欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 635-644.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.81072

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    

基因型和环境对小麦产量、品质和氮素效率的影响

金欣欣,姚艳荣,贾秀领(),姚海坡,申海平,崔永增,李谦   

  1. 河北省农林科学院粮油作物研究所, 河北石家庄 050035
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-10 接受日期:2019-01-12 出版日期:2019-04-12 发布日期:2019-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 贾秀领 E-mail:jiaxiuling2013@163.com
  • 作者简介:金欣欣, E-mail: jinxinxin1984@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300402);本研究由国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFNC050025-3);河北省现代农业产业技术体系-小麦产业创新团队项目资助

Effects of genotype and environment on wheat yield, quality, and nitrogen use efficiency

JIN Xin-Xin,YAO Yan-Rong,JIA Xiu-Ling(),YAO Hai-Po,SHEN Hai-Ping,CUI Yong-Zeng,LI Qian   

  1. Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050035, Hebei, China
  • Received:2018-10-10 Accepted:2019-01-12 Online:2019-04-12 Published:2019-01-12
  • Contact: Xiu-Ling JIA E-mail:jiaxiuling2013@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFD0300402);This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFNC050025-3);Hebei Wheat Industry Technology System.

RichHTML

9

PDF

331

摘要：

以不同基因型的小麦品种(13个强筋小麦品种和2个中筋小麦品种), 不同试验地点(馆陶、宁晋、藁城)和不同施氮水平(0、180、240和300 kg hm -2)的田间试验, 综合分析基因型、环境对小麦产量、品质、氮肥利用率的影响, 以期为优质强筋小麦品种选育、栽培调控及高产提质增效的协同目标提供科学依据。研究表明, 不同小麦品种产量在9289~10,088 kg hm -2之间, 强筋小麦品种平均产量9548 kg hm -2, 比中筋小麦品种减产3.1%。藁城、宁晋、馆陶三地的产量分别达9932、9433和9223 kg hm -2。不同小麦品种籽粒蛋白质均值14.5%, 湿面筋28.5%, 沉淀指数39.5 mL, 稳定时间15.4 min, 拉伸能量87.5 cm 2, 最大拉伸阻力428.8 BU。藁优5218、藁优5766、冀麦738、科农2009、师栾02-1、藁优2018、冀麦867综合品质表现较好。馆陶和宁晋的小麦品质性状相对较好, 藁城的品质较差。氮肥利用率随施氮量增加呈降低趋势, N180处理的氮肥农学效率、氮肥吸收利用效率、氮肥生理利用率最高, 依次为4.3 kg kg -1、26.2%、16.6 kg kg -1。兼顾产量、品质、效率三方面, 藁城适宜种植品种有冀麦738、冀麦867、师栾02-1; 宁晋有师栾02-1、科农2009、冀麦738; 馆陶有藁优5766、藁优2018、师栾02-1。综合考虑小麦产量、籽粒品质和氮素利用率, 180 kg hm -2为本研究条件下的最佳施氮量。

关键词: 基因型, 环境, 小麦, 产量, 品质, 氮素效率

Abstract:

An experiment was carried out at Guantao, Ningjin, and Gaocheng using five wheat varieties (thirteen strong gluten wheat varieties and two middle gluten wheat varieties) with four levels of nitrogen fertilizer application (0, 180, 240, and 300 kg ha -1). The average yield of different wheat varieties was 9289 to 10,088 kg ha -1; yield of strong gluten varieties was 9548 kg ha -1, which was 3.1% lower than that of middle gluten varieties. The yield in Gaocheng, Ningjin and Guantao was 9932, 9433, 9223 kg ha -1, respectively. The averaged grain protein content, wet gluten content, Zeleny sedimentation, dough stability time, extensibility energy and maximum resistance were 14.5%, 28.5%, 39.5 mL, 15.4 min, 87.5 cm 2, and 428.8 BU, respectively. Gaoyou 5218, Gaoyou 5766, Jimai 738, Kenong 2009, Shiluan 02-1, Gaoyou 2018, and Jimai 738 had better quality. The wheat had better quality in Guantao and Ningjin than in Gaocheng. The nitrogen use efficiency decreased with nitrogen fertilizer increase. Under nitrogen fertilizer application of 180 kg ha -1, nitrogen agronomic efficiency, recovery efficiency and internal efficiency were the highest, with 4.3 kg kg -1, 26.2% and 16.6 kg kg -1, respectively. Gaocheng was suitable for growing Jimai 738, Jimai 867, and Shiluan 02-1. Ningjin was suitable for growing Shiluan 02-1, Kenong 2009, and Jimai 738. Guantao was suitable for growing Gaoyou 5766, Gaoyou 2018, and Shiluan 02-1. Taking grain yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency into account, 180 kg ha -1 is the optimum nitrogen application under the similar condition of this study.

Key words: genotype, environment, wheat, yield, quality, nitrogen efficiency

表1

各试验地点土壤基本特性(0~20 cm)"

地点
Location		 有机质
Organic matter
(g kg-1)		 全氮
Total N content
(g kg-1)		 碱解氮
Available N
(mg kg-1)		 有效磷
Available P
(mg kg-1)		 有效钾
Available K
(mg kg-1)
藁城 Gaocheng 21.1 a 1.1 a 119.1 a 23.3 a 107.6 b
宁晋 Ningjin 19.5 a 1.1 a 93.7 b 15.6 b 167.4 a
馆陶 Guantao 14.1 b 0.8 b 75.6 c 22.2 a 103.4 c

表2

试验所用小麦品种"

序号
Number		 品种
Variety		 审定编号
Authorized number		 类别
Category
1 藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018 2008007 强筋 Strong gluten
2 藁优5218 Gaoyou 5218 2015005 强筋 Strong gluten
3 藁优5766 Gaoyou 5766 2014002 强筋 Strong gluten
4 邯麦18 Hanmai 18 2016005 强筋 Strong gluten
5 河农5290 Henong 5290 2011003 强筋 Strong gluten
6 冀麦738 Jimai 738 2016015 强筋 Strong gluten
7 冀麦867 Jimai 867 2016006 强筋 Strong gluten
8 科农2009 Kenong 2009 20170015 强筋 Strong gluten
9 师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1 2007016 强筋 Strong gluten
10 石4366 Shi 4366 2015003 强筋 Strong gluten
11 石农952 Shinong 952 2016011 强筋 Strong gluten
12 石优17 Shiyou 17 2007007 强筋 Strong gluten
13 石优20 Shiyou 20 2011011 强筋 Strong gluten
14 衡4444 Heng 4444 2012002 中筋 Middle gluten
15 济麦22 Jimai 22 2006018 中筋 Middle gluten

表3

基因型和环境(地点、氮肥)对产量、品质及氮素吸收的方差分析"

来源
Source		 F值 F-value
产量
Yield		 吸氮量Nitrogen absorption 蛋白质
Grain protein content		 湿面筋
Wet gluten content		 沉淀指数
Zeleny
sedimentation		 稳定时间
Dough
stability time		 拉伸能量Extensibility energy 最大拉伸阻力Maximum resistance
地点Location (L) 52.4* 43.6* 49.2* 307.9* 449.0* 92.9* 60.9* 74.9*
氮肥Nitrogen (N) 31.6* 27.6* 12.0* 34.1* 2.8* 3.0* 1.0 0.7
品种Variety (V) 4.0* 3.9* 9.9* 58.2* 122.7* 60.7* 141.2* 82.5*
L×N 3.2* 4.4* 2.5* 2.2 0.9 1.7 3.1* 2.6*
L×V 4.5* 3.1* 2.1* 3.6* 6.3* 5.1* 4.0* 2.5*
N×V 1.1 1.4 1.2 1.5 1.4 2.9* 1.8* 1.0
L×N×V 1.0 1.6* 0.9 0.5 0.5 3.3 1.0 1.5

表4

不同品种在不同地点的产量"

品种
Variety		 产量Yield (kg hm-2)
馆陶 Guantao 宁晋 Ningjin 藁城 Gaocheng 平均Average
藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018 8782 cd 9591 abc 9784 abcd 9442 de
藁优5218 Gaoyou 5218 86912 cd 9817 ab 9643 bcd 9421 de
藁优5766 Gaoyou 5766 9721 ab 8628 d 9442 d 9289 e
邯麦18 Hanmai 18 9528 ab 9018 cd 9596 bcd 9411 de
河农5290 Henong 5290 8600 d 9941 a 9821 abcd 9507 cde
冀麦738 Jimai 738 10115 a 9601 abc 10395 ab 10088 a
冀麦867 Jimai 867 9879 ab 9778 ab 9549 cd 9708 bcd
科农2009 Kenong 2009 8789 cd 9642 abc 9483 d 9330 e
师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1 8779 cd 9316 abc 10050 abcd 9477 de
石4366 Shi 4366 10124 a 9491 abc 9960 abcd 9873 abc
石农952 Shinong 952 8645 cd 9174 bcd 10134 abcd 9434 de
石优17 Shiyou 17 8835 cd 9179 bcd 10318 abc 9569 cde
石优20 Shiyou 20 9343 bc 9101 cd 10046 abcd 9575 cde
衡4444 Heng 4444 9635 ab 9406 a 10563 a 9967 ab
济麦22 Jimai 22 8884 cd 9812 ab 10194 abcd 9711 bcd
平均Average 9223 9433 9934 9586

表5

不同品种或不同试验地点在不同氮肥条件下的产量"

品种或地点
Variety or location		 产量 Yield (kg hm-2)
N0 N180 N240 N300
品种 Variety
藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018 8872 c 9817 a 9773 a 9307 b
藁优5218 Gaoyou 5218 8514 b 9658 a 9712 a 9800 a
藁优5766 Gaoyou 5766 8233 c 9928 a 9406 b 9590 ab
邯麦18 Hanmai 18 8402 b 9824 a 9773 a 9646 a
河农5290 Henong 5290 8764 c 10155 a 9676 ab 9431 b
冀麦738 Jimai 738 9575 b 10465 a 9983 a 10329 a
冀麦867 Jimai 867 9092 c 10250 a 9869 ab 9623 b
科农2009 Kenong 2009 8956 c 9206 b 9453 ab 9705 a
师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1 9299 b 9648 a 9626 a 9377 b
石4366 Shi 4366 9437 b 10386 a 9741 ab 9928 a
石农952 Shinong 952 8930 c 9735 a 9572 ab 9499 b
石优17 Shiyou 17 9309 b 9830 a 9430 b 9706 a
石优20 Shiyou 20 9123 b 9859 a 9581 b 9739 a
衡4444 Heng 4444 9737 b 10114 a 9853 ab 10165 a
济麦22 Jimai 22 9601 b 9656 ab 9874 a 9712 ab
平均 Average 9023 c 9804 a 9632 b 9559 b
地点 Location
馆陶 Guantao 8761 b 9376 a 9295 a 9462 a
宁晋 Ningjin 9036 b 9543 a 9572 a 9581 a
藁城 Gaocheng 9273 b 10492 a 10028 a 9934 a

表6

不同处理条件下的小麦的品质性状"

项目
Item		 蛋白质
Grain protein content (%)		 湿面筋
Wet gluten content (%)		 沉淀指数
Zeleny sedimentation (mL)		 稳定时间
Dough stability time (min)		 拉伸能量
Extensibility energy (cm2)		 最大拉伸阻力
Maximum
resistance (BU)
品种 Variety
藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018 14.3 cde 29.3 cd 40.9 c 17.1 de 99.3 cd 481.6 c
藁优5218 Gaoyou 5218 15.0 abc 30.3 b 41.0 c 26.1 c 115.1 b 557.0 b
藁优5766 Gaoyou 5766 14.9 abc 27.6 efg 40.4 cd 34.0 a 112.3 b 571.0 b
邯麦18 Hanmai 18 15.5 a 32.9 a 43.7 b 7.4 f 82.8 fg 346.2 e
河农5290 Henong 5290 13.8 def 27.4 fg 37.3 e 9.6 f 56.5 g 269.7 f
冀麦738 Jimai 738 15.1 abc 29.3 bcd 43.9 b 18.4 d 106.6 bc 527.5 bc
冀麦867 Jimai 867 14.8 bc 29.7 bc 41.2 c 16.2 de 101.1 cd 513.0 bc
科农2009 Kenong 2009 15.5 ab 32.1 a 41.4 c 13.7 e 87.9 ef 411.1 d
师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1 15.5 ab 28.5 de 47.4 a 30.5 b 183.8 a 803.0 a
石4366 Shi 4366 13.6 ef 25.5 i 33.9 f 10.0 f 58.3 g 343.1 e
石农952 Shinong 952 13.8 def 23.8 j 36.2 e 15.3 de 93.8 de 531.8 bc
石优17 Shiyou 17 13.6 ef 26.0 hi 39.5 d 10.0 f 75.3 g 402.1 d
石优20 Shiyou 20 14.6 c 26.8 gh 44.7 b 14.5 e 82.4 fg 411.3 d
衡4444 Heng 4444 13.5 f 27.9 ef 28.2 h 3.5 g 17.7 i 75.6 h
济麦22 Jimai 22 14.4 cd 30.1 bc 32.6 g 4.1 g 38.8 h 188.1 g
平均 Average 14.5 28.5 39.5 15.4 87.5 428.8
变异系数 CV(%) 5.0 8.6 12.8 58.5 43.9 40.9
地点 Location
馆陶Guantao 14.5 b 27.4 b 39.3 b 21.1 a 100.1 a 515.1 a
宁晋Ningjin 15.3 a 31.3 a 43.9 a 12.0 b 83.8 b 384.9 b
藁城Gaocheng 13.8 c 26.7 c 35.3 c 13.0 b 78.5 c 386.4 b
处理 Treatment
N0 13.9 b 27.1 b 39.2 b 14.0 b 85.7 a 440.6 a
N180 14.7 a 28.7 a 39.5 ab 16.0 a 88.6 a 426.4 a
N240 14.9 a 29.0 a 39.3 b 15.2 ab 86.4 a 421.9 a
N300 14.7 a 29.2 a 40.1 a 16.3 a 89.2 a 426.2 a

表7

不同处理条件下小麦植株的吸氮量"

品种或地点
Variety or location		 吸氮量 Nitrogen absorption (kg hm-2)
N0 N180 N240 N300 平均 Average
品种 Variety
藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018 221.7 b 319.5 a 307.3 a 299.8 a 287.1
藁优5218 Gaoyou 5218 232.1 b 292.0 a 315.2 a 317.9 a 289.3
藁优5766 Gaoyou 5766 270.6 b 339.7 a 327.6 a 340.4 a 319.6
邯麦18 Hanmai 18 269.6 b 322.7 a 342.4 a 331.1 a 316.4
河农5290 Henong 5290 252.7 c 280.2 b 320.1 a 284.0 b 284.3
冀麦738 Jimai 738 304.2 b 335.9 a 320.6 a 323.9 a 321.2
冀麦867 Jimai 867 302.1 b 338.8 a 329.4 a 338.6 a 327.2
科农2009 Kenong 2009 284.8 b 303.6 b 319.8 a 303.2 b 302.9
师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1 272.2 c 353.0 a 327.9 b 338.5 ab 322.9
石4366 Shi 4366 241.7 c 313.8 a 318.2 a 283.3 b 289.3
石农952 Shinong 952 240.7 c 292.3 b 304.9 ab 330.2 a 292.0
石优17 Shiyou 17 263.3 b 289.6 a 297.0 a 300.6 a 287.6
石优20 Shiyou 20 285.7 c 338.4 a 310.3 b 319.3 ab 313.4
衡4444 Heng 4444 280.8 b 286.5 b 290.1 ab 314.3 a 292.9
济麦22 Jimai 22 286.2 b 309.0 a 299.9 a 304.7 a 300.0
平均 Average 267.2 b 314.3 a 315.4 a 315.3 a -
地点 Location
馆陶 Guantao 294.5 c 318.6 b 321.2 ab 335.5 a 317.4
宁晋 Ningjin 294.4 c 316.3 b 333.8 a 330.6 a 318.8
藁城 Gaocheng 231.0 b 310.2 a 291.4 a 288.6 a 280.3

表8

不同处理条件下小麦的表征氮肥利用效率"

项目
Item		 氮肥农学效率
Nitrogen agronomic efficiency
(kg kg-1)		 氮肥吸收利用效率
Nitrogen recovery efficiency
(%)		 氮肥生理利用率
Nitrogen internal efficiency
(kg kg-1)
品种 Variety
藁优2018 Gaoyou 2018 3.5 c 38.7 a 8.7 ef
藁优5218 Gaoyou 5218 5.2 ab 32.2 b 15.9 d
藁优5766 Gaoyou 5766 6.3 a 25.7 c 24.0 b
邯麦18 Hanmai 18 5.9 a 26.8 c 21.5 bc
河农5290 Henong 5290 4.6 b 17.9 d 23.5 b
冀麦738 Jimai 738 3.1 cd 10.3 f 30.3 a
冀麦867 Jimai 867 3.8 c 14.7 de 24.5 b
科农2009 Kenong 2009 2.0 e 10.4 f 20.8 c
师栾02-1 Shiluan 02-1 1.1 f 30.1 b 3.5 g
石4366 Shi 4366 2.7 d 28.6 bc 9.2 ef
石农952 Shinong 952 3.0 d 28.4 bc 9.8 ef
石优17 Shiyou 17 1.6 e 13.7 e 10.7 e
石优20 Shiyou 20 2.7 d 16.9 d 16.3 d
衡4444 Heng 4444 1.3 ef 6.0 g 19.1 c
济麦22 Jimai 22 0.6 f 8.2 fg 8.0 f
平均 Average 3.2 20.6 16.4
地点 Location
馆陶 Guantao 2.7 b 12.8 b 20.1 a
宁晋 Ningjin 2.3 b 13.5 b 16.3 b
藁城 Gaocheng 4.0 a 29.5 a 13.4 b
处理 Treatment
N180 4.3 a 26.2 a 16.6 a
N240 2.5 b 18.7 b 13.6 b
N300 1.8 b 15.6 b 11.5 b
[1] Triboi E, Abad A, Michelena A, Lloveras J, Ollier J L, Daniel C . Environmental effects on the quality of two wheat genotypes: 1. quantitative and qualitative variation of storage proteins. Eur J Agron, 2000,13:47-64.
doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00059-9
[2] Rozbicki J, Ceglińka A, Gozdowski D, Gozdowski D , Jakubcza k, Cacak-Pietrzak G, Mądry W, Golba J, Piechociński M, Sobczyński G, Studnicki M, Drzazga T . Influence of the cultivar, environment and management on the grain yield and bread-making quality in winter wheat. J Cereal Sci, 2015,61:126-132.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2014.11.001
[3] 乔玉强, 马传喜, 司红起, 蔡华, 夏云翔 . 基因型和环境及其互作效应对小麦品质的影响及品质稳定性分析. 激光生物学报, 2008,17:768-774.
Qiao Y Q, Ma C X, Si H Q, Cai H, Xia Y X . The effects of genotype, environment and G×E interaction on wheat quality and the analysis of stability. Acta Laser Biol Sin, 2008,17:768-774 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[4] 郭天财, 马冬云, 朱云集, 王晨阳, 夏国军, 罗毅 . 冬播小麦品种主要品质性状的基因型与环境及其互作效应分析. 中国农业科学, 2004,37:948-953.
Guo T C, Ma D Y, Zhu Y J, Wang C Y, Xia G J, Luo Y . Genotype, environment and their interactive effects on main quality traits of winter sown wheat variety. Sci Agric Sin, 2004,37:948-953 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5] 马冬云, 朱云集, 郭天财, 王晨阳 . 基因型和环境及其互作对河南省小麦品质的影响及品质稳定性分析. 麦类作物学报, 2002,22(4):13-18.
Ma D Y, Zhu Y J, Guo T C, Wang C Y . Effects of genotype, environment and G×E Interaction on Wheat quality of Henan province and the stability analysis. J Triticeae Crops, 2002,22(4):13-18 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[6] 师日鹏, 上官宇先, 马巧蓉, 王林权 . 密度与氮肥配合对垄沟覆膜栽培冬小麦干物质累积及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011,17:823-830.
Shi R P , Shang-guan Y X, Ma Q R, Wang L Q. Effects of sowing density and N rate on biomass accumulation and yield of winter wheat in furrow and ridge film mulching. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2011,17:823-830 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7] 曹承富, 孔令聪, 汪建来, 赵斌, 赵竹 . 氮素营养水平对不同类型小麦品种品质性状的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2004,24(1):47-50.
Cao C F, Kong L C, Wang J L, Zhao B, Zhao Z . Effect of nitrogen nutrition on the quality of different types of wheat varieties. J Triticeae Crops, 2004,24(1):47-50 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[8] 张秀, 朱文美, 代兴龙, 初金鹏, 钤太峰, 贺明荣 . 施氮量对强筋小麦产量、氮素利用率和品质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2018,38:963-969.
Zhang X, Zhu W M, Dai X L, Chu J P, Qian T P, He M R . Effect of nitrogen application rate on grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency and grain quality of strong gluten wheat. J Triticeae Crops, 2018,38:963-969 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9] 张美微, 王晨阳, 郭天财, 马冬云, 朱云集 . 施氮量对冬小麦蛋白质品质和面粉色泽的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012,18:1312-1318.
Zhang M W, Wang C Y, Guo T C, Ma D Y, Zhu Y J . Effects of nitrogen fertilization on protein quality and flour color of winter wheat. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2012,18:1312-1318 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[10] 张晓涛, 黄玉芳, 马晓晶, 叶优良 . 播种量和施氮量对不同基因型冬小麦干物质积累、运转及产量的影响. 植物生理学报, 2017,53:1067-1076.
Zhang X T, Huang Y F, Ma X J, Ye Y L . Effects of seeding rate and nitrogen level on dry matter accumulation, translocation and grain yield in two genotypes of winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum). Plant Physiol J, 2017,53:1067-1076 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11] 赵广才, 万富世, 常旭红, 刘利华, 杨玉双, 池忠志, 杨丽珍 . 不同试点氮肥水平对强筋小麦加工品质性状及其稳定性的影响. 作物学报, 2006,32:1498-1502.
Zhao G C, Wan F S, Chang X H, Liu L H, Yang Y S, Chi Z Z, Yang L Z . Effects of nitrogen levels and experimental sites on processing quality characteristics and stability in strong gluten wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2006,32:1498-1502 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12] 郭明明, 董招娣, 易媛, 张明伟, 李银银, 代丹丹, 刘立伟, 朱新开, 郭文善, 赵广才, 彭永欣 . 氮肥运筹对不同筋型小麦产量和品质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2014,34:1559-1565.
Guo M M, Dong Z D, Yi Y, Zhang M W, Li Y Y, Dai D D, Liu L W, Zhu X K, Guo W S, Zhao G C, Peng Y X . Effects of nitrogen management on grain yield and quality on wheat cultivars with different gluten types. J Triticeae Crops, 2014,34:1559-1565 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[13] 贺明荣, 杨雯玉, 王晓英, 王振林, 杨万立 . 不同氮肥运筹模式对冬小麦籽粒产量品质和氮肥利用率的影响. 作物学报, 2005,31:1047-1051.
He M R, Yang W Y, Wang X Y, Wang Z L, Yang W L . Effects of different N management modes on grain yield and quality as well as fertilizer N use efficiency of winter wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2005,31:1047-1051 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14] 曹承富, 孔令聪, 汪建来, 赵斌, 赵竹 . 施氮量对强筋和中筋小麦产量和品质及养分吸收的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2005,11:46-50.
Cao C F, Kong L C, Wang J L, Zhao B, Zhao Z . Effects of nitrogen on yield, quality and nutritive absorption of middle and strong gluten wheat. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2005,11:46-50 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[15] 池忠志, 赵广才, 郑家国, 杨玉双, 刘利华 . 施氮量对不同品种小麦籽粒蛋白组分和加工品质的影响. 西南农业学报, 2010,23:427-431.
Chi Z Z, Zhao G C, Zheng J G, Yang Y S, Liu L H . Effects of nitrogen application amount on protein components in grain of different varieties wheat. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2010,23:427-431 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16] 杨武广, 田中伟, 殷美, 蔡剑, 姜东, 季陆鹰, 戴廷波 . 不同年代冬小麦品种籽粒产量与品质的演变及其对氮肥的响应. 麦类作物学报, 2014,34:1390-1397.
Yang W G, Tian Z W, Yin M, Cai J, Jiang D, Ji L Y, Dai T B . Variations of grain yield and quality characteristics in winter wheat cultivars from different eras and their responses to nitrogen. J Triticeae Crops, 2014,34:1390-1397 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[17] 王小纯, 王晓航, 熊淑萍, 马新明, 丁世杰, 吴克远, 郭建彪 . 不同供氮水平下小麦品种的氮效率差异及其氮代谢特征. 中国农业科学, 2015,48:2569-2579.
Wang X C, Wang X H, Xiong S P, Ma X M, Ding S J, Wu K Y, Guo J B . Differences in nitrogen efficiency and nitrogen metabolism of wheat varieties under different nitrogen levels. Sci Agric Sin, 2015,48:2569-2579 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18] 徐晴, 许甫超, 董静, 董建辉, 秦丹丹, 鲁梦莹, 李梅芳 . 小麦氮素利用效率的基因型差异及相关特性分析. 中国农业科学, 2017,50:2647-2657.
Xu Q, Xu F C, Dong J, Dong J H, Qin D D, Lu M Y, Li M F . Genotypic difference of nitrogen use efficiency of wheat and correlation analysis of the related characters. Sci Agric Sin, 2017,50:2647-2657 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19] 张杰, 王备战, 冯晓, 李国强, 赵巧丽, 胡峰, 郑国庆 . 氮肥调控对冬小麦干物质量、产量和氮素利用效率的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2014,34:516-520.
Zhang J, Wang B Z, Feng X, Li G Q, Zhao Q L, Hu F, Zheng G Q . Effect of nitrogen fertilizer management on the dry matter quantity, yield and N utilization in winter wheat. J Triticeae Crops, 2014,34:516-520 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20] 李淑文, 文宏达, 周彦珍, 李雁鸣, 肖凯 . 不同氮效率小麦品种氮素吸收和物质生产特性. 中国农业科学, 2006,39:1992-2000.
Li S W, Wen H D, Zhou Y Z, Li Y M, Xiao K . Characterization of nitrogen uptake and dry matter production in wheat varieties with different N efficiency. Sci Agric Sin, 2006,39:1992-2000 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[21] 傅晓艺, 史占良, 赵彦坤, 郭进考, 王秀堂, 韩然, 何明琦 . 2009-2015年河北省审定小麦品种的聚类及产量分析. 山东农业科学, 2016,48(9):23-26.
Fu X Y, Shi Z L, Zhao Y K, Guo J K, Wang X T, Han R, He M Q . Cluster and yield analysis of Hebei registered wheat varieties during 2009-2015. Shandong Agric Sci, 2016,48(9):23-26 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22] 张影全, 唐娜, 张波, 景东林, 马永安, 魏益民 . 冀南地区小麦籽粒品质现状及利用潜力分析. 麦类作物学报, 2018,38:157-163.
Zhang Y Q, Tang N, Zhang B, Jing D L, Ma Y A, Wei Y M . Study on kernel quality property and processing potency of wheat in the south of Hebei province. J Triticeae Crops, 2018,38:157-163 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[23] 赵满兴, 周建斌, 杨绒, 郑险峰, 翟丙年, 李生秀 . 不同施氮量对旱地不同品种冬小麦氮素积累、运输和分配的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006,12:143-149.
Zhao M X, Zhou J B, Yang R, Zheng X F, Zhai B N, Li S X . Characteristics of nitrogen accumulation, distribution and translocation in winter wheat on dryland. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2006,12:143-149 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[24] 孙传范, 戴廷波, 荆奇, 姜东, 曹卫星 . 小麦品种氮利用效率的评价指标及其氮营养特性研究. 应用生态学报, 2004,15:983-987.
Sun C F, Dai T B, Jing Q, Jiang D, Cao W X . Nitrogen use efficiency and its relationship with nitrogen nutrition characteristics of wheat varieties. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2004,15:983-987 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[25] 王晓婧, 代兴龙, 马鑫, 董述鑫, 张秀, 初金鹏, 贺明荣 . 不同小麦品种产量和氮素吸收利用的差异. 麦类作物学报, 2017,37:1065-1071.
Wang X J, Dai X L, Ma X, Dong S X, Zhang X, Chu J P, He M R . Differences of grain yield, nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency of different wheat varieties. J Triticeae Crops, 2017,37:1065-1071 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26] 孙新素, 龙致炜, 宋广鹏, 陈长青 . 气候变化对黄淮海地区夏玉米-冬小麦种植模式和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017,50:2476-2487.
Sun X S, Long Z W, Song G P, Chen C Q . Effects of climate change on cropping pattern and yield of summer maize-winter wheat in Huang-Huai-Hai plain. Sci Agric Sin, 2017,50:2476-2487 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27] 敬海霞, 王晨阳, 左学玲, 胡吉帮, 王永华, 郭天财 . 花后高温胁迫对小麦籽粒产量和蛋白质含量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2010,30:459-463.
Jing H X, Wang C Y, Zuo X L, Hu J B, Wang Y H, Guo T C . Effect of post-anthesis high temperature stress on grain yield and protein content of different wheat cultivars. J Triticeae Crops, 2010,30:459-463 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[28] 雷振生, 吴政卿, 田云峰, 罗鹏, 杨会民, 刘媛媛, 白由路, 孙克刚 . 生态环境变异对优质强筋小麦品质性状的影响. 华北农学报, 2005,50(3):1-4.
Lei Z S, Wu Z Q, Tian Y F, Luo P, Yang H M, Liu Y Y, Bai Y L, Sun K G . Effects of environmental variations to main quality characters of the strong gluten wheat. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2005,50(3):1-4 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29] 柳伟伟, 马宏亮, 梵高琼, 李勇, 莫飘, 郭翔 . 生态条件和施磷量对四川不同筋力型小麦籽粒产量与蛋白质品质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2018,38:298-305.
Liu W W, Ma H L, Fan G Q, Li Y, Mo P, Guo X . Effect of phosphorus application and location on grain yield and protein quality of different gluten type wheat in Sichuan province. J Triticeae Crops, 2018,38:298-305 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[30] 李浩然, 贾彬, 王红光, 李东晓, 李瑞奇 . 水氮措施对强筋冬小麦品种藁优2018干物质积累量及产量的影响. 河北农业科学, 2017,21(5):10-17.
Li H R, Jia B, Wang H G, Li D X, Li R Q . Effects of irrigation and nitrogen treatments on dry matter accumulation and yield of a strong gluten winter wheat cultivar Gaoyou 2018. J Hebei Agric Sci, 2017,21(5):10-17 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[31] 张经廷, 陈青云, 吕丽华, 申海平, 贾秀领, 梁双波 . 冬小麦-夏玉米轮作产量与氮素利用最佳水氮配置. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016,22:886-896.
Zhang J T, Chen Q Y, Lyu L H, Shen H P, Jia X L, Liang S B . Optimum combination of irrigation and nitrogen for high yield and nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat and summer maize rotation system. Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2016,22:886-896 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[1] 甄晓宇,杨坚群,栗鑫鑫,刘兆新,高芳,赵继浩,李颖,钱必长,李金融,杨东清,李向东. 播种深度对花生生育进程和叶片衰老的影响及其生理机制[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1386-1397.
[2] 张力,陈阜,雷永登. 近60年河北省冬小麦干旱风险时空规律[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1407-1415.
[3] 孙程明,陈松,彭琦,张维,易斌,张洁夫,傅廷栋. 甘蓝型油菜角果长度性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1303-1310.
[4] 常建忠,董春林,张正,乔麟轶,杨睿,蒋丹,张彦琴,杨丽莉,吴佳洁,景蕊莲. 小麦抗逆相关基因TaSAP1的5′非翻译区内含子功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1311-1318.
[5] 苏强,荣玮,张增艳. 小麦类受体蛋白激酶基因TaPK3A的克隆与抗纹枯病功能初步分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(8): 1158-1165.
[6] 张诚信,郭保卫,唐健,许方甫,许轲,胡雅杰,邢志鹏,张洪程,戴其根,霍中洋,魏海燕,黄丽芬,陆阳,唐闯,戴琪星,周苗,孙君仪. 灌浆结实期低温弱光复合胁迫对稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(8): 1208-1220.
[7] 王艳丽,吴鹏年,李培富,王西娜,朱旭. 有机肥配施氮肥对滴灌春玉米产量及土壤肥力状况的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(8): 1230-1237.
[8] 吴亚鹏,贺利,王洋洋,刘北城,王永华,郭天财,冯伟. 冬小麦生物量及氮积累量的植被指数动态模型研究[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(8): 1238-1249.
[9] 李朝苏,吴晓丽,汤永禄,李俊,马孝玲,李式昭,黄明波,刘淼. 小麦产量对中后期氮素胁迫的响应及品种间差异[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(8): 1260-1269.
[10] 要凯,赵章平,康益晨,张卫娜,石铭福,杨昕宇,范艳玲,秦舒浩. 沟垄覆膜对连作马铃薯土壤酶活性、理化性状及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(8): 1286-1292.
[11] 于奇,冯乃杰,王诗雅,左官强,郑殿峰. S3307对始花期和始粒期淹水绿豆光合作用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1080-1089.
[12] 赵小强,任斌,彭云玲,徐明霞,方鹏,庄泽龙,张金文,曾文静,高巧红,丁永福,陈奋奇. 8种水旱环境下2个玉米群体穗部性状QTL间的上位性及环境互作效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6): 856-871.
[13] 姜丽娜,马静丽,方保停,马建辉,李春喜,王志敏,蒿宝珍. 限水减氮对豫北冬小麦产量和植株不同层次器官干物质运转的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6): 957-966.
[14] 金迪,王冬至,王焕雪,李润枝,陈树林,阳文龙,张爱民,刘冬成,詹克慧. 小麦芒长抑制基因B2的精细定位与候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6): 807-817.
[15] 何昕楠,林祥,谷淑波,王东. 微喷补灌对麦田土壤物理性状及冬小麦耗水和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(6): 879-892.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨建昌;张亚洁;张建华;王志琴;朱庆森. 水分胁迫下水稻剑叶中多胺含量的变化及其与抗旱性的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(11): 1069 -1075 .
[2] 王永胜;王景;段静雅;王金发;刘良式. 水稻极度分蘖突变体的分离和遗传学初步研究[J]. 作物学报, 2002, 28(02): 235 -239 .
[3] 胡玉琪;廖晓海. 玉米叶形系数研究[J]. 作物学报, 1986, (01): 71 -72 .
[4] 梁太波;尹燕枰;蔡瑞国;闫素辉;李文阳;耿庆辉;王平;王振林. 大穗型小麦品种强、弱势籽粒淀粉积累和相关酶活性的比较[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(01): 150 -156 .
[5] 王成章;韩锦峰;史莹华;李振田;李德锋. 不同秋眠类型苜蓿品种的生产性能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(01): 133 -141 .
[6] 田志坚;易蓉;陈建荣;郭清泉;张学文. 苎麻纤维素合成酶基因cDNA的克隆及表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(01): 76 -83 .
[7] 赵秀琴;朱苓华;徐建龙;黎志康. 灌溉与自然降雨条件下水稻高代回交导入系产量QTL的定位[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(09): 1536 -1542 .
[8] 吴影;宋丰顺;陆徐忠;赵 伟;杨剑波;李莉. 实时荧光PCR技术定量检测转基因大豆方法的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(10): 1733 -1737 .
[9] 勾玲;黄建军;张宾;李涛;孙锐;赵明. 群体密度对玉米茎秆抗倒力学和农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(10): 1688 -1695 .
[10] 于晶;张林;崔红;张永侠;苍晶;郝再彬;李卓夫. 高寒地区冬小麦东农冬麦1号越冬前的生理生化特性[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(11): 2019 -2025 .
版权所有 © 2018 《作物学报》编辑部
京ICP备15008789号-2