不同地理来源MGIII组大豆品种生育期结构分析及E基因型鉴定

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01448

Abstract

Abstract:

In 2014 and 2015, 60 Maturity Group (MG) III soybean varieties from different geographic regions were chosen to characterize the maturity-related traits and to identify the alleles of the maturity genes (E alleles) in these varieties. The MGIII soybean varieties shared the similar growth period but owned different growth period structure. The spring-sowing MGIII soybean varieties from Northern China and the US bloomed earlier (shorter VP) and exhibited lower R/V values than those from Yellow-Huai-Hai River Valley (YHH) and South China. Six combinations of E alleles were identified in the tested Chinese varieties, among them E1e2E3E4 and e1-asE2E3E4 were found to distribute in larger areas of different regions and cover more ecotypes than other four combinations. In contrast, the type of e1-asE2E3E4 was the only E allele combination in the eight US standard varieties, indicating that the Chinese MGIII varieties were more abundant in genetic variations for the maturity-related traits. By comparing the average effect of each E allele on the maturity-related traits in MGIII soybean varieties under different sowing dates, it was found that the varieties with more dominant E alleles showed longer VP, shorter RP and smaller R/V value. The effects of different E alleles on flowering time and maturity were different, and the effect of the dominant E alleles on spring- sowing soybeans was stronger than that on the summer-sowing ones. The agronomic traits for MGIII varieties from different regions were significantly different and that correlated with the growth period structure. The height of bottom pods of MGIII soybean varieties from Northern China was negatively correlated with R/V, while the number of pods per plant was positively correlated with R/V. Branch number, pod number per plant and 100-seed weight of YHH MGIII varieties were not correlated with R/V. The branch number of southern soybean varieties was significant negative correlated with the VP. These results provide a basis for the improvement of the growth period structure of soybean varieties and adaptability of soybeans to multiple environments.

Key words: soybean, MGIII, geographical origin, E gene, agronomic traits

Hong JIANG,Shi SUN,Wen-Wen SONG,Cun-Xiang WU,Ting-Ting WU,Shui-Xiu HU,Tian-Fu HAN. Characterization of Growth Period Structure and Identification of E Genes of MGIII Soybean Varieties from Different Geographic Regions[J].Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(10): 1448-1458.

Figures/Tables 10

Table 1

Table 2

Phenotypic data of maturity-related traits of MGIII soybean varieties from different regions under spring-sowing and summer-sowing conditions in Beijing"

地理来源 Region	品种 Variety		播季类型 Sowing type		春播 Spring-sowing					夏播Summer-sowing
地理来源 Region	品种 Variety		播季类型 Sowing type		VE-R7		VE-R1	R1-R7	R/V	VE-R7	VE-R1	R1-R7	R/V
中国北方 North China	吉38 Ji 38		Sp		98.8±3.9		23.9±2.0	75.0±2.6	3.2±0.2	95.0±3.4	25.9±2.6	69.4±4.4	2.7±0.4
	吉82 Ji 82		Sp		99.5±9.2		25.3±2.1	75.2±7.4	3.1±0.1	104.1±0.4	30.2±2.3	75.1±1.7	2.6±0.2
	吉91 Ji 91		Sp		101.8±3.0		21.5±1.7	80.2±4.7	3.8±0.5	90.8±1.2	24.6±1.2	66.2±2.3	2.7±0.2
	吉农11 Jinong 11		Sp		97.1±1.5		20.9±0.2	76.3±1.8	3.7±0.1	87.9±3.1	26.3±2.2	61.6±4.9	2.4±0.4
	九农24 Jiunong 24		Sp		94.8±2.9		20.8±1.5	74.0±1.6	3.6±0.2	91.0±1.7	24.6±1.1	66.8±1.8	2.8±0.1
	长农8号 Changnong 8		Sp		106.6±7.2		21.9±1.6	84.8±7.5	3.9±0.5	91.7±4.3	26.4±0.8	65.3±3.5	2.5±0.1
	蒙豆24 Mengdou 24		Sp		95.7±3.9		20.6±2.0	75.1±2.1	3.7±0.3	95.0±3.6	25.5±1.1	69.4±4.7	2.7±0.3
	抚97-16 Fu 97-16		Sp		99.0±3.6		22.7±0.6	76.3±4.1	3.4±0.3	89.3±2.5	25.2±1.8	64.1±2.3	2.6±0.2
	通农12 Tongnong 12		Sp		100.4±3.1		28.3±2.9	72.1±2.4	2.6±0.3	89.7±2.8	35.3±0.7	54.3±2.7	1.5±0.1
	铁丰31 Tiefeng 31		Sp		102.8±5.6		22.9±2.8	79.9±3.0	3.5±0.4	104.4±2.8	25.2±0.4	79.3±2.5	3.1±0.1
	铁丰33 Tiefeng 33		Sp		94.8±9.0		21.5±1.6	73.3±7.5	3.4±0.1	92.5±0.8	25.6±0.5	66.9±1.2	2.6±0.1
	中黄30 Zhonghuang 30		Sp		102.0±6.1		24.2±1.2	77.8±5.8	3.2±0.3	92.4±2.3	30.0±0.3	62.4±2.1	2.1±0.1
	中黄35 Zhonghuang 35		Sp		112.5±9.2		54.5±1.3	58.1±10.5	1.1±0.2	92.3±1.5	51.3±0.7	40.9±1.0	0.8±0.0
	辽豆15 Liaodou 15		Sp		111.6±1.1		41.9±5.9	69.7±6.6	1.7±0.4	98.4±2.3	39.1±0.7	59.3±1.5	1.5±0.0
	辽豆31 Liaodou 31		Sp		112.0±5.5		39.9±3.0	72.1±3.1	1.8±0.1	101.7±2.2	39.4±0.7	62.3±2.6	1.6±0.1
	晋豆19 Jindou 19		Sp		102.6±2.7		22.4±0.7	80.2±3.2	3.6±0.3	91.3±2.0	29.7±0.8	61.6±1.5	2.1±0.1
	平均值 Mean				102.0±5.9 b		27.1±9.7 b	75.0±5.9 ab	3.1±0.8 a	94.2±5.2 b	30.3±7.5 b	64.1±8.6 a	2.3±0.6 a
中国黄淮海 Yellow-Huai- Hai River Valley of China	诱变30 Youbian 30		Su		114.7±4.4		47.7±4.6	67.0±2.1	1.4±0.1	108.4±1.9	52.3±0.7	56.1±2.5	1.1±0.1
	中黄37 Zhonghuang 37		Su		114.6±0.9		40.7±0.5	74.0±1.0	1.8±0.1	105.1±0.6	40.2±0.6	64.9±1.0	1.6±0.0
	中黄39 Zhonghuang 39		Su		111.1±3.9		43.9±1.4	67.3±3.4	1.5±0.1	104.3±0.6	43.3±0.6	61.1±0.3	1.4±0.0
	中黄13 Zhonghuang 13		Su		108.0±1.7		41.3±1.5	66.8±3.1	1.6±0.1	99.7±0.1	42.5±0.4	57.2±0.6	1.3±0.0
	沧豆6号 Cangdou 6		Su		110.6±2.0		30.7±2.2	79.8±2.4	2.6±0.2	91.1±2.6	37.3±0.7	54.0±2.4	1.5±0.1
	冀豆12 Jidou 12		Su		109.5±6.2		29.7±2.7	79.9±3.6	2.7±0.1	98.3±2.8	37.9±0.3	60.4±2.9	1.6±0.1
	邯豆5号 Handou 5		Su		106.6±9.6		24.2±4.1	82.4±9.2	3.5±0.8	96.7±3.4	29.2±1.3	67.5±4.3	2.3±0.2
	丰收黄 Fengshouhuang		Su		110.0±4.5		28.7±1.4	81.3±2.3	2.8±0.2	99.5±2.7	35.1±1.0	64.2±3.3	1.8±0.1
	鲁豆4号 Ludou 10		Su		99.1±2.4		34.3±1.8	64.8±3.9	1.9±0.2	89.6±1.1	34.8±1.4	54.8±1.6	1.6±0.1
	临豆10号 Lindou 10		Su		108.7±7.0		34.3±5.6	74.4±1.6	2.2±0.3	104.0±1.3	41.3±0.7	62.7±1.1	1.5±0.0
	齐黄34 Qihuang 34		Su		108.4±2.3		38.5±3.6	70.0±2.1	1.8±0.2	104.3±0.8	42.0±1.0	62.3±0.3	1.5±0.0
	齐黄35 Qihuang 35		Su		106.3±3.3		38.1±3.1	68.1±0.3	1.8±0.1	103.0±0.7	38.8±1.1	64.2±1.7	1.7±0.1
	山宁11 Shanning 11		Su		107.5±7.2		41.0±1.2	66.5±7.7	1.6±0.2	101.3±1.1	39.4±0.4	61.9±0.9	1.6±0.0
	山宁14 Shanning 14		Su		105.5±3.1		32.6±6.4	72.9±8.2	2.3±0.8	100.1±2.8	36.4±2.4	63.8±4.6	1.8±0.2
	山宁12 Shanning 12		Su		110.5±7.8		37.9±3.5	72.6±4.6	1.9±0.1	97.1±2.0	40.3±0.7	57.1±2.0	1.4±0.0
	冀豆17 Jidou 17		Su		104.7±0.8		30.3±0.8	74.4±0.4	2.5±0.1	95.5±3.0	33.3±0.7	62.4±2.7	1.9±0.1
	菏豆19 Hedou 19		Su		107.1±9.7		33.2±4.0	73.9±5.7	2.2±0.1	102.7±0.8	38.6±1.0	64.0±1.8	1.7±0.1
	菏豆12 Hedou 12		Su		112.6±0.3		43.9±3.4	68.8±3.2	1.6±0.2	106.5±2.1	45.3±0.7	61.4±2.0	1.4±0.0
	菏豆13 Hedou 13		Su		108.0±3.6		39.1±1.7	68.9±1.9	1.8±0.0	96.1±1.9	43.3±0.7	53.0±1.6	1.2±0.0
	徐豆18 Xudou 18		Su		113.5±2.8		33.9±3.9	79.6±2.1	2.4±0.3	106.0±1.0	41.3±0.7	64.7±0.5	1.6±0.0
	淮豆9号 Huaidou 9		Su		114.1±2.4		45.1±2.9	69.0±6.5	1.5±0.3	106.4±1.8	42.9±0.1	63.4±1.9	1.5±0.0
	徐豆14 Xudou 14		Su		115.3±3.4		34.5±4.3	80.8±3.9	2.4±0.4	103.2±1.0	39.1±1.0	63.6±0.1	1.6±0.0
	徐豆15 Xudou 15		Su		112.7±4.1		33.7±3.2	79.0±3.3	2.4±0.2	85.3±1.1	27.2±2.8	57.8±2.7	2.1±0.3
	徐豆9号 Xudou 9		Su		108.4±4.0		32.0±3.9	76.4±4.1	2.4±0.4	103.6±2.1	40.3±0.7	63.3±2.1	1.6±0.1
	皖宿2156 Wansu 2156		Su		111.4±4.9		42.4±1.0	69±4.6	1.6±0.1	99.9±3.4	42.4±0.9	57.5±3.8	1.4±0.1
	皖宿5717 Wansu 5717		Su		106.9±1.0		32.1±0.3	74.8±0.7	2.3±0.1	102.3±2.4	36.7±1.1	65.6±3.4	1.8±0.1
	平均值 Mean				109.5±3.7 a		36.3±5.8 a	73.2±5.4 bc	2.1±0.5 b	100.4±5.5 a	39.3±5.0 a	61.1±3.9 a	1.6±0.3 b
地理来源 Region	品种 Variety		播季类型 Sowing type		春播 Spring-sowing					夏播Summer-sowing
地理来源 Region	品种 Variety		播季类型 Sowing type		VE-R7		VE-R1	R1-R7	R/V	VE-R7	VE-R1	R1-R7	R/V
中国南方 South China		浙H0634 Zhe H0634		Sp**		96.4±2.4	21.7±0.3	74.7±2.2	3.4±0.1	89.9±1.7	26.3±0.7	63.6±1.7	2.4±0.1
		中豆39 Zhongdou 39		Sp**		115.1±0.1	43.0±2.1	70.7±0.1	1.6±0.1	100.5±1.8	43.0±1.8	57.5±0.5	1.3±0.1
		川豆15 Chuandou 15		Sp**		113.9±6.0	45.2±3.3	68.7±9.1	1.5±0.3	108.0±2.8	46.6±1.1	62.0±2.8	1.3±0.1
		贡豆22 Gongdou 22		Sp**		105.1±3.5	35.8±1.8	69.3±4.3	1.9±0.2	91.4±0.3	40.8±1.7	50.5±2.1	1.2±0.1
		贡豆21 Gongdou 21		Sp**		112.7±4.2	43.1±3.0	69.6±6.3	1.6±0.2	100.3±0.8	42.3±0.7	58.3±0.8	1.4±0.0
		南豆21 Nandou 21		Sp**		98.9±5.7	39.4±2.2	59.5±6.9	1.5±0.2	100.5±1.0	43.3±0.7	57.5±1.0	1.3±0.0
		福豆310 Fudou 310		Sp**		113.5±3.6	44.7±1.6	68.7±2.7	1.5±0.1	92.7±3.1	42.7±0.8	50.0±3.9	1.2±0.1
		黔豆3号 Qiandou 3		Sp**		109.6±2.5	37.5±1.4	72.2±3.0	1.9±0.1	90.7±0.5	41.2±0.4	49.4±0.7	1.2±0.0
		黔豆5号 Qiandou 5		Sp**		101.0±3.6	36.5±1.3	64.5±2.6	1.8±0.1	87.2±1.9	39.6±1.2	47.6±1.5	1.2±0.1
		黔豆1号 Qiandou 1		Sp**		111.5±0.7	36.7±2.9	74.1±4.4	2.0±0.3	91.5±9.9	39.2±0.4	52.3±10.1	1.3±0.3
		平均值 Mean				107.8±6.9 a	38.4±6.9 a	69.2±4.5 c	1.9±0.6 b	95.3±6.6 b	40.5±5.4 a	54.9±5.6 b	1.4±0.4 b
北美 North America		Athow		Sp		101.3±2.7	26.2±0.3	75.3±3.5	2.9±0.1	—	—	—	—
		Dilworth		Sp		104.6±2.0	25.5±0.7	80.2±0.3	3.2±0.1	—	—	—	—
		Iroquois		Sp		98.2±4.2	22.7±0.4	77.3±3.5	3.4±0.1	—	—	—	—
		Kottman		Sp		102.9±2.5	23.4±0.3	81.0±0.1	3.5±0.1	—	—	—	—
		Macon		Sp		106.3±1.1	25.1±0.1	81.6±1.1	3.3±0.1	—	—	—	—
		Will		Sp		101.1±2.7	26.7±0.7	75.7±3.0	2.8±0.2	—	—	—	—
		Williams 82		Sp		105.2±5.2	27.4±0.6	80.8±0.2	3.0±0.1	—	—	—	—
		Zane		Sp		104.5±2.3	26.1±1.8	79.5±0.1	3.1±0.2	—	—	—	—
		平均值 Mean				103.0±2.8 b	25.4±1.6 b	78.9±2.5 a	3.1±0.2 a	—	—	—	—

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 5

Table 6

Fig. 3

Table 7

References 45

[1]	Fehr W R, Caviness C E. Stages of Soybean Development. In: Special Report 80. Ames: Cooperative Extension Service, Agriculture and Home Economic Experiment Station, Iowa State University, 1977. pp 1-11
[2]	孙志强, 田佩占, 王继安 . 东北大豆品种生育期结构的初步分析. 大豆科学, 1990,9:198-205
	Sun Z Q, Tian P Z, Wang J A . Preliminary study on the growth period structure of soybean varieties in the northeast of China. Soybean Sci, 1990,9:198-205 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	韩天富, 盖钧镒, 陈风云, 邱家驯 . 生育期结构不同的大豆品种的光周期反应和农艺性状. 作物学报, 1998,24:550-557
	Han T F, Gai J Y, Chen F Y, Qiu J X . Photoperiod response and agronomic characters of soybean varieties with different growth period structures. Acta Agron Sin, 1998,24:550-557 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	王金陵, 祝其昌 . 大豆生育期遗传的初步研究. 作物学报, 1963,2:333-335
	Wang J L, Zhu Q C . The preliminary research on the growth period of soybean genetic. Acta Agron Sin, 1963,2:333-335 (in Chinese)
[5]	吴存祥, 李继存, 沙爱华, 曾海燕, 孙石, 杨光明, 周新安, 常汝镇, 年海, 韩天富 . 国家大豆品种区域试验对照品种的生育期组归属. 作物学报, 2012,38:1977-1987
	Wu C X, Li J C, Sha A H, Zeng H Y, Sun S, Yang G M, Zhou X A, Chang R Z, Nian H, Han T F . Maturity group classification of check varieties in national soybean uniform trials of China. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38:1977-1987 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	宋雯雯 . 中国大豆品种生育期组的精细划分与应用. 中国科学院大学博士学位论文, 北京, 2016
	Song W W . Digitized Classification and Application of Soybean Variety Maturity Groups in China. PhD Dissertation of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing,China, 2016 ( in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	Jia H C, Jiang B J, Wu C X, Lu W C, Hou W S, Sun S, Yan H R, Han T F . Maturity group classification and maturity locus genotyping of early-maturing soybean varieties from high-latitude cold regions. PLoS One, 2014,9:e94139 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094139
[8]	Wang Y, Cheng L R, Leng J T, Wu C X, Shao G H, Hou W S, Han T F . Genetic analysis and Quantitative trait locus identification of the reproductive to vegetative growth period ratio in soybean (Glycine max( L.) Merr.). Euphytica, 2015,201:275-284
[9]	Bernard R L . Two major genes for time of flowering and maturity in soybeans. Crop Sci, 1971,11:242-244 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100020022x
[10]	Buzzell R I . Inheritance of a soybean flowering response to fluorescent daylength conditions. Can J Genet Cytol, 1971,13:703-707 doi: 10.1080/00222937100770511
[11]	Buzzell R I, Voldeng H D . Inheritance of insensitivity to long day length. Soybean Genet Newsl, 1980,7:26-29
[12]	McBlain B A, Bernard R L, Cremeens C R, Korczak J F . A procedure to identify genes affecting maturity using soybean isoline testers. Crop Sci, 1987,27:1127-1132 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1987.0011183X002700060008x
[13]	Bonato E R, Vello N A . E6, a dominant gene conditioning early flowering and maturity in soybeans. Genet Mol Biol, 1999,22:229-232
[14]	Cober E R, Voldeng H D . A new soybean maturity and photoperiod sensitivity locus linked to E1 and T. Crop Sci, 2001,41:698-701 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.413698x
[15]	Cober E R, Molnar S J, Charette M, Voldeng H D . A new locus for early maturity in soybean. Crop Sci, 2010,50:524-527 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2009.04.0174
[16]	Kong F J, Nan H Y, Cao D, Li Y, Wu F F, Wang J L, Lu S J, Yuan X H, Cober E R, Abe J, Liu B H . A new dominant gene E9 conditions early flowering and maturity in soybean. Crop Sci, 2014,54:2529-2535 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.03.0228
[17]	Samanfar B, Molnar S J, Charette M, Schoenrock A, Dehne F, Golshani A, Belzile F, Cober E R . Mapping and identification of a potential candidate gene for a novel maturity locus, E10, in soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 2017,130:377-390
[18]	Ray J D, Hinson K, Mankono J E B . Genetic control of a long-juvenile trait in soybean. Crop Sci, 1995,35:1001-1006 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500040012x
[19]	常汝镇, 李星华 . 夏播条件下大豆成熟期基因作用的研究. 中国油料, 1993, ( 3):15-17
	Chang R Z, Li X H . Study on effect of maturity genes in soybeans under summer sowing condition. Chin J Oil Crops Sci, 1993, ( 3):15-17 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	Xia Z J, Watanabe S, Yamada T, Tsubokura Y, Nakashima H, Zhai H, Anai T, Sato S, Yamazaki T, Lyu S X, Wu H Y, Tabata S, Harada K . Positional cloning and characterization reveal the molecular basis for soybean maturity locus E1 that regulates photoperiodic flowering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109:2155-2164
[21]	Watanabe S, Xia Z J, Hideshima R, Tsubokura Y, Sato S, Yamanaka N, Takahashi R, Anai T, Tabata S, Kitamura K . A map-based cloning strategy employing a residual heterozygous line reveals that the GIGANTEA gene is involved in soybean maturity and flowering. Genetics, 2011,188:395-407
[22]	Watanabe S, Hideshima R, Xia Z J, Tsubokura Y, Sato S, Nakamoto Y, Yamanaka N, Takahashi R, Ishimoto M, Anai T . Map-based cloning of the gene associated with the soybean maturity locus E3. Genetics, 2009,182:1251-1262 doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.098772 pmid: 19474204
[23]	Tsubokura Y, Matsumura H, Xu M L, Liu B H, Nakashima H, Anai T, Kong F J, Yuan X H, Kanamori H, Katayose Y . Genetic variation in soybean at the maturity locus E4 is involved in adaptation to long days at high latitudes. Agronomy, 2013,3:117-134
[24]	Yue Y L, Liu N X, Jiang B J, Li M, Wang H, Jiang Z, Pan H T, Xia Q J, Ma Q B, Han T F, Nian H . A single nucleotide deletion in J encoding GmELF3 confers long juvenility and is associated with adaption of tropic soybean. Mol Plant, 2017,10:656-658
[25]	Lu S J, Zhao X H, Hu Y L, Liu S L, Nan H Y, Li X M, Fang C, Cao D, Shi X Y, Kong L P, Su T, Zhang F G, Li S C, Wang Z, Yuan X H, Cober E R, Weller J L, Liu B H, Hou X L, Tian Z X, Kong F J . Natural variation at the soybean J locus improves adaptation to the tropics and enhances yield. Nat Genet, 2017,49:773-779 doi: 10.1038/ng.3819 pmid: 28319089
[26]	Cheng L R, Wang Y, Zhang C B, Wu C X, Xu J L, Zhu H Y, Leng J T, Bai Y N, Guan R X, Hou W S, Zhang L J, Han T F . Genetic analysis and QTL detection of reproductive period and post-flowering photoperiod responses in soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 2011,123 : 421-429 doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1594-8
[27]	王英, 吴存祥, 张学明, 王云鹏, 韩天富 . 不同光周期条件下大豆生育期主基因的效应. 作物学报, 2008,34:1160-1168
	Wang Y, Wu C X, Zhang X M, Wang Y P, Han T F . Effects of soybean major maturity genes under different photoperiods. Acta Agron Sin, 2008,34:1160-1168 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	Mao T T, Li J Y, Wen Z X, Wu T T, Wu C X, Sun S, Jiang B J, Hou W S, Li W B, Song Q J, Wang D C, Han T F . Association mapping of loci controlling genetic and environmental interaction of soybean flowering time under various photo-thermal conditions. BMC Genomics, 2017,18:415-423 doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3778-3
[29]	夏正俊 . 大豆光周期反应与生育期基因研究进展. 作物学报. 2013,39:571-579
	Xia Z J . Research progresses on photoperiodic flowering and maturity genes in soybean (Glycine max Merr.). Acta Agron Sin, 2013,39:571-579 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	Tsubokura Y, Watanabe S, Xia Z J, Kanamori H, Yamagata H, Kaga A, Katayose Y, Abe J, Ishimoto M, Harada K . Natural variation in the genes responsible for maturity loci E1, E2, E3 and E4 in soybean. Ann Bot, 2014,113:429-441 doi: 10.1093/aob/mct269 pmid: 24284817
[31]	Xu M L, Xu Z H, Liu B H, Kong F J, Tsubokura Y, Watanabe S, Xia Z J, Harada K, Kanazawa A, Yamada T . Genetic variation in four maturity genes affects photoperiod insensitivity and PHYA-regulated post-flowering responses of soybean. BMC Plant Biol, 2013,13:91 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-91
[32]	Harada K, Watanabe S, Xia Z J, Tsubokura Y, Yamanaka N, Anai T. Positional cloning of the responsible genes for maturity Loci E1, E2 and E3 in soybean. In: Krezhovaed D eds. Soybean-Genetics and Novel Techniques for Yield Enhancement. Shanghai: InTech, 2011. pp 51-76 doi: 10.5772/21085
[33]	Liu B, Kanazawa A, Matsumura H, Takahashi R, Harada K, Abe J . Genetic redundancy in soybean photoresponses associated with duplication of phytochrome A gene. Genetics, 2008,180:996-1007
[34]	Hong Z, Lu S X, Wang Y Q, Chen X, Ren H X, Yang J Y, Cheng W, Zong C M, Gu H P, Qiu H M, Wu H Y, Zhang X Z, Cui T T, Xia Z J . Allelic variations at four major maturity E genes and transcriptional abundance of the E1 gene are associated with flowering time and maturity of soybean cultivars. PLoS One, 2014,9:e97636
[35]	Jiang B J, Nan H Y, Gao Y F, Tang L L, Yue Y L, Lu S J, Ma L M, Cao D, Sun S, Wang J L, Wu C X, Yuan X H, Hou W S, Kong F J, Han T F, Liu B H . Allelic combinations of soybean maturity loci E1, E2, E3 and E4 result in diversity of maturity and adaptation to different latitudes. PLoS One, 2014,9:e106042
[36]	Mansur L M, Orf J H, Chase K, Jarvik T, Cregan P B, Lark K G . Genetic mapping of agronomic traits using recombinant inbred lines of soybean. Crop Sci, 1996,36:1327-1336 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600050042x
[37]	Tian Z X, Wang X B, Lee R, Li Y H, Specht J E, Nelson R L, McClean P E, Qiu L J, Ma J X . Artificial selection for determinate growth habit in soybean. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2010,107:8563-8568 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000088107 pmid: 20421496
[38]	Li J C, Wang X B, Song W W, Huang X Y, Zhou J, Zeng H Y, Sun S, Jia H C, Li W B, Zhou X A, Li S Z, Chen P Y, Wu C X, Yong G, Han T F, Qiu L J . Genetic variation of maturity groups and four E genes in the Chinese soybean mini core collection. PLoS One, 2017,12:e0172106
[39]	Liu X Q, Wu J A, Ren H X, Qi Y X, Li C Y, Cao J Q, Zhang X Y, Zhang Z P, Cai Z Y, Gai J Y . Genetic variation of world soybean maturity date and geographic distribution of maturity groups. Breed Sci, 2017,67:221-232 doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.16167 pmid: 5515309
[40]	刘汉中 . 大豆引种中发育“延”、“促”效应之再论证. 中国农业大学学报, 1988,7(1):89-96
	Liu H Z . A further discussion on “enhancing” and “delaying” effects on soybean development by daylength and temperature during variety introduction. J Chin Agric Univ, 1988,7(1):89-96 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[41]	费志宏, 吴存祥, 孙洪波, 侯文胜, 张宝石, 韩天富 . 以光周期处理与分期播种试验综合鉴定大豆品种的光温反应. 作物学报, 2009,35:1525-1531 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01525
	Fei Z H, Wu C X, Sun H B, Hou W S, Zhang B S, Han T F . Identification of photothermal responses in soybean by integrating photoperiod treatments with planting-date experiments. Acta Agron Sin, 2009,35:1525-1531 (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.01525
[42]	邱丽娟, 常汝镇, 袁翠平, 关荣霞, 刘章雄, 李英慧 . 国外大豆种质资源的基因挖掘利用现状与展望. 植物遗传资源学报, 2006,7(1):1-6
	Qiu L J, Chang R Z, Yuan C P, Guan R X, Liu Z X, Li Y H . Prospect and present statue of gene discovery and utilization for introduced soybean germplasm. J Plant Genet Resour, 2006, 7(1):1-6 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[43]	汪越胜, 马宏惠 . 美国的大豆熟期划分及其影响. 安徽农学通报, 2000,6(4):28-29
	Wang Y S, Ma H H . The division and influence of soybean maturity in the United State.Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2000, 6(4):28-29 (in Chinese)
[44]	吴存祥 . 中国不同生态类型大豆品种的生态适应性研究. 华南农业大学博士学位论文, 广东广州, 2009 doi: 10.7666/d.Y1499762
	Wu C X . Studies on the Ecological Adaptability of Different Soybean Ecotypes in China. PhD Dissertation of South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 2009 ( in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.7666/d.Y1499762
[45]	Saindon G, Voldeng H D, Beversdorf W D, Buzzell R I . Genetic control of long daylength response in soybean. Crop Sci, 1989,29:1436-1439 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900060021x

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

基因座 Locus	等位基因 Allele	引物序列 Primer sequence (5°-3°)	参考文献 Reference
E1	e1-nl/e1-as/e1-fs	F: CACTCAAATTAAGCCCTTTCA; R: TCCGATCTCATCACCTTTCC	[20], [31]
E2	e2	F: ACAGCCTCCCGTGCTG; R: TCCCATGAGTTGCGGAATGG
E3	e3-ns	F: GTCTTTTGTCCTTGTCATTTGTGT; R: CAAAGCATCATCCAATACCCTCC
	e3-fs	F: GGGATAGTTCTGATGCTGTTCAA; R: CCTTGTATCGATAGCATATGTGCT	[31]
	E3-Mi	F: TGGGTCTTCAGTTCAGTTGG; R: TGCTTCCTTTCACTTTCTGATG	[31]
	E3-Ha	F: TGGAGGGTATTGGATGATGC; R: CGGTCAAGAGCCAACATGAG
	e3-tr	F: TGGAGGGTATTGGATGATGC; R: GTCCTATACAATTCTTTACGACG
E4	e4-oto/e4-tsu/e4-kam/e4-kes	F: AGACGTAGTGCTAGGGCTAT; R: GCATCTCGCATCACCAGATCA	[23]
	e4-SORE--1	F: GCATCTCGCATCACCAGATCA; R: GCTCATCCCTTCGAATTCAG	[32]

基因型 Genotype	品种所属地区 Region
基因型 Genotype	美国 USA	中国北方 North China	中国黄淮海 Yellow-Huai-Hai River Valley of China	中国南方 South China
E1E2E3E4			菏豆12 Hedou 12	黔豆3号 Qiandou 3
e1-asE2E3E4	Athow, Zane, Dilworth, Iroquois, Williams 82, Kottman, Macon, Will	蒙豆24, 铁丰31, 铁丰33, 中黄30 Mengdou 24, Tiefeng 31, Tiefeng 33, Zhonghuang 30	冀豆17 Jidou 17
e1-ase2E3E4			邯豆5号 Handou 5
E1e2E3E4		吉38, 吉82, 吉91, 吉农11, 九农24, 长农8号, 抚97-16, 通农12, 中黄35, 辽豆15, 辽豆31, 晋豆19 Ji 38, Ji 82, Ji 91, Jinong 11, Jiunong 24, Changnong 8, Fu 97-16, Tongnong 12, Zhonghuang 35, Liaodou 15, Liaodou 31, Jindou 19	诱变30, 中黄37, 中黄39, 中黄13, 沧豆6号, 冀豆12, 鲁豆4号, 临豆10号, 齐黄34, 齐黄35, 山宁11, 山宁14, 山宁12, 菏豆19 Hedou 19, 菏豆13, 徐豆18, 淮豆9号, 徐豆14, 徐豆15, 徐豆9号, 皖宿2156, 皖宿5717 Youbian 30, Zhonghuang 37, Zhonghuang 39, Zhonghuang 13, Cangdou 6, Jidou 12, Ludou 4, Lindou 10, Qihuang 34, Qihuang 35, Shanning 11, Shanning 14, Shanning 12, Hedou 19, Hedou 13, Xudou 18, Huaidou 9, Xudou 14, Xudou 15, Xudou 9, Wansu 2156, Wansu 5717	中豆39, 川豆15, 贡豆21, 南豆21, 福豆310, 黔豆1号, 黔豆5号 Zhongdou 39, Chuandou 15, Gongdou 21, Nandou 21, Fudou 310, Qiandou 1, Qiandou 5
E1e2e3-trE4			丰收黄 Fengshouhuang	贡豆22 Gongdou 22
e1-ase2e3-trE4				浙H0634 Zhe H0634

基因型 Genotype	春播 Spring-sowing				夏播 Summer-sowing
基因型 Genotype	VE-R7	VE-R1	R1-R7	R/V	VE-R7	VE-R1	R1-R7	R/V
e1-ase2e3-trE4	96.4±3.8 c	21.7±1.2 c	74.7±2.9 b	3.4±0.3 a	89.9±4.0 a	26.3±7.0 c	63.6±2.1 ab	2.4±0.2 a
e1-ase2E3E4	106.6±6.9 ab	24.2±3.5 bc	82.4±3.6 a	3.5±0.4 a	96.7±3.7 a	29.2±2.4 bc	67.5±1.3 a	2.3±0.2 a
e1-asE2E3E4	100.0±4.4 bc	23.9±3.8 bc	76.1±2.7 ab	3.3±0.5 a	96.0±4.9 a	27.9±3.6 c	68.1±6.9 a	2.5±0.5 a
E1e2e3-trE4	107.5±3.4 a	32.2±5.0 ab	75.3±8.5 b	2.4±0.6 b	95.5±5.7 a	38.0±4.0 ab	57.3±9.7 b	1.5±0.4 b
E1e2E3E4	107.7±5.7 a	35.5±8.2 a	72.2±5.8 b	2.2±0.7 b	98.0±6.4 a	38.0±6.9 ab	60.1±6.1 ab	1.7±0.5 b
E1E2E3E4	111.1±2.1 a	40.7±4.5 a	70.5±2.4 b	1.8±0.2 b	98.6±11.2 a	43.3±2.9 a	55.4±8.5 b	1.3±0.1 b

基因 Gene	背景基因型 Background genotype	春播 Spring-sowing				夏播 Summer-sowing
基因 Gene	背景基因型 Background genotype	VE-R7(d)	VE-R1 (d)	R1-R7 (d)	R/V	VE-R7 (d)	VE-R1 (d)	R1-R7 (d)	R/V
E1	E2E3E4	11.3	13.8	-5.6	-1.5	2.6	15.3	-12.7	-1.2
	e2E3E4	1.7	15.0	-10.1	-1.3	1.3	8.7	-7.4	-0.6
	e2e3-trE4	11.5	10.5	0.7	-1.0	5.6	11.7	-6.3	-0.9
	平均值 Mean	8.2	12.8	-5.0	-1.3	3.1	11.9	-8.8	-0.9
E2	e1-asE3E4	-5.8	-0.3	-6.3	-0.2	-0.7	-1.2	0.6	0.2
	E1E3E4	3.8	5.3	-1.9	-0.5	0.6	5.4	-4.7	-0.4
	平均值 Mean	-1.0	2.5	-4.1	-0.4	0.0	2.1	-2.1	-0.1
E3	E1e2E4	0.2	3.1	-3.0	-0.2	2.5	-0.1	2.8	0.1
	e1-ase2E4	10.0	2.4	7.8	0.1	6.8	2.9	3.9	-0.1
	平均值 Mean	5.1	2.8	2.4	-0.1	4.6	1.4	3.4	0.0

来源地区 Region	性状 Trait	株高 PH (cm)	底荚高度 BPH (cm)	主茎节数 NM	分枝数 BM	单株荚数 PP	秕荚数 BP	百粒重 SW (g)
北方 Northern China	VE-R1	-0.244	0.937^**	0.185	-0.370	-0.847^**	-0.819^**	0.451
	R1-R7	-0.303	-0.674^*	-0.412	0.527	0.688^*	0.681^*	-0.783^*
	R/V	0.006	-0.902^**	-0.333	0.494	0.870^**	0.870^**	-0.647
黄淮海 Yellow-Huai- Hai River Valley	VE-R1	-0.210	0.242	0.204	-0.014	0.077	-0.013	0.416
	R1-R7	0.175	-0.148	-0.088	-0.059	-0.232	0.313	0.306
	R/V	0.250	-0.220	-0.152	-0.036	-0.189	0.100	-0.148
南方 South China	VE-R1	0.577	-0.166	0.687	-0.836^*	-0.008	0.264	0.672
	R1-R7	0.377	0.113	0.457	-0.783	-0.173	-0.198	0.587
	R/V	0.069	0.251	0.083	-0.350	-0.207	-0.381	0.214
全国平均 Average in China	VE-R1	-0.118	0.738^**	0.268	0.351	0.110	0.337	-0.118
	R1-R7	0.306	-0.597^**	0.078	-0.597^**	-0.013	0.228	0.306
	R/V	0.164	-0.765^**	-0.196	-0.439^*	-0.079	-0.194	0.164

Characterization of Growth Period Structure and Identification of E Genes of MGIII Soybean Varieties from Different Geographic Regions

RichHTML337

PDF

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 45

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

播季类型 Sowing type	春播 Spring-sowing				夏播 Summer-sowing
播季类型 Sowing type	VE-R7	VE-R1	R1-R7	R/V	VE-R7	VE-R1	R1-R7	R/V
北方春大豆(Sp)	102.3±5.0 b	26.5±8.0 b	76.3±5.3 a	3.1±0.7 a	94.2±5.2 b	30.3±7.5 b	64.1±8.6 a	2.3±0.6 a
黄淮海夏大豆(Su)	109.5±3.7 a	36.3±5.8 a	73.2±5.4 a	2.1±0.5 b	100.4±5.5 a	39.3±5.0 a	61.1±3.9 ab	1.6±0.3 b
南方春大豆(Sp**)	107.8±6.9 a	38.4±6.9 a	69.2±4.5b	1.9±0.6 b	95.3±6.6 b	40.5±5.4 a	54.9±5.6 b	1.4±0.4 b
平均值 Mean	106.2±5.9	32.7±8.6	73.7±5.7	2.5±0.8	97.5±6.3	36.7±7.3	60.8±6.7	1.8±0.5

[1]	CHEN Ling-Ling, LI Zhan, LIU Ting-Xuan, GU Yong-Zhe, SONG Jian, WANG Jun, QIU Li-Juan. Genome wide association analysis of petiole angle based on 783 soybean resources (Glycine max L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1333-1345.
[2]	YANG Huan, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, PU Tian, WEN Jing, YANG Wen-Yu, YONG Tai-Wen. Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[3]	YU Chun-Miao, ZHANG Yong, WANG Hao-Rang, YANG Xing-Yong, DONG Quan-Zhong, XUE Hong, ZHANG Ming-Ming, LI Wei-Wei, WANG Lei, HU Kai-Feng, GU Yong-Zhe, QIU Li-Juan. Construction of a high density genetic map between cultivated and semi-wild soybeans and identification of QTLs for plant height [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[4]	LI A-Li, FENG Ya-Nan, LI Ping, ZHANG Dong-Sheng, ZONG Yu-Zheng, LIN Wen, HAO Xing-Yu. Transcriptome analysis of leaves responses to elevated CO₂ concentration, drought and interaction conditions in soybean [Glycine max (Linn.) Merr.] [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1103-1118.
[5]	PENG Xi-Hong, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, YANG Xue-Li, REN Jun-Bo, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, LUO Kai, XIE Chen, LEI Lu, YONG Tai-Wen, YANG Wen-Yu. Effects of reduced nitrogen application on soil aeration and root nodule growth of relay strip intercropping soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209.
[6]	WANG Hao-Rang, ZHANG Yong, YU Chun-Miao, DONG Quan-Zhong, LI Wei-Wei, HU Kai-Feng, ZHANG Ming-Ming, XUE Hong, YANG Meng-Ping, SONG Ji-Ling, WANG Lei, YANG Xing-Yong, QIU Li-Juan. Fine mapping of yellow-green leaf gene (ygl2) in soybean (Glycine max L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 791-800.
[7]	LI Rui-Dong, YIN Yang-Yang, SONG Wen-Wen, WU Ting-Ting, SUN Shi, HAN Tian-Fu, XU Cai-Long, WU Cun-Xiang, HU Shui-Xiu. Effects of close planting densities on assimilate accumulation and yield of soybean with different plant branching types [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[8]	DU Hao, CHENG Yu-Han, LI Tai, HOU Zhi-Hong, LI Yong-Li, NAN Hai-Yang, DONG Li-Dong, LIU Bao-Hui, CHENG Qun. Improving seed number per pod of soybean by molecular breeding based on Ln locus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[9]	ZHOU Yue, ZHAO Zhi-Hua, ZHANG Hong-Ning, KONG You-Bin. Cloning and functional analysis of the promoter of purple acid phosphatase gene GmPAP14 in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 590-596.
[10]	WANG Juan, ZHANG Yan-Wei, JIAO Zhu-Jin, LIU Pan-Pan, CHANG Wei. Identification of QTLs and candidate genes for 100-seed weight trait using PyBSASeq algorithm in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 635-643.
[11]	ZHANG Guo-Wei, LI Kai, LI Si-Jia, WANG Xiao-Jing, YANG Chang-Qin, LIU Rui-Xian. Effects of sink-limiting treatments on leaf carbon metabolism in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 529-537.
[12]	SONG Li-Jun, NIE Xiao-Yu, HE Lei-Lei, KUAI Jie, YANG Hua, GUO An-Guo, HUANG Jun-Sheng, FU Ting-Dong, WANG Bo, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of shade tolerance of forage soybean varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1741-1752.
[13]	CAO Liang, DU Xin, YU Gao-Bo, JIN Xi-Jun, ZHANG Ming-Cong, REN Chun-Yuan, WANG Meng-Xue, ZHANG Yu-Xian. Regulation of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in leaf of soybean cultivar Suinong 26 at seed-filling stage under drought stress by exogenous melatonin [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1779-1790.
[14]	ZHANG Ming-Cong, HE Song-Yu, QIN Bin, WANG Meng-Xue, JIN Xi-Jun, REN Chun-Yuan, WU Yao-Kun, ZHANG Yu-Xian. Effects of exogenous melatonin on morphology, photosynthetic physiology, and yield of spring soybean variety Suinong 26 under drought stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1791-1805.
[15]	ZHAO Jing, MENG Fan-Gang, YU De-Bin, QIU Qiang, ZHANG Ming-Hao, RAO De-Min, CONG Bo-Tao, ZHANG Wei, YAN Xiao-Yan. Response of agronomic traits and P/Fe utilization efficiency to P application with different P efficiency in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1824-1833.