欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (08): 1234-1244.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01234

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

甘薯块根硬度与干物质含量的相关性

唐道彬1,2,**,安建刚2,**,丁祎2,白慧2,张凯2,吕长文2,傅体华1,*,王季春2,*   

  1. 1四川农业大学农学院，四川成都611130；2西南大学农学与生物科技学院/西南大学南方山地农业教育部工程研究中心/重庆市甘薯工程技术研究中心**，重庆400716
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-18 修回日期:2017-04-18 出版日期:2017-08-12 网络出版日期:2017-05-11
  • 通讯作者: 傅体华, E-mail: futihua@sina.com; 王季春, E-mail: wchun1963@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由重庆市社会事业与民生保障科技创新专项重大项目(cstc2015shms-ztzx80001, cstc2015shms-ztzx80002, cstc2015shms-ztzx80003, cstc2015shms-ztzx80004)资助。

Correlation between Hardness and Dry-matter Content of Storage Root in Sweetpotato[Ipomoea batatas (L.)Lam.]

TANG Dao-Bin1,2,AN Jian-Gang2,DING Yi2,BAI Hui2,ZHANG Kai2, LYU Chang-Wen2,FUTi-Hua1,*,WANG Ji-Chun2,*   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China;2College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University/Engineering Research Center of South Upland Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Southwest University/Sweetpotato Engineering and Technology Research Center, Chongqing, 400716,China
  • Received:2016-11-18 Revised:2017-04-18 Published:2017-08-12 Published online:2017-05-11
  • Contact: Fu tihua, E-mail: futihua@sina.com; Wang jichen, E-mail: wchun1963@163.com
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the Technology Innovation Fund of Chongqing(cstc2015shms-ztzx80001, cstc2015shms-ztzx80002, stc2015shms-ztzx80003, cstc2015shms-ztzx80004).

RichHTML

PDF

749

被引次数

1

摘要：

分别采用硬度测定法和烘干法，测试129份甘薯品种(系)块根不同部位的硬度值与干物质含量，构建甘薯各部位硬度与干物质含量的线性回归方程，以探讨甘薯硬度与干物质含量的关系，以及甘薯硬度与干物质含量分级标准。结果表明，129份甘薯材料的块根干物质含量与硬度均可划分为服从正态分布的5级，其平均分布频率为10.00%、19.12%、40.88%、20.88%和9.12%；甘薯不同部位硬度之间存在显著差异；其硬度值表现为径向切割心部>径向切割中部>轴向切割尾部>轴向切割头部>轴向切割心部>轴向切割中部；甘薯硬度与干物质含量呈极显著正相关，以径向切割心部与径向切割中部硬度的平均值建立甘薯干物质含量与硬度间的回归方程为y=0.6743x+3.6184(20≤x≤60,R2=0.712192)；用该回归方程验证20个样品集，计算所得干物质含量值与测定值相对误差为0.2%，表明该回归方程可用于准确、快速、低消耗测定甘薯块根干物质含量，指导甘薯育种实践。

关键词: 甘薯, 硬度, 干物质含量, 相关性, 回归方程, 概率分级

Abstract:

To explore the correlation and to discuss the classification standard of hardness and dry-matter contentof sweetpotato, collectedand determined 129 sweetpotato varieties (lines) by using sclerometer and drying method, respectively, and the linear regression equation was established based on the correlation between hardness and dry-matter content values. The dry-matter content and hardness of storage root in the 129 sweetpotato varieties (lines) could be divided into five grades with normal distribution, which proportions were 10.00%, 19.12%, 40.88%, 20.88%, and 9.12%, respectively. There were significant differences in hardness among different parts of storage root,ranking as: the core site of radial cuttingsurface>the middle site of radial cutting surface >the tail site of axial cutting surface>the head site of axial cutting surface>the core site of axial cutting surface >the middle site of axial cutting surface. There was significant positive correlation between hardness and dry-matter content of storage root. By using the mean value of hardness at core and middle parts of storage root after radial cutting, the dry matter content could be well predicted by using the regression equation y=0.6743x+3.6184 (20≤x≤60,R2=0.712192).This equation was validated in evaluation of the dry matter content in 20 sweet potato varieties (lines), and the relative error between estimated value and measured value was 0.2%. This result demonstrated that the equation obtained in this study could be used for accurate, fast and low cost measurement of dry matter content insweetpotato production and breeding.

Key words: 甘薯, 硬度, 干物质含量, 相关性, 回归方程, 概率分级

[1]吕长文, 唐道彬, 罗小敏, 王季春. 甘薯干物质测定方法研究. 江苏农业科学, 2009, (3): 307–308
Lyu C W, Tang D B, Luo X M, Wang J C. Study on the method of determination dry rate in sweet potato.Jiangsu AgricSic, 2009, (3): 307–308 (in Chinese)
[2]武崇光, 许海涛, 冯启涣, 陆漱韵. 测定甘薯干物质含量取样部位的研究. 北京农业大学学报, 1991, 17(4): 54–59
Wu C G, Xu H T, Feng Q H, Lu S Y. Study on the sampling site of determinating dry rate in sweet potato. ActaAgricUnivPekinensis, 1991, 17(4): 54–59 (inChinese)
[3]聂继云, 李志霞, 李海飞, 李静, 王昆, 毋永龙, 徐国锋, 闫震, 吴锡, 覃兴. 苹果理化品质评价指标研究. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45: 2895–2903
Nie J Y, Li Z X, Li H F, Li J, Wang K, Wu Y L, Xu G F, Yan Z, Wu X, Qin X. Evaluation in dices for apple physicochemical quality.SciAgricSin, 2012, 45: 2895–2903 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]刘平, 刘孟军, 周俊义, 毕平. 枣树数量性状的分布类型及其概率分级指标体系. 林业科学, 2003, 29(6): 77–82
Liu P, Liu M J, Zhou J Y, Bi P. Liu P, Liu M J, Zhou J Y, Bi P. Distribution and probability grading index system of quantitative character of Chinese jujube. SciSilv Sin, 2003, 39(6): 77–82 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]刘孟军. 枣树数量性状的概率分级研究. 园艺学报, 1996, 23: 105–109
Liu M J. Studies on the variation and probability grading of major quantitative characters of Chinese jujube.ActaHort Sin, 1996, 23: 105–109 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]李基平. 林木种子的正态分布曲线分级方法. 云南林业科技, 1998, 3(3): 37–41
Li J P. Normal distribution curve grade method of forest-tree seeds. Yunnan ForSciTechnol, 1998, 3(3): 37–41 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]郑丽静, 聂继云, 李明强, 康艳玲, 匡立学, 叶孟亮. 苹果风味评价指标的筛选研究. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48: 2796–2805
Zheng L J, Nie J Y, Li M Q, Kang Y L, Kuang L X, Ye M L. Study on screening of taste evaluation indexes for apple.SciAgric Sin, 2015, 48: 2796–2805 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]吴列洪, 沈升法, 李兵. 甘薯品种干物质含量与油炸薯片含油量和硬度间的相关性. 中国粮油学报, 2009, 24(11): 47–49
Wu L H, Shen S F, Li B. Correlation between dry rate of varieties and oil content and hardness of fried potato chips in sweet potato. J Chin Cereal OilAss, 2009, 24(11): 47–49 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]王文质, 以凡, 杜述荣, 魏秀玲, 许莉萍, 曹化林. 甘薯淀粉含量换算公式及换算表. 作物学报, 1989, 15: 94–96
Wang W Z, Yi F, Du S R, Wei X L, Xu L P, Cao H L. Conversion table of the starch content in sweet potato.ActaAgronSin, 1989, 15: 94–96 (in Chinese)
[10]董敦义, 关明杰, 朱一辛, 莫翠招, 莫弦丰. 不同竹龄毛竹硬度的测试分析. 林业科技开发, 2009, 23(5): 48–50
Dong D Y, Guan M J, Zhu Y X, Mo C Z, Mo X F. The hardness test and analysis solidness of Moso Bamboo in different ages.China ForSciTechnol, 2009, 23(5): 48–50 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]杜社妮, 李晶晶, 张蕊, 白岗栓. 苹果果实硬度适宜测定部位的研究. 北方园艺, 2011, (24): 33–35
Du S N, Li J J, Zhang R, Bai G S. Study on the suitable site of measuring fruit firmness in apple. Northern Hort, 2011, (24): 33–35 (in Chinese with English abstract )
[12]刘超超, 魏景利, 徐玉亭, 焦其庆, 孙海兵, 王传增, 陈学森. 苹果3个早熟品种果实发育后期硬度及其相关生理指标的初步研究. 园艺学报, 2011, 38: 133–138
Liu C C, Wei J L, Xu Y T, Jiao Q Q, Sun H B, Wang C Z, Chen X S. Preliminary study on firmness and related physiological indices of three early-ripening apple cultivar during late development of the fruit. ActaHort Sin, 2011, 38: 133–138 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] 唐启义, 冯明光. DPS数据处理系统: 实验设计、统计分析及模型优化. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006.pp656–665
Tang Q Y, Feng M G. DPS Data Processing System: Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Modeling. Beijing: Science Press, 2006. pp656–665 (in Chinese)
[14] 姜松, 王海鸥, 赵杰文. 猕猴桃低温贮藏期间硬度与化学品质的相关性研究. 食品科学, 2005, 26(5): 244–247
Jiang S, Wang H O, Zhao J W. Study on the correlation between firmness and chemical qualities of kiwi fruit during cold-storage. Food Sci, 2005, 26(5): 244–247 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]于振文. 作物栽培学各论北方本(第2版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013.pp 171–180
Yu Z W.The Theory of Crop Cultivation Northern Version.2nd edn. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2013. pp 171–180 (in Chinese)
[16]贾延宇, 师玉忠, 田丰贺, 张宝宝, 靳卫娜. 甘薯不同部位淀粉的组成及黏度特性研究. 河南农业科学, 2011, 40(8): 84–86
Jia Y Y, Shi Y Z, Tian F H, Zhang B B, Le W N. Contents and viscosity properties of extracted starches from different parts of fresh sweet potato tubers. JHenan AgricSci, 2011, 40(8): 84–86 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]马文, 李喜宏, 刘霞, 贾晓昱, 张华, 李至良. 支链淀粉与直链淀粉比例对重组营养强化米品质的影响. 中国食品学报, 2014, 14(11): 42–48
Ma W, Li X H, Liu X, Jia X Y, Zhang H, Li Z L. Effects of the proportion of branched chain starch and amylose content on the quality of recombinant rice of nutrient enrichment.J Chin Inst Food Sci Tech, 2014, 14(11): 42–48 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 靳容, 蒋薇, 刘明, 赵鹏, 张强强, 李铁鑫, 王丹凤, 范文静, 张爱君, 唐忠厚. 甘薯Dof基因家族挖掘及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(3): 608-623.
[2] 张海燕, 解备涛, 姜常松, 冯向阳, 张巧, 董顺旭, 汪宝卿, 张立明, 秦桢, 段文学. 不同抗旱性甘薯品种叶片生理性状差异及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 518-528.
[3] 赵雪, 周顺利. 玉米抗茎倒伏能力相关性状与评价研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 15-26.
[4] 张思梦, 倪文荣, 吕尊富, 林燕, 林力卓, 钟子毓, 崔鹏, 陆国权. 影响甘薯收获期软腐病发生的指标筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(8): 1450-1459.
[5] 宋天晓, 刘意, 饶莉萍, Soviguidi Deka Reine Judesse, 朱国鹏, 杨新笋. 甘薯细胞壁蔗糖转化酶基因IbCWIN家族成员鉴定及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1297-1308.
[6] 罗兰, 雷丽霞, 刘进, 张瑞华, 金桂秀, 崔迪, 黎毛毛, 马小定, 赵正武, 韩龙植. 利用东乡普通野生稻染色体片段置换系定位产量相关性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(7): 1391-1401.
[7] 王翠娟, 柴沙沙, 史春余, 朱红, 谭中鹏, 季杰, 任国博. 铵态氮素促进甘薯块根形成的解剖特征及其IbEXP1基因的表达[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2): 305-319.
[8] 马猛, 闫会, 高闰飞, 后猛, 唐维, 王欣, 张允刚, 李强. 紫甘薯SSR标记遗传图谱构建与重要农艺性状QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2147-2162.
[9] 黄小芳,毕楚韵,石媛媛,胡韵卓,周丽香,梁才晓,黄碧芳,许明,林世强,陈选阳. 甘薯基因组NBS-LRR类抗病家族基因挖掘与分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(8): 1195-1207.
[10] 刘培勋,马小飞,万洪深,郑建敏,罗江陶,蒲宗君. 两个不同籽粒硬度小麦的比较蛋白组学分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(8): 1275-1282.
[11] 刘永晨,司成成,柳洪鹃,张彬彬,史春余. 改善土壤通气性促进甘薯源库间光合产物运转的原因解析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(3): 462-471.
[12] 陈杉彬, 孙思凡, 聂楠, 杜冰, 何绍贞, 刘庆昌, 翟红. 甘薯IbCAF1基因的克隆及耐盐性、抗旱性鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1862-1869.
[13] 张力岚, 张列梅, 牛焕颖, 徐益, 李玉, 祁建民, 陶爱芬, 方平平, 张立武. 黄麻SSR标记与纤维产量性状的相关性[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1905-1913.
[14] 张欢, 杨乃科, 商丽丽, 高晓茹, 刘庆昌, 翟红, 高少培, 何绍贞. 甘薯抗旱相关基因IbNAC72的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(11): 1649-1658.
[15] 姜仲禹, 唐丽雪, 柳洪鹃, 史春余. 不同施钾量条件下甘薯块根形成的内源激素变化及其与块根数量的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(11): 1750-1759.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2