Welcome to Acta Agronomica Sinica，

Acta Agron Sin ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (07): 1092-1099.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01092

• CROP GENETICS & BREEDING·GERMPLASM RESOURCES·MOLECULAR GENETICS • Previous Articles     Next Articles

QTL Mapping of Agronomic and Quality Traits in Soybean under Different Post-Flowering Photoperiods

WANG Ying,CHENG Li-Rui**,LENG Jian-Tian,WU Cun-Xiang,HOU Wen-Sheng,HAN Tian-Fu*   

  1. Institute of Crop Sciences/National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,China
  • Received:2009-12-28 Revised:2010-03-19 Online:2010-07-12 Published:2010-04-28
  • Contact: HAN Tian-Fu, E-mail: hantf@mail.caas.net.cn; Tel: 010-82108784

PDF

1622

Cited

4

Abstract: Most of agronomic and quality traits of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) are quantitatively inherited, and sensitive to photoperiod. In this study, 181recombinant inbred lines (RIL) of F10 generation were used to analyze the post-flowering photoperiod effects on yield and quality traits of soybean, and 129 SSR markers were used to map QTLs associated with the above traits under both long day (LD) and short day (SD) conditions and their photoperiod sensitivity (PS). The results showed that photoperiod greatly affected the performances of agronomic and quality traits of soybean, and the photoperiod sensitivity of the traits were plant height.node number on the main stem>protein content and oil content>100-seed weight>pod number per plant>total percentage of protein and oil. By using CIM (composite interval mapping) method, a total of 12 QTLs associated with the agronomic and quality traits and their sensitivity to the post-flowering photoperiod were identified and mapped on eight linkage groups including A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, D1a, F and L. Among the QTLs mentioned above, four were identified under SD and could explain 11.37%–26.63% of phenotypic variation, and three were identified under LD condition and could explain 11.84%–27.85% of phenotypic variation. The other five were associated with photoperiod sensitivity of various traits and could explain 6.15%–21.44% of phenotypic variation. For the same individual agronomic or quality trait, no major QTL was detected under both SD and LD, indicating that post-flowering photoperiod dramatically regulates the expression of genes determining yield and quality traits, and the agronomic and quality traits of soybean are sensitive to environmental factors. It was drawn that photoperiod sensitivity is a key index for adaptability improvement of soybean. For breeding elite varieties with ideal yield potential, quality and stress tolerance, the photoperiod-insensitive genes related to various traits should be explored and pyramided with other needed genes.

Key words: Soybean, Post-flowering photoperiod, Agronomic trait, Quality trait, QTL mapping

[1] Han T-F(韩天富), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Qiu J-X (邱家驯). A comparative study on pre- and post-flowering photoperiod response in various ecotypes of soybeans. Soybean Sci (大豆科学), 1998, 17(2): 129-134 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2] Wang Y(王英), Wu C-X(吴存祥), Zhang X-M(张学明), Wang Y-P(王云鹏), Han T-F(韩天富). Effects of soybean major maturity genes under different photoperiods. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2008, 34(7): 1160-1168 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3] Han T-F(韩天富), Wang J-L(王金陵). Studies on the post-flowering photoperiodic responses in soybean. Acta Bot Sin (植物学报), 1995, 37(11): 863-869 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4] Wu C, Ma Q, Yam K M, Cheung M Y, Xu Y, Han T, Lam H M, Chong K. In situ expression of the GmNMH7 gene is photoperiod-dependent in a unique soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) flowering reversion system. Planta, 2006, 223: 725-735
[5] Kantolic A G, Slafer G A. Reproductive development and yield components in indeterminate soybean as affected by post-flowering photoperiod. Field Crops Res, 2005, 93: 212-222
[6] Han T-F(韩天富), Wang J-L(王金陵). A study on the responses of different ecotypes of Chinese soybeans to post-flowering photoperiod. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1996, 22(1): 20-26(in Chinese with English abstract)
[7] Han T-F(韩天富), Wang J-L(王金陵), Fan B-B(范彬彬), Yao W-Q(姚文秋), Yang Q-K(杨庆凯). Effect of post-flowering daylength on agronomic characters of soybean. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 1996, 7(2): 169-173 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8] Kantolic A G, Slafer G A. Development and seed number in indeterminate soybean as affected by timing and duration of exposure to long photoperiods after flowering. Ann Bot, 2007, 99: 925-933
[9] Kumudini S V, Pallikonda P K, Steele C. Photoperiod and E-genes influence the duration of the reproductive phase in soybean. Crop Sci, 2007, 47: 1510-1517
[10] Boote K J. Response of soybeans in different maturity groups to March planting in southern USA. Agron J, 1981, 73: 854-859
[11] Smith J R, Nelson R L. Relationship between seed-filling period and yield among soybean breeding lines. Crop Sci, 1986, 26: 469-472
[12] Sarwar G. Impact of grain filling period and other morphological traits in soybean. Soybean Genet Newsl, 1996, 23: 112-116
[13]Curtis D F, Tanner J W, Luzzi B M, Hume D J. Agronomic and phenological differences of soybean isolines differing in maturity and growth habit. Crop Sci, 2000, 40: 1624-1629
[14] Han T-F(韩天富), Wang J-L(王金陵), Yang Q-K(杨庆凯), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒). Effects of post-flowering photoperiod on chemical composition of soybeans. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1997, 30(2): 47-53 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15] Orf J H, Chase K, Jarvik T, Mansur L M, Cregan P B, Adler F R, Lark K G. Genetics of soybean agronomic traits: I. Comparison of three related recombinant inbred populations. Crop Sci, 1999, 39: 1642-1651
[16] Hyten D L, Pantalone V R, Sams C E, Saxton A M, Landau-Ellis D, Stefaniak T R. Seed quality QTL in a prominent soybean population. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 552-561
[17] Xu P(徐鹏), Wang H(王慧), Li Q(李群), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Yu D-Y(喻德跃). Mapping QTLs related to oil content of soybeans. Hereditas (遗传), 2007, 29(1): 92-96 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18] Sun D, Li W, Zhang Z, Chen Q, Ning H, Qiu L, Sun G. Quantitative trait loci analysis for the developmental behavior of Soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Theor Appl Genet, 2006, 112: 665-673
[19] Csanádi G, Vollmann J, Stift G, Lelley T. Seed quality QTLs identified in a molecular map of early maturing soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 103: 912-919
[20] Wu X -L(吴晓雷), Wang Y-J(王永军), He C-Y(贺超英), Chen S-Y(陈受宜), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Wang X-C(王学臣). QTLs mapping of some agronomic traits of soybean. Acta Genet Sin (遗传学报), 2001, 28(10): 947-955 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21] Chung J, Babka H L, Graef G L, Staswick P E, Lee D J, Cregan P B, Shoemaker R C, Specht J E. The seed protein, oil, and yield QTL on soybean linkage group I. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 1053-1067
[22] Zhang W K, Wang Y J, Luo G Z, Zhang J S, He C Y, Wu X L, Gai J Y, Chen S Y. QTL mapping of ten agronomic traits on the soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) genetic map and their association with EST markers. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 108: 1131-1139
[23] Zheng Y-Z(郑永战), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Lu W-G(卢为国), Li W-D(李卫东), Zhou R-B(周瑞宝), Tian S-J(田少君). QTL mapping for fat and fatty acid composition contents in soybean. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2006, 32(12): 1823-1830 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24] Chen Q-S(陈庆山), Zhang Z-C(张忠臣), Liu C-Y(刘春燕), Xin D-W(辛大伟), Shan D-P(单大鹏), Qiu H-M (邱红梅), Shan C-Y(单彩云). QTL analysis of major agronomic traits in soybean. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2007, 40(1): 41-47(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25] Wang X-Z(王贤智), Zhang X-J(张晓娟), Zhou R(周蓉), Sha A-H(沙爱华), Wu X-J(吴学军), Cai S-P(蔡淑平), Qiu D-Z(邱德珍), Zhou X-A(周新安). QTL analysis of seed and pod traits in soybean RIL population. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(3): 441-448(in Chinese with English abstract)
[26] Chapman A, Pantalone V R, Ustun A, Allen F L, Landau-Ellis D, Trigiano R N, Gresshoff P M. Quantitative trait loci for agronomic and seed quality traits in an F2 and F4:6 soybean population. Euphytica, 2003, 129: 387-393
[27] Mian M A R, Ashley D A, Vencill W K, Boerma H R. QTLs conditioning early growth in a soybean population segregating for growth habit. Theor Appl Genet, 1998, 97: 1210-1216
[28] Panthee D R, Pantalone V R, West D R, Saxton A M, Sams C E. Quantitative trait loci for seed protein and oil concentration, and seed size in soybean. Crop Sci, 2005,45: 2015-2022
[29] Lee S H, Bailey M A, Mian M A R, Shipe E R, Ashley D A, Parrott W A, Hussey R S, Boerma H R. Molecular markers associated with soybean plant height, lodging, and maturity across locations. Crop Sci, 1996, 36: 728-735
[30] Xin D W, Qiu H M, Shan D P, Shan C Y, Liu C Y, Hu G H, Staehelin C, Chen Q S. Analysis of quantitative trait loci underlying the period of reproductive growth stages in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Euphytica, 2008, 162: 155-165
[31] Tasma I M, Lorenzen L L, Green D E, Shoemaker R C. Mapping genetic loci for flowering time, maturity, and photoperiod insensitivity in soybean. Mol Breed, 2001, 8: 25-35
[32] Han T-F(韩天富), Gai J-Y(盖钧镒), Chen F-Y(陈风云), Qiu J-X(邱家驯). Photoperiod response and agronomic characters of soybean varieties with different growth period structures. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1998, 24(5): 550-557 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[33] Fehr W R, Caviness C E. Stages of Soybean Development. Agric Home Econ Exp Stn Spec Rep 80, Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA, USA, 1977
[34] Fei Z-H(费志宏), Wu C-X(吴存祥), Sun H-B(孙洪波), Hou W-S(侯文胜), Zhang B-S(张宝石), Han T-F(韩天富). Identification of photothermal responses in soybean by integrating photoperiod treatments with planting-date experiments. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2009, 35(8): 1525-1531 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[35] Lander E S, Bostein D. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP maps. Genetics, 1989, 121: 185-199
[36] Song Q J, Marek L F, Shoemaker R C, Lark K G, Concibido V C, Delannay X, Specht J E, Cregan P B. A new integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean. Theor Appl Genet, 2004, 109: 122-128
[37] Wang D L, Zhu J, Li Z K, Paterson A H. Mapping QTLs with epistastic effects and QTL environment interactions by mixed linear model approaches. Theor Appl Genet, 1999, 99: 1255-1264
[38] Watanabe S, Hideshima R, Xia Z, Tsubokura Y, Sato S, NakamotoY,Yamanaka N, Takahashi R, Ishimoto M, Anai T, Tabata S, Harada K. Map-based cloning of the gene associated with soybean maturity locus E3. Genentics, 2009, 182: 1251-1262
[39] Kantolic A G, Slafer G A. Photoperiod sensitivity after flowering and seed number determination in indeterminate soybean cultivars. Field Crops Res, 2001, 72: 109-118
[40] Sinclair T R, Neumaier N, Farias J R B, Nepomuceno A L. Comparison of vegetative development in soybean cultivars for low-latitude environments. Field Crops Res, 2005, 92: 53-59
[41] Tomkins J P, Shipe E R. Environmental adaptation of long-juvenile soybean cultivars and elite strains. Agron J, 1997,89: 257-262
[42] Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, Yamanouchi U, Monna L, Fuse T, Baba T, Yamamoto K, Umehara Y, Nagamura Y, Sasaki T. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell, 2000, 12: 2473-2483
[43] Sourdille P, Snape J W, Cadalen T, Charmet G, Nakata N, Bernard S, Bernard M. Detection of QTLs for heading time and photoperiod response in wheat using a doubled haploid population. Genome, 2000, 43: 487-494
[1] CHEN Ling-Ling, LI Zhan, LIU Ting-Xuan, GU Yong-Zhe, SONG Jian, WANG Jun, QIU Li-Juan. Genome wide association analysis of petiole angle based on 783 soybean resources (Glycine max L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1333-1345.
[2] YANG Huan, ZHOU Ying, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, PU Tian, WEN Jing, YANG Wen-Yu, YONG Tai-Wen. Effects of nutrient uptake and utilization on yield of maize-legume strip intercropping system [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[3] YU Chun-Miao, ZHANG Yong, WANG Hao-Rang, YANG Xing-Yong, DONG Quan-Zhong, XUE Hong, ZHANG Ming-Ming, LI Wei-Wei, WANG Lei, HU Kai-Feng, GU Yong-Zhe, QIU Li-Juan. Construction of a high density genetic map between cultivated and semi-wild soybeans and identification of QTLs for plant height [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1091-1102.
[4] LI A-Li, FENG Ya-Nan, LI Ping, ZHANG Dong-Sheng, ZONG Yu-Zheng, LIN Wen, HAO Xing-Yu. Transcriptome analysis of leaves responses to elevated CO2 concentration, drought and interaction conditions in soybean [Glycine max (Linn.) Merr.] [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1103-1118.
[5] PENG Xi-Hong, CHEN Ping, DU Qing, YANG Xue-Li, REN Jun-Bo, ZHENG Ben-Chuan, LUO Kai, XIE Chen, LEI Lu, YONG Tai-Wen, YANG Wen-Yu. Effects of reduced nitrogen application on soil aeration and root nodule growth of relay strip intercropping soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1199-1209.
[6] LIU Jia-Xin, LAN Yu, XU Qian-Yu, LI Hong-Ye, ZHOU Xin-Yu, ZHAO Xuan, GAN Yi, LIU Hong-Bo, ZHENG Yue-Ping, ZHAN Yi-Hua, ZHANG Gang, ZHENG Zhi-Fu. Creation and identification of peanut germplasm tolerant to triazolopyrimidine herbicides [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 1027-1034.
[7] WANG Hao-Rang, ZHANG Yong, YU Chun-Miao, DONG Quan-Zhong, LI Wei-Wei, HU Kai-Feng, ZHANG Ming-Ming, XUE Hong, YANG Meng-Ping, SONG Ji-Ling, WANG Lei, YANG Xing-Yong, QIU Li-Juan. Fine mapping of yellow-green leaf gene (ygl2) in soybean (Glycine max L.) [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 791-800.
[8] LI Rui-Dong, YIN Yang-Yang, SONG Wen-Wen, WU Ting-Ting, SUN Shi, HAN Tian-Fu, XU Cai-Long, WU Cun-Xiang, HU Shui-Xiu. Effects of close planting densities on assimilate accumulation and yield of soybean with different plant branching types [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 942-951.
[9] DU Hao, CHENG Yu-Han, LI Tai, HOU Zhi-Hong, LI Yong-Li, NAN Hai-Yang, DONG Li-Dong, LIU Bao-Hui, CHENG Qun. Improving seed number per pod of soybean by molecular breeding based on Ln locus [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 565-571.
[10] ZHOU Yue, ZHAO Zhi-Hua, ZHANG Hong-Ning, KONG You-Bin. Cloning and functional analysis of the promoter of purple acid phosphatase gene GmPAP14 in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 590-596.
[11] WANG Juan, ZHANG Yan-Wei, JIAO Zhu-Jin, LIU Pan-Pan, CHANG Wei. Identification of QTLs and candidate genes for 100-seed weight trait using PyBSASeq algorithm in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(3): 635-643.
[12] ZHANG Guo-Wei, LI Kai, LI Si-Jia, WANG Xiao-Jing, YANG Chang-Qin, LIU Rui-Xian. Effects of sink-limiting treatments on leaf carbon metabolism in soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 529-537.
[13] YU Tao-Bing, SHI Qi-Han, NIAN-Hai , LIAN Teng-Xiang. Effects of waterlogging on rhizosphere microorganisms communities of different soybean varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1690-1702.
[14] SONG Li-Jun, NIE Xiao-Yu, HE Lei-Lei, KUAI Jie, YANG Hua, GUO An-Guo, HUANG Jun-Sheng, FU Ting-Dong, WANG Bo, ZHOU Guang-Sheng. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of shade tolerance of forage soybean varieties [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1741-1752.
[15] CAO Liang, DU Xin, YU Gao-Bo, JIN Xi-Jun, ZHANG Ming-Cong, REN Chun-Yuan, WANG Meng-Xue, ZHANG Yu-Xian. Regulation of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in leaf of soybean cultivar Suinong 26 at seed-filling stage under drought stress by exogenous melatonin [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(9): 1779-1790.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Add: No. 80 Xueyuan South Rd, Beijing 100081, P. R. China E-mail: zwxb301@caas.cn
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd