欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (08): 1485-1490.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01485

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

华北平原主要作物生产的碳效率研究初报

史磊刚，范士超，孔凡磊，陈阜*   

  1. 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院 / 农业部农作制度重点开放实验室，北京100193
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-24 修回日期:2011-04-27 出版日期:2011-08-12 网络出版日期:2011-06-13
  • 通讯作者: 陈阜, E-mail: chenfu@cau.edu.cn, Tel:010-62733316
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2010CB951502)和国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200903003)资助。

Preliminary Study on the Carbon Efficiency of Main Crops Production in North China Plain

SHI Lei-Gang,FAN Shi-Chao,KONG Fan-Lei,CHEN Fu   

  1. College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Farming System, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100193, China
  • Received:2011-01-24 Revised:2011-04-27 Published:2011-08-12 Published online:2011-06-13
  • Contact: 陈阜, E-mail: chenfu@cau.edu.cn, Tel:010-62733316

PDF

1696

被引次数

44

摘要： 提高农作物生产的碳效率是实现低碳农业的重要途径之一。为探明农业生产中的碳效率，本文以河北吴桥县为例，基于农户生产调查数据，利用投入产出法，对华北平原冬小麦、夏玉米和棉花3种主要作物生产的碳投入、碳产出和碳效率进行了评价。结果表明，冬小麦、夏玉米和棉花生产的碳投入总量分别为943.47±225.14、525.74±134.73和513.60±138.94 kg CE km-2，其中化肥和电能占总量的大部分，分别约占60%和25%。3种作物碳的产出总量分别为8 430.70±774.45、7 194.50± 754.58和5 486.00±547.69 kg CE hm-2，其中秸秆约占总量的50%，经济产量约占34%，根约占17%。冬小麦、夏玉米和棉花碳的生产效率分别为7.95±2.55、15.90±4.34和7.60±2.92 kg kg-1 CE，碳的经济效率分别为13.28±4.56、21.47±5.86和76.70±29.45 CHY kg-1 CE，碳的生态效率分别为9.59±3.07、14.57±3.98和11.69±4.49 kg C kg-1 CE，作物间的碳效率差异显著，初步表明在华北平原，夏玉米生产的碳综合效率最高，棉花次之，冬小麦最低。

关键词: 华北平原, 冬小麦, 夏玉米, 棉花, 碳效率, 低碳农业

Abstract: Improving the carbon efficiency of crop production is one of the important ways to realize the low-carbon agriculture. In order to get a clear understanding of carbon efficiency in agricultural production, this paper, based on the investigation data of the farmer’s production, applying input and output calculation method, evaluated the carbon input, carbon output and carbon efficiency in production of the three major crops, winter wheat, summer maize and cotton, in Wuqiao County of Hebei Province in North China Plain. The results were as follows:the carbon input of winter wheat, summer maize and cotton was 943.47±225.14, 525.74±134.73, and 513.60±138.94 kg CE ha-1, of which fertilizers and electricity accounted for a majority, about 60% and 25% respectively. The carbon output of the three major crops was 8 430.70±774.45, 7 194.50±754.58, and 5 486.00±547.69 kg CE ha-1 respectively, of which straw accounted for 50%, economic yield accounted for 34%, and root accounted for 17%. The carbon production efficiency of winter wheat, summer maize and cotton was 7.95±2.55, 15.90±4.34, and 7.60±2.92 kg kg-1 CE, respectively. The carbon economic efficiency of the three crops was 13.28±4.56, 21.47±5.86, and 76.70±29.45 CHY kg-1 CE, respectively.The carbon ecological efficiency of the three crops was 9.59±3.07, 14.57±3.98, and 11.69±4.49 kg C kg-1 CE, respectively. There were significant differences in the carbon efficiency of the three major crops. Preliminary results showed that the carbon integrated efficiency of summer maize was the highest, followed by cotton, which in turn had higher the efficiency than winter wheat in North China Plain.

Key words: North China Plain, Winter wheat, Summer maize, Cotton, Carbon efficiency, Low-carbon agriculture

[1]Xie G-D(谢高地), Qi W-H(齐文虎), Zhang Y-S(章予舒), Leng Y-F(冷允法). A study on utilization efficiency of main agriculture resources. Resour Sci (资源科学), 1998, 20(5): 7–11 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]Jin J(靳京), Wu S-H(吴绍洪), Dai E-F(戴尔阜). Assessment on agricultural resources efficiency: comparison on methods and integrated approaches. Resour Sci (资源科学), 2005, 27(1): 146–152 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]Lal R. Carbon emission from farm operations. Environ Int, 2004, 30: 981–990
[4]Canadell J G, Le Quere C, Raupach M R, Field C B, Buitenhuis E T, Ciais P, Conway T J, Gillett N P, Houghton R A, Marland G. Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 18866–18870
[5]Shi Y-L(石玉林), Feng Z-M(封志明). Developing the study of high efficient utilization of agricultural resources. J Nat Resour (自然资源学报), 1997, 12(4): 293–298 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Fu X-L(付雪丽), Zhang H(张惠), Jia J-Z(贾继增), Du L-F(杜立丰), Fu J-D(付金东), Zhao M(赵明). Yield performance and resources use efficiency of winter wheat and summer maize in double late-cropping system. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(9): 1708–1714 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]Burney J A, Davis S J, Lobell D B. Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010, 107: 12052–12057
[8]Mrini M, Senhaji F, Pimentel D. Energy analysis of sugar beet production under traditional and intensive farming systems and impacts on sustainable agriculture in Morocco. J Sustainable Agric, 2002, 20: 5–28
[9]Dubey A, Lal R. Carbon footprint and sustainability of agricultural production systems in Punjab, India and Ohio, USA. J Crop Improvement, 2009, 23: 332–350
[10]Han B(韩冰), Wang X-K(王效科), Lu F(逯非), Duan X-N(段晓男), Ou-Yang Z-Y(欧阳志云). Researches on the greenhouse gas leakage and net mitigation potentials of soil carbon sequestration measures in croplands. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2009, 29(9): 4494–5006 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]Li J-J(李洁静), Pan G-X(潘根兴), Zhang X-H(张旭辉), Fei Q-H(费庆华), Li Z-P(李志鹏), Zhou P(周萍), Zhen J-F(郑聚锋), Qiu D-S(邱多生). An evaluation of net carbon sink effect and cost/benefits of a rice-rape rotation ecosystem under long-term fertilization from Tai Lake region of China. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2009, 20(7): 1664–1670 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]Li J-J(李洁静), Pan G-X(潘根兴), Li L-Q(李恋卿), Zhang X-H(张旭辉). Estimation of net carbon balance and benefits of rice-rice cropping farm of a red earth paddy under long term fertilization experiment from Jiangxi, China. J Agro-Environ Sci (农业环境科学学报), 2009(12): 2520–2525 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13]Lu F(逯非), Wang X-K(王效科), Han B(韩冰), Ouyang Z-Y(欧阳志云), Duan X-N(段晓男), Zheng H(郑华). Assessment on the availability of nitrogen fertilization in improving carbon sequestration potential of China’s cropland soil. Chin J App Ecol (应用生态学报), 2008, 19(10): 2239–2250 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]Xia D-J(夏德建), Ren Y-F(任玉珑), Shi L-F(史乐峰). Measurement of life-cycle carbon equivalent emissions of coal-energy chain. Stat Res (统计研究), 2010, 27(8): 82–89 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]West T O, Marland G. A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2002, 91: 217–232
[16]Fang J Y, Guo Z D, Pu S L, Chen A P. Terrestrial vegetation carbon sinks in China, 1981–2000. Sci China (Ser D: Earth Sci), 2007, 50(9): 1341–1350
[17]The Prices Division of National Development and Reform Commission (国家发展和改革委员会价格司). Data Compilation of the National Agricultural Costs and Returns (全国农产品成本收益资料汇编). Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2009. pp 119–163 (in Chinese)
[18]Zhang Z-F(张智峰), Zhang W-F(张卫峰). The situation and trend of fertilizer application in China. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer (磷肥与复肥), 2008, 23(6): 9–12 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]Luo Q-Y(罗其友), Tang H-J(唐华俊), Jang W-L(姜文来). Strategies of high efficient and sustainable allocation of water and land resources for agricultural purposes. Resour Sci (资源科学), 2001, 23(2): 42–45 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]Han L-J(韩鲁佳), Yan Q-J(闫巧娟), Liu X-Y(刘向阳), Hu J-Y(胡金有). Straw resources and their utilization in China. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2002, 18(3): 87–91 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[2] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[3] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[4] 乔宇馨, 李程越, 康晓玉, 张鑫琪, 贾绍辉, 刘倩, 曹亚丽, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇, 李萍. 基于APSIM模型的长期免耕秸秆覆盖对旱地小麦增产效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1181-1192.
[5] 周琦翔, 朱艳, 汪楚博, 朱柏林, 李俊博, 宋利兵. 基于DSSAT模型模拟气候变化对新疆棉花物候期及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 590-602.
[6] 刘吉昌, 李思烨, 李雪婷, 王洪章, 刘鹏, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 任昊. 盐胁迫对不同耐盐型夏玉米品种根系生长及养分吸收效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 565-577.
[7] 陈如雪, 孙丽芳, 张芯源, 牟海萌, 张永新, 袁丽雪, 彭仕乐, 王壮壮, 王永华. 秸秆还田与微生物菌剂配施对冬小麦旗叶碳氮代谢及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1901-1913.
[8] 吴柳格, 陈坚, 张鑫, 邓艾兴, 宋振伟, 郑成岩, 张卫建. 近二十年国审冬小麦品种的产量与品质性状变化趋势研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1814-1826.
[9] 赵刚, 张建军, 党翼, 樊廷录, 王磊, 周刚, 王淑英, 李兴茂, 倪胜利, 米文博, 周旭姣, 程万莉, 李尚中. 黄土旱塬区秸秆覆盖量对不同降雨年型土壤水温效应和冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1643-1653.
[10] 郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466.
[11] 王亚雯, 戚正阳, 尤佳琦, 聂新辉, 曹娟, 杨细燕, 涂礼莉, 张献龙, 王茂军. 棉花60K功能位点基因芯片的制备及应用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1178-1188.
[12] 王东, 王森, 尚丽, 冯浩伟, 张永巧, 崔佳鸣, 李爽, 章佳聪, 车欢. 补灌对黄土高原半湿润区冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1312-1325.
[13] 孟凡琦, 房孟颖, 罗艺, 卢霖, 董学瑞, 王亚菲, 郭丽娜, 闫鹏, 董志强, 张凤路. 乙烯利-甜菜碱-水杨酸合剂对夏玉米耐热性和产量的调控效应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1299-1311.
[14] 王娇, 白海霞, 韩语燕, 梁惠, 冯雅楠, 张东升, 李萍, 宗毓铮, 史鑫蕊, 郝兴宇. CO2浓度升高、升温及其交互作用对良星99冬小麦叶片碳氮代谢的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1061-1076.
[15] 宋利, 刘广周, 张华, 卢庭启, 卿春燕, 杨云山, 郭晓霞, 胡单, 李少昆, 侯鹏. 密植滴灌水肥一体化对西南夏玉米产量及土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 992-1004.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2