欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (03): 556-562.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00556

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

甘蔗-大豆间作和减量施氮对甘蔗产量和主要农艺性状的影响

杨文亭1,2,李志贤1,3,赖健宁1,吴鹏1,章莹1,王建武1,*   

  1. 1 华南农业大学热带亚热带生态研究所，广东广州 510642；2 江西农业大学农学院，江西南昌 330045；3 湖南科技大学煤炭资源清洁利用与矿山环境保护湖南省重点实验室，湖南湘潭 411201
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-11 修回日期:2013-11-25 出版日期:2014-03-12 网络出版日期:2014-01-16
  • 通讯作者: 王建武, E-mail: wangjw@scau.edu.cn, Tel: 020-38604886
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家重大基础研究计划(973计划)项目(2011CB100400), 国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD14B16-04)和广东省科技计划项目(2012A020100003)资助。

Effects of Sugarcane-Soybean Intercropping and Reduced Nitrogen Application on Yield and Major Agronomic Traits of Sugarcane

YANG Wen-Ting1,2,LI Zhi-Xian1,3,LAI Jian-Ning1,WU Peng1,ZHANG Ying1,WANG Jian-Wu1,*   

  1. 1 Institute of Tropical and Subtropical Ecology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; 2 College of Agronomy, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China; 3 Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Coal Resources Clean-utilization and Mine Environment Protection, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, China
  • Received:2013-07-11 Revised:2013-11-25 Published:2014-03-12 Published online:2014-01-16
  • Contact: 王建武, E-mail: wangjw@scau.edu.cn, Tel: 020-38604886

RichHTML

PDF

1325

被引次数

17

摘要：

甘蔗-大豆间作逐渐得到推广应用。我们于2009—2011年连续3年在华南农业大学农场进行大田定位试验，探讨甘蔗-大豆间作和减量施氮对甘蔗产量和主要农艺性状的影响。试验设置3种种植模式(甘蔗-大豆(1∶1)间作、甘蔗-大豆(1∶2)间作、甘蔗单作)和2种施氮水平(常规施氮，525 kg hm–2和减量施氮，300 kg hm–2)。结果表明，施氮水平连续3年对甘蔗产量均无显著影响；相比甘蔗单作，甘蔗-大豆间作模式在2010年显著降低了甘蔗产量，但2009、2011年和3年均值都表明间作模式对甘蔗产量无显著影响。3年结果表明施氮水平对甘蔗的主要农艺性状均无显著影响；种植模式对甘蔗株高没有显著影响，但显著影响了甘蔗茎粗、有效茎数和单株产量，与甘蔗单作相比，2009年的甘蔗-大豆间作显著降低了甘蔗有效茎数，2011年甘蔗-大豆间作模式下的甘蔗茎粗和单株产量均显著大于甘蔗单作。相关分析表明，甘蔗产量与甘蔗单株产量、有效茎数和株高均呈正相关，其中甘蔗-大豆(1∶2)间作模式下甘蔗产量与单株产量呈极显著正相关(P<0.01)，减量施氮水平下的甘蔗-大豆(1∶2)间作模式的甘蔗产量与有效茎数呈显著正相关(P<0.05)。综合来看，减量施氮和间作大豆对甘蔗产量影响不显著，对甘蔗主要农艺性状也没有显著负面影响。从节约成本和维持甘蔗产量来考虑，减量施氮水平下的甘蔗-大豆(1∶2)间作模式具有一定的可行性。

关键词: 甘蔗-大豆间作, 产量, 氮素, 株高, 有效茎数

Abstract:

Sugarcane-soybean intercropping pattern is gradually popularized and applied in China. Three years continuous (2009–2011) field experiments were conducted in South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou to investigate the effect of sugarcane-soybean intercropping systems on yield and major agronomic traits of sugarcane. Experiments with randomized block design included six treatments with two rates of N fertilizer (reduced nitrogen application, 300 kg ha–1; normal nitrogen application, 525 kg ha–1) and three cropping patterns [sugarcane monocropping, sugarcane-soybean (1:1) intercropping, sugarcane/soybean (1:2) intercropping]. The results showed that nitrogen rates had no effect on sugarcane yield and agronomic traits in 2009–2011. Compared with sugarcane monocropping, sugarcane-soybean intercropping obviously reduced sugarcane yield only in 2010, and no significant influence in sugercane yield in 2009, 2011 as well as average of the three years. Cropping patterns had no significant influence on plant height in 2009–2011. Compared with sugarcane monoculture, sugarcane-soybean intercropping obviously reduced the sugarcane millable stalks in 2009, significantly increased sugarcane stem diameter and yield per plant in 2011. Sugarcane yield had positive correlation with yield per plant, millable stalks and plant height. Sugarcane yield had highly significant positive correlation with yield per plant in sugarcane/soybean (1:2) intercropping (P<0.01). Sugarcane yield had notable correlation with millable stalks in sugarcane/soybean (1:2) intercropping under reduced nitrogen application (P<0.05). In conclusion, reduced nitrogen application and intercropping patterns had no negative influence on sugarcane agronomic traits in 2009–2011, and significant effect on sugarcane yield based on average values of the three years. Sugarcane-soybean intercropping with reduced nitrogen application is feasible in practice in consideration of saving cost and sustaining sugarcane yield.

Key words: Sugarcane-soybean intercropping;, Yield, Nitrogen, Plant height, Millable stalks

[1]李奇伟. 现代甘蔗改良技术. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2000. pp 212–214



Li Q W. Modern Sugarcane Improvement Techniques. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology Press, 2000. pp 212–214 (in Chinese)



[2]卢良恕. 中国立体农业概论. 成都: 四川科学技术出版社, 1999. pp 98–106



Lu L S. Chinese Agriculture Science Bulletin. Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Technology Press, 1999. pp 98–106 (in Chinese)



[3]Suman A, Lal M, Singh A K, Gaur A. Microbial biomass turnover in Indian subtropical soils under different sugarcane intercropping systems. Agron J, 2006, 98: 698–704



[4]Kamruzzaman M, Hasanuzzaman M. Factors affecting profitability of sugarcane production as monoculture and as intercrop in selected areas of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Agric Res, 2007, 32: 433–444



[5]Manimaran S, Kalyanasundaram D, Ramesh S, Sivakumar K. Maximizing sugarcane yield through efficient planting methods and nutrient management practices. Sugar Tech, 2009, 11: 395–397



[6]冯奕玺. 蔗行间种黄豆花生, 获得蔗豆双丰收. 广西蔗糖, 2006, 42(1): 46–47



Feng Y X. Sugarcane inter-row soybean or peanuts, get bumper sugarcane and beans. Guangxi Sugar Cane, 2006, 42(1): 46–47 (in Chinese)



[7]孟庆宝, 方锋学, 周艳霞, 龙明华, 刘海斌, 张革民, 汪淼, 黄芳, 蒋洪涛. 甘蔗间种菜用大豆对蔗田土壤养分的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(5): 186–189



Meng Q B, Fang F X, Zhou Y X, Long M H, Liu H B, Zhang G M, Wang M, Huang F, Jiang H T. Effect of sugarcane-soybean intercropping on soil nutrients. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2011, 27(5): 186–189 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]吴建明, 李杨瑞, 杨丽涛, 方锋学, 朱秋珍, 谢金兰, 刘晓燕. 甘蔗间种大豆的试验. 作物杂志, 2011, (5): 103–105



Wu J M, Li Y R, Yang L T, Fang F X, Zhu Q Z, Xie J L, Liu X Y. Sugarcane intercropping with soybean. Crops, 2011, (5): 103–105 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[9] Nazir M S, Jabbar A, Ahmad I, Nawaz S, Bhatti I H. Production potential and economics of intercropping in autumn-planted sugarcane. Int J Agric Biol, 2002, 4: 140–142



[10]王秀林, 阳代天. 甘蔗不同生育期对氮磷钾的吸收与分配. 土壤通报, 1994, 25(5): 224–226



Wang X L, Yang D T. Absorption and distribution of nitrogen phosphorus and potassium in different growth stages of sugarcane. Chin J Soil Sci, 1994, 25(5): 224–226 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]周修冲, 刘国坚, 曾秋朋, 姚建武, 艾绍英. 高产甘蔗平衡施肥效应. 土壤肥料, 1998, (3): 26–28



Zhou X C, Liu G J, Portch S, Zeng Q P, Yao J W, Ai S Y. Effect of fertilizer K, S, Mg and nutient characteristics of high yield sugarcane. Soils Fert, 1998, (3): 26–28 (in Chinese)



[12]Robinson N, Brackin R, Vinall K, Soper F, Holst J, Gamage H, Paungfoo-Lonhienne C, Rennenberg H, Lakshmanan P, Schmidt S. Nitrate paradigm does not hold up for sugarcane. PloS ONE, 2011, 6: e19045



[13]敖俊华, 江永, 黄振瑞, 卢颖林, 黄莹, 周文灵, 陈迪文, 李奇伟. 加强甘蔗养分管理, 降低甘蔗生产成本. 广东农业科学, 2011, (23): 31–34



Ao J H, Jiang Y, Huang Z R, Lu Y L, Huang Y, Zhou W L, Chen D W, Li Q W. Stengthen the sugarcane nutrient management and reduce the sugarcane production cost. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2011, (23): 31–34 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[14]谢金兰, 陈引芝, 朱秋珍, 刘晓燕, 吴建明, 王维赞. 氮肥施用量与施用方法对甘蔗生长的影响. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(31): 237–241



Xie J L, Chen Y Z, Zhu Q Z, Liu X Y, Wu J M, Wang W Z. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and application methods on sugarcane growth. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2012, 28(31): 237–241 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]Singh A, Lal M, Suman A. Effect of intercropping in sugarcane (Saccharum complex hybrid) on productivity of plant cane-ratoon system. Indian J Agron, 2008, 53: 140–144



[16]杨文亭, 李志贤, 冯远娇, 舒磊, 王建武. 甘蔗-大豆间作对大豆鲜荚产量和农艺性状的影响. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31: 577–582



Yang W T, Li Z X, Feng Y J, Shu L, Wang J W. Effects of sugarcane-soybean intercropping on soybean fresh pod yield and agronomic traits. Chin J Ecol, 2006, 32: 949–955 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[17]韦贵剑, 梁景文, 陆文娟, 罗积维, 侯青光. 甘蔗间种大豆最佳模式探讨. 南方农业学报, 2013, 44: 49–53



Wei G J, Liang J W, Lu W J, Luo J W, Hou Q G. Preliminary report on the optimal model for sugarcane intercropped with soybean. J South Agric, 2013, 44: 49–53 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Singels A, Smit M. Sugarcane response to row spacing-induced competition for light. Field Crops Res, 2009, 113: 149–155



[19]吴才文, 杨洪昌, 陈学宽, 刘家勇, 陆鑫, 赵俊, 王建光. 苗期间种黄豆对甘蔗生长及产量的影响. 西南农业学报, 2004, 17: 645–650



Wu C W, Yang H C, Chen X K, Liu J Y, Lu X, Zhao J, Wang J G. Effect of soybean intercropping on the growth and yield of sugarcane at seedling stage. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2004, 17: 645–650 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]刘福业, 杨俊贤, 吴文龙, 潘方胤, 吴建涛, 邓海华, 齐永文, 陈勇生, 沈万宽. 甘蔗新品种粤糖00-236蔗产量及其构成因子间相关和多元回归分析. 广东农业科学, 2011, (5): 42–44



Liu F Y, Yang J X, Wu W L, Pan F Y, Wu J T, Deng H H, Qi Y W, Chen Y S, Shen W K. Correlation and multiple regression anallysis between cane yield and its component factors of new variety YT00-236. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2011, (5): 42–44 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[3] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[4] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[5] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[6] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[7] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[8] 郭星宇, 刘朋召, 王瑞, 王小利, 李军. 旱地冬小麦产量、氮肥利用率及土壤氮素平衡对降水年型与施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1262-1272.
[9] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[10] 于春淼, 张勇, 王好让, 杨兴勇, 董全中, 薛红, 张明明, 李微微, 王磊, 胡凯凤, 谷勇哲, 邱丽娟. 栽培大豆×半野生大豆高密度遗传图谱构建及株高QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[11] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[12] 王泽, 周钦阳, 刘聪, 穆悦, 郭威, 丁艳锋, 二宫正士. 基于无人机和地面图像的田间水稻冠层参数估测与评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1248-1261.
[13] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[14] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[15] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2