甜玉米果皮厚度QTL的定位及上位性互作

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00359

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

果皮厚度是影响甜玉米口感的一个重要因素。发掘果皮厚度的基因资源、了解玉米果皮厚度的遗传机制，是指导其育种的基础。本研究以日超-1 (薄果皮，56.57 μm) × 1021 (厚果皮，100.23 μm)的190个BC₁F₂家系为作图群体，分别采用2种遗传模型检测QTL。基于复合区间作图(CIM)共检测到3个影响果皮厚度的QTL，位于3.01、6.01、8.05区段，分别解释8.6%、16.0%和7.2%的表型变异，其中3.01和8.05处QTL以加性效应为主；基于混合线性CIM模型(MCIM)共检测到5个影响果皮厚度的QTL，其中除8.05处QTL为加性QTL外，另有2对加×加上位性互作QTL，1对是2.01和6.05处QTL之间的互作，另1对则是5.06和6.01处QTL间的互作。这2对互作QTL分别解释了6.63%和12.48%的表型变异率。本结果表明，加性效应和上位性互作效应等都在果皮厚度的形成和遗传中起重要作用。能够检测QTL上位互作的MCIM模型更适用于果皮厚度QTL定位。本研究还在其中4个QTL的区域内分别检索到胚乳中色素合成以及细胞转变的相关候选基因，这些基因的表达是否与果皮厚度的变异有关值得进一步研究。

关键词: 甜玉米, 果皮厚度, QTL, 上位性互作

Abstract:

Pericarp thickness is of great importance to the sensory quality of sweet corn. Mining the gene for pericarp thickness and understanding its genetic mechanism can provide a base for instructing breeding. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) for pericarp thickness was detected based on two genetic models using a population comprising 190 BC₁F₂ families derived from the cross of Richao-1 (thin pericarp, 56.57 μm) ×1021 (thick pericarp, 100.23 μm) in the present study. Three QTLs for pericarp thickness were identified on bin 3.01, 6.01, and 8.05 using the Composite interval mapping (CIM) method, explained 8.6%, 16.0%, and 7.2% of phenotypic variation, respectively. Based on the MCIM (mixed-model based CIM) method, we identified five QTLs for pericarp thickness, comprising one additive QTL and two pairs of epistatic QTLs. The additive QTL was located on bin 8.05. Additive × additive epistatic effects for pericarp thickness were showed between QTL in 2.01 and QTL in 6.05 with estimated 6.63% of the phenotypic variation and between QTL in 5.06 and QTL in 6.01 with the estimated phenotypic variation of 12.48%. The results indicated that epistasis and additive effects play an important role in the genetic basis of pericarp thickness. The MCIM model with the ability to detect epistatic QTLs is more suitable for pericarp thickness QTL mapping. In addition, candidate genes encoding proteins that play important role for pigment biosynthesis and cell transformation in endosperm were contained in four QTL regions of all, suggesting the likely relations between the expressions of these candidate genes and pericarp thickness variation.

Key words: Sweet corn, Pericarp thickness, QTL mapping, Epistasis

于永涛，李高科，祁喜涛，李春艳，毛笈华，胡建广. 甜玉米果皮厚度QTL的定位及上位性互作[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(03): 359-366.

YU Yong-Tao,LI Gao-Ke,QI Xi-Tao,LI Chun-Yan,MAO Ji-Hua,HU Jian-Guang*. Mapping and Epistatic Interactions of QTLs for Pericarp Thickness in Sweet Corn[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41(03): 359-366.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00359

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2015/V41/I03/359

参考文献

[1]Bailey D M, Bailey R M. The relationship of pericarp to tenderness in sweet corn. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci, 1938, 36: 555–559

[2]Ito G M, Brewbaker J L. Genetic advance through mass selection for tenderness in sweet corn. J Am Hortic Sci, 1981, 106: 496–499

[3]Hoenisch R W, Davis R M. Relationship between kernel pericarp thickness and susceptibility to Fusarium ear rot. Plant Dis, 1994, 78: 517–519

[4]Tracy W F, Galinai W C. Thickness and cell layer number of the pericarp of sweet corn and some of its relatives. HortScience, 1987, 22: 645–647

[5]Helm J L, Zuber M S. Inheritance of pericarp thickness in corn belt maize. Crop Sci, 1972, 12: 428–430

[6]Ho L C, Kannenberg W, Hunter R B. Inheritance of pericarp thickness in short season maize inbreds. Can J Genet Cytol, 1975, 17: 621–629

[7]Ito G M, Brewbaker J L. Genetic analysis of pericarp thickness in progenies of eight corn hybrids. J Am Soc Hortic Sci, 1991, 116: 1072–1077

[8]Choe E, Rocheford T. Marker assisted selection and breeding for desirable thinner pericarp thickness and ear traits in fresh market waxy corn germplasm. Euphytica, 2012, 183: 243–260

[9]Helm J L, Zuber M S. Pericarp thickness on dent corn inbred lines. Crop Sci, 1969, 9: 803–804

[10]王晓明, 谢振文, 曾慕衡, 乐素菊. 超甜玉米果穗形态和品质性状的杂种优势及遗传特性分析. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38: 1931–1936

Wang X M, Xie Z W, Zeng M H, Le S J. Heterosis and inheritance analysis of ear shape and quality characters in super sweet corn. Sci Agric Sin, 2005, 38: 1931–1936 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11]刘鹏飞, 蒋锋, 乐素菊, 张姿丽, 陈青春, 张媛, 王晓明. 甜玉米果皮厚度主基因＋多基因遗传效应分析. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(7): 43–48

Liu P F, Jiang F, Le S J, Zhang Z L, Chen Q C, Zhang Y, Wang X M. Major genes and polygenes inheritance for pericarp thickness of sweet corn. J Northwest A&F Univ (Nat Sci Edn), 2013, 41(7): 43–48 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Wang B, Brewbaker J L. Quantitative trait loci affecting pericarp thickness of corn kernels. Maydica, 2001, 46: 159–165

[13]李余良, 林瑞德, 胡建广, 刘建华. 用显微测微尺测定超甜玉米果皮厚度初报. 广东农业科学, 2004, (增刊): 48–49

Li L Y, Lin R D, Hu J G, Liu J H. A preliminary report on pericarp thickness determination by micrometer in sweet corn. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2004, (suppl): 48–49 (in Chinese)

[14]Saghai-Maroof M A, Soliman K M, Jorgensen R A, Allard R W. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1984, 81: 8014–8018

[15]Sanguinetti C J, Neto E D, Simpson A J G. Rapid silver staining and recovery of PCR products separated on polyacrylamide gels. BioTechniques, 1994, 17: 914–921

[16]Lander E S, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly M J, Lincoln S E, Newberg L A. MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics, 1987, 1: 174–181

[17]Lincoln S E, Daly M J, Lander E S. Mapping Genes Controlling Quantitative Traits Using MAPMAKER/QTL. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA. 1993

[18]Voorrips R E. MapChart: Software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered, 2002, 93: 77–78

[19]苏成付, 赵团结, 盖钧镒. 不同统计遗传模型QTL定位方法应用效果的模拟比较. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 1100–1107

Su C F, Zhao T J, Gai J Y. Simulation comparisons of effectiveness among QTL mapping procedures of different statistical genetic models. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 1100–1107 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]Utz H F, Melchinger A E. PlabQTL: A program for composite interval mapping of QTL. J Agric Genomics, 1996, 2: 1–5

[21]Edwards M D, Stuber C W, Wendel J F. Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize: I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. Genetics, 1987, 116: 113–125

[22]Yang J, Zhu J, Williams R W. Mapping the genetic architecture of complex traits in experimental populations. Bioinformatics, 2007, 23: 1527–1536

[23]Yang J, Hu C C, Hu H, Yu R D, Xia Z, Ye X Z, Zhu J. QTLNetwork: mapping and visualizing genetic architecture of complex traits in experimental populations. Bioinformatics, 2008, 24: 721–723

[24]Helm J L, Zuber M S. Effect of harvest date on pericarp thickness in dent corn. Can J Plant Sci, 1970, 50: 411–413

[25]张士龙, 周淑梅, 王青峰, 李小琴. 玉米籽粒果皮厚度变化规律研究. 华南农业大学学报, 2008, 29(1): 10–13

Zhang S L, Zhou S M, Wang Q F, Li X Q. Research on variation of pericarp thickness of sweet maize kernel. J South China Agric Univ, 2008, 29(1): 10–13 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[26]乐素菊, 肖德兴, 刘鹏飞, 曾慕衡, 王伟权, 王晓明. 超甜玉米果皮结构与籽粒柔嫩性的关系. 作物学报, 2011, 37: 2111–2116

Yue S J, Xiao D X, Liu P F, Zeng M H, Wang W Q, Wang X M. Relationship between pericarp structure and kernel tenderness in super sweet corn. Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37: 2111–2116 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[27]姚坚强, 俞琦英, 王美兴, 张莲英, 朱金庆. 春播超甜玉米籽粒果皮厚度与可溶性总糖含量在灌浆期间的变化. 浙江农业学报, 2012, 24: 193–196

Yao J Q, Yu Q Y, Wang M X, Zhang L Y, Zhu J Q. Changes of pericarp thickness and soluble sugar during the kernel filling process of spring super-sweet corn. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis, 2012, 24: 193–196 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[28]Brewbaker J L, Larish L B, Zan G H. Pericarp thickness of the indigenous American races of maize. Maydica, 1996, 41: 105–111

[29]Richardson D L. Pericarp thickness in popcorn. Agron J, 1960, 52: 77–80

[30]Li Z K, Luo L J, Mei H W, Wang D L, Shu Q Y, Tabien R, Zhong D B, Ying C S, Stansel J W, Khush G S, Paterson A H. Overdominant epistatic loci are the primary genetic basis of inbreeding depression and heterosis in rice: I. biomass and grain yield. Genetics, 2001, 158: 1737–1753

[31]Carlborg O, Haley C S. Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? Nat Rev Genet, 2004, 5: 618–625

[32]Gómez E, Royo J, Muñiz L M, Sellam O, Paul W, Gerentes D, Barrero C, López M, Perez P, Hueros G. The maize transcription factor myb-related protein-1 is a key regulator of the differentiation of transfer cells. Plant Cell, 2009, 21: 2022–2035

[33]Selinger D, Chandler V L. A mutation in the pale aleurone color1 gene identifies a novel regulator of the maize anthocyanin pathway. Plant Cell, 1999, 11: 5–14

[34]Carey C, Strahle J T, Selinger D, Chandler V. Mutations in the pale aleurone color 1 regulatory gene of the Zea mays anthocyanin pathway have distinct phenotypes relative to the functionally similar TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell, 2004, 16: 450–464

[35]Buckner B, Miquel P S, Janick-Buckner D, Bennetzen J L. The y1 gene of maize codes for phytoene synthase. Genetics, 1996, 143: 479–488

[36]Matusova R, Rani K, Verstappen F W A, Franssen M C R, Beale M H, Bouwmeester H J. The strigolactone germination stimulants of the plant-parasitic Striga and Orobanche spp. are derived from the carotenoid pathway. Plant Physiol, 2005, 130: 920–934

相关文章 15

[1]	郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[2]	蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[3]	刘长友, 王珅, 时会影, 沈颖超, 孙蕾, 王彦, 张志肖, 苏秋竹, 田静, 范保杰. 基于饭豆基因资源的小豆远缘杂交群体抗豆象QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 936-944.
[4]	张飞飞, 何万龙, 焦文娟, 白斌, 耿洪伟, 程宇坤. 小麦抗条锈病相关性状元分析及候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2111-2127.
[5]	霍建喆, 于爱忠, 王玉珑, 王鹏飞, 尹波, 刘亚龙, 张冬玲, 姜科强, 庞小能, 王凤. 有机肥替代化肥对绿洲灌区甜玉米产量、品质及氮素利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1887-1900.
[6]	胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[7]	邵顺伟, 陈卓, 兰振东, 蔡兴奎, 邹华芬, 李晨曦, 唐景华, 朱熙, 张彧, 董建科, 金辉, 宋波涛. 基于BSA-seq技术的块茎芽眼深度QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1725-1735.
[8]	杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[9]	郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466.
[10]	张金泽, 周庆国, 肖莉晶, 金海润, 欧阳青静, 龙旭, 晏中彬, 田恩堂. 芥菜型油菜不同组织硫苷含量的QTL定位与候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1166-1177.
[11]	林伟津, 郭泽佳, 刘浩, 李海芬, 王润风, 黄璐, 余倩霞, 陈小平, 洪彦彬, 李少雄, 鲁清. 花生荚果产量相关性状QTL定位与候选基因分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 969-981.
[12]	雍瑞, 胡文静, 吴迪, 汪尊杰, 李东升, 赵蝶, 尤俊超, 肖永贵, 王春平. 小麦穗粒数QTL分析及其对千粒重多效性评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 312-323.
[13]	胡朋举, 郭颂, 宋亚辉, 金欣欣, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 王瑾. 多环境下花生含油量遗传及QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 324-333.
[14]	郭淑慧, 潘转霞, 赵战胜, 杨六六, 皇甫张龙, 郭宝生, 胡晓丽, 录亚丹, 丁霄, 吴翠翠, 兰刚, 吕贝贝, 谭逢平, 李朋波. 陆地棉D11染色体一个纤维长度主效位点的遗传解析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(2): 383-394.
[15]	王哲, 胡燕灵, 龚方仪, 易睿, 赵书宏, 刘睿琴, 刘雨杭, 张甜, 张亚洲, 郑有良, 刘登才, 黄林, 伍碧华. 基于16K芯片的野生二粒小麦渗入系BAd7-209籽粒蛋白含量QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3238-3250.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed