Bai Tian-Tian1,**,Liu Wei1,**,Ma Qun1,Su Yong-Tao1,Li Yu-Jiao1,Wang Jia-Qi1,Li Zhao1,Yan Lei1,Ma Qian-Chi1,Wang Xiao-Guang1,Zhong Chao1,Ren Jing-Yao1,Liu Xi-Bo1,Zhao Shu-Li1,Zhang He1,Zhao Xin-Hua1,Jiang Chun-Ji1,Wang Jing1,*,Yu Hai-Qiu1,2,*
|
[1] 郝西, 张俊, 刘娟, 等. 不同花生品种萌发期抗旱性评价. 农业科学, 2018, 8: 1485–1490.
[2] 陈俊芳, 吴宪, 杨佳绒, 等. 全球气候变化下干旱及复水对植物和土壤微生物的影响: 进展与展望. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42: 3038–3049.
[3] 张美恩, 王春乙, 宋艳玲, 等. 河南省夏花生生育期旱涝灾害危险性评价. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38: 158–168.
[4] 李楠, 杨秀丽, 宁东贤, 等. 花生抗旱性鉴定指标及评价研究进展. 农业与技术, 2020, 40(11): 11–14.
[5] 厉广辉, 张昆, 刘风珍, 等. 不同抗旱性花生品种的叶片形态及生理特性. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47: 644–654.
[6] 刘帆, 申双和, 李永秀, 等. 不同生育期水分胁迫对玉米光合特性的影响. 气象科学, 2013, 33: 378–383.
[7] 王瑞丽, 于贵瑞, 何念鹏, 等. 气孔特征与叶片功能性状之间关联性沿海拔梯度的变化规律: 以长白山为例. 生态学报, 2016, 36: 2175–2184.
[8] 张风娟, 李健, 杜成忠, 等. 不同甘蔗品种叶片气孔对水分胁迫的响应. 广西植物, 2014, 34: 821–827. [9] Lauriano J A, Ramalho J C, Lidon F C, et al. Peanut photosynthesis under drought and re-watering. Photosynthetica, 2004, 42: 37–41.
[10] 董奇琦, 艾鑫, 张艳正, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同耐性花生品种生理特性及产量的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2020, 51: 18–26. [11] Mwale S S, Azam-Ali S N, Massawe F J. Growth and development of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) in response to soil moisture 1. Dry matter and yield. Eur J Agron, 2007, 26: 345–353.
[12] 嵇军德, 万勇善, 刘风珍, 等. 不同类型花生品种荚果空间分布与抗旱性关系研究. 花生学报, 2015, 44: 28–34.
[13] 张铭. 不同花生品种对干旱胁迫与复水的响应及其机理. 山东农业大学博士学位论文, 山东泰安, 2017. [14] Liu X J, Wang X D, Liu P, et al. Rehydration compensation of winter wheat is mediated by hormone metabolism and de-peroxidative activities under field conditions. Front Plant Sci, 2022, 13: 823846. [15] Abid M, Tian Z W, Ata-Ul-Karim S T, et al. Adaptation to and recovery from drought stress at vegetative stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars. Funct Plant Biol, 2016, 43: 1159–1169. [16] Dramé K N, Clavel D, Repellin A, et al. Water deficit induces variation in expression of stress-responsive genes in two peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars with different tolerance to drought. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2007, 45: 236–243.
[17] 陈嘉敏, 刘瑞显, 张国伟, 等. 二氢卟吩铁对花针期干旱及复水后花生叶片光合特性的影响. 花生学报, 2023, 52: 52–62.
[18] 赵长星, 程曦, 王月福, 等. 不同生育时期干旱胁迫对花生生长发育和复水后补偿效应的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2012, 34: 627–632.
[19] 王诗语, 李仍媛, 艾鑫, 等. 开花下针期干旱-复水对花生根系发育、光合生理及产量形成的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2024, 46: 1329–1338.
[20] 厉广辉, 万勇善, 刘风珍, 等. 苗期干旱及复水条件下不同花生品种的光合特性. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38: 729–739.
[21] 任婧瑶, 王婧, 蒋春姬, 等. 花生种质苗期耐旱性鉴定与综合评价. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2019, 50: 722–727.
[22] 向雪林, 朱丹青, 刘光华, 等. 花生花期极端品种开花成针结荚习性差异及与产量相关性. 中国油料作物学报, 2025, 47: 1264–1275.
[23] 厉广辉, 万勇善, 刘风珍, 等. 不同抗旱性花生品种根系形态及生理特性. 作物学报, 2014, 40: 531–541.
[24] 陶洪斌, 林杉. 打孔称重法与复印称重法和长宽校正法测定水稻叶面积的方法比较. 植物生理学通讯, 2006, 42: 496–498.
[25] 邓文辉, 宋珂辰, 张浩, 等. 降水变化对荒漠草原植物群落主要物种气孔形态和光合生理特性的影响. 草业学报, 2026, 35: 65–78. [26] Mattiello E M, Ruiz H A, Neves J C, et al. Zinc deficiency affects physiological and anatomical characteristics in maize leaves. J Plant Physiol, 2015, 183: 138–143. [27] Sun Z X, Liu W, Wang X N, et al. Transcriptome-based spatiotemporal analysis of drought response mechanisms in two distinct peanut cultivars. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25: 11895.
[28] 景晨娟, 陈雪峰, 王端, 等. 三个李子品种叶片结构差异及其抗旱性分析. 北方园艺, 2021(15): 27–34.
[29] 应朝阳, 吕亮雪, 刘国道, 等. 干旱胁迫对多年生落花生生长和活性氧代谢的影响. 热带作物学报, 2006, 27: 17–21.
[30] 姚君平, 罗瑶年, 杨新道, 等. 早、中熟花生不同生育阶段土壤水分亏缺对植株生育和产量的影响. 花生科技, 1985(2): 1–8.
[31] 张艳正. 不同耐性花生品种响应干旱胁迫的机理研究. 沈阳农业大学硕士学位论文, 辽宁沈阳, 2018.
[32] 刘吉利, 赵长星, 吴娜, 等. 苗期干旱及复水对花生光合特性及水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44: 469–476.
[33] 曾雯珺, 王东雪. 基于叶片解剖结构的岑软系列油茶抗旱性综合评价. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32: 2492–2501. [34] Richardson A D, Duigan S P, Berlyn G P. An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytol, 2002, 153: 185–194. [35] Arunyanark A, Jogloy S, Akkasaeng C, et al. Chlorophyll stability is an indicator of drought tolerance in peanut. J Agron Crop Sci, 2008, 194: 113–125.
[36] 方宇辉, 齐学礼, 李艳, 等. 强光胁迫对转玉米C4型ZmPEPC+ZmPPDK基因小麦光合和生理特性的影响. 作物学报, 2024, 50: 1647–1657. [37] Shimazaki K, Doi M, Assmann S M, et al. Light regulation of stomatal movement. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2007, 58: 219–247.
[38] 孙庆芳. 花生种质资源抗旱性和叶片抗旱性状的研究. 山东农业大学硕士学位论文, 山东泰安, 2016.
[39] 曹慧, 许雪峰, 韩振海, 等. 水分胁迫下抗旱性不同的2种苹果属植物光合特性的变化. 园艺学报, 2004, 31: 285–290. [40] Efeoğlu B, Ekmekçi Y, Çiçek N. Physiological responses of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery. S Afr N J Bot, 2008, 75: 34–42. [41] Flexas J, Barón M, Bota J, et al. Photosynthesis limitations during water stress acclimation and recovery in the drought-adapted Vitis hybrid Richter-110 (V. berlandieri × V. rupestris). J Exp Bot, 2009, 60: 2361–2377. [42] Miyashita K, Tanakamaru S, Maitani T, et al. Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress. Environ Exp Bot, 2005, 53: 205–214.
[43] 杨妮, 李逸民, 李静文, 等. 外源5-ALA对干旱胁迫下茶树叶绿素合成和荧光特性及关键酶基因表达的影响. 茶叶科学, 2022, 42: 187–199. [44] Reinbothe S, Reinbothe C. Regulation of chlorophyll biosynthesis in angiosperms. Plant Physiol, 1996, 111: 1–7. [45] Brusslan J A, Peterson M P. Tetrapyrrole regulation of nuclear gene expression. Photosynth Res, 2002, 71: 185–194.
[46] 蒋文华, 燕飞, 付静, 等. 外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸对低温胁迫下茶树光合特性的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48: 108–115.
[47] 王嘉楠, 李小艳, 魏石美, 等. 5-ALA对干旱胁迫下小麦幼苗光合作用及D1蛋白的调节作用. 作物杂志, 2018(5): 121–126.
[48] 武亚琼, 宣振国. 5-ALA对干旱胁迫下沙棘叶绿素合成和光合作用的影响. 吉林林业科技, 2024, 53(4): 14–20. [49] Subbarao G V, Chauhan Y S, Johansen C. Patterns of osmotic adjustment in pigeonpea: its importance as a mechanism of drought resistance. Eur J Agron, 2000, 12: 239–249.
[50] 张智猛, 戴良香, 宋文武, 等. 干旱处理对花生品种叶片保护酶活性和渗透物质含量的影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39: 133–141. [51] Quilambo O A. Proline content, water retention capability and cell membrane integrity as parameters for drought tolerance in two peanut cultivars. S Afr N J Bot, 2004, 70: 227–234.
[52] 邓雅诗, 马朝阳, 袁炜蓉, 等. 干旱胁迫和复水对掌叶木幼苗叶片结构和水分状况的影响. 广西林业科学, 2024, 53: 178–184. [53] Voronin P Y, Maevskaya S N, Nikolaeva M K. Physiological and molecular responses of maize (Zea mays L.) plants to drought and rehydration. Photosynthetica, 2019, 57: 850–856. [54] Yoshiba Y, Kiyosue T, Nakashima K, et al. Regulation of levels of proline as an osmolyte in plants under water stress. Plant Cell Physiol, 1997, 38: 1095–1102. [55] Rajendrakumar C S V, Reddy B V B, Reddy A R. Proline-protein interactions: protection of structural and functional integrity of M 4 lactate dehydrogenase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1994, 201: 957–963. [56] Reddy A R, Chaitanya K V, Vivekanandan M. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J Plant Physiol, 2004, 161: 1189–1202. [57] Székely G, Abrahám E, Cséplo A, et al. Duplicated P5CS genes of Arabidopsis play distinct roles in stress regulation and developmental control of proline biosynthesis. Plant J, 2008, 53: 11–28. [58] Trovato M, Mattioli R, Costantino P. Multiple roles of proline in plant stress tolerance and development. RENDICONTI LINCEI, 2008, 19: 325–346. [59] Szabados L, Savouré A. Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci, 2010, 15: 89–97. [60] Sankar B, Karthishwaran K, Somasundaram R. Leaf anatomical changes in peanut plants in relation to drought stress with or without paclobutrazol and ABA. J Phytology, 2016, 25–29. [61] Du Y L, Zhao Q, Chen L R, et al. Effect of drought stress on sugar metabolism in leaves and roots of soybean seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2020, 146: 1–12. [62] Wang J, Sun Z X, Wang X N, et al. Transcriptome-based analysis of key pathways relating to yield formation stage of foxtail millet under different drought stress conditions. Front Plant Sci, 2022, 13: 1110910. [63] Yang T Y, Li H R, Li L W, et al. Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of α-amylase and β-amylase genes underlying drought tolerance in cassava. BMC Genom, 2023, 24: 190.
[64] 周娟丽. 河南省花生生产现状、发展优势及对策. 农业科技通讯, 2022(8): 4–6.
[65] 严美玲, 李向东, 林英杰, 等. 苗期干旱胁迫对不同抗旱花生品种生理特性、产量和品质的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 113–119. |
| [1] | Huang Zhou-Xiang, Li Yi-Hong, Liu Xiao-Yan, Liu Wei, Meng Yu-Shan, Tang Dao-Bin, Zhang Kai, Du Kang, Wang Ji-Chun, Lyu Chang-Wen. Effects of 6-BA and uniconazole on photosynthetic performance, stress physiology, yield, and quality of sweet potato under pre-drought followed by waterlogging stress [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(8): 2521-2532. |
| [2] | Xie Ke-Ying, Li Qiao-Long, Li Guo-Feng, Zhao Ming-Hui, Gao Rui-Man, Ling Ying-Hua, Zhao Fang-Ming. QTL identification of yield-related traits and fine mapping of qGL8 using SSSLs derived from rice CSSL-Z815 [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(8): 2350-2365. |
| [3] | Xiang Yu-Xin, Zhang Jie-Yu, Li Gui-Zhen, Wang Lin, Liu Han, Qin Yu-Xing, Ma Gen, Xiang Da-Bing. Effects of the interaction between nitrogen application and planting density on the canopy light environment, yield, and quality of Tartary buckwheat [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(8): 2480-2495. |
| [4] | Zhang Rui-Lian, Shang Xiao-Min, Li Jing, Dong Kai-Lin, Xie Yu-Qin, Liu Yang, Yu Shu-Qin, Cao Meng-Yuan, Li Wen-Yang. Effects of high-temperature stress at different stages on grain yield and the physicochemical properties of starch in maize [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(8): 2424-2437. |
| [5] | Gao Wang-Nan, Meng Tian-Qi, Sun Zhao-Xin, Shang Xu-Ge, Wu Jun, Liu Yu-Xiu. Research progress and breeding applications of wheat solid stem trait [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(8): 2233-2243. |
| [6] | Wang Bi-Sheng, Sun Xiao-Lu, Cui Yu-Sha, Zhao Zhong-Qing, Ma Qing-Min, Ding He-Yang, Fang Quan-Xiao. Simulation improvement and validation of winter wheat yield formation in response to planting density and row spacing [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(8): 2438-2453. |
| [7] | Jin Xin-Xin, Su Qiao, Song Ya-Hui, Zhao Ji-Yu, Yang Yong-Qing, Wang Jin. Effects of planting density on dry matter production and yield of semi-creeping and erect peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(7): 2219-2230. |
| [8] | Xiao Hong, Li Bing-Lin, Liao Bo, Xiao Guo-Bin, Lyu Wei-Sheng, Ren Tao, Lu Zhi-Feng, Lu Jian-Wei. Effects of exogenous magnesium spraying at the final flowering stage on rapeseed yield and silique development [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(7): 2084-2094. |
| [9] | Liu Feng, Dong Hong-Wei, Zhang Yue, Li Ran, Sun Ruo-Nan, Liu Jia-Cheng, Sun Shu-Jie, Zhang Xu-Dong, Han Qing-Fang. Photosynthetic mechanisms underlying yield stability under reduced nitrogen in maize-soybean intercropping: enhanced conversion efficiency of photosynthates [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(7): 2095-2108. |
| [10] | Xu Jia-Yi, Liu Yu-Hang, Xu Bing-Jie, Xu Ming, Wang Ru-Juan, Chai Sha-Sha, Liu Hong-Juan. Physiological mechanisms by which transplanting method and density interact to regulate photosynthate production, translocation, and partitioning in sweet potato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(7): 2127-2143. |
| [11] | Zhang Guo-Chao, Wang Yun-Jie, Chang Qiao-Ling, Hou Si-Yu, Fan Zhi-Long, Yin Wen, Hu Fa-Long, Chai Qiang. Effects of intercropped green manure and irrigation quota on water use characteristics and water productivity of maize in an oasis irrigation district [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(7): 2180-2192. |
| [12] | Tan Xiao-Qiang, Wang Jian, Kuai Jie, Wang Bo, Wang Jing, Xu Zheng-Hua, Zhao Jie, Zhang Peng-Peng, Zhang Jian, Zhou Guang-Sheng. Synergistic monitoring of rapeseed based on nitrogen nutrition index and comprehensive growth index [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(7): 2109-2126. |
| [13] | Hu Chuan, Zhao Kai-Nan, Huang Xiu-Li, Wu Jin-Zhi, Ren Kai-Ming, Wang He-Zheng, Fu Guo-Zhan, Huang Ming, Li You-Jun. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen rates on yield and quality of dryland wheat under one-off irrigation [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846. |
| [14] | Ma Sheng-Qian, Wang Zhi-Ping, Chen Hao-Tian, Dou Shu-Xian, Zhang Yan, Deng Ai-Xing, Zhang Wei-Jian, Yuan Xiang-Yang, Song Zhen-Wei. Effects of tillage methods and nitrogen application rate on maize yield and soil aggregates in northeastern China under straw returning [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(6): 1802-1816. |
| [15] | Zhang Si-Si, Zhao Xiang-Hui, Zhou Yang, Yao Yun-Feng, Zhu Rong-Yu, Dong Yuan-Jie, Hu Guo-Qing, Xu Tong, Liu Zhao-Xin. Effects of plowing and green manure returning in winter fallow period on soil physicochemical properties and yield in continuously cropped peanut [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2026, 52(5): 1472-1486. |
|
||