵玺文), Tong S-Y(童淑媛), Du Z-Y(杜震宇), Yang M(杨沫), Sun C-Z(孙长占). Effects of water stress on yield composition and yield of rice in booming stage. J Jilin Agric Univ (吉林农业大学学报), 2006, 28(17): 1-7 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17] Xu F-X(徐富贤),Zheng J-K(郑家奎),Zhu Y-C(朱永川), Ding G-X(丁国祥), Wang G-X(王贵雄). Relationship between rooting ability and drought resistance at full-heading in mid-season hybrids rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(2): 188-193 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王霞, 尹晓雨, 于晓明, 刘晓丹. 干旱锻炼对B73自交后代当代干旱胁迫记忆基因表达及其启动子区DNA甲基化的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1191-1198.
[2] 丁红, 徐扬, 张冠初, 秦斐斐, 戴良香, 张智猛. 不同生育期干旱与氮肥施用对花生氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 695-703.
[3] 张明聪, 何松榆, 秦彬, 王孟雪, 金喜军, 任春元, 吴耀坤, 张玉先. 外源褪黑素对干旱胁迫下春大豆品种绥农26形态、光合生理及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(9): 1791-1805.
[4] 李洁, 付惠, 姚晓华, 吴昆仑. 不同耐旱性青稞叶片差异蛋白分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1248-1258.
[5] 李鹏程, 毕真真, 孙超, 秦天元, 梁文君, 王一好, 许德蓉, 刘玉汇, 张俊莲, 白江平. DNA甲基化参与调控马铃薯响应干旱胁迫的关键基因挖掘[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 599-612.
[6] 秦天元, 刘玉汇, 孙超, 毕真真, 李安一, 许德蓉, 王一好, 张俊莲, 白江平. 马铃薯StIgt基因家族的鉴定及其对干旱胁迫的响应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 780-786.
[7] 周练, 刘朝显, 熊雨涵, 周京, 蔡一林. 质膜内在蛋白ZmPIP1;1参与玉米耐旱性和光合作用的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 472-480.
[8] 刘亚文, 张红燕, 曹丹, 李兰芝. 基于多平台基因表达数据的水稻干旱和盐胁迫相关基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(12): 2423-2439.
[9] 秦天元, 孙超, 毕真真, 梁文君, 李鹏程, 张俊莲, 白江平. 基于WGCNA的马铃薯根系抗旱相关共表达模块鉴定和核心基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(7): 1033-1051.
[10] 张海燕, 汪宝卿, 冯向阳, 李广亮, 解备涛, 董顺旭, 段文学, 张立明. 不同时期干旱胁迫对甘薯生长和渗透调节能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(11): 1760-1770.
[11] 李旭凯,李任建,张宝俊. 利用WGCNA鉴定非生物胁迫相关基因共表达网络[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1349-1364.
[12] 袁溢,朱双,方婷婷,蒋金金,王幼平. 人工合成甘蓝型油菜抗旱性及DNA甲基化水平分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(5): 693-704.
[13] 李云富,王静贤,杜艳芳,邹华文,张祖新. 玉米开花期相关的Indeterminate domain (IDD)蛋白家族基因的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4): 499-507.
[14] 李萍,侯万伟,刘玉皎. 青海高原耐旱蚕豆品种青海13号响应干旱胁迫蛋白质组学分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(2): 267-275.
[15] 李鹏程,毕真真,梁文君,孙超,张俊莲,白江平. DNA甲基化参与调控马铃薯干旱胁迫响应[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(10): 1595-1603.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2