[1] Misu I J, Kayess M O, Siddiqui M N, et al. Microbiome engineering for sustainable rice production: strategies for biofertilization, stress tolerance, and climate resilience. Microorganisms, 2025, 13: 233.

[2] Harman G E, Uphoff N. Symbiotic root-endophytic soil microbes improve crop productivity and provide environmental benefits. Scientifica, 2019, 2019: 9106395.

[3] Wang M Y, Eyre A W, Thon M R, et al. Dynamic changes in the microbiome of rice during shoot and root growth derived from seeds. Front Microbiol, 2020, 11: 559728.

[4] Kim H, Lee K K, Jeon J, et al. Domestication of Oryza species eco-evolutionarily shapes bacterial and fungal communities in rice seed. Microbiome, 2020, 8: 20.

[5] Khan M I, Gwon H S, Alam M A, et al. Short term effects of different green manure amendments on the composition of main microbial groups and microbial activity of a submerged rice cropping system. Appl Soil Ecol, 2020, 147: 103400.

[6] Hussain Q, Liu Y Z, Zhang A F, et al. Variation of bacterial and fungal community structures in the rhizosphere of hybrid and standard rice cultivars and linkage to CO2 flux. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2011, 78: 116–128.

[7] Jiang Y J, Liang Y T, Li C M, et al. Crop rotations alter bacterial and fungal diversity in paddy soils across East Asia. Soil Biol Biochem, 2016, 95: 250–261.

[8] Finkel O M, Castrillo G, Herrera Paredes S, et al. Understanding and exploiting plant beneficial microbes. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2017, 38: 155–163.

[9] Zhang X X, Ma Y N, Wang X, et al. Dynamics of rice microbiomes reveal core vertically transmitted seed endophytes. Microbiome, 2022, 10: 216.

[10] Yuan C L, Zhang L M, Wang J T, et al. Distributions and environmental drivers of Archaea and bacteria in paddy soils. J Soils Sediments, 2019, 19: 23–37.

[11] Tao D X, Gao Y Z, Revillini D, et al. Root traits regulate the capacity of the rhizosphere to support multiple ecosystem services under intercropping and phosphorus fertilization. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2024, 374: 109181.

[12] Wang B, Chen C, Xiao Y M, et al. Trophic relationships between protists and bacteria and fungi drive the biogeography of rhizosphere soil microbial community and impact plant physiological and ecological functions. Microbiol Res, 2024, 280: 127603.

[13] Sokol N W, Foley M M, Blazewicz S J, et al. The path from root input to mineral-associated soil carbon is dictated by habitat-specific microbial traits and soil moisture. Soil Biol Biochem, 2024, 193: 109367.

[14] Ma Y, Vosátka M, Freitas H. Editorial: beneficial microbes alleviate climatic stresses in plants. Front Plant Sci, 2019, 10: 595.

[15] Kim H, Lee Y H. The rice microbiome: a model platform for crop holobiome. Phytobiomes J, 2020, 4: 5–18.

[16] Thapa S, Ranjan K, Ramakrishnan B, et al. Influence of fertilizers and rice cultivation methods on the abundance and diversity of phyllosphere microbiome. J Basic Microbiol, 2018, 58: 172–186.

[17] Bakker P A H M, Berendsen R L, Doornbos R F, et al. The rhizosphere revisited: root microbiomics. Front Plant Sci, 2013, 4: 165.

[18] Zhao B H, Zi M C, Zhang X Y, et al. Microbial communities and metagenomes in methane-rich deep coastal sediments. Sci Data, 2024, 11: 1043.

[19] Zhu N, Liu X Y, Zhou Y M, et al. Functional stratification of core and variable microbial taxa in the Codonopsis pilosula rhizosphere: Links to soil enzyme activity, nutrient cycling, and spatiotemporal dynamics. Appl Soil Ecol, 2025, 215: 106435.

[20] Chinta Y D, Araki H. Responses of bulk and rhizosphere soil microbiomes to different cover crop inputs and their connection and contribution to soil fertility and plant growth. Pedobiologia, 2023, 101: 150907.

[21] Somenahally A C, Hollister E B, Loeppert R H, et al. Microbial communities in rice rhizosphere altered by intermittent and continuous flooding in fields with long-term arsenic application. Soil Biol Biochem, 2011, 43: 1220–1228.

[22] Xu S F, Qiu Q F, Yan C Q, et al. Structure, acquisition, assembly, and function of the root-associated microbiomes in Japonica rice and hybrid rice. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2024, 373: 109122.

[23] Fernández-Baca C P, Rivers A R, Maul J E, et al. Rice plant–soil microbiome interactions driven by root and shoot biomass. Diversity, 2021, 13: 125.

[24] Zhang Y, Jiang W Z, Li Q, et al. Soil nutrient levels determine the variation of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of rice under different conditions of climate and genotype. Appl Soil Ecol, 2021, 167: 104025.

[25] Bamba M, Akyol T Y, Azuma Y, et al. Synergistic effects of plant genotype and soil microbiome on growth in Lotus japonicus. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2024, 100: fiae056.

[26] Park I, Seo Y S, Mannaa M. Recruitment of the rhizo-microbiome army: assembly determinants and engineering of the rhizosphere microbiome as a key to unlocking plant potential. Front Microbiol, 2023, 14: 1163832.

[27] Tola E, Al-Gaadi K A, Madugundu R, et al. Characterization of spatial variability of soil physicochemical properties and its impact on Rhodes grass productivity. Saudi J Biol Sci, 2017, 24: 421–429.

[28] Kumar M, Ansari W A, Zeyad M T, et al. Core microbiota of wheat rhizosphere under Upper Indo-Gangetic plains and their response to soil physicochemical properties. Front Plant Sci, 2023, 14: 1186162.

[29] Edwards J, Johnson C, Santos-Medellín C, et al. Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2015, 112: E911–E920.

[30] Lakshmanan V. Plant Microbe Interactions: Root Microbiome Assemblage is Modulated by Plant Host Factors. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015. pp 57–79.

[31] Matsushima C, Shenton M, Kitahara A, et al. Multiple analysis of root exudates and microbiome in rice (Oryza sativa) under low P conditions. Arch Microbiol, 2021, 203: 5599–5611.

[32] Venturi V, Keel C. Signaling in the rhizosphere. Trends Plant Sci, 2016, 21: 187–198.

[33] Singh A, Kumar M, Chakdar H, et al. Influence of host genotype in establishing root associated microbiome of indica rice cultivars for plant growth promotion. Front Microbiol, 2022, 13: 1033158.

[34] Zhang J Y, Liu Y X, Zhang N, et al. NRT1.1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice. Nat Biotechnol, 2019, 37: 676–684.

[35] Solanki M K, Joshi N C, Singh P K, et al. From concept to reality: Transforming agriculture through innovative rhizosphere engineering for plant health and productivity. Microbiol Res, 2024, 279: 127553.

[36] Fan X Y, Ge A H, Qi S S, et al. Root exudates and microbial metabolites: signals and nutrients in plant-microbe interactions. Sci China Life Sci, 2025, 68: 2290–2302.

[37] Korenblum E, Massalha H, Aharoni A. Plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere via a circular metabolic economy. Plant Cell, 2022, 34: 3168–3182.

[38] Chen M Y, Feng S Z, Lv H, et al. OsCIPK2 mediated rice root microorganisms and metabolites to improve plant nitrogen uptake. BMC Plant Biol, 2024, 24: 285.

[39] Hu L F, Robert C A M, Cadot S, et al. Root exudate metabolites drive plant-soil feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the rhizosphere microbiota. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 2738.

[40] Liu Y H, Xu C M, Chen S, et al. Beyond genotype: the influence of developmental stage on rice rhizospheric microbiome-metabolome networks. BMC Plant Biol, 2025, 25: 1471.

[41] Zhou X, Wang J T, Zhang Z F, et al. Microbiota in the rhizosphere and seed of rice from China, with reference to their transmission and biogeography. Front Microbiol, 2020, 11: 995.

[42] Redford A J, Bowers R M, Knight R, et al. The ecology of the phyllosphere: geographic and phylogenetic variability in the distribution of bacteria on tree leaves. Environ Microbiol, 2010, 12: 2885–2893.

[43] Rastogi G, Sbodio A, Tech J J, et al. Leaf microbiota in an agroecosystem: spatiotemporal variation in bacterial community composition on field-grown lettuce. ISME J, 2012, 6: 1812–1822.

[44] Vishwakarma P, Dubey S K. Diversity of endophytic bacterial community inhabiting in tropical aerobic rice under aerobic and flooded condition. Arch Microbiol, 2020, 202: 17–29.

[45] 杨宽, 王慧玲, 叶坤浩, 等. 叶际微生物及与植物互作的研究进展. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021(1): 155–164.Yang K, Wang H L, Ye K H, et al. Advances in research on phyllosphere microorganisms and their interaction with plants. J Yunnan Agric Univ (Nat Sci), 2021(1): 155–164 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[46] Abdelfattah A, Li Destri Nicosia M G, Cacciola S O, et al. Metabarcoding analysis of fungal diversity in the phyllosphere and carposphere of olive (Olea europaea). PLoS One, 2015, 10: e0131069.

[47] 刘宇星, 董醇波, 邵秋雨, 等. 叶际微生物与植物健康研究进展. 微生物学杂志, 2022, 42(2): 88–98.Liu Y X, Dong C B, Shao Q Y, et al. Advances on phyllosphere microorganisms and their association with plant health. J Microbiol, 2022, 42(2): 88–98 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[48] Varghese E M, George J, Hareendran A, et al. Dynamics of rice microbiome: insights into functional diversity, environmental influences, response to stress, and applications. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2025, 41: 296.

[49] Huang S L, Zha X J, Fu G. Affecting factors of plant phyllosphere microbial community and their responses to climatic warming-a review. Plants, 2023, 12: 2891.

[50] Su P, Kang H X, Peng Q Z, et al. Microbiome homeostasis on rice leaves is regulated by a precursor molecule of lignin biosynthesis. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 23.

[51] Zhang M Z, Peng C, Sun W T, et al. Effects of variety, plant location, and season on the phyllosphere bacterial community structure of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Microorganisms, 2022, 10: 2023.

[52] Yeo F K S, Cheok Y H, Wan Ismail W N, et al. Genotype and organ effect on the occupancy of phyllosphere prokaryotes in different rice landraces. Arch Microbiol, 2022, 204: 600.

[53] Wang P, Kong X, Chen H S, et al. Exploration of intrinsic microbial community modulators in the rice endosphere indicates a key role of distinct bacterial taxa across different cultivars. Front Microbiol, 2021, 12: 629852.

[54] 梁胜贤, 刘春成, 胡超, 等. 叶面喷施硅肥对再生水灌溉水稻叶际细菌群落结构及功能基因的影响. 环境科学, 2024, 45: 555–566.Liang S X, Liu C C, Hu C, et al. Effects of foliar application of silicon fertilizers on phyllosphere bacterial community and functional genes of paddy irrigated with reclaimed water. Environ Sci, 2024, 45: 555–566 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[55] Wang P, Dai J P, Luo L Y, et al. Scale-dependent effects of growth stage and elevational gradient on rice phyllosphere bacterial and fungal microbial patterns in the terrace field. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12: 766128.

[56] Roman-Reyna V, Pinili D, Borja F N, et al. Characterization of the leaf microbiome from whole-genome sequencing data of the 3000 rice genomes project. Rice, 2020, 13: 72.

[57] Mano H, Morisaki H. Endophytic bacteria in the rice plant. Microbes Environ, 2008, 23: 109–117.

[58] Wang Z S, Li N, Wang W P, et al. Endophytic bacterial community diversity in genetically related hybrid rice seeds. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2023, 107: 6911–6922.

[59] Sun L, Qiu F B, Zhang X X, et al. Endophytic bacterial diversity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots estimated by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. Microb Ecol, 2008, 55: 415–424.

[60] Moronta-Barrios F, Gionechetti F, Pallavicini A, et al. Bacterial microbiota of rice roots: 16S-based taxonomic profiling of endophytic and rhizospheric diversity, endophytes isolation and simplified endophytic community. Microorganisms, 2018, 6: 14.

[61] Sodhi G K, Saxena S. Plant growth-promoting endophyte Nigrospora oryzae mitigates abiotic stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2023, 99: fiad094.

[62] Naik B S, Shashikala J, Krishnamurthy Y L. Study on the diversity of endophytic communities from rice (Oryza sativa L.) and their antagonistic activities in vitro. Microbiol Res, 2009, 164: 290–296.

[63] Zhong Y, Hu J H, Xia Q M, et al. Soil microbial mechanisms promoting ultrahigh rice yield. Soil Biol Biochem, 2020, 143: 107741.

[64] Tian Q L, Gong Y R, Liu S, et al. Endophytic bacterial communities in wild rice (Oryza officinalis) and their plant growth-promoting effects on perennial rice. Front Plant Sci, 2023, 14: 1184489.

[65] Krishnamoorthy A, Gupta A, Sar P, et al. Metagenomics of two gnotobiotically grown aromatic rice cultivars reveals genotype-dependent and tissue-specific colonization of endophytic bacterial communities attributing multiple plant growth promoting traits. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2021, 37: 59.

[66] Hu J H, Zeng T, Xia Q M, et al. Identification of key genes for the ultrahigh yield of rice using dynamic cross-tissue network analysis. Genom Proteom Bioinf, 2020, 18: 256–270.

[67] Liu Y H, Zhao K K, Stirling E, et al. Heterosis of endophytic microbiomes in hybrid rice varieties improves seed germination. MSystems, 2024, 9: e00004.

[68] Hardoim P R, van Overbeek L S, Elsas J D. Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol, 2008, 16: 463–471.

[69] Nag P, Supriya Y, Datta J, et al. Investigating microbial diversity in the endosphere and rhizoplane of three aromatic rice landraces: implications for biological nitrogen fixation. Curr Microbiol, 2024, 81: 454.

[70] Lorenzi A S, Chia M A. Cyanobacteria’s power trio: auxin, siderophores, and nitrogen fixation to foster thriving agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2024, 40: 381.

[71] Jing H M, Xia X M, Liu H B, et al. Anthropogenic impact on diazotrophic diversity in the mangrove rhizosphere revealed by nifH pyrosequencing. Front Microbiol, 2015, 6: 1172.

[72] Ma A Y, Xun W B, Zhang S N, et al. Amino-acid-transporter-mediated assembly of rhizosphere microbiota enhances soil organic nitrogen acquisition in rice. Nat Plants, 2026, 12: 356–368.

[73] Saddique M A B, Ali Z, Khan A S, et al. Inoculation with the endophyte Piriformospora indica significantly affects mechanisms involved in osmotic stress in rice. Rice, 2018, 11: 34.

[74] Yang Z L, Chen X H, Hou J T, et al. Soil texture and pH exhibit important effects on biological nitrogen fixation in paddy soil. Appl Soil Ecol, 2022, 178: 104571.

[75] Wang Q, Wang C T, Lei L, et al. Key factors driving soil diazotrophic community assembly and nitrogenase activity in Qinghai-Tibet alpine meadows. Catena, 2025, 248: 108600.

[76] Zhang Y J, Ding S J, Xue X H, et al. Combined application of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria enhances rice growth and nutritional quality in saline environments. Algal Res, 2025, 89: 104061.

[77] Vermeiren H, Willems A, Schoofs G, et al. The rice inoculant strain Alcaligenes faecalis A15 is a nitrogen-fixing Pseudomonas stutzeri. Syst Appl Microbiol, 1999, 22: 215–224.

[78] Kellar P E, Goldman C R. A comparative study of nitrogen fixation by the Anabaena-Azolla symbiosis and free-living populations of Anabaena spp. in Lake Ngahawa, New Zealand. Oecologia, 1979, 43: 269–281.

[79] Kollah B, Patra A K, Mohanty S R. Aquatic Microphylla azolla: a perspective paradigm for sustainable agriculture, environment and global climate change. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2016, 23: 4358–4369.

[80] Alaylar B, Egamberdieva D, Gulluce M, et al. Integration of molecular tools in microbial phosphate solubilization research in agriculture perspective. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2020, 36: 93.

[81] Rawat P, Das S, Shankhdhar D, et al. Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms: mechanism and their role in phosphate solubilization and uptake. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2021, 21: 49–68.

[82] Zhuang Q L, Yuan H Y, Qi J Q, et al. Phosphorus fertiliser application mitigates the negative effects of microplastic on soil microbes and rice growth. J Hazard Mater, 2024, 465: 133278.

[83] Che S H, Xu Y F, Qin X T, et al. Building microbial consortia to enhance straw degradation, phosphorus solubilization, and soil fertility for rice growth. Microb Cell Fact, 2024, 23: 232.

[84] Jiang Y F, Ge F, Li F, et al. Intracellular metabolomics switching alters extracellular acid production and insoluble phosphate solubilization behavior in Penicillium oxalicum. Metabolites, 2020, 10: 441.

[85] Sun X W, Shao C, Chen L, et al. Plant growth-promoting effect of the chitosanolytic phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Burkholderia gladioli MEL01 after fermentation with chitosan and fertilization with rock phosphate. J Plant Growth Regul, 2021, 40: 1674–1686.

[86] Li H F, Chen S Y, Wang M Y, et al. Phosphate solubilization and plant growth properties are promoted by a lactic acid bacterium in calcareous soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2024, 108: 24.

[87] Azene B, Zhu R H, Pan K W, et al. Land use change alters phosphatase enzyme activity and phosphatase-harboring microbial abundance in the subalpine ecosystem of southeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Ecol Indic, 2023, 153: 110416.

[88] 潘林, 弥春霞, 徐青山, 等. 解磷细菌解磷机制研究进展及其在水稻上的应用. 中国稻米, 2024, 30(3): 1–9.Pan L, Mi C X, Xu Q S, et al. Research progress on phosphorus solubilization mechanism of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria and its application in rice production. China Rice, 2024, 30(3): 1–9 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[89] De Nardi F S, dos Santos Trentin T, dos Santos Trentin N, et al. Mycorrhizal biotechnology reduce phosphorus in the nutrient solution of strawberry soilless cultivation systems. Agronomy, 2024, 14: 355.

[90] Akplo T M, Kouelo Alladassi F, Zoundji M C C, et al. Phosphate solubilization and mobilization: bacteria-mycorrhiza interactions. Lett Appl Microbiol, 2025, 78: ovaf105.

[91] Fu S F, Balasubramanian V K, Chen C L, et al. The phosphate-solubilising fungi in sustainable agriculture: unleashing the potential of fungal biofertilisers for plant growth. Folia Microbiol, 2024, 69: 697–712.

[92] Peng Q Z, Sun S E, Ma J J, et al. The effect of developmental stages on microbiome assembly in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice grown in urban area soil. Environ Microbiome, 2025, 20: 86.

[93] Yang M Y, Qin X T, Yue C C, et al. Phosphate-solubilizing and polymerizing bacteria enhance phosphorus availability and growth of rice. Front Microbiol, 2025, 16: 1700135.

[94] Kossalbayev B D, Wei M, Wang J J, et al. Growth promotion of synthetic microbial communities influenced by the function, diversity and interactions of their constituent strains and soil types. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2025, 41: 181.

[95] Sharma R, Sindhu S S, Glick B R. Potassium solubilizing microorganisms as potential biofertilizer: a sustainable climate-resilient approach to improve soil fertility and crop production in agriculture. J Plant Growth Regul, 2024, 43: 2503–2535.

[96] Li C B, Wang S, Zhang Q, et al. Isolation and characterization of efficient multifunctional potassium-solubilizing bacteria from tobacco rhizosphere soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2025, 25: 7728–7737.

[97] Tian S Q, Xu Y F, Zhong Y L, et al. Exploring the organic acid secretion pathway and potassium solubilization ability of Pantoea vagans ZHS-1 for enhanced rice growth. Plants, 2024, 13: 1945.

[98] Bashir Z, Hamid B, Yatoo A M, et al. Phosphorus solubilizing microorganisms: an eco-friendly approach for sustainable plant health and bioremediation. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2024, 24: 6838–6854.

[99] Nawaz A, Qamar Z U, Marghoob M U, et al. Contribution of potassium solubilizing bacteria in improved potassium assimilation and cytosolic K+/Na+ ratio in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under saline-sodic conditions. Front Microbiol, 2023, 14: 1196024.

[100] El-Egami H M, Hegab R H, Montaser H, et al. Impact of potassium-solubilizing microorganisms with potassium sources on the growth, physiology, and productivity of wheat crop under salt-affected soil conditions. Agronomy, 2024, 14: 423.

[101] Olaniyan F T, Alori E T, Adekiya A O, et al. The use of soil microbial potassium solubilizers in potassium nutrient availability in soil and its dynamics. Annals Microbiol, 2022, 72: 45.

[102] Fatema K, Mahmud N U, Gupta D R, et al. Enhancing rice growth and yield with weed endophytic bacteria Alcaligenes faecalis and Metabacillus Indicus under reduced chemical fertilization. PLoS One, 2024, 19: e0296547.

[103] Negi R, Sharma B, Yadav N, et al. Novel potassium solubilizing bacterium Pseudomonas marginalis (EU-MRN-08) and its role in plant growth promotion of maize (Zea mays L.). Biologia, 2025, 80: 2183–2190.

[104] Saheewala H, Sanadhya S, Upadhyay S K, et al. Polyphasic characterization of indigenous potassium-solubilizing bacteria and its efficacy studies on maize. Agronomy, 2023, 13: 1919.

[105] Singhmar R, Singh V, Bhatti L, et al. Inoculation of multi-trait plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for wheat growth promotion in pothouse conditions. J Microb Biotech Food Sci, 2024, 14: e10484.

[106] Jeewanthi P B D, Dandeniya W S, Dharmakeerthi R S, et al. Characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria from rice (Oryza sativa L.) rhizosphere soils and their potential for plant growth promotion. Ceylon J Sci, 2025, 54: 703–714.

[107] Kharmawphlang I M, Browne R B, Roy J D, et al. Sustainable biocontrol of bacterial blight disease using Eisenia fetida gut derived Glutamicibacter sp. Insights from metabolomics and in silico discovery. Plant Gene, 2025, 44: 100552.

[108] 俞海平, 傅庆林, 刘俊丽, 等. 解钾细菌的分离筛选及其对水稻的促生效果. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63: 1161–1164.Yu H P, Fu Q L, Liu J L, et al. Isolation and identification of decomposing potassium bacteria and its promoting effect on rice. J Zhejiang Agric Sci, 2022, 63: 1161–1164 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[109] Xiong Q Q, Wang R N, Lai D H, et al. Metagenomic insights into the root‒soil response mechanisms of indica and Japonica rice under nitrogen deficiency and high-efficiency nitrogen compensation. Rice, 2025, 18: 72.

[110] Ishaq S, Belduz A O, Ceylan E, et al. Plant growth-promoting bacteria from Uzungöl forest stimulate rice growth via seed biopriming and root inoculation: isolation and functional characterization of potent PGPR strains from rhizosphere soils of different trees. Front Plant Sci, 2025, 16: 1622951.

[111] Peng M, Jiang Z H, Zhou F Z, et al. From salty to thriving: plant growth promoting bacteria as nature’s allies in overcoming salinity stress in plants. Front Microbiol, 2023, 14: 1169809.

[112] Adhikari Dhungana S, Adachi F, Hayashi S, et al. Plant growth promoting effects of Nepalese sweet potato endophytes. Horticulturae, 2018, 4: 53.

[113] Perelomov L, Rajput V D, Gertsen M, et al. Ecological features of trace elements tolerant microbes isolated from sewage sludge of urban wastewater treatment plant. Stress Biol, 2024, 4: 8.

[114] Sharma N, Sharma G, Kour S, et al. Unravelling the role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in boosting plant growth and phytoremediation of heavy metals. Appl Soil Ecol, 2024, 199: 105416.

[115] Amobonye A, Bhagwat P, Singh S, et al. Enhanced xylanase and endoglucanase production from Beauveria bassiana SAN01, an entomopathogenic fungal endophyte. Fungal Biol, 2021, 125: 39–48.

[116] Zhang G H, Hou X, Wang L, et al. Photo-sensitive leaf rolling 1 encodes a polygalacturonase that modifies cell wall structure and drought tolerance in rice. New Phytol, 2021, 229: 890–901.

[117] Mai N T P, Nguyen V P, Dinh T H D. The mechanism underlying the growth stimulation of rice plants by Burkholderia cepacia. Russ J Plant Physiol, 2025, 72: 203.

[118] Yanni Y G, Rizk R Y, El-Fattah F K A, et al. The beneficial plant growth-promoting association of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii with rice roots. Aust J Plant Physiol, 2001, 28: 845–870.

[119] Jha M, Chourasia S, Sinha S. Microbial consortium for sustainable rice production. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst, 2013, 37: 340–362.

[120] Yusuf A, Li M, Zhang S Y, et al. Harnessing plant-microbe interactions: strategies for enhancing resilience and nutrient acquisition for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci, 2025, 16: 1503730.

[121] Parasar B J, Sharma I, Agarwala N. Root exudation drives abiotic stress tolerance in plants by recruiting beneficial microbes. Appl Soil Ecol, 2024, 198: 105351.

[122] Su P, Kang H X, Peng Q Z, et al. Host metabolites explain microbiome variation between different rice genotypes. Microbiome, 2025, 13: 185.

[123] Li G T, Wang X D, Wang X J, et al. Editorial: Molecular interactions between crops and phytopathogens, volume II: Rice. Front Plant Sci, 2022, 13: 984072.

[124] Liu W D, Wang G L. Plant innate immunity in rice: a defense against pathogen infection. Natl Sci Rev, 2016, 3: 295–308.

[125] Akber M A, Fang X L. Research progress on diseases caused by the soil-borne fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani in alfalfa. Agronomy, 2024, 14: 1483.

[126] Elsharkawy M M, Sakran R M, Ahmad A A, et al. Induction of systemic resistance against sheath blight in rice by different Pseudomonas isolates. Life, 2022, 12: 349.

[127] Doni F, Fathurrahman F, Mispan M S, et al. Transcriptomic profiling of rice seedlings inoculated with the symbiotic fungus Trichoderma asperellum SL2. J Plant Growth Regul, 2019, 38: 1507–1515.

[128] Jiang J W, Qiu Y, Luo J X, et al. Endophytic Pseudomonas koreensis A1 of Bletilla striata as a plant growth promoter and biocontrol agent against rice sheath blight. Plants, 2025, 14: 3546.

[129] Prasanna R, Joshi M, Rana A, et al. Influence of co-inoculation of bacteria-cyanobacteria on crop yield and C-N sequestration in soil under rice crop. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2012, 28: 1223–1235.

[130] Stockwell V O, Stack J P. Using Pseudomonas spp. for integrated biological control. Phytopathology, 2007, 97: 244–249.

[131] Oni F E, Olorunleke O F, Höfte M. Phenazines and cyclic lipopeptides produced by Pseudomonas sp. CMR12a are involved in the biological control of Pythium myriotylum on cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium). Biol Control, 2019, 129: 109–114.

[132] Nandakumar R, Babu S, Viswanathan R, et al. Induction of systemic resistance in rice against sheath blight disease by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Soil Biol Biochem, 2001, 33: 603–612.

[133] Chakraborty S, Islam M M, Khokon M A R. Field performance assessment of formulated Pseudomonas fluorescens for enhancing plant growth and inducing resistance against rice blast disease. J King Saud Univ Sci, 2024, 36: 103228.

[134] Saini S, Raj K, Kumar R, et al. Potency of formulated biocontrol agents from lab to field: a sustainable approach for onion purple blotch suppression. J Plant Pathol, 2026, 108: 125–137.

[135] Durgadevi D, Harish S, Manikandan R, et al. Proteomic profiling of defense/resistant genes induced during the tripartite interaction of Oryza sativa, Rhizoctonia solani AG1-1A, and Bacillus subtilis against rice sheath blight. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol, 2021, 115: 101669.

[136] Leelasuphakul W, Sivanunsakul P, Phongpaichit S. Purification, characterization and synergistic activity of β-1, 3-glucanase and antibiotic extract from an antagonistic Bacillus subtilis NSRS 89-24 against rice blast and sheath blight. Enzyme Microb Technol, 2006, 38: 990–997.

[137] Wang L Q, Li X T, Galileya Medison R, et al. Biocontrol efficacy of Burkholderia pyrrocinia S17-377 in controlling rice sheath blight. Biol Control, 2023, 187: 105368.

[138] Akhtar M, Nosheen A, Keyani R, et al. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani in basmati rice by the application of Lactobacillus and Weissella spp. Sci Rep, 2023, 13: 13855.

[139] Soltani Nejad M, Samandari Najafabadi N, Aghighi S, et al. Investigating the potential of Streptomyces spp. in suppression of Rhizoctonia solani (AG1-IA) causing rice sheath blight disease in northern Iran. Agronomy, 2022, 12: 2292.

[140] Wu L M, Wu H J, Chen L N, et al. Difficidin and bacilysin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 have antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae rice pathogens. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 12975.

[141] Qi Y T, Rao Q, Lu C L, et al. Recent progress in rice-Xanthomonas oryzae interactions. Biology, 2025, 14: 471.

[142] Amin T, Gupta V, Sharma A, et al. Distribution of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae pathotypes in Basmati-rice-growingareas of Jammu and Kashmir, India. Agronomy, 2023, 13: 713.

[143] Ngalimat M S, Mohd Hata E, Zulperi D, et al. A laudable strategy to manage bacterial panicle blight disease of rice using biocontrol agents. J Basic Microbiol, 2023, 63: 1180–1195.

[144] Yasmin S, Hafeez F Y, Mirza M S, et al. Biocontrol of bacterial leaf blight of rice and profiling of secondary metabolites produced by rhizospheric Pseudomonas aeruginosa BRp3. Front Microbiol, 2017, 8: 1895.

[145] Shrestha B K, Karki H S, Groth D E, et al. Biological control activities of rice-associated Bacillus sp. strains against sheath blight and bacterial panicle blight of rice. PLoS One, 2016, 11: e0146764.

[146] Ahsan T, Zang C Q, Yu S Y, et al. Screening, and optimization of fermentation medium to produce secondary metabolites from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, for the biocontrol of early leaf spot disease, and growth promoting effects on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J Fungi, 2022, 8: 1223.

[147] Zhang H, Zhang R S, Qiao J Q, et al. Optimization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Lx-11 suspoemulsion by response surface methodology to control rice bacterial blight. BioControl, 2023, 68: 169–179.

[148] Jambhulkar P P, Sharma P, Manokaran R, et al. Assessing synergism of combined applications of Trichoderma harzianum and Pseudomonas fluorescens to control blast and bacterial leaf blight of rice. Eur J Plant Pathol, 2018, 152: 747–757.

[149] Sharma S, Joshi M. Microbial strategies for enhancing wheat and rice resilience to drought, salinity, and heat stress. Rhizosphere, 2025, 34: 101108.

[150] Liu K W, Deng F L, Zeng F R, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improve drought tolerance of crops: a review. Plant Growth Regul, 2025, 105: 567–581.

[151] Khan W, Zhu Y, Khan A, et al. Above-and below-ground feedback loop of maize is jointly enhanced by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in drier soil. Sci Total Environ, 2024, 917: 170417.

[152] Rai P K, Sabharwal U, Singh S, et al. Exploration of drought tolerant PGPR and their role in regulating antioxidant enzymes in maize (Zea mays L.). J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2024, 24: 4483–4498.

[153] Tsai H J, Shao K H, Chan M T, et al. Piriformospora indica symbiosis improves water stress tolerance of rice through regulating stomata behavior and ROS scavenging systems. Plant Signal Behav, 2020, 15: 1722447.

[154] Ni Y, Bao H, Zou R F, et al. Aquaporin ZmPIP2;4 promotes tolerance to drought during arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi symbiosis. Plant Soil, 2025, 508: 1–20.

[155] Zhang J, Guo T T, Tao Z, et al. Transcriptome profiling of genes involved in nutrient uptake regulated by phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Plant Physiol Biochem, 2020, 156: 611–626.

[156] Chareesri A, De Deyn G B, Sergeeva L, et al. Increased arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization reduces yield loss of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under drought. Mycorrhiza, 2020, 30: 315–328.

[157] Panneerselvam P, Kumar U, Sugitha T C K, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) for sustainable rice production. Advances in Soil Microbiology: Recent Trends and Future Prospects: Volume 2: Soil-microbe-plant Interaction. Singapore: Springer, 2017. pp 99–126.

[158] Singh D P, Singh V, Gupta V K, et al. Microbial inoculation in rice regulates antioxidative reactions and defense related genes to mitigate drought stress. Sci Rep, 2020, 10: 4818.

[159] Qin W, Liu C X, Jiang W, et al. A coumarin analogue NFA from endophytic Aspergillus fumigatus improves drought resistance in rice as an antioxidant. BMC Microbiol, 2019, 19: 50.

[160] Shukla N, Awasthi R P, Rawat L, et al. Biochemical and physiological responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as influenced by Trichoderma harzianum under drought stress. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2012, 54: 78–88.

[161] Pandey V, Ansari M W, Tula S, et al. Dose-dependent response of Trichoderma harzianum in improving drought tolerance in rice genotypes. Planta, 2016, 243: 1251–1264.

[162] Saakre M, Baburao T M, Salim A P, et al. Identification and characterization of genes responsible for drought tolerance in rice mediated by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Rice Sci, 2017, 24: 291–298.

[163] Zhou S H, Bi J G, Zhou S, et al. Community assembly mechanisms underlying divergent responses of indica and Japonica rice rhizosphere microbiota to drought stress. Microb Ecol, 2025, 88: 126.

[164] Xu F Y, Wang Y S, Yang J Y, et al. Auxin-producing Pseudomonas Recruited by root flavonoids increases rice rhizosheath formation through the bacterial histidine kinase under soil drying. Adv Sci, 2025, 12: e00607.

[165] Yadav A, Chen M F, Acharya S M, et al. A stable 15-member bacterial SynCom promotes Brachypodium growth under drought stress. Front Microbiol, 2025, 16: 1649750.

[166] Xun W B, Ren Y, Yan H, et al. Sustained inhibition of maize seed-borne Fusarium Using a Bacillus-dominated rhizospheric stable core microbiota with unique cooperative patterns. Adv Sci, 2023, 10: e2205215.

[167] Liu H W, Li J Y, Singh B K. Harnessing co-evolutionary interactions between plants and Streptomyces to combat drought stress. Nat Plants, 2024, 10: 1159–1171.

[168] Sobahan M A, Akter N, Karim M M, et al. Bioaugmentation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria alleviates chromium and salt stress in rice through the improvement of physiology, ion homeostasis, and antioxidant defense. Microorganisms, 2025, 13: 1462.

[169] Siddika A, Rashid A A, Khan S N, et al. Harnessing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Bacillus subtilis and B. aryabhattai to combat salt stress in rice: a study on the regulation of antioxidant defense, ion homeostasis, and photosynthetic parameters. Front Plant Sci, 2024, 15: 1419764.

[170] Wang G, Zhang L S, Zhang S H, et al. The combined use of a plant growth promoting Bacillus sp. strain and GABA promotes the growth of rice under salt stress by regulating antioxidant enzyme system, enhancing photosynthesis and improving soil enzyme activities. Microbiol Res, 2023, 266: 127225.

[171] Liu J, Zhao X H, Niu Y Q, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Halomonas alkaliantarcticae M23 promotes the salt tolerance of maize by increasing the K+/Na+ ratio, antioxidant levels, and ABA levels and changing the rhizosphere bacterial community. BMC Plant Biol, 2025, 25: 727.

[172] Xu T T, Meng S, Zhu X, et al. Integrated GWAS and transcriptomic analysis reveal the candidate salt-responding genes regulating Na+/K+ balance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Front Plant Sci, 2023, 13: 1004477.

[173] Nahar L, Aycan M, Lopes Hornai E M, et al. Tolerance with high yield potential is provided by lower Na+ ion accumulation and higher photosynthetic activity in tolerant YNU31-2-4 rice genotype under salinity and multiple heat and salinity stress. Plants, 2023, 12: 1910.

[174] Li P S, Kong W L, Wu X Q. Rahnella aquatilis JZ-GX1 alleviate salt stress in Cinnamomum camphora by regulating oxidative metabolism and ion homeostasis. Forests, 2023, 14: 1110.

[175] Yasmeen R, Siddiqui Z S. Physiological responses of crop plants against Trichoderma harzianum in saline environment. Acta Bot Croat, 2017, 76: 154–162.

[176] Boorboori M R, Zhang H Y. The role of Serendipita indica (Piriformospora indica) in improving plant resistance to drought and salinity stresses. Biology, 2022, 11: 952.

[177] Ning Z C, Lin K X, Gao M Y, et al. Mitigation of salt stress in rice by the halotolerant plant growth-promoting bacterium Enterobacter asburiae D2. J Xenobiot, 2024, 14: 333–349.

[178] Ruíz-Sánchez M, Armada E, Muñoz Y, et al. Azospirillum and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization enhance rice growth and physiological traits under well-watered and drought conditions. J Plant Physiol, 2011, 168: 1031–1037.

[179] Rawat L, Singh Y, Shukla N, et al. Seed biopriming with salinity tolerant isolates of Trichoderma harzianum alleviates salt stress in rice: growth, physiological and biochemical characteristics. J Plant Pathol, 2012, 94: 353–365.

[180] Meng W N, Zhou Z L, Tan M P, et al. Integrated analysis of metatranscriptome and amplicon sequencing to reveal distinctive rhizospheric microorganisms of salt-tolerant rice. Plants, 2024, 14: 36.

[181] Li Q, Jiang J H, Cheng H Y, et al. Changes in root-associated bacterial communities across growth stages of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive rice grown in coastal saline-alkali soils. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2025, 41: 76.

[182] Song J J, Guan X T, Chen L L, et al. Cooperative interplay between PGPR and Trichoderma longibrachiatum reprograms the rhizosphere microecology for improved saline alkaline stress resilience in rice seedlings. Microorganisms, 2025, 13: 1562.

[183] Fu S L, Iqbal B, Li G L, et al. The role of microbial partners in heavy metal metabolism in plants: a review. Plant Cell Rep, 2024, 43: 111.

[184] Sanjana S, Jazeel K, Janeeshma E, et al. Synergistic interactions of assorted ameliorating agents to enhance the potential of heavy metal phytoremediation. Stress Biol, 2024, 4: 13.

[185] Charagh S, Wang H, Wang J X, et al. Leveraging multi-omics tools to comprehend responses and tolerance mechanisms of heavy metals in crop plants. Funct Integr Genomics, 2024, 24: 194.

[186] Ivanov F D, Pulikova E P, Gorovtsov A V, et al. A global meta-analysis on microbially-assisted phytoremediation of heavy metals in contaminated soils. Water Air Soil Pollut, 2025, 237: 145.

[187] Fatima K, Mohsin H, Afzal M. Revisiting biochemical pathways for lead and cadmium tolerance by domain bacteria, Eukarya, and their joint action in bioremediation. Folia Microbiol, 2025, 70: 41–54.

[188] 汤洪伟, 吴岳, 朱新霞, 等. 微生物菌剂对水稻吸收富集镉及根系微生物群落的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 35: 627–633.Tang H W, Wu Y, Zhu X X, et al. Effects of microbial inoculants on cadmium uptake and accumulation in rice and rhizosphere microbial community. Chin J Rice Sci, 2016, 35: 627–633 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[189] Liao Y H, Huang S C, Hareem M, et al. Addressing cadmium stress in rice with potassium-enriched biochar and Bacillus altitudinis rhizobacteria. BMC Plant Biol, 2024, 24: 1084.

[190] Thanwisai L, Janket A, Siripornadulsil W, et al. A cadmium-tolerant bacterium (Cupriavidus taiwanensis KKU2500-3) reduces cadmium accumulation in grains of KDML105 rice cultivated in a contaminated paddy field. Environ Technol Innov, 2022, 28: 102685.

[191] Chan W F, Li H, Wu F Y, et al. Arsenic uptake in upland rice inoculated with a combination or single arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J Hazard Mater, 2013, 262: 1116–1122.

[192] Ghosh A, Pramanik K, Bhattacharya S, et al. Abatement of arsenic-induced phytotoxic effects in rice seedlings by an arsenic-resistant Pantoea dispersa strain. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2021, 28: 21633–21649.

[193] Liu A R, Wang W J, Chen X C, et al. Phytoremediation of DEHP and heavy metals co-contaminated soil by rice assisted with a PGPR consortium: Insights into the regulation of ion homeostasis, improvement of photosynthesis and enrichment of beneficial bacteria in rhizosphere soil. Environ Pollut, 2022, 314: 120303.

[194] Pandey S, Ghosh P K, Ghosh S, et al. Role of heavy metal resistant Ochrobactrum sp. and Bacillus spp. strains in bioremediation of a rice cultivar and their PGPR like activities. J Microbiol, 2013, 51: 11–17.

[195] Zhao J Y, Qiu Y H, Feng X W, et al. Characteristic rhizosphere metabolites of low-cadmium-accumulating rice drive microbially induced soil cadmium speciation transformation. Front Microbiol, 2026, 17: 1832350.

[196] Liu S J, Pan Y W, Jin X J, et al. A novel Biochar-PGPB strategy for simultaneous soil remediation and safe vegetable production. Environ Pollut, 2024, 356: 124254.

[197] Yang X, Chen Q Y, Jiang Z M, et al. Mycorrhizal fungi drive Cd and P allocation strategies for the co-planting system of hyperaccumulator S. nigrum and upland rice. Environ Pollut, 2025, 376: 126382.

[198] Kong F Y, Guan D X, Lu L T, et al. Multi-element amendment reshaped rhizosphere microbiome: a microbially driven Fe/Mn/S synergistic action for Cd immobilization. Environ Res, 2025, 286: 122985.

[199] Lei L L, Zhu Q Y, Xu P X, et al. The intercropping and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus decrease Cd accumulation in upland rice and improve phytoremediation of Cd-contaminated soil by Sphagneticola calendulacea (L.) Pruski. J Environ Manage, 2021, 298: 113516.

[200] Chen J, Wen Y Y, Pan Y B, et al. Analysis of the role of the rice metallothione in gene OsMT2b in grain size regulation. Plant Sci, 2024, 349: 112272.

[201] Xu X H, Dou Y, Zhao S J, et al. Rhizosphere microbes enhance plant resistance to cadmium through a root ROS-microbial IAA-root DNA methylation interKingdom signaling pathway. Cell Rep, 2025, 44: 116491.

[202] Wang N, Wang X X, Chen L, et al. Biological roles of soil microbial consortium on promoting safe crop production in heavy metal(loid) contaminated soil: a systematic review. Sci Total Environ, 2024, 912: 168994.

[203] Mohan S L, Beena R, Joy M. An improvement in water stress tolerance in rice by altering morpho-physiological and biochemical mechanisms using root colonizing endophyte Piriformospora indica. Vegetos, 2025, 38: 341–352.

[204] Turino Mattos M L, Valgas R A, Martins J F D S. Coinoculation with growth-promoting bacteria increases the efficiency of nitrogen use by irrigated rice. ACS Omega, 2023, 8: 48719–48727.

[205] Yanni Y G, Dazzo F B. Enhancement of rice production using endophytic strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii in extensive field inoculation trials within the Egypt Nile delta. Plant Soil, 2010, 336: 129–142.

[206] Nain L, Rana A, Joshi M, et al. Evaluation of synergistic effects of bacterial and cyanobacterial strains as biofertilizers for wheat. Plant Soil, 2010, 331: 217–230.

[207] Susanti W I, Cholidah S N, Agus F. Agroecological nutrient management strategy for attaining sustainable rice self-sufficiency in Indonesia. Sustainability, 2024, 16: 845.

[208] Anh N H, Ngoc V Y, An N K T, et al. Purple nonsulfur bacteria affected soil-plant nitrogen, growth, and yield of rice in high salinized soil in thoi Binh - ca mau under greenhouse condition. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2025, 41: 439.

[209] Gui Y F, Gu C H, Xiao X, et al. Microbial inoculations promoted the rice plant growth by regulating the root-zone bacterial community composition and potential function. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2023, 23: 5222–5232.

[210] Shi M Y, Wu Y L, Wu R T, et al. Differential impacts of Funneliformis Mosseae and Rhizophagus intraradices on the rice rhizosphere microbiome, nutrient availability, and yield in paddy fields. Mycorrhiza, 2025, 35: 61.

[211] Oteino N, Lally R D, Kiwanuka S, et al. Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates. Front Microbiol, 2015, 6: 745.

[212] Zaidi A, Khan M S, Oves M, et al. Strategies for development of Microphos and mechanisms of phosphate-solubilization. In Khan M S, Zaidi A, eds. Phosphate Solubilizing Microbes for Crop Improvement. New York: Nova Science, 2009.

[213] Jin F Y, Hu Q L, Zhao Y X, et al. Enhancing quinoa growth under severe saline-alkali stress by phosphate solubilizing microorganism Penicillium funicuiosum P1. PLoS One, 2022, 17: e0273459.

[214] Abbas S R, Shahid I, Javed M, et al. Contribution of mineral mobilizing fluorescent pseudomonads in growth promotion of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in nutrient deficient soil. S Afr N J Bot, 2024, 166: 88–96.

[215] Wang D, Poinsot V, Li W X, et al. Genomic insights and functional analysis reveal plant growth promotion traits of Paenibacillus mucilaginosus G78. Genes, 2023, 14: 392.

[216] Ferrusquía-Jiménez N I, González-Arias B, Rosales A, et al. Elicitation of Bacillus cereus-amazcala (B.c-A) with SiO2 nanoparticles improves its role as a plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) in chili pepper plants. Plants, 2022, 11: 3445.

[217] Luo D, Shi J, Li M, et al. Consortium of phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria promotes maize growth and changes the microbial community composition of rhizosphere soil. Agronomy, 2024, 14: 1535.

[218] Minamisawa K, Nishioka K, Miyaki T, et al. Anaerobic nitrogen-fixing consortia consisting of clostridia isolated from gramineous plants. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2004, 70: 3096–3102.

[219] Elekhtyar N M, AL-Huqail A A. Influence of chemical, organic, and biological silicon fertilization on physiological studies of Egyptian Japonica green super rice (Oryza sativa L.). Sustainability, 2023, 15: 12968.

[220] Arriel-Elias M T, de Carvalho Barros Côrtes M V, de Sousa T P, et al. Induction of resistance in rice plants using bioproducts produced from Burkholderia pyrrocinia BRM 32113. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2019, 26: 19705–19718.

[221] de Sousa Oliveira M I, Chaibub A A, Sousa T P, et al. Formulations of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Burkholderia pyrrocinia control rice blast of upland rice cultivated under no-tillage system. Biol Control, 2020, 144: 104153.

[222] Mazumder M, Tikariha H, Mayalagu S, et al. An ecology-driven microbial consortium enhances plant growth and immunity while sustaining rhizospheric microbial balance. Plant Commun, 2026, 7: 101665.

[223] Jiang N, Qiu J H, Tian D G, et al. Mixture of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus pumilus modulates community structures of rice rhizosphere soil to suppress rice seedling blight. Rice Sci, 2025, 32: 118–130.

[224] Li M, Li W J, Wang C X, et al. Growth-promoting effects of self-selected microbial community on wheat seedlings in saline-alkali soil environments. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2024, 12: 1464195.

[225] Zaki A G, Hasanien Y A, El-Sayyad G S. Novel fabrication of SiO2/Ag nanocomposite by gamma irradiated Fusarium oxysporum to combat Ralstonia solanacearum. AMB Express, 2022, 12: 25.

[226] Zhao S C, Wang H R, Wang J H. Synthesis and application of a compound microbial inoculant for effective soil remediation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2023, 30: 120915–120929.

[227] Ma Y M, Wen Y F, Liu R, et al. Harnessing microbial agents to improve soil health and rice yield under straw return in rice: wheat agroecosystems. Agriculture, 2025, 15: 1538.

[228] 刘华山, 张志勇, 韩锦峰, 等. 复合菌剂对二氯喹啉酸胁迫下烟草根际土壤微生物及酶活性的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2014, 20(2): 65–69.

Liu H S, Zhang Z Y, Han J F, et al. Effects of compound microbial agents on soil microbe and enzyme activities of tobacco rhizosphere under quinclorac stress. Acta Tabacaria Sin, 2014, 20(2): 65–69 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[229] Sun C S, Geng L L, Wang M L, et al. No adverse effects of transgenic maize on population dynamics of endophytic Bacillus subtilis strain B916-gfp. Microbiologyopen, 2017, 6: e00404.

[230] Han H, Liu H, Zhang B, et al. Competitive relationships due to similar nutrient preferences reshape soil bacterial metacommunities. Sci Total Environ, 2024, 933: 172956.

[231] Li Z, Zhang H. Application of microbial fertilizers in sustainable agriculture. J Crop Product, 2000, 3: 337–347.

[232] 武君洁, 吴毅歆, 何鹏搏, 等. 枯草芽胞杆菌YN2014090悬浮剂的研制. 中国生物防治学报, 2019, 35: 777–784.

Wu J J, Wu Y X, He P B, et al. Development of Bacillus subtilis YN2014090 suspension concentrate. Chin J Biol Control, 2019, 35: 777–784 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[233] Zhao S Q, Wang J J, Yang Z Z, et al. Preparation of microbial compound agents. Microbiology China, 2020, 47: 1492–1502.

[234] Cruz-Magalhães V, Guimarães R A, da Silva J C, et al. The combination of two Bacillus strains suppresses Meloidogyne incognita and fungal pathogens, but does not enhance plant growth. Pest Manage Sci, 2022, 78: 722–732.

[235] Schommer V A, Nazari M T, Melara F, et al. Techniques and mechanisms of bacteria immobilization on biochar for further environmental and agricultural applications. Microbiol Res, 2024, 278: 127534.

[236] Bhattacharyya P N, Sandilya S P, Sarma B, et al. Biochar as soil amendment in climate-smart agriculture: opportunities, future prospects, and challenges. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2024, 24: 135–158.

[237] Bolan S, Hou D Y, Wang L W, et al. The potential of biochar as a microbial carrier for agricultural and environmental applications. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 886: 163968.

[238] Li M Z, Xiao J H, Zeng Z, et al. Study on the biodegradation of phenol by Alcaligenes faecalis JH1 immobilized in rice husk biochar. Front Environ Sci, 2023, 11: 1294791.

[239] Song Y, Yuan G S, Wu Q F, et al. Change in microbial metabolic quotient under biochar amendment was associated with soil organic carbon quality, microbial community composition, and enzyme activity in bulk and rhizosphere soils in an acid rice paddy. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2023, 23: 3149–3162.

[240] Jin X, Bai Y, Khashi U Rahman M, et al. Biochar stimulates tomato roots to recruit a bacterial assemblage contributing to disease resistance against Fusarium wilt. iMeta, 2022, 1: e37.

[241] Yu K R, Wang Z Y, Yang W Y, et al. Application of biochar-immobilized Bacillus megaterium for enhancing phosphorus uptake and growth in rice. Plants, 2025, 14: 214.

[242] Guan T K, Wang Q Y, Li J S, et al. Biochar immobilized plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhanced the physicochemical properties, agronomic characters and microbial communities during lettuce seedling. Front Microbiol, 2023, 14: 1218205.

[243] Ajeng A A, Abdullah R, Ling T C. Biochar-Bacillus consortium for a sustainable agriculture: physicochemical and soil stability analyses. Biochar, 2023, 5: 17.

[244] Beula Isabel J, Balamurugan A, Renuka Devi P, et al. Chitosan-encapsulated microbial biofertilizer: a breakthrough for enhanced tomato crop productivity. Int J Biol Macromol, 2024, 260: 129462.

[245] Fan T F, Luan Y Y, Xiang S, et al. Seed coating with biocontrol bacteria encapsulated in sporopollenin exine capsules for the control of soil-borne plant diseases. Int J Biol Macromol, 2024, 281: 136093.

[246] Li Y T, Shabir R, Rashti M R, et al. Cow manure compost-based products as alternative rhizobial carrier materials. Land Degrad Dev, 2023, 34: 4768–4780.

[247] Wang K N, Hou J J, Zhang S D, et al. Preparation of a new biochar-based microbial fertilizer: Nutrient release patterns and synergistic mechanisms to improve soil fertility. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 860: 160478.

[248] Montreemuk J, Stewart T N, Prapagdee B. Bacterial-assisted phytoremediation of heavy metals: Concepts, current knowledge, and future directions. Environ Technol Innov, 2024, 33: 103488.

[249] Mathew B T, Torky Y, Amin A, et al. Halotolerant marine rhizosphere-competent Actinobacteria promote Salicornia bigelovii growth and seed production using seawater irrigation. Front Microbiol, 2020, 11: 552.

[250] Frikha-Gargouri O, Ben Abdallah D, Bhar I, et al. Antibiosis and bmyB gene presence as prevalent traits for the selection of efficient Bacillus biocontrol agents against crown gall disease. Front Plant Sci, 2017, 8: 1363.

[251] Tanaka E, Umeki D, Kido S, et al. Biocontrol of bacterial wilt disease using plant-associated bacterial communities in tomato. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2025, 38: 411–426.

[252] Szymańska S, Sikora M, Deja-Sikora E, et al. HPMO colonization of Salicornia europaea is shaped by environmental factors beyond associated microbiome and plant-derived antimicrobials. Appl Soil Ecol, 2025, 216: 106522.

[253] Lutz S, Thuerig B, Oberhaensli T, et al. Harnessing the microbiomes of suppressive composts for plant protection: from metagenomes to beneficial microorganisms and reliable diagnostics. Front Microbiol, 2020, 11: 1810.

[254] Khatri S, Bhattacharjee A, Shivay Y S, et al. Transplantation of soil from organic field confers disease suppressive ability to conducive soil. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2024, 40: 112.

[255] Zhu H J, Zhou H, Ren Z H, et al. Control of Magnaporthe oryzae and rice growth promotion by Bacillus subtilis JN005. J Plant Growth Regul, 2022, 41: 2319–2327.

[256] Subba R, Mathur P. Functional attributes of microbial and plant based biofungicides for the defense priming of crop plants. Theor Exp Plant Physiol, 2022, 34: 301–333.

[257] 兰宇, 孟军, 韩晓日, 等. 生物炭基产品及其对土壤培肥改良效应的研究进展. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2024, 30: 1396–1412.Lan Y, Meng J, Han X R, et al. Advances in research on biochar-based products and their effects on soil fertility improvement. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2024, 30: 1396–1412 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[258] Tsalgatidou P C, Papageorgiou A, Boutsika A, et al. Insights into the interaction between the biocontrol agent Bacillus amyloliquefaciens QST 713, the pathogen Monilinia fructicola and peach fruit. Agronomy, 2024, 14: 771.

[259] Murunde R, Ringo G, Robinson-Boyer L, et al. Effective biocontrol of rice blast through dipping transplants and foliar applications. Agronomy, 2022, 12: 592.

[260] Ju M X, Zhang Q C, Wang R T, et al. Correlation in endophytic fungi community diversity and bioactive compounds of Sophora alopecuroides. Front Microbiol, 2022, 13: 955647.

[261] Keswani C, Dilnashin H, Birla H, et al. Regulatory barriers to agricultural research commercialization: a case study of biopesticides in India. Rhizosphere, 2019, 11: 100155.

[262] Luan H N, Zhang Y, Qiu W H, et al. Research progress on microbial pesticides. Pestic Biochem Physiol, 2025, 213: 106512.

[263] Wend K, Zorrilla L, Freimoser F M, et al. Microbial pesticides - challenges and future perspectives for testing and safety assessment with respect to human health. Environ Health, 2024, 23: 49.

[264] Alkassab A T, Erler S, Steinert M, et al. Exposure of honey bees to mixtures of microbial biopesticides and their effects on bee survival under laboratory conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2024, 31: 26618–26627.

[265] Hezakiel H E, Thampi M, Rebello S, et al. Biopesticides: a green approach towards agricultural pests. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2024, 196: 5533–5562.

[266] Zhao W S, Guo Q G, Li S Z, et al. Application of Bacillus subtilis NCD-2 can suppress cotton Verticillium wilt and its effect on abundant and rare microbial communities in rhizosphere. Biol Control, 2022, 165: 104812.

[267] Shehata H R, Ettinger C L, Eisen J A, et al. Genes required for the anti-fungal activity of a bacterial endophyte isolated from a corn Landrace grown continuously by subsistence farmers since 1000 BC. Front Microbiol, 2016, 7: 1548.

[268] Pérez-Bonilla M, Oves-Costales D, de la Cruz M, et al. Phocoenamicins B and C, new antibacterial spirotetronates isolated from a marine Micromonospora sp. Mar Drugs, 2018, 16: 95.

[269] Rezaee Danesh Y, Mulet J M, Porcel R. Bridging microbial biocontrol and phytochemical biopesticides: synergistic approaches for sustainable crop protection. Plants, 2025, 14: 3453.

[270] Vasques N C, Nogueira M A, Hungria M. Increasing application of multifunctional Bacillus for biocontrol of pests and diseases and plant growth promotion: lessons from Brazil. Agronomy, 2024, 14: 1654.

[271] Saldaña-Mendoza S A, Pacios-Michelena S, Palacios-Ponce A S, et al. Trichoderma as a biological control agent: mechanisms of action, benefits for crops and development of formulations. World J Microbiol Biotechnol, 2023, 39: 269.

[272] Devi S, Chand S, Sharma P, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in pesticide biodegradation: a comprehensive review. Soil Sediment Contam Int J, 2026, 35: 437–473.

[273] Liu-Xu L, González-Hernández A I, Camañes G, et al. Harnessing green helpers: nitrogen-fixing bacteria and other beneficial microorganisms in plant–microbe interactions for sustainable agriculture. Horticulturae, 2024, 10: 621.

[274] Gureev A P, Kryukova V A, Eremina A A, et al. Plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria Azospirillum partially alleviate pesticide-induced growth retardation and oxidative stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Growth Regul, 2024, 104: 503–521.

[275] Getenga Z M, Mogusu E O, Ngige A N, et al. A review of the enhanced degradation of pesticides in tropical agricultural soils. J Environ Eng Sci, 2024, 19: 9–17.

[276] Guerrero Ramírez J R, Ibarra Muñoz L A, Balagurusamy N, et al. Microbiology and biochemistry of pesticides biodegradation. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24: 15969.

[277] Shahid M, Khan M S, Singh U B. Pesticide-tolerant microbial consortia: potential candidates for remediation/clean-up of pesticide-contaminated agricultural soil. Environ Res, 2023, 236: 116724.

[278] Kumar A, de los Santos Villalobos S, Santoyo G. Next generation microbial pesticides for sustainable vegetable production: application and challenges. Int J Veg Sci, 2026, 32: 143–148.

[279] Katsenios N, Sparangis P, Vitsa S, et al. Application of biostimulants and herbicides as a promising co-implementation: the incorporation of a new cultivation practice. Agronomy, 2023, 13: 2634.

[280] Regaiolo A, Dominelli N, Andresen K, et al. The biocontrol agent and insect pathogen Photorhabdus luminescens interacts with plant roots. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2020, 86: e00891–e00820.

[281] Al Basir F, Chowdhury J, Torres D F M. Dynamics of a double-impulsive control model of integrated pest management using perturbation methods and floquet theory. Axioms, 2023, 12: 391.

[282] Wang X G, Wang Q S, Zhang Y C, et al. Influence of decomposition agent application and schedule in wheat straw return practice on soil quality and crop yield. Chem Biol Technol Agric, 2023, 10: 8.

[283] Liu Q, Dai H C, Wang L, et al. Microbial community and functions depending on tillage and straw returning management: consequences for soil health and ecosystem services. Land Degrad Dev, 2024, 35: 5357–5366.

[284] Zhang T T, Ge S Q, Gan R, et al. Effects of straw returning on physicochemical properties and microbial characteristics of agricultural soil. Curr Microbiol, 2025, 83: 91.

[285] Liu B, Xia H, Jiang C C, et al. 14 year applications of chemical fertilizers and crop straw effects on soil labile organic carbon fractions, enzyme activities and microbial community in rice-wheat rotation of middle China. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 841: 156608.

[286] Liu X Q, Liu H R, Zhang Y S, et al. Straw return drives soil microbial community assemblage to change metabolic processes for soil quality amendment in a rice-wheat rotation system. Soil Biol Biochem, 2023, 185: 109131.

[287] Guan Y P, Wu M K, Che S H, et al. Effects of continuous straw returning on soil functional microorganisms and microbial communities. J Microbiol, 2023, 61: 49–62.

[288] Xu H D, Sun J N, Zhao Z Q, et al. Long-term straw return promotes soil phosphorus cycling by enhancing soil microbial functional genes responsible for phosphorus mobilization in the rice rhizosphere. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2025, 381: 109422.

[289] Miura M, Hill P W, Jones D L. Impact of a single freeze-thaw and dry-wet event on soil solutes and microbial metabolites. Appl Soil Ecol, 2020, 153: 103636.

[290] Zhang M M, Dang P F, Haegeman B, et al. The effects of straw return on soil bacterial diversity and functional profiles: a meta-analysis. Soil Biol Biochem, 2024, 195: 109484.

[291] Zhang Y T, Wang Y X, Sun Z B. Varying effects of straw-returning methods on soil microbial diversity and community composition in Northeast China. Microorganisms, 2025, 13: 1749.

[292] Cui S Y, Xu S Q, Cao G Q, et al. The long-term straw return resulted in significant differences in soil microbial community composition and community assembly processes between wheat and rice. Front Microbiol, 2025, 16: 1533839.

[293] Gao X Y, Liu W Z, Li X Q, et al. A novel fungal agent for straw returning to enhance straw decomposition and nutrients release. Environ Technol Innov, 2023, 30: 103064.

[294] Zhou J, Li Y L, Lou J W, et al. Fungal saprotrophic promotion and plant pathogenic suppression under ditch-buried straw return with appropriate burial amount and depth. Plants, 2024, 13: 1738.

[295] Kimeklis A K, Gladkov G V, Orlova O V, et al. The succession of the cellulolytic microbial community from the soil during oat straw decomposition. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24: 6342.

[296] Zhao Y Z, Wang S Y, Zhang M L, et al. Nitrogen application and rhizosphere effect exert opposite effects on key straw-decomposing microorganisms in straw-amended soil. Microorganisms, 2024, 12: 574.

[297] Wang S S, Zou C, Lou C, et al. Effects of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin on the ignition behaviors of biomass in a drop tube furnace. Bioresour Technol, 2020, 310: 123456.

[298] Gong X J, Yu Y, Hao Y B, et al. Characterizing corn-straw-degrading actinomycetes and evaluating application efficiency in straw-returning experiments. Front Microbiol, 2022, 13: 1003157.

[299] Wang X Y, Huang J, Yang L L, et al. From residue to resource: a physicochemical and microbiological analysis of soil microbial communities through film mulch-enhanced rice straw return strategies. Agronomy, 2024, 14: 1001.

[300] Yu M, Wang Q X, Su Y, et al. Response of soil environment and microbial community structure to different ratios of long-term straw return and nitrogen fertilizer in wheat–maize system. Sustainability, 2023, 15: 1986.

[301] Xi H, Jia M Y, Kuzyakov Y, et al. Key decomposers of straw depending on tillage and fertilization. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2023, 358: 108717.

[302] Wang X L, Ji X J, Long A R, et al. Response of soil phosphorus fractions and microbial community network to straw returning: Insights from microbial phosphorus limitation. Soil Tillage Res, 2025, 253: 106698.

[303] Song K, Sun Y F, Qin Q, et al. The effects of earthworms on fungal diversity and community structure in farmland soil with returned straw. Front Microbiol, 2020, 11: 594265.

[304] Song A L, Li Z M, Liao Y L, et al. Soil bacterial communities interact with silicon fraction transformation and promote rice yield after long-term straw return. Soil Ecol Lett, 2021, 3: 395–408.

[305] Lu Q, Xiao Y, Wu P F. Emerging technologies of employing algae and microorganisms to promote the return-to-field of crop straws: a mini-review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2023, 11: 1152778.

[306] Xuan D T, Guong V T, Rosling A, et al. Different crop rotation systems as drivers of change in soil bacterial community structure and yield of rice, Oryza sativa. Biol Fertil Soils, 2012, 48: 217–225.

[307] Zhang H F, Luo G W, Wang Y Z, et al. Crop rotation-driven change in physicochemical properties regulates microbial diversity, dominant components, and community complexity in paddy soils. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2023, 343: 108278.

[308] Martínez S. Soil microbial community structure in rice rotation systems with crops and pastures in temperate Uruguay. Appl Soil Ecol, 2023, 188: 104929.

[309] Breidenbach B, Blaser M B, Klose M, et al. Crop rotation of flooded rice with upland maize impacts the resident and active methanogenic microbial community. Environ Microbiol, 2016, 18: 2868–2885.

[310] Zhou J B, Liu Q H, Luo R Y, et al. Microbial community robustness and function are associated with yield and multifunctionality under rice rotation in the subtropical Anning River Valley. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2026, 399: 110164.

[311] Ma X, Du M L, Liu P, et al. Alternation of soil bacterial and fungal communities by tomato-rice rotation in Hainan Island in Southeast of China. Arch Microbiol, 2021, 203: 913–925.

[312] Zhao J, Ren T, Fang Y T, et al. Soil abundant and rare microbes and their contributions to nutrient cycling in the upland and paddy stages: Insights from oilseed rape-rice and wheat-rice rotations. Soil Tillage Res, 2026, 256: 106888.

[313] Peng C J, Lai S S, Luo X S, et al. Effects of long term rice straw application on the microbial communities of rapeseed rhizosphere in a paddy-upland rotation system. Sci Total Environ, 2016, 557/558: 231–239.

[314] Wang K K, Ren T, Lu Z F, et al. Straw return and phosphorus (P) fertilization shape P-solubilizing bacterial communities and enhance P mobilization in rice-rapeseed rotation systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2025, 381: 109434.

[315] Bai N L, Lv W G, Chu X Q, et al. Comparison of soil microbial community and physicochemical properties between rice–fallow and rice–bean (green manure) rotation. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 2022, 86: 593–603.

[316] Zhang X X, Gao J S, Cao Y H, et al. Long-term rice and green manure rotation alters the endophytic bacterial communities of the rice root. Microb Ecol, 2013, 66: 917–926.

[317] Erktan A, Or D, Scheu S. The physical structure of soil: Determinant and consequence of trophic interactions. Soil Biol Biochem, 2020, 148: 107876.

[318] Pathan S I, Arfaioli P, Ceccherini M T, et al. Physical protection of extracellular and intracellular DNA in soil aggregates against simulated natural oxidative processes. Appl Soil Ecol, 2021, 165: 104002.

[319] Wang Y Z, Zhang H F, Zhang Y P, et al. Crop rotation-driven changes in rhizosphere metabolite profiles regulate soil microbial diversity and functional capacity. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2023, 358: 108716.

[320] Fernández-Baca C P, Rivers A R, Kim W, et al. Changes in rhizosphere soil microbial communities across plant developmental stages of high and low methane emitting rice genotypes. Soil Biol Biochem, 2021, 156: 108233.

[321] Dondjou D T, Diedhiou A G, Mbodj D, et al. Rice developmental stages modulate rhizosphere bacteria and Archaea co-occurrence and sensitivity to long-term inorganic fertilization in a West African Sahelian agro-ecosystem. Environ Microbiome, 2023, 18: 42.

[322] Jiang M D, Xu P, Wu L, et al. Methane emission, methanogenic and methanotrophic communities during rice-growing seasons differ in diversified rice rotation systems. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 842: 156781.

[323] Kong W B, Yao Y F, Qiu L P, et al. Crop rotation enhances soil microbial network complexity and functionality: a meta-analysis. Appl Soil Ecol, 2025, 216: 106511.

[324] Liu Y L, Qin Z, Li Y, et al. Effects of different long-term crop rotation patterns on soil microbial biomass carbon and its turnover characteristics in yellow paddy soil. Appl Soil Ecol, 2025, 214: 106367.

[325] Zhang Y, Wang B Y, Zhang J, et al. By reconstructing a multifunctional intensive microbiome, effective microorganisms (EM) improve the ecological environment of rice–crayfish cocropping. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2023, 357: 108698.

[326] Cai S Y, Zhao X. Responses of bacterial communities and nitrogen-cycling microbiomes to the conversion from cereals to legumes in the rice-based system. Appl Soil Ecol, 2024, 195: 105241.

[327] Doni F, Suhaimi N S M, Mispan M S, et al. Microbial contributions for rice production: from conventional crop management to the use of ‘omics’ technologies. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23: 737.

[328] Fu J H, Liu Y W, Liu X C, et al. Screening of saline-alkali tolerant microorganisms and their promoting effects on rice growth under saline-alkali stress. J Clean Prod, 2024, 481: 144176.

[329] O’Callaghan M, Shi S J. A synthetic microbial community used as a bioinoculant can overcome rice production constraints in acid soils. Sci China Life Sci, 2024, 67: 1085–1086.