欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (01): 171-174.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00171

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    

新疆滴灌棉花花铃期干旱复水对叶片光合特性及产量的影响

罗宏海;张亚黎;张旺锋*;白慧东;何在菊;杜明伟;张宏芝   

  1. 石河子大学新疆兵团绿洲生态农业重点实验室/农学院, 新疆石河子832003

  • 收稿日期:2007-05-10 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-01-12 网络出版日期:2008-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 张旺锋

Effects of Rewatering after Drought Stress on Photosynthesis and Yield during Flowering and Boll-Setting Stage of Cotton Under- Mulch-Drip Irrigation in Xinjiang

LUO Hong-Hai,ZHANG Ya-Li,ZHANG Wang-Feng*,BAI Hui-Dong,HE Zai-Ju,DU Ming-Wei,ZHANG Hong-Zhi   

  1. Shihezi University of Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology Agriculture of Xinjiang Construction Crops/College of Agriculture, Shihezi 832003, Xinjiang, China

  • Received:2007-05-10 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-01-12 Published online:2008-01-12
  • Contact: ZHANG Wang-Feng

摘要:

在新疆气候生态条件下, 采用膜下滴灌植棉技术, 控制花铃期0~60 cm土壤滴水下限分别为田间持水量的45%(中度干旱)、60%(轻度干旱)和75%(正常供水, 对照), 滴水上限均为田间持水量, 研究不同程度干旱复水对棉花叶片光合特性及产量形成的影响。结果表明, 干旱降低了叶片净光合速率(Pn)和气孔导度(Gs), 中度干旱下叶片光化学猝灭系数(qP)、PSⅡ电子传递量子产量(ФPSⅡ)降低, 非光化学猝灭系数(NPQ)升高。复水后3 d内Pn和Gs恢复, 以轻度干旱恢复最快; ФPSⅡ和qP与Pn的变化相似; NPQ复水后1~2 d显著降低。从初花期至盛铃前期, 轻度干旱复水后光合物质累积量与对照无明显差异, 盛铃后期至吐絮期低于对照, 籽棉产量较低; 中度干旱复水后光合物质累积量及籽棉产量均最低。

关键词: 棉花, 干旱, 复水, 光合特性, 新疆, 膜下滴灌

Abstract:

In order to develop water saving irrigation stratagem and increase cotton yield in Xinjiang, we did the irrigation experiment in the field, controlled the lower limit of soil relative moisture content in layer of 0–60 cm at 45%, 60%, and 75% (the control) respectively of field water-holding capacity, which was the upper irrigation limit, and studied the effects of rewatering after drought on photosynthesis and yield during flowering-boll stage of cotton under-mulch-drip irrigation. The result showed that drought reduced the parameters of gas exchange. Photochemical quenching coefficient (qP) and PSⅡ photochemical quantum yield (ФPSⅡ) were reduced but non-photochemical quenching coefficient (NPQ) was increased significantly under moderate drought. Net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and stomatal conductance (Gs) of three water treatments could be rapidly recovered within three days after rewatering, and the recovery of mild drought treatment was the most rapid. The recovery of ФPSⅡ and qP in three water treatments was similar to that of Pn which achieved the maximum in 2–3 days after rewatering. The NPQ of three water treatments decreased significantly in 1–2 days after rewatering. From early flowering stage to early full boll stage, accumulation of single plant photosynthate was not much different from that of mild drought treatment after rewatering and the control, but the accumulation of single plant photosynthate was decreased significantly from later full boll stage to boll opening stage that let the seed cotton yield in mild drought treatment after rewatering be lower than that in control. Accumulation of single plant photosyn-thate and seed cotton yield in moderate drought treatment after rewatering was always lower than that in mild drought treatment and control.

Key words: Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), Drought, Rewatering, Photosynthesis, Xinjiang, Under-Mulch-Drip irrigation

[1] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[2] 赵佳雪, 周龙昊, 郭岂源, 尚伦霄, 王涵, 刘志涛, 陈曦, 张晓佩, 宋宪亮, 毛丽丽. 长期秸秆还田与深松通过改善土壤环境与棉花光合特性提高滨海盐碱地棉花产量[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1548-1560.
[3] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[4] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[5] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[6] 周琦翔, 朱艳, 汪楚博, 朱柏林, 李俊博, 宋利兵. 基于DSSAT模型模拟气候变化对新疆棉花物候期及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 590-602.
[7] 杨飚, 杜帅康, 张继旺, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 马铃薯III类POD基因家族的全基因组鉴定及其表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 405-420.
[8] 孔娜, 刘涛, 刘文婷, 陈刚, 文利超, 邓智超, 郭梅, 李伟, 郭永峰. 烟草NtCEP7基因克隆及其编码小肽在苗期抗旱中的作用分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 249-261.
[9] 刘海波, 张蕾, 王立琦, 石晓丽, 周文莹, 崔国贤, 佘玮. 苎麻BnGCL1基因响应干旱胁迫的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 14-27.
[10] 姬炫彤, 卞春松, 金黎平, 李森, 秦军红, 李广存. 不同耐旱型马铃薯根际微生物对干旱的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 165-177.
[11] 胡城祯, 高维东, 孔斌雪, 王建飞, 车卓, 杨德龙, 陈涛. 小麦TaAPC11基因家族鉴定及TaAPC11-5B参与干旱胁迫的生物学功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 148-164.
[12] 王雅致, 杨飚, 季香林, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 二倍体马铃薯抗旱资源鉴定及抗旱基因初步筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 72-84.
[13] 何鹏旭, 姚立蓉, 陈远玲, 闫妍, 张宏, 汪军成, 李葆春, 杨轲, 司二静, 孟亚雄, 马小乐, 王化俊. 大麦干旱胁迫萌发生理及分子机理的差异性与相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2412-2432.
[14] 张建鹏, 王国瑞, 别海, 叶飞宇, 马晨晨, 梁小菡, 鲁晓民, 尚霄丽, 曹丽茹. 转录因子ZmMYB153通过ABA信号调节气孔运动增强玉米苗期抗旱性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1827-1837.
[15] 郭栋财, 吕涛, 蔡永生, 买吾鲁达·艾合买提, 全家, 曲延英, 郑凯. 棉花纤维品质相关性状QTL元分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1445-1466.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!