欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (03): 556-562.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00556

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

甘蔗-大豆间作和减量施氮对甘蔗产量和主要农艺性状的影响

杨文亭1,2,李志贤1,3,赖健宁1,吴鹏1,章莹1,王建武1,*   

  1. 1 华南农业大学热带亚热带生态研究所，广东广州 510642；2 江西农业大学农学院，江西南昌 330045；3 湖南科技大学煤炭资源清洁利用与矿山环境保护湖南省重点实验室，湖南湘潭 411201
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-11 修回日期:2013-11-25 出版日期:2014-03-12 网络出版日期:2014-01-16
  • 通讯作者: 王建武, E-mail: wangjw@scau.edu.cn, Tel: 020-38604886
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重大基础研究计划(973计划)项目(2011CB100400), 国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD14B16-04)和广东省科技计划项目(2012A020100003)资助。

Effects of Sugarcane-Soybean Intercropping and Reduced Nitrogen Application on Yield and Major Agronomic Traits of Sugarcane

YANG Wen-Ting1,2,LI Zhi-Xian1,3,LAI Jian-Ning1,WU Peng1,ZHANG Ying1,WANG Jian-Wu1,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Tropical and Subtropical Ecology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; 2 College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China; 3 Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Clean-utilization and Mine Environment Protection, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China
  • Received:2013-07-11 Revised:2013-11-25 Published:2014-03-12 Published online:2014-01-16
  • Contact: 王建武, E-mail: wangjw@scau.edu.cn, Tel: 020-38604886

RichHTML

PDF

1553

被引次数

17

摘要：

甘蔗-大豆间作逐渐得到推广应用。我们于2009—2011年连续3年在华南农业大学农场进行大田定位试验，探讨甘蔗-大豆间作和减量施氮对甘蔗产量和主要农艺性状的影响。试验设置3种种植模式(甘蔗-大豆(1∶1)间作、甘蔗-大豆(1∶2)间作、甘蔗单作)和2种施氮水平(常规施氮，525 kg hm–2和减量施氮，300 kg hm–2)。结果表明，施氮水平连续3年对甘蔗产量均无显著影响；相比甘蔗单作，甘蔗-大豆间作模式在2010年显著降低了甘蔗产量，但2009、2011年和3年均值都表明间作模式对甘蔗产量无显著影响。3年结果表明施氮水平对甘蔗的主要农艺性状均无显著影响；种植模式对甘蔗株高没有显著影响，但显著影响了甘蔗茎粗、有效茎数和单株产量，与甘蔗单作相比，2009年的甘蔗-大豆间作显著降低了甘蔗有效茎数，2011年甘蔗-大豆间作模式下的甘蔗茎粗和单株产量均显著大于甘蔗单作。相关分析表明，甘蔗产量与甘蔗单株产量、有效茎数和株高均呈正相关，其中甘蔗-大豆(1∶2)间作模式下甘蔗产量与单株产量呈极显著正相关(P<0.01)，减量施氮水平下的甘蔗-大豆(1∶2)间作模式的甘蔗产量与有效茎数呈显著正相关(P<0.05)。综合来看，减量施氮和间作大豆对甘蔗产量影响不显著，对甘蔗主要农艺性状也没有显著负面影响。从节约成本和维持甘蔗产量来考虑，减量施氮水平下的甘蔗-大豆(1∶2)间作模式具有一定的可行性。

关键词: 甘蔗-大豆间作, 产量, 氮素, 株高, 有效茎数

Abstract:

Sugarcane-soybean intercropping pattern is gradually popularized and applied in China. Three years continuous (2009–2011) field experiments were conducted in South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou to investigate the effect of sugarcane-soybean intercropping systems on yield and major agronomic traits of sugarcane. Experiments with randomized block design included six treatments with two rates of N fertilizer (reduced nitrogen application, 300 kg ha–1; normal nitrogen application, 525 kg ha–1) and three cropping patterns [sugarcane monocropping, sugarcane-soybean (1:1) intercropping, sugarcane/soybean (1:2) intercropping]. The results showed that nitrogen rates had no effect on sugarcane yield and agronomic traits in 2009–2011. Compared with sugarcane monocropping, sugarcane-soybean intercropping obviously reduced sugarcane yield only in 2010, and no significant influence in sugercane yield in 2009, 2011 as well as average of the three years. Cropping patterns had no significant influence on plant height in 2009–2011. Compared with sugarcane monoculture, sugarcane-soybean intercropping obviously reduced the sugarcane millable stalks in 2009, significantly increased sugarcane stem diameter and yield per plant in 2011. Sugarcane yield had positive correlation with yield per plant, millable stalks and plant height. Sugarcane yield had highly significant positive correlation with yield per plant in sugarcane/soybean (1:2) intercropping (P<0.01). Sugarcane yield had notable correlation with millable stalks in sugarcane/soybean (1:2) intercropping under reduced nitrogen application (P<0.05). In conclusion, reduced nitrogen application and intercropping patterns had no negative influence on sugarcane agronomic traits in 2009–2011, and significant effect on sugarcane yield based on average values of the three years. Sugarcane-soybean intercropping with reduced nitrogen application is feasible in practice in consideration of saving cost and sustaining sugarcane yield.

Key words: Sugarcane-soybean intercropping;, Yield, Nitrogen, Plant height, Millable stalks

[1]李奇伟. 现代甘蔗改良技术. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2000. pp 212–214



Li Q W. Modern Sugarcane Improvement Techniques. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology Press, 2000. pp 212–214 (in Chinese)



[2]卢良恕. 中国立体农业概论. 成都: 四川科学技术出版社, 1999. pp 98–106



Lu L S. Chinese Agriculture Science Bulletin. Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Technology Press, 1999. pp 98–106 (in Chinese)



[3]Suman A, Lal M, Singh A K, Gaur A. Microbial biomass turnover in Indian subtropical soils under different sugarcane intercropping systems. Agron J, 2006, 98: 698–704



[4]Kamruzzaman M, Hasanuzzaman M. Factors affecting profitability of sugarcane production as monoculture and as intercrop in selected areas of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Agric Res, 2007, 32: 433–444



[5]Manimaran S, Kalyanasundaram D, Ramesh S, Sivakumar K. Maximizing sugarcane yield through efficient planting methods and nutrient management practices. Sugar Tech, 2009, 11: 395–397



[6]冯奕玺. 蔗行间种黄豆花生, 获得蔗豆双丰收. 广西蔗糖, 2006, 42(1): 46–47



Feng Y X. Sugarcane inter-row soybean or peanuts, get bumper sugarcane and beans. Guangxi Sugar Cane, 2006, 42(1): 46–47 (in Chinese)



[7]孟庆宝, 方锋学, 周艳霞, 龙明华, 刘海斌, 张革民, 汪淼, 黄芳, 蒋洪涛. 甘蔗间种菜用大豆对蔗田土壤养分的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(5): 186–189



Meng Q B, Fang F X, Zhou Y X, Long M H, Liu H B, Zhang G M, Wang M, Huang F, Jiang H T. Effect of sugarcane-soybean intercropping on soil nutrients. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2011, 27(5): 186–189 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]吴建明, 李杨瑞, 杨丽涛, 方锋学, 朱秋珍, 谢金兰, 刘晓燕. 甘蔗间种大豆的试验. 作物杂志, 2011, (5): 103–105



Wu J M, Li Y R, Yang L T, Fang F X, Zhu Q Z, Xie J L, Liu X Y. Sugarcane intercropping with soybean. Crops, 2011, (5): 103–105 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9] Nazir M S, Jabbar A, Ahmad I, Nawaz S, Bhatti I H. Production potential and economics of intercropping in autumn-planted sugarcane. Int J Agric Biol, 2002, 4: 140–142



[10]王秀林, 阳代天. 甘蔗不同生育期对氮磷钾的吸收与分配. 土壤通报, 1994, 25(5): 224–226



Wang X L, Yang D T. Absorption and distribution of nitrogen phosphorus and potassium in different growth stages of sugarcane. Chin J Soil Sci, 1994, 25(5): 224–226 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]周修冲, 刘国坚, 曾秋朋, 姚建武, 艾绍英. 高产甘蔗平衡施肥效应. 土壤肥料, 1998, (3): 26–28



Zhou X C, Liu G J, Portch S, Zeng Q P, Yao J W, Ai S Y. Effect of fertilizer K, S, Mg and nutient characteristics of high yield sugarcane. Soils Fert, 1998, (3): 26–28 (in Chinese)



[12]Robinson N, Brackin R, Vinall K, Soper F, Holst J, Gamage H, Paungfoo-Lonhienne C, Rennenberg H, Lakshmanan P, Schmidt S. Nitrate paradigm does not hold up for sugarcane. PloS ONE, 2011, 6: e19045



[13]敖俊华, 江永, 黄振瑞, 卢颖林, 黄莹, 周文灵, 陈迪文, 李奇伟. 加强甘蔗养分管理, 降低甘蔗生产成本. 广东农业科学, 2011, (23): 31–34



Ao J H, Jiang Y, Huang Z R, Lu Y L, Huang Y, Zhou W L, Chen D W, Li Q W. Stengthen the sugarcane nutrient management and reduce the sugarcane production cost. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2011, (23): 31–34 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]谢金兰, 陈引芝, 朱秋珍, 刘晓燕, 吴建明, 王维赞. 氮肥施用量与施用方法对甘蔗生长的影响. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(31): 237–241



Xie J L, Chen Y Z, Zhu Q Z, Liu X Y, Wu J M, Wang W Z. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and application methods on sugarcane growth. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2012, 28(31): 237–241 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Singh A, Lal M, Suman A. Effect of intercropping in sugarcane (Saccharum complex hybrid) on productivity of plant cane-ratoon system. Indian J Agron, 2008, 53: 140–144



[16]杨文亭, 李志贤, 冯远娇, 舒磊, 王建武. 甘蔗-大豆间作对大豆鲜荚产量和农艺性状的影响. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31: 577–582



Yang W T, Li Z X, Feng Y J, Shu L, Wang J W. Effects of sugarcane-soybean intercropping on soybean fresh pod yield and agronomic traits. Chin J Ecol, 2006, 32: 949–955 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]韦贵剑, 梁景文, 陆文娟, 罗积维, 侯青光. 甘蔗间种大豆最佳模式探讨. 南方农业学报, 2013, 44: 49–53



Wei G J, Liang J W, Lu W J, Luo J W, Hou Q G. Preliminary report on the optimal model for sugarcane intercropped with soybean. J South Agric, 2013, 44: 49–53 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Singels A, Smit M. Sugarcane response to row spacing-induced competition for light. Field Crops Res, 2009, 113: 149–155



[19]吴才文, 杨洪昌, 陈学宽, 刘家勇, 陆鑫, 赵俊, 王建光. 苗期间种黄豆对甘蔗生长及产量的影响. 西南农业学报, 2004, 17: 645–650



Wu C W, Yang H C, Chen X K, Liu J Y, Lu X, Zhao J, Wang J G. Effect of soybean intercropping on the growth and yield of sugarcane at seedling stage. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2004, 17: 645–650 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]刘福业, 杨俊贤, 吴文龙, 潘方胤, 吴建涛, 邓海华, 齐永文, 陈勇生, 沈万宽. 甘蔗新品种粤糖00-236蔗产量及其构成因子间相关和多元回归分析. 广东农业科学, 2011, (5): 42–44



Liu F Y, Yang J X, Wu W L, Pan F Y, Wu J T, Deng H H, Qi Y W, Chen Y S, Shen W K. Correlation and multiple regression anallysis between cane yield and its component factors of new variety YT00-236. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2011, (5): 42–44 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[2] 马胜乾, 王志平, 陈浩天, 窦淑贤, 张燕, 邓艾兴, 张卫建, 原向阳, 宋振伟. 秸秆还田下耕作方式与氮肥施用量对东北玉米产量及土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[3] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[4] 张思思, 赵向辉, 周洋, 姚云凤, 朱荣昱, 董元杰, 胡国庆, 徐通, 刘兆新. 冬闲期翻耕和绿肥还田对连作花生田土壤理化性质和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
[5] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[6] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[7] 王宇诚, 张露, 刘阿康, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 袁珅. 基于产量差的作物大面积单产提升策略与展望[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1279-1290.
[8] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[9] 郭星宇, 胡丹, 林苏期, 王梦凯, 谭文峰, 黄传琴. 生物炭配施化肥提高玉米‖大豆下玉米产量和土壤生态系统多功能性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1536-1547.
[10] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[11] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[12] 刘昕萌, 任昊, 张继波, 张吉旺, 赵斌, 任佰朝, 刘鹏, 王洪章. 茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)缓解高温影响玉米雌穗分化的生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1561-1572.
[13] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[14] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[15] 崔雪梅, 柳妍娣, 刘景辉, 米俊珍, 武俊英, 赵宝平. 不同基因型燕麦强弱势粒生理特性与产量关系研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1220-1235.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2