欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (03): 559-562.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.00559

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

大豆重组自交家系群体动态株高及其相对生长速率与产量的关系

黄中文1,王伟1,徐新娟1,李金英2,卢为国2,*   

  1. 1 河南科技学院农学系,河南新乡453003;2 河南省农科院经作所,河南郑州450002
  • 收稿日期:2010-08-09 修回日期:2010-12-09 出版日期:2011-03-12 网络出版日期:2011-01-17
  • 通讯作者: 卢为国, E-mail: 123bean@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由河南科技学院博士启动基金(2008005),国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2009CB118404)和国家科技支撑项目(2006BAD01A04)资助。

Relationship of Dynamic Plant Height and Its Relative Growth Rate with Yield Using Recombinant Inbred Lines of Soybean

HUANG Zhong-Wen1,WANG Wei1,XU Xin-Juan1,LI Jin-Ying2,LU Wei-Guo2,*   

  1. 1 Department of Agronomy, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China; 2 Institute of Industrial Crops, Hennan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, China
  • Received:2010-08-09 Revised:2010-12-09 Published:2011-03-12 Published online:2011-01-17
  • Contact: 卢为国, E-mail: 123bean@163.com

摘要: 提高产量潜力始终是大豆育种的重要目标,研究产量相关性状是解析产量重要途径之一。大豆株高影响产量,但存在不确定性。本研究利用一套包含212个家系的大豆重组自交家系(RIL),于2008—2009年连续2年测定各家系动态株高,并计算相对生长速率,研究与产量的关系,以期为大豆产量改良中对株高的选择提供参考信息。试验结果表明,(1) 产量和株高变幅分别为1 000~5 000 kg hm–1和38~103 cm,说明样本有较大代表性。(2) 出苗后20 d的株高即与产量具极显著正相关,随生长进程,相关系数逐渐增大,至株高生长停止达到最大。株高生长速率前期与产量呈显著正相关,后期与产量具负相关,说明后期过快增加株高不利于产量。(3) 在试验范围内,株高与产量呈负指数回归关系,随株高增加,产量逐渐增加,当株高为80 cm时,随株高增加,产量的增加逐渐缓慢。发现株高的变异在70~90 cm之间时,均能获得4 000 kg hm–1产量。本文还简要讨论了重组自交家系用于表型分析的优势,以及在大豆产量育种中如何对株高进行选择。

关键词: 大豆, 动态株高, 相对生长速率, 产量, 相关

Abstract: Selection for increasing yield potential is consistantlythe main goal of soybean breeding. Plant height influences yield with uncertainty in soybean. A population of 212recombinant inbred lines (RIL) was used to analyze the correlation of dynamic plant height and its relative growth rate with yield across two-year field experiments. The results were as followed. (1) The range of yield and plant height was 1 000–5 000 kg ha–1, 38–128 cm respectively, which indicated the sample in the study had a good representativeness. Significant differences between plant height and its relative growth rate at the same developmental stages were observed among the RILs. (2) Yield was significantly and positively correlated with plant height at 20 days after emergence, and the correlation increased with the growing stages and the highest correlation occurred when plant height culminated. Yield was positively correlated with relative growth rate in plant height at earlier growth stages and negatively correlated at later stages, indicating that faster growth in plant height at later stage would not be beneficial to higher yield. (3) A negative exponential regression mode was observed in the relationship between yield and plant height. Yield increased steeply when plant height was less than 80 cm and this trend would slow down when plant height was over 80 cm. We found yields reached 4 000 kg ha–1 when plant heights were 70–90 cm. The merits and demerits of phenotypic analysis using RIL and how to select plant height in soybean breeding were discussed.

Key words: Soybean, Dynamic plant height, Relative growth rate, Yield, Correlation

[1]Specht J E, Hume D J, Kumudini S V. Soybean yield potential: a genetic and physiological perspective. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1560–1570
[2]Hao X-X(郝欣先), Jiang H-L(蒋惠兰), Li X-H(李星华), Ding F-W(丁发武), Wang J-L(王金龙), Peng J-Q(彭继青). The analysis of characters of high yield varieties of summer soybean. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1987, 6(1): 11–19 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Chen H-H(陈恒鹤), Li N(李楠). Relative genetic advance and combining ability of plant type characters in soybeans. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1984, 3(4): 268–280 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]Wang J-L(王金陵). Soybean (大豆). Harbin: Heilongjiang Science and Technology Press, 1982. p 42 (in Chinese)
[5]Wilcox J R, Tuneo S. Interrelationships among height, lodging and yield in determinate and indeterminate soybeans. Euphytica, 1981, 30: 323–326
[6]Luis F A, Natal A V. Heritability and correlations among traits in four- way soybean crosses. Euphytica, 2004, 136: 81–91
[7]Li Y(李莹). Studies on the yield constitutive factors in soybean varieties. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1984, 3(3): 209–214 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Song S-H(宋书宏), Zhao Y-L(赵亚玲), Wang P(王萍), He Z-M(河锺明). Research progress of relationships between yield and yield related traits. Rain Fed Crops (杂粮作物), 2006, 26(2): 112–113 (in Chinese)
[9]Cheng B-R(程宝荣), Jin Y-C(金英琛), Li Y(李颖). Relationships among yield and plant height and weather conditions in oybean. Heilongjiang Weather (黑龙江气象), 1996, 46(2): 22–33 (in Chinese)
[10]Huang Z-W(黄中文), Zhao T-J(赵团结), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Dynamic analysis of biomass accumulation and partition in soybean. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(8): 1483–1490 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Wang L-Z(王连铮), Wang J-L(王金陵). Soybean Genetics and Breeding (大豆遗传育种学). Beijing: Science Press, 1992. pp 334–339 (in Chinese)
[12]Aanderud Z T, Bledsoe C S, Richards J H. Contribution of relative growth rate to root foraging by annual and perennial grasses from California oak woodlands. Oecologia, 2003, 136: 424–430
[13]Huang Z-W(黄中文), Zhao T-J(赵团结), Yu D-Y(喻德跃), Chen S-Y(陈受宜), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Correlation and QTL mapping of biomass accumulation, apparent harvest index, and yield in soybean. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(6): 944–951 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Huang Z-W(黄中文), Zhao T-J(赵团结), Yu D-Y(喻德跃), Chen S-Y(陈受宜), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Indicators of lodging resistance and related QTL analysis in soybean. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(4): 605–611 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]Board J E, Modali H. Dry matter accumulation predictors for optimal yield in soybean. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 1790–1799
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 金昱何, 王雪菲, 徐张一娃, 缪怡宁, 蒋云杰, 伊莹, 缪德麟, 朱静仪, 钟一帆, 陈铭亨, 方芳, 刘鹏. 外源激素对低温胁迫下大豆叶片叶绿素荧光参数及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1817-1829.
[3] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[4] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[5] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[6] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[7] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[8] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[9] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[10] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[11] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[12] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[13] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[14] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[15] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!