作物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 1119-1127.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84128
贾小平1,*(
),全建章2,王永芳2,董志平2,袁玺垒1,张博1,李剑峰1
JIA Xiao-Ping1,*(
),QUAN Jian-Zhang2,WANG Yong-Fang2,DONG Zhi-Ping2,YUAN Xi-Lei1,ZHANG Bo1,LI Jian-Feng1
摘要:
本研究连续2年在短日照(海南)、中等日照(河南)、长日照(吉林) 3个不同光周期环境调查160份谷子资源的抽穗期、株高、叶片数、穗长、穗粗、穗码数、码粒数、穗重、穗粒重、千粒重10个主要性状, 利用SPSS 19.0软件进行多因素方差分析及多重比较, 揭示光周期对谷子各性状的影响, 评价160份谷子资源对光周期的敏感性。结果表明, 3个不同光周期环境间谷子株高、叶片数、穗长、穗码数、抽穗期、穗粗、穗重、穗粒重、码粒数9个性状均表现出极显著差异(P<0.01), 千粒重表现出显著差异(P<0.05)。株高、叶片数、穗长、穗码数、抽穗期5个性状随着日照的延长呈现出递增趋势。品种对谷子的10个性状有极显著影响(P<0.01), 年份对千粒重以外的9个性状有极显著影响(P<0.01)。光周期与品种互作效应对10个性状均有极显著影响(P<0.01), 光周期与年份互作效应对抽穗期以外的9个性状有极显著影响(P<0.01), 年份与品种互作效应对株高、叶片数、穗长、穗粗、穗重、穗粒重、穗码数、码粒数8个性状有极显著影响(P<0.01)。160份谷子资源中对光周期表现中、低敏感性的材料没有明显的地域特性, 而对光周期表现强敏感性的材料主要是来自春谷区的农家品种。筛选出光周期极不敏感材料小早谷和极端敏感材料呼和浩特大毛谷、然谷、红钙谷、茄谷、二白谷等, 为选育谷子光周期钝感品种及开展光周期敏感性形成机理研究奠定了基础。
| [1] | 韩天富, 王金陵 . 大豆开花后光周期反应的研究. 植物学报, 1995,37:863-869. |
| Han T F, Wang J L . Studies on the post-flowering photoperiodic responses in soybean. Acta Bot Sin, 1995,37:863-869 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [2] | Sun H B, Jia Z, Cao D, Jiang B J, Wu C X, Hou W S, Liu Y K, Fei Z H, Zhao D Z, Han T F . GmFT2a, a soybean homolog of flowering locus T, is involved in flowering transition and maintenance. PLoS One, 2011,6:e29238. |
| [3] | 韩天富, 王金陵 . 中国大豆不同生态类型开花至成熟期对光周期的反应. 作物学报, 1996,22:21-26. |
| Han T F, Wang J L . A study on the responses of different ecotypes of Chinese soybeans to post-flowering photoperiod. Acta Agron Sin, 1996,22:21-26 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [4] | 姜妍, 冷建田, 费志宏, 冯涛, 祖伟, 王连铮, 韩天富, 吴存祥 . 广适应大豆品种中黄13的光周期反应. 大豆科学, 2009,28:377-381. |
| Jiang Y, Leng J T, Fei Z H, Feng T, Zu W, Wang L Z, Han T F, Wu C X . Photoperiod responses of a widely-adapted soybean cultivar of Zhonghuang 13. Soybean Sci, 2009,28:377-381 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [5] | 孙洪波 . 大豆光温互作新模式的验证及PEBP家族基因的克隆和功能分析. 中国农业科学院研究生院博士后报告, 北京, 2008. |
| Sun H B . Testify a New Soybean Model of Photo-thermal Interaction and Clone PEBP Family Genes. Postdoctoral Report of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2008 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [6] | 张凤路 , Mugo S. 不同玉米种质对长光周期反应的初步研究. 玉米科学, 2001,9(4):54-56. |
| Zhang F L, Mugo S . Primary study on the effect of long photo- period on different maize germplasm. J Maize Sci, 2001,9(4):54-56 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [7] | 陈彦惠, 吴连成, 吴建宇, 席章营 . 两种纬度生态条件下热带、亚热带玉米种质群体的鉴定. 中国农业科学, 2000,33(增刊):40-48. |
| Chen Y H, Wu L C, Wu J Y, Xi Z Y . Identification of tropical, subtropical populations of maize in different ecological conditions of two latitudes. Sci Agric Sin, 2000,33(suppl):40-48 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [8] | 梁文科 . 热带温带玉米群体育种价值评估及光周期反应敏感性指标研究. 华中农业大学博士学位论文, 湖北武汉, 2008. |
| Liang W K . Breeding Value Estimation and Photoperiod Sensitivity Index Study of Tropical, Temperate Maize Populations. PhD Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China, 2008 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [9] |
Bennetzen J L, Schmutz J, Wang H, Percifield R, Hawkins J, Pontaroli A C, Estep M, Feng L, Vaughn J N, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Barry K, Lindquist E, Hellsten U, Deshpande S, Wang X W, Wu X M, Therese M T, Triplett J, Yang X H, Ye C Y, Mauro- Herrera M, Wang L, Li P H, Sharma M, Sharma R, Ronald P C, Panaud O, Kellogg E A, Brutnell T P, Doust A N, Tuskan G A, Rokhsar D, Devos K M . Reference genome sequence of the model plant setaria. Nat Biotechnol, 2012,30:555-564.
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2196 |
| [10] | Zhang G Y, Liu X, Quan Z W, Cheng S F, Xu X, Pan S K, Xie M, Zeng P, Yue Z, Wang W L, Tao Y, Bian C, Han C L, Xia Q J, Peng X H, Cao R, Yang X H, Zhan D L, Hu J C, Zhang Y X, Li H N, Li H, Li N, Wang J Y, Wang C C, Wang R Y, Guo T, Cai Y J, Liu C Z, Xiang H T, Shi Q X, Huang P, Chen Q C, Li Y R, Wang J, Zhao Z H, Wang J . Genome sequence of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) provides insights into grass evolution and biofuel potential. Nat Biotechnol, 2012,30:549-556. |
| [11] | 谢丽莉 . 谷子光周期敏感相关性状的QTL定位与分析. 河南农业大学硕士学位论文, 河南郑州, 2012. |
| Xie L L . QTL Mapping and Analysis of the Photoperiod-sensitive Traits in Foxtail Millet. MS Thesis of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 2012 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [12] | Margarita M H, Wang X W, Barbier H, Brutnell T P, Devos K M, Doust A N . Genetic control and comparative genomic analysis of flowering time in Setaria (Poaceae). G3: Genes Genom Genet, 2013,3:283-295. |
| [13] | Doust A N, Mauro-Herrera M, Hodgeand J G, Stromsk J . The C4 model grass Setaria is a short day plant with secondary long day genetic regulation. Front Plant Sci, 2017,8:1-10. |
| [14] | 贾小平, 董普辉, 张红晓, 孔祥生 . 不同谷子品种(系)生长发育及抗倒性分析. 河南农业科学, 2015,44(8):27-31. |
| Jia X P, Dong P H, Zhang H X, Kong X S . Analysis of growth and development characteristics and lodging resistance of different foxtail millet cultivars (strains). J Henan Agric Sci, 2015,44(8):27-31 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [15] | 贾小平, 董普辉, 张红晓, 全建章, 董志平 . 谷子抗倒伏性和株高、穗部性状的相关性研究. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015,16:1188-1193. |
| Jia X P, Dong P H, Zhang H X, Quan J Z, Dong Z P . Correlation study of lodging resistance and plant height, panicle traits in foxtail millet. J Plant Genet Resour, 2015,16:1188-1193 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [16] | 许寅生, 赵治海, 米连明, 孙玉山, 白有生 . 不同短日照对不同叶龄谷子生长发育的影响. 张家口农专学报, 1999,15(3):19-22. |
| Xu Y S, Zhao Z H, Mi L M, Sun Y S, Bai Y S . Effects of different leaf age and short-day on growth and development of foxtail millet. J Zhangjiakou Agric College, 1999,15(3):19-22 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [17] | 谢丽莉, 吴连成, 库丽霞, 吴刘记, 张君, 王新涛, 陈彦惠 . 玉米和狗尾草光周期敏感性的比较研究. 玉米科学, 2012,20(2):82-86. |
| Xie L L, Wu L C, Ku L X, Wu L J, Zhang J, Wang X T, Chen Y H . Comparative study on the photoperiod-sensitive between maize and Setaria viridis. J Maize Sci, 2012,20(2):82-86 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [18] | Doust A N, Diao X M . Genetics and Genomics of Setaria. German: Springer-Verlag Publisher, 2017. pp 197-210. |
| [19] | Doi K, Izawa T, Fuse T, Yamanouchi U, Kubo T, Shimatani Z, Yano M, Yoshimura A . Ehd1, a B-type response regulator in rice, confers short-day promotion of flowering and controls FT-like gene expression independently of Hd1. Genes Dev, 2004,18:926-936. |
| [20] | Xue W Y, Xing Y Z, Weng X Y, Zhao Y, Tang W J, Wang L, Zhou H J, Yu S B, Xu C G, Li X H, Zhang Q F . Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genetics, 2009,40:761-767. |
| [21] | 夏正俊 . 大豆光与生育期基因研究进展. 作物学报, 2013,39:571-579. |
| Xia Z J . Research progresses on photoperiodic flowering and maturity genes in soybean (Glycine max Merr.). Acta Agron Sin, 2013,39:571-579 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [22] | 孙朝辉 . 玉米光周期敏感相关性状的QTL定位与分析. 河南农业大学硕士学位论文, 河南郑州, 2009. |
| Sun Z H . QTL Mapping and Analysis for the Relevant Traits of Photoperiod Sensitivity in Maize. MS Thesis of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 2009 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [23] | 库丽霞, 孙朝辉, 王翠玲, 张君, 张伟强, 陈彦惠 . 玉米光周期敏感相关性状发育动态QTL定位. 作物学报, 2010,36:602-611. |
| Ku L X, Sun Z H, Wang C L, Zhang J, Zhang W Q, Chen Y H . QTL analysis of the photoperiod sensitivity-related traits at different developmental stages in maize (Zea mays L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2010,36:602-611 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
| [24] |
Yang Q, Li Z, Li W Q, Ku L X, Wang C, Ye J R, Li K, Yang N, Li Y P, Zhong T, Li J S, Chen Y H, Yan J B, Yang X H, Xu M L . CACTA-like transposable element in ZmCCT attenuated photoperiod sensitivity and accelerated the postdomestication spread of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2013,110:16969-16974.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310949110 |
| [25] |
Cui M, Jia B, Liu H H, Kan X, Zhang Y, Zhou R H, Li Z P, Yang L, Deng D X, Yin Z T . Genetic mapping of the leaf number above the primary ear and its relationship with plant height and flowering time in maize. Front Plant Sci, 2017,8:1437, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01437.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01437 |
| [1] | 马小倩, 秦娜, 代书桃, 秦家范, 李小艳, 王淑婷, 刘忠玲, 李君霞. 175份谷子种质在2种环境下的表型变异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1757-1773. |
| [2] | 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400. |
| [3] | 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056. |
| [4] | 李瑞, 余意雯, 王敦亮, 田婷, 孙灵湘, 陶玥玥, 孙华. 长江中下游油菜薹油兼用模式菜籽产量特征比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 620-630. |
| [5] | 迟晓元, 刘庆, 张君, 赵旭红, 李美, 于天一, 潘丽娟, 许静, 姜骁, 殷祥贞, 马俊卿, 陈娜. 不同花生品种(系)耐盐碱性田间鉴定及各性状指标相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 85-98. |
| [6] | 杨锐, 陈敬东, 黄郢, 张学昆, 周登文, 刘清云, 徐劲松, 谢伶俐, 许本波. 基于北纬30°分界的长江中游油菜增产策略研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 99-117. |
| [7] | 王若楠, 张颖星, 于筱菡, 刘少雄, 王跃, 薛亚鹏, 辛旭霞, 张莉, 刘敏轩. 基于近红外快速检测技术的谷子淀粉多样性分析及模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1757-1768. |
| [8] | 沈傲, 刘敏, 倪迪安, 刘炜. 谷子m6A甲基转移酶基因SiMTA1的启动子序列特征和基因表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1969-1978. |
| [9] | 梁红凯, 赵苏蒙, 陆琼, 周鹏, 智慧, 刁现民, 贺强. 谷子微核心种质的构建[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1435-1444. |
| [10] | 王梦宁, 谢可冉, 高逖, 王飞, 任孝俭, 熊栋梁, 黄见良, 彭少兵, 崔克辉. 水稻幼穗分化期至抽穗期高温对籽粒形态和充实的影响及其与粒重的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1347-1362. |
| [11] | 郭冰, 秦家范, 李娜, 宋梦瑶, 王黎明, 李君霞, 马小倩. 谷子SHMT基因家族全基因组鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 586-5897. |
| [12] | 杨芳萍, 郭莹, 田媛媛, 徐玉凤, 王兰兰, 白斌, 展宗冰, 张雪婷, 徐银萍, 刘金栋. 甘肃省小麦地方品种春化光周期基因效应及抗寒性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 370-382. |
| [13] | 陈于婷, 丁晓雨, 许本波, 张学昆, 徐劲松, 殷艳. 气候变暖对冬油菜产量、品质及重要农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 516-525. |
| [14] | 朱灿灿, 李君霞, 景雅, 付森杰, 秦娜, 王春义, 代书桃, 魏昕, 张程炀. 不同耐荫性谷子对遮阴的生理响应及转录组分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3211-3223. |
| [15] | 李琰, 李雨晨, 于爱萍, 陈爱萍. 8份无芒雀麦种质资源的草产量与营养品质的综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3377-3386. |
|
||