欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (08): 1212-1219.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.01212

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

免耕冬小麦田土壤微生物特征和土壤酶活性对水分调控的响应

叶德练**,齐瑞娟**,管大海,李建民,张明才*,李召虎   

  1. 植物生长调节剂教育部工程研究中心 / 中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院, 北京100193
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-29 修回日期:2015-05-04 出版日期:2015-08-12 网络出版日期:2015-06-03
  • 通讯作者: 张明才, E-mail: zmc1214@163.com, Tel: 010-62733049
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2011AA10A206)资助。

Response of Soil Microbial Characteristics and Soil Enzyme Activity to Irrigation Method in No-till Winter Wheat Field

YE De-Lian**,QI Rui-Juan**,GUAN Da-Hai,LI Jian-Min,ZHANG Ming-Cai*,LI Zhao-Hu   

  1. Engineering Research Center of Plant Growth Regulator, Ministry of Education / College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
  • Received:2015-01-29 Revised:2015-05-04 Published:2015-08-12 Published online:2015-06-03
  • Contact: 张明才, E-mail: zmc1214@163.com, Tel: 010-62733049

摘要:

针对华北地区冬小麦的免耕农业管理方式,研究了不同水分管理方式对小麦产量及产量因子、土壤基础呼吸、土壤微生物量氮(SMBN)和土壤酶活性的影响。试验设常规灌溉(W1)、节水灌溉(W2)和无灌溉(W3) 3个处理,小麦全生育期总灌水量分别为150750 mmW1W2处理对小麦产量影响较小,但W3显著降低小麦产量。水分胁迫对冬小麦拔节期和灌浆期的土壤基础呼吸和土壤微生物量氮影响较大,土壤基础呼吸表现为W2W3低于W1,而土壤微生物量氮的影响则表现为W1 > W2 > W3。随灌溉量的减少,土壤β-葡萄糖苷酶、多酚氧化酶和脲酶活性均有不同程度的降低。与冬小麦生长后期相比,土壤酶活性对水分的胁迫响应在生长前期更为敏感,其中0~10 cm土层的土壤酶活性受水分胁迫影响大于10~20 cm土层。研究结果表明,免耕条件下灌溉方式与灌溉量显著影响了土壤微生物活性,从而调节了冬小麦产量形成。

关键词: 灌溉, 水分胁迫, 土壤酶活性, 土壤基础呼吸, 微生物量氮

Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to understand the effects of conventional (150 mm, W1), water-saving (75 mm, W2), and zero (W3) irrigation on winter wheat yield, soil basal respiration, soil microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN) and soil enzyme activities under no-till practice in North China Plain. Wheat yields in W1 and W2 were similar and significantly higher than that in W3. Water stress showed great influence on soil basal respiration and SMBN at jointing and filling stages, resulting in a significant decrease of soil basal respiration under W2 and W3 compared with that under W1, and a change of SMBN as W1 > W2 > W3. The activities of soil β-glucosidase, polyphenol oxidase, and urease declined with the decrease of irrigation quantity. Such influence was more sensitive in early growth period of wheat than in late growth period, particularly in the 0–10 cm soil layer. These results suggested that yield formation of winter wheat under no-till practice might result from the regualtion of soil microbial activity that received great impact of irrigation strategy.

Key words: Irrigation, Water stress, Soil enzyme activity, Soil basal respiration, Microbial biomass nitrogen

[1]Jenkinson D S, Ladd J N. Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover. In: Paul V E A, Ladd J N, eds. Soil Biochemistry. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1981. pp 415–471



[2]Zelles L. Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in the characterization of microbial communities in soil: a review. Biol Fert Soils, 1999, 29: 111–129



[3]Marx M C, Wood M, Jarvis S C. A microplate fluorimetric assay for the study of enzyme diversity in soils. Soil Biol Biochem, 2001, 33: 1633–1640



[4]Dick R P. Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality. In: Doran J W, Coleman D C, Bezdicek D F, Stewart B A, eds. Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment, Madison, WI, USA: Soil Science Society of America Special Publication 35, 1994. pp 107–124



[5]Benitez E, Melgar R, Sainz H, Gomez, M, Nogales, R. Enzyme activities in the rhizosphere of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) grown with olive cakemulches. Soil Biol Biochem, 2000, 32: 1829–1835



[6]Paz Jimenez M D, Horra A M, Peuzzo L, Palma M R. Soil quality: a new index based on microbiological and biochemical parameters. Biol Fert Soils, 2002, 35: 302–306



[7]Spedding T A, Hamel C, Mehuys G R, Madramootoo C A. Soil microbial dynamics in maize-growing soil under different tillage and residue management systems. Soil Biol Biochem, 2004, 36: 499–512



[8]Al-Kaisi M M, Yin X H. Tillage and crop residue effects on soil carbon and dioxide emission in corn-soybean rotations. J Environ Qual, 2005, 34: 437–445



[9]Adl S M, Coleman D C, Read F. Slow recovery of soil biodiversity in sandy loam soils of Georgia after 25 years of no-tillage management. Agric Ecol Environ, 2006, 114: 323–334



[10]Yancey P H, Clark M E, Hand S C, Bowlus R D, Somero G N. Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte systems. Science, 1982, 217: 1214–1222



[11]Schimel J P, Gulledge J M, Clein-Curley J S, Lindstrom J E, Braddock J F. Moisture effects on microbial activity and community structure in decomposing birch litter in the Alaskan taiga. Soil Biol Biochem, 1999, 31: 831–838



[12]Sardans J, Penuelas J. Drought decreases soil enzyme activity in a Mediterranean Quercus ilex L. forest. Soil Biol Biochem, 2005, 37: 455–461



[13]Sardans J, Penuelas J. Soil enzyme activity in a Mediterranean forest after six years of drought. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2010, 74: 838–851



[14]Meng Q, Sun Q, Chen X, Cui Z, Yue S, Zhang F, Römheld V. Alternative cropping systems for sustainable water and nitrogen use in the North China Plain. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2012, 146: 93–102



[15]李素娟, 陈继康, 陈阜, 李琳, 张海林. 华北平原免耕冬小麦生长发育特征研究. 作物学报, 2008, 34: 290–296



Li S J, Chen J K, Chen F, Li L, Zhang H L. Characteristics of growth and development of winter wheat under zero tillage in North China Plain. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34: 290–296 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]Bergstrom D W, Monreal C M, Tomlin A D, Miller J J. Interpretation of soil enzyme activities in a comparison of tillage practices along a topographic and textural gradient. Can J Soil Sci, 2000, 80: 71–79



[17]王志敏, 王璞, 李绪厚, 李建民, 鲁来清. 冬小麦节水省肥高产简化栽培理论与技术. 中国农业科技导报, 2006, 8(5): 38–44



Wang Z M, Wang P, Li X H, Li J M, Lu L Q. Principle and technology of water-saving, fertilizer-saving, high-yielding and simple cultivation in winter wheat. Rev China Agric Sci Tech, 2006, 8(5): 38–44 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]秦欣, 刘克, 周丽丽, 周顺利, 鲁来清, 王润政. 华北地区冬小麦-夏玉米轮作节水体系周年水分利用特征. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 4014–4024



Qin X, Liu K, Zhou L L, Zhou Z L, Lu L Q, Wang R Z. Characteristics of annual water utilization in winter wheat-summer maize rotation system n North China Plain. Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45: 4014–4024 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[19]Guan D, Zhang Y, Al-Kaisi M M, Wang Q, Zhang M, Li Z. Tillage practices effect on root distribution and water use efficiency of winter wheat under rain-fed condition in the North China Plain. Soil Tillage Res, 2015, 146: 286–295



[20]Bardgett R D, Ovell R D, Hobbs P J, Jarvis S C. Seasonal changes in soil microbial communities along a fertility gradient of temperate grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem, 1999, 31: 1021–1030



[21]Joergensen R G, Brookes P C. Ninhydrin-reactive nitrogen measurements of microbial biomass in 0.5M K2SO4 soil extracts. Soil Biol Biochem, 1990, 22: 1023–1027



[22]关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986. pp 342–344



Guan S Y. Methods in Soil Enzyme Research. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1986. pp 342–344 (in Chinese)



[23]Sinsabaugh R L, Antibus R K, Linkins A E, McClaugherty C A, Rayburn L, Repert D, Weiland T. Wood decomposition: nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in relation to extracellular enzyme activity. Ecology, 1993, 74: 1586–1593



[24]Allison S D, Czimczik C I, Treseder K K. Microbial activity and soil respiration under nitrogen addition in Alaskan boreal forest. Global Change Biol, 2008, 14: 1156–1168



[25]王彬彬, 林启美, 陈源泉, 隋鹏, 高旺盛. 微池板比色法在多酚氧化酶和β-葡萄糖苷酶研究中的应用. 土壤学报, 2012, 49: 773–779



Wang B B, Lin Q M, Chen Y Y, Sui P, Gao W S. Application of microplate colorimetric method in determining activities of polyphenol oxidase and β-glucosidase in soil. Acta Pedol Sin, 2012, 49: 773–779 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[26]Zhang X, Chen S, Sun H, Pei D, Wang Y. Dry matter, harvest index, grain yield and water use efficiency as affected by water supply in winter wheat. Irrig Sci, 2008, 27: 1–10



[27]Han H, Li Z, Ning T, Zhang X, Shan Y, Bai M. Radiation use efficiency and yield of winter wheat under deficit irrigation in North China. Plant Soil Environ, 2008, 54: 313–319



[28]Zhang X Y, Pei D, Li Z, Li J, Wang Y. Management of supplemental irrigation of winter wheat for maximum profit. In: FAO. Deficit Irrigation Practices: Water Reports, 2002. pp 57–65



[29]Sun H, Shen Y, Yu Q, Flerchinger G N, Zhang Y, Liu C, Zhang X. Effect of precipitation change on water balance and WUE of the winter wheat–summer maize rotation in the North China Plain. Agric Water Manag, 2010, 97: 1139–1145



[30]Sardans J, Peñuelas J, Estiarte M. Changes in soil enzymes related to C and N cycle and in soil C and N content under prolonged warming and drought in a Mediterranean shrubland. Appl Soil Ecol, 2008, 39: 223–235



[31]Hueso S, García C, Hernández T. Severe drought conditions modify the microbial community structure, size and activity in amended and unamended soils. Soil Biol Biochem, 2012, 50: 167–173



[32]Sanaullah M, Blagodatskaya E, Chabbi A, Rumpel C, Kuzyakov Y. Drought effects on microbial biomass and enzyme activities in the rhizosphere of grasses depend on plant community composition. Appl Soil Ecol, 2011, 48: 38–44



[33]Yao X H, Min H, Lü Z H, Yuan H P. Influence of acetamiprid on soil enzymatic activities and respiration. Eur J Soil Biol, 2006, 42: 120–126



[34]Kato S, Haruta S, Cui Z J, Ishii M, Igarashi Y. Effective cellulose degradation by a mixed-culture system composed of a cellulolytic Clostridium and aerobic non-cellulolytic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2004, 51: 133–142



[35]Blanchette R A. Deligni?cation by wood-decay fungi. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 1991, 29: 381–398



[36]Li F, Yu J, Nong M, Kang S, Zhang J. Partial root-zone irrigation enhanced soil enzyme activities and water use of maize under different ratios of inorganic to organic nitrogen fertilizers. Agric Water Manag, 2010, 97: 231–239



[37]Steinweg J M, Jeffrey S D, Matthew D W. Modeling the effects of temperature and moisture on soil enzyme activity: linking laboratory assays to continuous field data. Soil Biol Biochem, 2012, 55: 85–92

[1] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[2] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[3] 朱金娟, 王慧萍, 杨国栋, 王宇诚, 杨晨, 王斌, Agustiani Nurwulan, 涂军明, 毕俊国, 崔克辉, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 水分管理和品种类型对再生稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 295-315.
[4] 王曜阔, 王文政, 张敏, 刘希伟, 杨敏, 李昊昱, 张灵鑫, 闫彦菲, 蔡瑞国. 水氮运筹对冬小麦籽粒GMP合成和面粉加工品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2176-2189.
[5] 张冬玲, 于爱忠, 吕汉强, 杨学慧, 王玉珑, 王鹏飞, 尚永盼, 尹波, 刘亚龙, 王凤. 绿肥还田结合减量施氮对绿洲灌区麦田N2O排放和小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 1005-1021.
[6] 张辰煜, 葛军勇, 褚俊聪, 王星宇, 赵宝平, 杨亚东, 臧华栋, 曾昭海. 燕麦红芸豆带状间作的产量效应及根系形态与土壤酶活性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 459-469.
[7] 王鹏博, 张冬霞, 乔唱唱, 黄明, 王贺正. 秸秆还田和施磷量对豫西旱地小麦土壤酶活性和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 534-547.
[8] 赵黎明, 段绍彪, 项洪涛, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰, 沈雪峰. 干湿交替灌溉与植物生长调节剂对水稻光合特性及内源激素的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 174-188.
[9] 付景, 马梦娟, 张骐飞, 段居琦, 王越涛, 王付华, 王生轩, 白涛, 尹海庆, 王亚. 干湿交替灌溉和施氮量对粳稻光合特性和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1787-1804.
[10] 徐冉, 杨文叶, 朱均林, 陈松, 徐春梅, 刘元辉, 章秀福, 王丹英, 褚光. 不同灌溉模式对籼粳杂交稻甬优1540产量与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 425-439.
[11] 杨晓慧, 王碧胜, 孙筱璐, 侯靳锦, 徐梦杰, 王志军, 房全孝. 冬小麦对水分胁迫响应的模型模拟与节水滴灌制度优化[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(8): 2196-2209.
[12] 冯连杰, 于振文, 张永丽, 石玉. 灌溉对小麦分蘖发生和不同茎蘖光合同化物生产分配及成穗的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1653-1667.
[13] 李盼, 陈桂平, 苟志文, 殷文, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 范虹, 柴强. 绿洲灌区春小麦光能利用与水分生产效益对秸秆还田方式的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(5): 1316-1326.
[14] 张金鑫, 葛均筑, 马玮, 丁在松, 王新兵, 李从锋, 周宝元, 赵明. 华北平原冬小麦-夏玉米种植体系周年水分高效利用研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 879-892.
[15] 付景, 王亚, 杨文博, 王越涛, 李本银, 王付华, 王生轩, 白涛, 尹海庆. 干湿交替灌溉耦合施氮量对水稻籽粒灌浆生理和根系生理的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 808-820.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!