欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (03): 495-504.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.00471

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国北方主栽花生品种抗旱性鉴定与评价

张智猛1，戴良香1，丁红1，陈殿绪1，杨伟强1，宋文武1，万书波2,*   

  1. 1 山东省花生研究所, 山东青岛 266100；2 山东省农业科学院, 山东济南 25010
  • 收稿日期:2011-06-16 修回日期:2011-12-12 出版日期:2012-03-12 网络出版日期:2012-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 万书波, E-mail: wansb@saas.ac.cn, Tel: 0531-83178127
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家科技支撑计划(2006BAD21B04-2, 2009BADA8B03), 现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金(CARS-14)和青岛市科技支撑计划项目(11-2-3-38-nsh)资助。

Identification and Evaluation of Drought Resistance in Different Peanut Varieties Widely Grown in Northern China

ZHANG Zhi-Meng1,DAI Liang-Xiang1,DING Hong1,CHEN Dian-Xu1,YANG Wei-Qiang1,SONG Wen-Wu1,WAN Shu-Bo2,*   

  1. 1 Peanut Research Institute of Shandong Province, Qingdao 266100, China; 2 Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji’nan, 250100, China
  • Received:2011-06-16 Revised:2011-12-12 Published:2012-03-12 Published online:2012-01-04
  • Contact: 万书波, E-mail: wansb@saas.ac.cn, Tel: 0531-83178127

PDF

983

被引次数

50

摘要： 人工控水条件下，通过盆栽试验，在花生植株的结荚期和饱果期, 测定29个品种(系)的株高、分枝数、生物累积量、叶片含水量和光合色素含量等与抗旱性有关的13个表型性状和生理生化指标，采用抗旱系数法和隶属函数值法，鉴定各性状指标水分胁迫下的抗旱性。结果表明,相同指标评价不同花生品种抗旱性时得出的结果不同,依此可将供试品种(系)划分为抗旱性强、中、弱和不抗旱4类,即供试品种中唐科8号、冀花2号、冀花4号、花育25、花育17、花育22、大唐油、花育21具有较强的抗旱能力；花育20、花育24、潍花6号、花育27、鲁花11、阜花11、阜花13、唐油4号、丰花1号和G2具有中等抗旱能力；具有较弱抗旱能力的品种(系)有16-8、阜花10号、M5、花育16和鲁花14；而花育19、花育23、丰花6号、潍花8号、M7和TE-2在结荚期和饱果期均无抗旱能力。水分胁迫至结荚期，除分枝数和类胡萝卜素外，其余各形态型状和生理生化指标及其综合D值均可作为鉴定品种(系)抗旱性的依据；水分胁迫至饱果期，只有叶面积与抗旱系数间的相关极显著。无论在结荚期或饱果期，综合D值可作为鉴定品种抗旱性的指标，单一指标均不能准确判定某品种(系)的抗旱性。

关键词: 主栽花生品种, 水分胁迫, 抗旱性

Abstract: It is necessary to systematically identify and evaluate drought-resistant varieties for stable development of peanut production in arid and semi-arid regions in China. To establish drought resistance index of peanut cultivars, we determined 13 morphological and biochemical indices including plant height, number of branch, biomass, leaf water content and photosynthetic pigment content in the pot experiment at pod setting and pod filling stages with 29 peanut cultivars (strains) widely grown in north China under artificial water stress condition. Drought resistances of varieties were scored with drought coefficient method and subordinate function value under water stresses. The results showed that the same index of drought resistance characterized in different peanut varieties achieved different results, and 29 peanut varieties were divided into four grads: high tolerant, moderate tolerant, weaker tolerant, and drought susceptible. In the 29 cultivars (strains), we screened out the high drought tolerant varieties consisting of Tangke 8, Jihua 2, Jihua 4, Huayu 25, Huayu 17, Huayu 22, Datangyou, and Huayu 21. The cultivars (strains) of Huayu 20, Huayu 24, Weihua 6, Huayu 27, Luhua 11, Fuhua 11, Fuhua 13, Tangyou 4, Fenghua 1, and G2 had moderate drought resistance. The cultivars (strains) with weaker drought resistance were 16-8, Fuhua 10, M5, Huayu 16, and Luhua 14. At pod setting and pod filling stages Huayu 19, Huayu 23, Fenghua 6, Weihua 8, M7, and TE-2 were all drought susceptible. From seedling to pod setting stages under water stress, all morphological and biochemical indices but the number of branch and carotenoid content and their comprehensive D values could be taken as evaluation criteria. From seedling to pod filling stages under water stress, there only existed significanct correlation between leaf area and drought resistance. Either at pod setting or pod filling stages under water stress, comprehensive D value of the indices had significant correlation with drought resistance, which could be used to identify peanuts drought resistance.

Key words: Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Varieties grown in production, Water stress, Drought resistance 

[1]Shan L(山仑). Development trend of dryland farming technologies. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2002, 35(7): 848–855 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2]Shan L(山仑), Zhang S-Q(张岁岐). Water saving agriculture and its biological basis. Res Soil Water Conserv (水土保持研究), 1999, (6): 3–6 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3]Li Y(黎裕). The identification method and index for crop drought resistance. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 1993, 11(1): 91–99 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4]Jiang H-F(姜慧芳), Ren X-P(任小平). The effect on SOD activity and protein content in groundnut leaves by drought stress. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2004, 30(2): 169–174 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5]Yan M-L(严美玲), Li X-D(李向东), Lin Y-J(林英杰), Wang L-L(王丽丽), Zhou L-Y(周录英). Effects of drought during seedling stage on physiological traits, yield and quality of different peanut cultivars. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(1): 113–119 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Xue H-Q(薛慧勤), Sun L-Z(孙兰珍), Gan X-M(甘信民). Study on comprehensive assessment and mechanism of drought resistance in peanut cultivars. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 1999, 17(4): 82–85 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Gao G-Q(高国庆), Zhou H-Q(周汉群), Tang R-H(唐荣华). Study on the drought resistance of peanut varieties. J Peanut Sci (花生科技), 1995, (3): 1–9 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8]Jiang H-F(姜慧芳), Ren X-P(任小平), Duan N-X(段乃雄), Liao B-S(廖伯寿). Response of morphological characters for tolerance to drought in dragon groundnut. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2001, 23(1): 12–16 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Jiang H-F(姜慧芳), Ren X-P(任小平), Duan N-X(段乃雄). Screening and evaluation for drought tolerance in Chinese dragon groundnut. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1999, 32(Z): 59–63 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Wang F-Q(王福青), Wang M-L(王铭伦), Zheng Z-R(郑芝荣), Meng X-X(孟祥霞). Study on relationship between drought tolerance and variety in seedling stage of peanut. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2000, 18(4): 82–86 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11]Xue H-Q(薛慧勤), Sun L-Z(孙兰珍). Effect of water stress on physiological character in different drought resistant peanut varieties. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 1997, 15(4): 82–86 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Yao C-M(姚春梅), Yang P-L(杨培岭), Hao Z-Y(郝仲勇), Wang Q-H(王泉海). Dynamic analysis on root/shoot development of peanut under different water regimes. J China Agric Univ (中国农业大学学报), 1999, 4(4): 40–44 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]Wang H-Z(王贺正). Study on Drought Resistance and Screening Identification Indexes of Drought Resistance in Rice. PhD Dissertation of Sichuan Agricultural University (四川农业大学), 2007 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Li G-Q(李贵全), Li H-F(李慧峰), Zhang H-Y(张海燕). Comprehensive evaluation of flowering-podding period drought resistance of soybean. Chin J Eco-Agric (中国生态农业学报), 2007, 15(6): 96–100 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Shao Y-J(邵艳军), Shan L(山仑). Advances in the studies on drought tolerance mechanism of plants. Chin J Eco-Agric (中国生态农业学报), 2006, 14(4): 16–20 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[16]Hsiao T C. Plant responses to water stress. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 1973, 24: 519–570

[17]Li Y-Q(栗雨琴), Zhang W-Y(张文英), Wang Y-Z(王有增), Li Y-C(李运朝), Li G-R(刘桂茹), Gu J-T(谷俊涛), Zhou J-B(周进宝). Advances of studies on crop drought resistance identification. J Hebei Agric Sci (河北农业科学), 2004, (8): 58–61 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18]Wang H-Z(王贺正), Ma J(马均), Li X-Y(李旭毅), LI Y(李艳), Zhang R-P(张荣萍), Liu H-Y(刘慧远), Wang R-Q(汪仁全). Screening identification indexes of drought resistance at flowering stage in rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(11): 1485–1489 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Wang Y-H(王育红), Yao Y-Q(姚宇卿), Zhang C-J(张灿军), Lu J-J(吕军杰), Zhang J(张洁), Wang C-H(王聪慧), Li J-H(李俊红). Study on drought-resistance identification methods and evaluation index of dry-land rice—Technical criterion for identification and evaluation of drought- resistance. Agric Res Arid Areas (旱地区农业研究), 2005, 23(4): 37–39 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]Zhang Z-M(张智猛), Wan S-B(万书波), Dai L-X(戴良香), Song W-W(宋文武), Chen J(陈静), Shi Y-Q(石运庆). Estimating and screening of drought resistance indexes in peanut. Chin J Plant Ecol (植物生态学报), 2011, 35(1): 100–109 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21]Zhang Z-M(张智猛), Wan S-B(万书波), Dai L-X(戴良香), Song W-W(宋文武), Chen J(陈静), Miao H-R(苗华荣). The screening identification index of drought resistance and comprehensive evaluation of peanut varieties at germination stage. J Agric Sci Technol (中国农业科技导报), 2010,12(1): 85–91(in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]Zhang Z-M(张智猛), Wan S-B(万书波), Dai L-X(戴良香), Song W-W(宋文武), Chen J(陈静), Shi Y-Q(石运庆). Response of different peanut varieties to drought stress. Chin J Eco-Agric (中国生态农业学报), 2011, 19(3): 1–8 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Hu B-L(胡标林), Yu S-W(余守武), Wan Y(万勇), Zhang Z(张铮), Qiu B-Y(邱兵余), Xie J-K(谢建坤). Drought-resistance identification of Dongxiang common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon) in whole growth period. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(3): 425–432 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[24]Wang Y-H(王育红), Yao Y-Q(姚宇卿), Lu J-J(吕军杰), Li Y(李瑜), Liu H-Q(刘红旗). A preliminary study on the indices of peanut varieties. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 2002, 20(3): 89–92 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王兴荣, 李玥, 张彦军, 李永生, 汪军成, 徐银萍, 祁旭升. 青稞种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1279-1287.
[2] 张海燕, 解备涛, 姜常松, 冯向阳, 张巧, 董顺旭, 汪宝卿, 张立明, 秦桢, 段文学. 不同抗旱性甘薯品种叶片生理性状差异及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 518-528.
[3] 韩贝, 王旭文, 李保奇, 余渝, 田琴, 杨细燕. 陆地棉种质资源抗旱性状的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 438-450.
[4] 徐银萍, 潘永东, 刘强德, 姚元虎, 贾延春, 任诚, 火克仓, 陈文庆, 赵锋, 包奇军, 张华瑜. 大麦种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 448-461.
[5] 张海燕,解备涛,汪宝卿,董顺旭,段文学,张立明. 不同甘薯品种抗旱性评价及耐旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3): 419-430.
[6] 张笑笑,潘映红,任富莉,蒲伟军,王道平,李玉斌,陆平,李桂英,朱莉. 基于多重表型分析的准确评价高粱抗旱性方法的建立[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(11): 1735-1745.
[7] 李龙,毛新国,王景一,昌小平,柳玉平,景蕊莲. 小麦种质资源抗旱性鉴定评价[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(7): 988-999.
[8] 王建伟,贺晓岚,李文旭,陈新宏. 小麦近缘属植物1-FFT基因的克隆及功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(6): 814-823.
[9] 吕品, 于海峰, 侯建华. 利用抗旱选择导入系定位向日葵产量性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(03): 385-396.
[10] 汪灿,周棱波,张国兵,张立异,徐燕,高旭,姜讷,邵明波. 薏苡种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(09): 1381-1394.
[11] DO Thanh-Trung,李健,张风娟,杨丽涛,李杨瑞,邢永秀. 甘蔗与抗旱性相关差异蛋白质组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(09): 1337-1346.
[12] 徐文,申浩,郭军,余晓丛,李祥,杨彦会,马晓,赵世杰,宋健民. 旗叶蜡质含量不同小麦近等基因系的抗旱性[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(11): 1700-1707.
[13] 吴奇,周宇飞,高悦,张姣,陈冰嬬,许文娟,黄瑞冬. 不同高粱品种萌发期抗旱性筛选与鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(08): 1233-1246.
[14] 叶德练,齐瑞娟,管大海,李建民,张明才,李召虎. 免耕冬小麦田土壤微生物特征和土壤酶活性对水分调控的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(08): 1212-1219.
[15] 王兰芬，武晶，景蕊莲，程须珍，王述民. 绿豆种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(08): 1287-1294.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2