Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1525-1531.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01525

• TILLAGE & CULTIVATION·PHYSIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Identification of Photothermal Responses in Soybean by Integrating Photoperiod Treatments with Planting-Date Experiments

FEI Zhi-Hong1,2,3,WU Cun-Xiang2,**,SUN Hong-Bo2,HOU Wen-Sheng2,ZHANG Bao-Shi1,HAN Tian-Fu2,*   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang110161, China; 2 National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 3 College of Agronomy, Heilongjiang August First Land Reclamation University, Daqing 163319, China
  • Received:2009-02-17 Revised:2009-03-13 Online:2009-08-12 Published:2009-06-10
  • Contact: HAN Tian-Fu, E-mail: hantf@mail.caas.net.cn; Tel: 010-82108784

PDF

1609

Cited

14

Abstract:

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is a short-day crop that favors temperate weather. There have been a lot of studies on the responses to photoperiod, temperature or photothermal comprehensive regimes in soybean. However, little work has been conducted in the interactive effects of photoperiod and temperature on the development of soybean. To fully understand the photothermal responses of soybean and to identify the varietal variations in these traits, we designed two photoperiodic treatments of 12 h (short day or SD) and 16 h (long day or LD) integrated with two thermal conditions, high temperature (HT) (summer seeding in Beijing) and low temperature (LT) (spring seeding) in the current study. In 2007, the responses to the photoperiod, temperature, and photoperiod-temperature combinations of 10 spring sowing soybean varieties (lines) from the Northeast and 18 summer sowing varieties (lines) from Yellow-Huai-Hai River Valleys of China were identified in 4 photothermal regimes (LD+LT, LD+HT, SD+LT, SD+HT). In 2008, 50 varieties (lines) were used to test the photoperiodic responses. The results showed that SD promoted the developmental rate of soybean regardless of the temperature conditions; HT shortened the number of the days from emergence to flowering no matter whether the photoperiod was long or short. There was significant interaction between temperature and photoperiod from emergence to flowering. With the increase of temperature, the promotive effect of SD on developmental rate of soybean was enhanced, and the HT hastening effect was strengthened by SD as well. The apparent differences in photoperiod response sensitivity (PRS), temperature response sensitivity (TRS) and photothermal comprehensive response sensitivity (PTCRS) between ecotypes were observed. The above three indices of spring sowing soybean varieties from the Northeast were all lower than those of summer sowing varieties from Yellow-Huai-Hai River Valleys. However, the differences between TRS values under the two photoperiod treatments and that between PRS values under the two temperature conditions in spring sowing soybean varieties from the Northeast were both larger than those in summer sowing varieties from the Valleys, and it indicated that there was higher photoperiod × temperature interaction in the spring sowing varieties. The relationship between photothermal responses of soybean varieties and their ecological adaptability was discussed, and it proposed that, in breeding program, emphasis should be paid not only on the identification of responses of soybean varieties to the individual photoperiod or temperature factor but also on the photothermal interaction.

Key words: Soybean, Ecotype, Photoperiod, Temperature, Photothermal interaction

[1] Wang J-L(王金陵), Wu Y-X(武镛祥), Wu H-L(吴和礼), Sun S-C(孙善澄). Analysis on photoperiod ecotypes of cultivated soybean originated from different locations of China. Acta Agric Sin (农业学报), 1956,7(3): 169-180 (in Chinese)

[2] Wang Z C, Reddy V R, Acock M C. Testing for early photoperiod insensitivity in soybean. Agron J, 1998, 90: 389-392
[3] Roberts R H. Further studies of the effects of temperature and other environmental factors upon the photoperiodic responses of plant. J Agric Res, 1939, 59: 699-709
[4] Ellis R H, Collinson S T, Hudson D, Patefield W M. The analysis of reciprocal transfer experiments to estimate the duration of the photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod insensitive phases of plant development: An example in soybean. Ann Bot, 1992, 70: 87-92

[5] Han T-F(韩天富), Wang J-L(王金陵), Fan B-B(范彬彬), Yao W-Q(姚文秋), Yang Q-K(杨庆凯). Effects of post-flowering daylength on agronomic characters of soybean. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 1996, 7: 167-173 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6] Nian H(年海), Lu Y-G(卢永根), Huang H(黄鹤), Yan X-L(严小龙). Studies on ecological types of pre- and post-flowering photoperiodic responses of soybean genotypes over different sowing seasons in Guangzhou. Suppl J Sun Yat-Sen Univ (中山大学学报论丛), 1997, (5): 77-82 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7] Upadhyay A P, Ellis R H, Summerfield R J, Roberts E H, Qi A. Characterization of photothermal flowering responses in maturity isolines of soybean (Glycine max) cv. Clark. Ann Bot, 1994, 74: 87-96
[8] Kantolic A G, Slafer G A. Development and seed number in indeterminate soybean as affected by timing and duration of exposure to long photoperiods after flowering. Ann Bot, 2007, 99: 925-933
[9] Rahman M M, Hampton J G, Hill M J. Soybean development under the cool temperate environment of Canterbury, New Zealand. J New Seeds, 2006, 7: 17-36

[10] Câmara G M S, Sediyama T, Dourado-Neto D, Bernardes M S. Influence of photoperiod and air temperature on the growth, flowering and maturation of soybean. Sci Agric, 1997, 54: 149-154
[11] Yang Z-P(杨志攀), Zhang X-J(张晓娟), Cai S-P(蔡淑平), Qiu D-Z(邱德珍), Wang G-X(王国勋), Zhou X-A(周新安). Response of short juvenility varieties to photoperiods: I. Response to sowing dates. Chin J Oil Crop Sci (中国油料作物学报), 2000, 22(3): 35-38 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12] Wang Y-S(汪越胜), Ma H-H(马宏惠). Response to photo-temperature conditions of days to flowering of soybean ecotypes from China. J Anhui Norm Univ (安徽师范大学学报), 2000, 23(1): 40-46 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[13] Cober E R, Stewart D W, Voldeng H D. Photoperiod and temperature responses in early-maturing, near-isogenic soybean lines. Crop Sci, 2001, 41: 721-727
[14] Agele S O, Adenawoola A R, Doherty M. Growth response of soybean lines contrasting photothermal and soil moisture regimes in a Nigerian tropical rainforest. Intl J Biotronics, 2004, 33: 49-64
[15] Han T-F(韩天富). Photoperiodism in Soybean. In: Wang L-Z(王连铮), Guo Q-Y(郭庆元), eds. Contemporary Soybean Research in China. Beijing: Jindun Press, 2007. pp 211-220 (in Chinese)

[16] Wang G-X(王国勋), Luo X-H(罗学华), Li Y-H(李友华). Discussion about the ecological type of duration and its uses in introduction of soybean (Soja max L.) in China. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1982, 1(1): 33-40 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17] Yang Z-P(杨志攀), Zhang X-J(张晓娟), Cai S-P(蔡淑平), Qu D-Z(邱德珍), Wang G-X(王国勋), Zhou X-A(周新安). Response of short juvenility varieties to photoperiods: Ⅲ. Response to long daylength. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 2001, 20(3): 191-196 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18] He Y-Z(何言章), He Y-L(何元农), Liu Z-S(刘支胜). Study on photoperiodic characters of soybean: IV. Response and relation of vegetative and reproductive growth to the photoperiod. Guizhou Agric Sci (贵州农业科学), 1994, (1): 21-26 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19] Han T-F(韩天富), Wu C-X(吴存祥), Yang H(杨华), Shao G-H(邵桂花). Investigation of floral abortion in spring-sown soybean variety of Zhonghuang 4. Soybean Bull (大豆通报), 2000, (5): 14 (in Chinese)
[20] Han T, Wu C, Tong Z, Mentreddy R S, Tan K, Gai J. Postflowering photoperiod regulates vegetative growth and reproductive development of soybean. Environ Exp Bot, 2006, 55: 120-129
[21] Wu C, Ma Q, Yam K M, Cheung M Y, Xu Y, Han T, Lam H M, Chong K. In situ expression of the GmNMH7 gene is photoperiod-dependent in a unique soybean
[Glycine max (L). Merr. ] flowering reversion system. Planta, 2006, 223: 725-735
[22] Fehr W R, Caviness C E. Stages of Soybean Development. Special Report 80, Cooperative Extension Service, Agriculture and Home Economic Experiment Station. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University, 1977. pp 1-11
[23] Han T-F(韩天富), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Qiu J-X(邱家驯). Comparative study on pre- and post-flowering photoperiod response in various ecotypes of soybeans. Soybean Sci(大豆科学), 1998, 17(2): 129-134 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] Tang Q-Y (唐启义), Feng M-G (冯明光). DPSÓ DATA Processing System—Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Modeling. Beijing: Science Press, 2006 (in Chinese)
[25] Wu J-A(吴纪安). Utilization of heat resource and prevention of accumulated temperature loss in soybean production of Heihe Municipality. Crops (作物杂志), 2007, (2): 32-35 (in Chinese)
[1] CHEN Ling-Ling, LI Zhan, LIU Ting-Xuan, GU Yong-Zhe, SONG Jian, WANG Jun, QIU Li-Juan. Genome wide association analysis of petiole angle based on 783 soybean resources (Glycine max L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1333-1345.
[2] YANG Huan, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, PU Tian, WEN Jing, YANG Wen-Yu, YONG Tai-Wen. Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[3] YU Chun-Miao, ZHANG Yong, WANG Hao-Rang, YANG Xing-Yong, DONG Quan-Zhong, XUE Hong, ZHANG Ming-Ming, LI Wei-Wei, WANG Lei, HU Kai-Feng, GU Yong-Zhe, QIU Li-Juan. Construction of a high density genetic map between cultivated and semi-wild soybeans and identification of QTLs for plant height [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[4] LI A-Li, FENG Ya-Nan, LI Ping, ZHANG Dong-Sheng, ZONG Yu-Zheng, LIN Wen, HAO Xing-Yu. Transcriptome analysis of leaves responses to elevated CO2 concentration, drought and interaction conditions in soybean [Glycine max (Linn.) Merr.] [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1103-1118.
[5] PENG Xi-Hong, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, YANG Xue-Li, REN Jun-Bo, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, LUO Kai, XIE Chen, LEI Lu, YONG Tai-Wen, YANG Wen-Yu. Effects of reduced nitrogen application on soil aeration and root nodule growth of relay strip intercropping soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209.
[6] WANG Hao-Rang, ZHANG Yong, YU Chun-Miao, DONG Quan-Zhong, LI Wei-Wei, HU Kai-Feng, ZHANG Ming-Ming, XUE Hong, YANG Meng-Ping, SONG Ji-Ling, WANG Lei, YANG Xing-Yong, QIU Li-Juan. Fine mapping of yellow-green leaf gene (ygl2) in soybean (Glycine max L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 791-800.
[7] XU Xin, QIN Chao, ZHAO Tao, LIU Bin, LI Hong-Yu, LIU Jun. Function analysis of GmELF3s in regulating soybean flowering time and circadian rhythm [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 812-824.
[8] FENG Ya, ZHU Xi, LUO Hong-Yu, LI Shi-Gui, ZHANG Ning, SI Huai-Jun. Functional analysis of StMAPK4 in response to low temperature stress in potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 896-907.
[9] LI Rui-Dong, YIN Yang-Yang, SONG Wen-Wen, WU Ting-Ting, SUN Shi, HAN Tian-Fu, XU Cai-Long, WU Cun-Xiang, HU Shui-Xiu. Effects of close planting densities on assimilate accumulation and yield of soybean with different plant branching types [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[10] DU Hao, CHENG Yu-Han, LI Tai, HOU Zhi-Hong, LI Yong-Li, NAN Hai-Yang, DONG Li-Dong, LIU Bao-Hui, CHENG Qun. Improving seed number per pod of soybean by molecular breeding based on Ln locus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[11] ZHOU Yue, ZHAO Zhi-Hua, ZHANG Hong-Ning, KONG You-Bin. Cloning and functional analysis of the promoter of purple acid phosphatase gene GmPAP14 in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 590-596.
[12] WANG Juan, ZHANG Yan-Wei, JIAO Zhu-Jin, LIU Pan-Pan, CHANG Wei. Identification of QTLs and candidate genes for 100-seed weight trait using PyBSASeq algorithm in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 635-643.
[13] YUAN Jia-Qi, LIU Yan-Yang, XU Ke, LI Guo-Hui, CHEN Tian-Ye, ZHOU Hu-Yi, GUO Bao-Wei, HUO Zhong-Yang, DAI Qi-Gen, ZHANG Hong-Cheng. Nitrogen and density treatment to improve resource utilization and yield in late sowing japonica rice [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 667-681.
[14] SONG Shi-Qin, YANG Qing-Long, WANG Dan, LYU Yan-Jie, XU Wen-Hua, WEI Wen-Wen, LIU Xiao-Dan, YAO Fan-Yun, CAO Yu-Jun, WANG Yong-Jun, WANG Li-Chun. Relationship between seed morphology, storage substance and chilling tolerance during germination of dominant maize hybrids in Northeast China [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 726-738.
[15] ZHANG Guo-Wei, LI Kai, LI Si-Jia, WANG Xiao-Jing, YANG Chang-Qin, LIU Rui-Xian. Effects of sink-limiting treatments on leaf carbon metabolism in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 529-537.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd