欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (07): 1037-1046.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.01037

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

棉花秸秆还田对土壤速效养分及微生物特性的影响

刘艳慧1,王双磊1,2,李金埔1,3,秦都林1,张美玲1,聂军军1,毛丽丽1,宋宪亮1,*,孙学振1,*   

  1. 1 山东农业大学农学院 / 作物生物学国家重点实验室, 山东泰安 271018；2 烟台市农业技术推广中心, 山东烟台 264000；3 平顶山市种子管理站, 河南平顶山 467000
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-17 修回日期:2016-05-09 出版日期:2016-07-12 网络出版日期:2016-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 孙学振, E-mail: sunxz@sdau.edu.cn; 宋宪亮, E-mail: xlsong@sdau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目(2013BAD05B06), 山东省现代农业产业技术体系(棉花)建设专项(SDAIT-03-05), 山东省农业良种工程项目(2013LZ, 2014LZ)和山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2013CM005)资助。

Effects of Cotton Straw Returning on Soil Available Nutrients and Microbial Characteristics

LIU Yan-Hui1,WANG Shuang-Lei1,2,LI Jin-Pu1,3,QIN Du-Lin1,ZHANG Mei-Ling1,NIE Jun-Jun1,MAO Li-Li1,SONG Xian-Liang1,*,SUN Xue-Zhen1,*?   

  1. 1 State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China; 2 Yantai Agricultural Technology Extension Service, Yantai 264000, China; 3 Pingdingshan Seed Service Center, Pingdingshan 467000, China
  • Received:2015-11-17 Revised:2016-05-09 Published:2016-07-12 Published online:2016-05-12
  • Contact: 孙学振, E-mail: sunxz@sdau.edu.cn; 宋宪亮, E-mail: xlsong@sdau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:

    The study is supported by Key Projects in National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period (2013BAD05B06), Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (SDAIT-03-05, SDAIT-03-05), Shandong Program for Improved Varieties of Agriculture (2013LZ, 2014LZ), and Natural Science Fund of Shandong Province (ZR2013CM005).

RichHTML

PDF

972

被引次数

13

摘要：

连续4年，以德农09068为试材，设棉花秸秆还田与未还田2个处理，调查棉花秸秆还田对土壤0~60 cm土层的速效养分含量和微生物特性的影响。结果表明，连续4年棉花秸秆还田显著提高0~20 cm土层土壤有机质、碱解氮、速效钾含量、土壤微生物量碳、土壤活跃微生物量及土壤基础呼吸速率，分别比未还田处理提高8.16%、13.23%、12.30%、13.63%、11.57%和13.14%；在20~40 cm土层中，分别提高6.08%、27.51%、11.47%、14.32%、15.03%和17.44%；在40~60 cm土层中土壤有机质、碱解氮、速效钾含量、土壤微生物量碳及土壤活跃微生物量分别提高6.05%、12.87%、8.08%、10.60%和20.30%，但对土壤基础呼吸速率的提高效果不显著。棉花秸秆还田显著提高了棉花的籽棉、皮棉产量、总铃数及单铃重，分别提高16.86%、15.03%、5.99%和10.25%，而对衣分无显著影响。在长期棉花秸秆还田的棉田中，应关注可能产生的连作障碍，注意磷肥的适量施入，以保证实现棉花稳产高产。

关键词: 棉花, 秸秆还田, 养分, 微生物特性, 产量

Abstract:

The experiment with two treatments of cotton straw returning and no straw returning was conducted using Denong 09068 at the Experimental Station of Shandong Agricultural University (Dezhou) to investigate the contents of soil available nutrients and microbial characters under cotton straw returning for four consecutive years. The main results indicated that compared with control (no straw returning), cotton straw returning significantly increased the contents of soil organic matter, alkaline hydrolyzed nitrogen, available potassium, soil microbial C and active microbial biomass by 8.16%, 13.23%, 12.30%, 13.63%, and 11.57% (0–20 cm soil layer), 6.08%, 27.51%, 11.47%, 14.32%, and 15.03% (20–40 cm soil layer), 6.05%, 12.87%, 8.08%, 10.60%, and 20.30% (40–60 cm soil layer) on average, respectively. Soil basal respiration rate of straw returning treatment was 13.14% and 17.44% in 0–20 cm and 20–40 cm soil layers respectively higher than that of no straw returning treatment, while no significant increase in 40–60 cm soil layer. Cotton straw returning significantly increased seed cotton yield (16.86%) and lint yield (15.03%), absolutely owning to larger total boll number (5.99%) and boll weight (10.25%), but there was no change in lint percentage, compared with no cotton straw returning treatment. Returning cotton straw can increase soil fertility, while applying appropriate P fertilizer and controlling obstacles in continuous cropping are necessary for long–term straw returning to enhance yield.

Key words: Cotton, Straw returning soil, Available nutrients contents, Microbial characters, Yield

[1] 林成先. 秸秆综合利用现状及发展战略研究. 中国农业信息, 2014, (10): 29–30
Ling C X. Research of straw comprehensive utilization status and development strategy. China Agric Inform, 2014, (10): 29–30 (in Chinese)
[2] Malhi S S, Nyborg M, Solberg E D, Dyck M F, Puurveen D. Improving crop yield and N uptake with long-term straw retention in two contrasting soil types. Field Crops Res, 2011, 124: 378–391
[3] 张亚丽, 吕家珑, 金继运, 李书田, 陈占全, 高旭升. 施肥和秸秆还田对土壤肥力质量及春小麦品质的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18: 307–314
Zhang Y L, Lü J L, Jin J Y, Li S T, Chen Z Q, Gao X S. Effects of chemical fertilizer and straw return on soil fertility and spring wheat quality. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2012, 18: 307–314 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] 劳秀荣, 孙伟红, 王真, 郝艳如, 张昌爱. 秸秆还田与化肥配合施用对土壤肥力的影响. 土壤学报, 2003, 40: 618–623
Lao X R, Sun W H, Wang Z, Hao Y R, Zhang C A. Effect of matching use of straw and chemical fertilizer on soil fertility. Acta Pedol Sin, 2003, 40: 618–623 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5] 杨宪龙, 路永莉, 同延安, 林文, 梁婷. 长期施氮和秸秆还田对小麦-玉米轮作体系土壤氮素平衡的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19: 65–73
Yang X L, Lu Y L, Tong Y A, Ling W, Liang T. Effects of long-term N application and straw returning on N budget under wheat-maize rotation system. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2013, 19: 65–73 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] 马晓霞, 王莲莲, 黎青慧, 李花, 张树兰, 孙本华, 杨学云. 长期施肥对玉米生育期土壤微生物量碳氮及酶活性的影响. 生态学报, 2012, 32: 5502–5511
Ma X X, Wang L L, Li Q H, Li H, Zhang S L, Sun B H, Yang X Y. Effects of long-term fertilization on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen and enzyme activities during maize growing season. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32: 5502–5511 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] 孙瑞, 孙本华, 高明霞, 杨学云, 张树兰. 长期不同土地利用方式下塿土土壤微生物特性的变化. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21: 655–663
Sun R, Sun B H, Gao M X, Yang X Y, Zhang S L. Changes of soil microbial characteristics under long-term different land use patterns on an anthropogenic loess soil. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2015, 21: 655–663 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] 宋秋华, 李凤民, 刘洪升, 王俊, 李世清. 黄土区地膜覆盖对麦田土壤微生物体碳的影响. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14: 1512–1516
Song Q H, Li F M, Liu H S, Wang J , Li S Q. Effect of plastic film mulching on soil microbial biomass in spring wheat field in semi-arid loess area. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2003, 14: 1512–1516 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9] 王志明, 朱培立, 黄东迈, 刘海琴. 秸秆碳的田间原位分解和微生物量碳的周转特征. 土壤学报, 2003, 40: 446–453
Wang Z M, Zhu P L, Huang D M, Liu H Q. Straw carbon decomposition in situ in field and characteristics of soil biomass carbon turnover. Acta Pedol Sin, 2003, 40: 446–453 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10] Jenkinson D S, Ladd J N. Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover. Soil Biochemistry, 1981, 16: 481–487
[11] 徐阳春, 沈其荣, 冉炜. 长期免耕与施用有机肥对土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷的影响. 土壤学报, 2002, 39: 89–96
Xu Y C, Shen Q R, Ran W. Effects of zero-tillage and application of manure on soil microbial biomass C, N and P after sixteen years of cropping. Acta Pedol Sin, 2002, 39: 89–96 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] Li L J, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Li J X, Yang X G, Jin J. Wheat straw burning and its associated impacts on Beijing air quality. Sci in China (Series D: Earth Sci), 2008, 51: 403–414
[13] 武际, 郭熙盛, 鲁剑巍, 王允青, 许征宇, 张晓玲. 水旱轮作制下连续秸秆覆盖对土壤理化性质和作物产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18: 587–594
Wu J, Guo X S, Lu J W, Wang Y Q, Xu Z Y, Zhang X L. Effects of continuous straw mulching on soil physical and chemical properties and crop yields in paddy-upland rotation system. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2012, 18: 587–594 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14] 马超, 周静, 刘满强, 郑学博, 崔键, 李辉信, 康炳龙. 秸秆促腐还田对土壤养分及活性有机碳的影响. 土壤学报, 2013, 50: 915–921
Ma C, Zhou J, Liu M Q, Zheng X B, Cui J, Li H X, Kang B L. Effects of incorporation of pre-treated straws into field on soil nutrients and labile organic carbon in Shajiang black soil. Acta Pedol Sin, 2013, 50: 915–921 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] 周永进, 吴文革, 许有尊, 陈刚, 徐汝民, 张丽娟. 油菜秸秆还田培肥土壤的效应及对后作水稻产量的影响. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 36: 53–58
Zhou Y J, Wu W G, Xu Y Z, Chen G, Xu R M, Zhang L J. Effects of returned rapeseed straw on soil fertility and yield of subsequent rice. J Yangzhou Univ (Agric Life Sci), 2015, 36: 53–58 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16] 王龙昌, 邹聪明, 张云兰, 张赛, 张晓雨, 周航飞, 罗海秀. 西南“旱三熟”地区不同保护性耕作措施对田土壤生态效应及生产效益的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 1880–1890
Wang L C, Zou C M, Zhang Y L, Zhang S, Zhang X Y, Zhou H F, Luo H X. Influences of conservation tillage practices on farmland soil ecological
factors and productive benefits in dryland region with triple cropping system in southwest China. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 1880–1890 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] 周怀平, 杨治平, 李红梅, 关春林. 秸秆还田和秋施肥对旱地玉米生长发育及水肥效应的影响. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15: 1231–1235
Zhou H P, Yang Z P, Li H M, Guan C L. Effect of straw return to field and fertilization in autumn on dryland corn growth and on water and fertilizer efficiency. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2004, 15: 1231–1235 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] 杨敏芳, 朱利群, 韩新忠, 顾克军, 胡乃娟, 张振文, 卞新民. 耕作措施与秸秆还田对稻麦两熟制农田土壤养分、微生物生物量及酶活性的影响. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27: 272–275
Yang M F, Zhu L Q, Han X Z, Gu K J, Hu N J, Zhang Z W, Bian X M. Effects of tillage and crop residues incorporation on soil nutrient, microbial biomass and enzyme activity under rice-wheat rotation. J Soil Water Conserv, 2013, 27: 272–275 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] Powlson D S, Riche A B, Coleman K, Glendining M J, Whitmore A P. Carbon sequestration in European soils through straw incorporation: limitations and alternatives. Waste Managt, 2008, 28: 741–746
[20] Alberto M C R, Neue H U. Effect of different straw management practices on soil fertility, rice yields and the environment. Philippine J Crop Sci, 1996, 21(S1): 69
[21] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第3版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. pp 25–111
Bao S D. Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analysis, 3rd edn. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. pp 25–111 (in Chinese)
[22] 王芸, 韩宾, 史忠强, 邵国庆, 江晓东, 宁堂原, 焦念元, 李增嘉. 保护性耕作对土壤微生物特性及酶活性的影响. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20: 120–122, 142
Wang Y, Han B, Shi Z Q, Shao G Q, Jiang X D, Ning T Y, Jiao N Y, Li Z J. Effects of conservation tillage on soil microbial characters and soil enzyme activities. J Soil Water Conserv, 2006, 20: 120–122, 142 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23] 林英杰, 高芳, 张佳蕾, 周录英, 张新民, 李宝龙, 赵华建, 李向东. 不同种植方式对花生土壤微生物生物量及活性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21: 2323–2328
Lin Y J, Gao F, Zhang J L, Zhou L Y, Zhang X M, Li B L, Zhao H J, Li X D. Soil microbial biomass and respiration rate under effects of different planting patterns of peanut. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010, 21: 2323–2328 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] 刘世平, 陈后庆, 聂新涛, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 张洪程. 稻麦两熟制不同耕作方式与秸秆还田土壤肥力的综合评价. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(5): 51–56
Liu S P, Chen H Q, Nie X T, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Zhang H C. Comprehensive evaluation of tillage and straw returning on soil fertility in a wheat-rice double cropping system. Trans CSAE, 2008, 24(5): 51–56 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] 汤文光, 肖小平, 唐海明, 张海林, 陈阜, 陈中督, 薛建福, 杨光立. 长期不同耕作与秸秆还田对土壤养分库容及重金属Cd的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26: 168–176
Tang W G, Xiao X P, Tang H M, Zhang H L, Chen F, Chen Z D, Xue J F, Yang G L. Effects of long-term tillage and rice straw returning on soil nutrient pools and Cd concentration. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2015, 26: 168–176 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] 戴志刚. 秸秆养分释放规律及秸秆还田对作物产量和土壤肥力的影响. 华中农业大学硕士毕业论文, 湖北武汉, 2009
Dai Z G. Study on nutrient release characteristics of crop residue and effect of crop residue returning on crop yield and soil fertility. MS Thesis of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China, 2009 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[27] 胡诚, 曹志平, 叶钟年, 吴文良. 不同的土壤培肥措施对低肥力农田土壤微生物生物量碳的影响. 生态学报, 2006, 26: 808–814
Hu C, Cao Z P, Ye Z N, Wu W L. Impact of soil fertility maintaining practice on soil microbial biomass carbon in low production agro-ecosystem in northern China. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006, 26: 808–814 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28] 王芸, 李增嘉, 韩宾, 史忠强, 宁堂原, 江晓东, 郑延海, 白美, 赵建波. 保护性耕作对土壤微生物量及活性的影响. 生态学报, 2007, 27: 3384–3390
Wang Y, Li Z J, Han B, Shi Z Q, Ning T Y, Jiang X D, Zheng Y H, Bai M, Zhao J B. Effects of conservation tillage on soil microbial biomass and activity. Acta Ecol Sin, 2007, 27: 3384–3390 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29] Bazzaz F A, Williams W E. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations within a mixed forest: implications for seedling growth. Ecology, 1991, 72: 12–16
[30] 赵士诚, 曹彩云, 李科江, 仇少君, 周卫, 何萍. 长期秸秆还田对华北潮土肥力、氮库组分及作物产量影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20: 1441–1449
Zhao S C, Cao C Y, Li K J, Qiu S J, Zhou W, He P. Effects of long-term straw return on soil fertility, nitrogen pool fractions and crop yields on a fluvo-aquic soil in North China. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2014, 20: 1441–1449 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31] Reiter M S, Reeves D W, Burmester C H, Torbert H A. Cotton nitrogen management in a high-residue conservation system: cover crop fertilization. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2008, 72: 1321–1329
[32] 王志勇, 白由路, 杨俐苹, 卢艳丽, 王磊, 王贺. 低土壤肥力下施钾和秸秆还田对作物产量及土壤钾素平衡的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18: 900–906
Wang Z Y, Bai Y L, Yang L P, Lu Y L, Wang L, Wang H. Effects of application of potassium fertilizer and straw returning on crop yields and soil potassium balance in low-yielding fields. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2012, 18: 900–906 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] 王宏庭, 金继运, 王斌, 赵萍萍. 山西褐土长期施钾和秸秆还田对冬小麦产量和钾素平衡的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16: 801–808
Wang H T, Jin J Y ,Wang B, Zhao P P. Effects of long-term potassium application and wheat straw return to cinnamon soil on wheat yields and soil potassium balance in Shanxi. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2010, 16: 801–808 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[34] 杨帆, 董燕, 徐明岗, 包耀贤. 南方地区秸秆还田对土壤综合肥力和作物产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23: 3040–3044
Yang F, Dong Y, Xu M G, Bao Y X. Effects of straw returning on the integrated soil fertility and crop yield in southern China. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2012, 23: 3040–3044 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] 张凡, 睢宁, 余超然, 刘瑞显, 杨长琴, 宋光雷, 孟亚利, 周治国. 小麦秸秆还田和施钾对棉花产量与养分吸收的效应. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 2169–2175
Zhang F, Sui N, Yu C R, Liu R X, Yang C Q, Song G L, Meng Y L, Zhou Z G. Effects of wheat straw returning and potassium fertilizer application on yield and nutrients uptake of cotton. Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40: 2169–2175 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[36] 程红梅, 简桂良, 倪万潮, 杨红华, 王志兴, 孙文姬, 张保龙, 王晓峰, 马存, 贾士荣. 转几丁质酶和?-1,3-葡聚糖酶基因提高棉花对枯萎病和黄萎病的抗性. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38: 1160–1166
Cheng H M, Jian G L, Ni W C, Yang H H, Wang Z X, Sun W J, Zhang B L, Wang X F, Ma C, Jia S R. Increase of fusarium- and verticillium-resistance by transferring chitinase and glucanase gene into cotton. Sci Agric Sin, 2005, 38: 1160–1166 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[2] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[3] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[4] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[5] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[6] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[7] 周静远, 孔祥强, 张艳军, 李雪源, 张冬梅, 董合忠. 基于种子萌发出苗过程中弯钩建成和下胚轴生长的棉花出苗壮苗机制与技术[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1051-1058.
[8] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[9] 孙思敏, 韩贝, 陈林, 孙伟男, 张献龙, 杨细燕. 棉花苗期根系分型及根系性状的关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1081-1090.
[10] 闫晓宇, 郭文君, 秦都林, 王双磊, 聂军军, 赵娜, 祁杰, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽, 孙学振. 滨海盐碱地棉花秸秆还田和深松对棉花干物质积累、养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1235-1247.
[11] 柯健, 陈婷婷, 吴周, 朱铁忠, 孙杰, 何海兵, 尤翠翠, 朱德泉, 武立权. 沿江双季稻北缘区晚稻适宜品种类型及高产群体特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 1005-1016.
[12] 孔垂豹, 庞孜钦, 张才芳, 刘强, 胡朝华, 肖以杰, 袁照年. 不同施肥水平下丛枝菌根真菌对甘蔗生长及养分相关基因共表达网络的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 860-872.
[13] 李瑞东, 尹阳阳, 宋雯雯, 武婷婷, 孙石, 韩天富, 徐彩龙, 吴存祥, 胡水秀. 增密对不同分枝类型大豆品种同化物积累和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[14] 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961.
[15] 闫宇婷, 宋秋来, 闫超, 刘爽, 张宇辉, 田静芬, 邓钰璇, 马春梅. 连作秸秆还田下玉米氮素积累与氮肥替代效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 962-974.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2