Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica,

Acta Agronomica Sinica

   

Effects of different nitrogen application methods on yield and fertilizer nitrogen fate of spring maize fields in the Loess Tableland

Li Jia1,Lyu Shen-Qiang2,Wang Jin-Feng1,Wang Xiao-Fei2,Yang Ze-Yu2,Wang Lin-Quan2,3,*   

  1. 1 Department of Life Sciences, Yuncheng University, Yuncheng 044000, Shanxi, China; 2 College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China; 3 Luohe Food Engineering Vocational University, Luohe 462000, Henan, China 
  • Received:2026-04-20 Revised:2026-08-21 Accepted:2026-08-21 Published:2026-08-26
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation Project of Shanxi Province (202403021222302), the Excellent Doctoral Research Project for Invited Scholars from Shanxi Province (QZX-2023041; LJZX-202504), the Yuncheng University Doctoral Research Initiation Project (YQ-2024001; YQ-2024028) and the Applied Research Project of Yuncheng University (YY-202402). 

Abstract: This study investigated the effects of fertilizer application time and nitrogen (N) fertilizer type on spring maize yield and fertilizer N fate to provide a theoretical basis for rational nitrogen management in rain-fed spring maize on the Loess Tableland. A field experiment combining large plots and microplots was conducted from 2020 to 2022. Four large-plot treatments were established: (1) no N application (CK); (2) split-applied common urea (S-U, with 40% applied as basal fertilizer and 60% as topdressing at the ten-leaf stage (V10)); (3) a single basal application of common urea (B-U); and (4) a single basal application of matrix-based slow-release urea (B-SRU). In the microplots, the fate of N fertilizer was traced using 15N?labeled urea (10.14 atom%). For the split-applied N treatment, two additional microplot treatments were established, with 15N-labeled urea applied only as basal fertilizer (S-Ubm) and only as topdressing (S-Utm). The N application rate for all fertilization treatments was 180 kg hm?2. The results showed that the B-SRU treatment produced a higher yield, but the difference from the other N treatments was not significant; however, its economic benefit was 2338 yuan hm?2 higher than that of S-U. There was no significant difference in total plant N accumulation among fertilization treatments during the whole growing season, but the stage-specific characteristics of the amount of plant N derived from fertilizer N (Ndff) varied with fertilization time and N fertilizer type. Compared with B-Um, S-Um significantly reduced pre-V10 Ndff by 53.7% and increased post-V10 Ndff by 63.2%; B-SRUm decreased pre-V10 Ndff by 12.4% and increased post-V10 Ndff by 22.4%. In the split-application treatment, S-Um plants derived N mainly from topdressed N, yet the first season 15N recovery efficiency (15NRE) of S-Ubm was greater than that of S-Utm. Regarding fertilizer N fate, the first season 15NRE, residual rate, and loss rate of S-Um were 29.7%, 49.6%, and 20.8%, respectively. The B-Um treatment exhibited a first-season 15NRE similar to that of S-Um, but significantly decreased the residual rate by 29.3%, increased the loss rate by 70.7%, and reduced the cumulative 15NRE by 18.5%. Compared with B-Um, B-SRUm increased the amount of soil 15N residue in the 0–20 cm layer by 31.4%, significantly increased the residual rate by 39.5%, decreased the loss rate by 26.7%, and enhanced the uptake of residual N by the succeeding crop, thus increasing the cumulative 15NRE by 7.4%. In conclusion, a single basal application of matrix-based slow-release urea can maintain yield while effectively improving economic benefit and reducing the N loss rate for rain-fed spring maize on the Loess Tableland. This practice is recommended as an appropriate fertilization strategy for simplified and labor-saving spring maize cultivation in this region.

Key words: yield, semi-film mulching, rain-fed, 15N recovery efficiency, slow-release nitrogen fertilizer

[1] Zhang G X, Zhao D H, Fan H Z, et al. Combining controlled-release urea and normal urea with appropriate nitrogen application rate to reduce wheat stem lodging risk and increase grain yield and yield stability. J Integr Agric, 2023, 22: 3006–3021.

[2] Wang C, Shen Y, Fang X T, et al. Reducing soil nitrogen losses from fertilizer use in global maize and wheat production. Nat Geosci, 2024, 17: 1008–1015.

[3] Mulvaney R L, Khan S A, Ellsworth T R. Synthetic nitrogen fertilizers deplete soil nitrogen: a global dilemma for sustainable cereal production. J Environ Qual, 2009, 38: 2295–2314.

[4] Lu J S, Hu T T, Zhang B C, et al. Nitrogen fertilizer management effects on soil nitrate leaching, grain yield and economic benefit of summer maize in Northwest China. Agric Water Manag, 2021, 247: 106739.

[5] 张雨婷, 囤灿平, 鄢世杰, 等. 缓控释氮肥对小麦增产和N2O减排效应的综合评价及影响因素. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2025, 31: 1552–1565.

Zhang Y T, Dun C P, Yan S J, et al. Effects and influencing factors of slow and controlled-release nitrogen fertilizers on wheat yield enhancement and N2O emission reduction in China. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2025, 31: 1552–1565 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[6] Zhang Z X, Dong J H, Liu X G, et al. Meta-analysis of slow/controlled-release fertilizers on yield, greenhouse gas emissions, and soil organic carbon in major cereal crops. Field Crops Res, 2026, 338: 110316.

[7] Farmaha B S, Sims A L. The influence of polymer-coated urea and urea fertilizer mixtures on spring wheat protein concentrations and economic returns. Agron J, 2013, 105: 1328–1334.

[8] 魏海燕, 李宏亮, 程金秋, 等. 缓释肥类型与运筹对不同穗型水稻产量的影响. 作物学报, 2017, 43: 730–740.

Wei H Y, Li H L, Cheng J Q, et al. Effects of slow/controlled release fertilizer types and their application regime on yield in rice with different types of panicle. Acta Agron Sin, 2017, 43: 730–740 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[9] Kaur G, Zurweller B A, Nelson K A, et al. Soil waterlogging and nitrogen fertilizer management effects on corn and soybean yields. Agron J, 2017, 109: 97–106.

[10] 孙晓, 景建元, 吕慎强, 等. 不同缓/控释尿素在黄土台塬区春玉米的减量施用效果. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25: 848–855.

Sun X, Jing J Y, Lyu S Q, et al. Effect of different rates of slow/controlled release urea on nitrogen content in spring maize in loess highlands. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2017, 25: 848–855 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[11] 李嘉, 吕慎强, 杨泽宇, 等. 氮肥运筹对黄土塬区春玉米产量、效益和氮肥利用率的综合效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26: 32–41.

Li J, Lyu S Q, Yang Z Y, et al. Comprehensive effects of nitrogen fertilizer management on yield, economic performance and nitrogen use efficiency of spring maize in Loess Plateau, China. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2020, 26: 32–41 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[12] Yang Y, Ni X Y, Zhou Z J, et al. Performance of matrix-based slow-release urea in reducing nitrogen loss and improving maize yields and profits. Field Crops Res, 2017, 212: 73–81.

[13] 高强, 李德忠, 汪娟娟, 等. 春玉米一次性施肥效果研究. 玉米科学, 2007, 15(4): 125–128.
Gao Q, Li D Z, Wang J J, et al. Effects of single fertilization for spring maize. J Maize Sci, 2007, 15(4): 125–128 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[14] 张婧, 夏光利, 李虎, 等. 一次性施肥技术对冬小麦/夏玉米轮作系统土壤N2O排放的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35: 195–204.
Zhang J, Xia G L, Li H, et al. Effect of single basal fertilization on N2O emissions in wheat and maize rotation system. J Agro-Environ Sci, 2016, 35: 195–204 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[15] 战秀梅, 李亭亭, 韩晓日, 等. 不同施肥方式对春玉米产量、效益及氮素吸收和利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17: 861–868.
Zhan X M, Li T T, Han X R, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilization methods on yield, profit and nitrogen absorption and utilization of spring maize. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2011, 17: 861–868 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[16] Yang Y M, Wang X B, Dai K, et al. Fate of labeled urea-15N as basal and topdressing applications in an irrigated wheat-maize rotation system in North China plain: Ⅱ summer maize. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 2011, 90: 379–389.

[17] Wang S J, Luo S S, Yue S C, et al. Fate of 15N fertilizer under different nitrogen split applications to plastic mulched maize in semiarid farmland. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 2016, 105: 129–140.

[18] Chameides W L, Yu H, Liu S C, et al. Case study of the effects of atmospheric aerosols and regional haze on agriculture: an opportunity to enhance crop yields in China through emission controls? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96: 13626–13633.

[19] 王艳, 米国华, 陈范骏, 等. 玉米根系形态对光照、氮水平反应的基因型差异. 土壤肥料, 2001(3): 12–16.
Wang Y, Mi G H, Chen F J, et al. Genetic difference on root morphology under different light intensity and N levels of maize. Soils Fert, 2001(3): 12–16 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[20] 赵立宁, 杨卫君, 孟祥睿, 等. 施用生物炭并优化氮肥用量对农田肥料氮去向的影响. 农业资源与环境学报, 2025, 42: 1247–1255.
Zhao L N, Yang W J, Meng X R, et al. Effects of biochar application and nitrogen application rate optimization on the fate of fertilizer nitrogen in farmland. J Agric Resour Environ, 2025, 42: 1247–1255 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[21] 祝建民, 付文涛, 万新才, 等. 土壤肥力和施氮量对红壤性稻田残留化肥氮去向的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2025(12): 28–35.
Zhu J M, Fu W T, Wan X C, et al. Effects of soil fertility and nitrogen rates on the fate of residual fertilizer nitrogen in red paddy fields. Soil Fert Sci China, 2025(12): 28–35 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[22] Li H T, Wang L, Peng Y, et al. Fate of fertilizer nitrogen from a winter wheat field under film mulching and straw retention practices. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst, 2023, 125: 123–136.

[23] 苏同庆, 邢璐, 王火焰. 氮磷配施和施肥方式对潮土小麦氮吸收利用的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(7): 1–7.
Su T Q, Xing L, Wang H Y. The effects of nitrogen combined with phosphorus and application methods on nitrogen uptake and utilization of wheat in fluvo-aquic soil. Soil Fert Sci China, 2022(7): 1–7 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[24] Kuzyakov Y, Friedel J K, Stahr K. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol Biochem, 2000, 32: 1485–1498.

[25] 毛小红, 刘蕊, 周国朋, 等. 绿肥驱动作物-土壤-环境系统氮循环的作用与机制. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2026, 32: 1–12.
Mao X H, Liu R, Zhou G P, et al. Role and mechanism of green manure in driving the nitrogen cycle of the crop-soil-environment system. J Plant Nutr Fert, 2026, 32: 1–12 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[26] 巨晓棠, 张福锁. 关于氮肥利用率的思考. 生态环境, 2003, 12: 192–197.
Ju X T, Zhang F S. Thinking about nitrogen recovery rate. Ecol Environ Sci, 2003, 12: 192–97 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[27] 吴振宇, 杨阳, 周子军, 等. 新型缓释尿素肥效与功能材料添加量的关系. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25: 740–748.
Wu Z Y, Yang Y, Zhou Z J, et al. Effects of adding proportions of functional absorption materials on performance of new slow-release urea. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2017, 25: 740–748 (in Chinese with English abstract).

[28] Shi Z L, Jing Q, Cai J, et al. The fates of 15N fertilizer in relation to root distributions of winter wheat under different N splits. Eur J Agron, 2012, 40: 86–93.

[29] Zhao J Y, Sun X D, Xue Y Q, et al. Optimizing nitrogen management for higher grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in summer maize by coordinating the N supply–demand balance. J Integr Agric, 2026, 25: 1902–1912. 

[1] Huang Zhou-Xiang, Li Yi-Hong, Liu Xiao-Yan, Liu Wei, Meng Yu-Shan, Tang Dao-Bin, Zhang Kai, Du Kang, Wang Ji-Chun, Lyu Chang-Wen. Effects of 6-BA and uniconazole on photosynthetic performance, stress physiology, yield, and quality of sweet potato under pre-drought followed by waterlogging stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(8): 2521-2532.
[2] Xie Ke-Ying, Li Qiao-Long, Li Guo-Feng, Zhao Ming-Hui, Gao Rui-Man, Ling Ying-Hua, Zhao Fang-Ming. QTL identification of yield-related traits and fine mapping of qGL8 using SSSLs derived from rice CSSL-Z815 [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(8): 2350-2365.
[3] Xiang Yu-Xin, Zhang Jie-Yu, Li Gui-Zhen, Wang Lin, Liu Han, Qin Yu-Xing, Ma Gen, Xiang Da-Bing. Effects of the interaction between nitrogen application and planting density on the canopy light environment, yield, and quality of Tartary buckwheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(8): 2480-2495.
[4] Zhang Rui-Lian, Shang Xiao-Min, Li Jing, Dong Kai-Lin, Xie Yu-Qin, Liu Yang, Yu Shu-Qin, Cao Meng-Yuan, Li Wen-Yang. Effects of high-temperature stress at different stages on grain yield and the physicochemical properties of starch in maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(8): 2424-2437.
[5] Gao Wang-Nan, Meng Tian-Qi, Sun Zhao-Xin, Shang Xu-Ge, Wu Jun, Liu Yu-Xiu. Research progress and breeding applications of wheat solid stem trait [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(8): 2233-2243.
[6] Wang Bi-Sheng, Sun Xiao-Lu, Cui Yu-Sha, Zhao Zhong-Qing, Ma Qing-Min, Ding He-Yang, Fang Quan-Xiao. Simulation improvement and validation of winter wheat yield formation in response to planting density and row spacing [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(8): 2438-2453.
[7] Jin Xin-Xin, Su Qiao, Song Ya-Hui, Zhao Ji-Yu, Yang Yong-Qing, Wang Jin. Effects of planting density on dry matter production and yield of semi-creeping and erect peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(7): 2219-2230.
[8] Xiao Hong, Li Bing-Lin, Liao Bo, Xiao Guo-Bin, Lyu Wei-Sheng, Ren Tao, Lu Zhi-Feng, Lu Jian-Wei. Effects of exogenous magnesium spraying at the final flowering stage on rapeseed yield and silique development [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(7): 2084-2094.
[9] Liu Feng, Dong Hong-Wei, Zhang Yue, Li Ran, Sun Ruo-Nan, Liu Jia-Cheng, Sun Shu-Jie, Zhang Xu-Dong, Han Qing-Fang. Photosynthetic mechanisms underlying yield stability under reduced nitrogen in maize-soybean intercropping: enhanced conversion efficiency of photosynthates [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(7): 2095-2108.
[10] Xu Jia-Yi, Liu Yu-Hang, Xu Bing-Jie, Xu Ming, Wang Ru-Juan, Chai Sha-Sha, Liu Hong-Juan. Physiological mechanisms by which transplanting method and density interact to regulate photosynthate production, translocation, and partitioning in sweet potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(7): 2127-2143.
[11] Zhang Guo-Chao, Wang Yun-Jie, Chang Qiao-Ling, Hou Si-Yu, Fan Zhi-Long, Yin Wen, Hu Fa-Long, Chai Qiang. Effects of intercropped green manure and irrigation quota on water use characteristics and water productivity of maize in an oasis irrigation district [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(7): 2180-2192.
[12] Tan Xiao-Qiang, Wang Jian, Kuai Jie, Wang Bo, Wang Jing, Xu Zheng-Hua, Zhao Jie, Zhang Peng-Peng, Zhang Jian, Zhou Guang-Sheng. Synergistic monitoring of rapeseed based on nitrogen nutrition index and comprehensive growth index [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(7): 2109-2126.
[13] Hu Chuan, Zhao Kai-Nan, Huang Xiu-Li, Wu Jin-Zhi, Ren Kai-Ming, Wang He-Zheng, Fu Guo-Zhan, Huang Ming, Li You-Jun. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen rates on yield and quality of dryland wheat under one-off irrigation [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[14] Ma Sheng-Qian, Wang Zhi-Ping, Chen Hao-Tian, Dou Shu-Xian, Zhang Yan, Deng Ai-Xing, Zhang Wei-Jian, Yuan Xiang-Yang, Song Zhen-Wei. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen application rate on maize yield and soil aggregates in northeastern China under straw returning [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816.
[15] Zhang Si-Si, Zhao Xiang-Hui, Zhou Yang, Yao Yun-Feng, Zhu Rong-Yu, Dong Yuan-Jie, Hu Guo-Qing, Xu Tong, Liu Zhao-Xin. Effects of plowing and green manure returning in winter fallow period on soil physicochemical properties and yield in continuously cropped peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!