欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 1853-1863.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01853

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于rDNA-ITS序列探讨甘蔗近缘属种的系统进化关系

刘新龙1,苏火生1,马丽1,陆鑫1,应雄美1,蔡青1,2,范源洪1,*   

  1. 1 云南省农业科学院甘蔗研究所 / 云南省甘蔗遗传改良重点实验室, 云南开远 661600; 2 云南省农业科学院生物技术与种质资源研究所, 云南昆明 650223
  • 收稿日期:2010-03-16 修回日期:2010-06-27 出版日期:2010-11-12 网络出版日期:2010-08-30
  • 通讯作者: 范源洪, E-mail: fyhysri@vip.sohu.com
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由云南省应用基础研究计划重点项目(2006C0013Z)和国家科技基础条件平台工作项目子专题(2007DKA21002-11)资助。

Phylogenetic Relationships of Sugarcane Related Genera and Species Based on ITS Sequences of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA

LIU Xin-Long1,SU Huo-Sheng1,MA Li1,LU Xin1,YING Xiong-Mei1,CAI Qing1,2,FAN Yuan-Hong1,*   

  1. 1 Yunnan Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement / Sugarcane Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kaiyuan 661600, China; 2 Biotechnology & Genetic Germplasm Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650223, China
  • Received:2010-03-16 Revised:2010-06-27 Published:2010-11-12 Published online:2010-08-30
  • Contact: FAN Hong-Li,E-mail:fyhysri@vip.sohu.com

PDF

2218

被引次数

14

摘要： 以狼尾草属(Pennisetum Rich.)的象草(P. purpureum) 为外群体，依据rDNA-ITS序列探讨了甘蔗亚族(Saccharinae)内与甘蔗植物分类关系较近的8属37种120份材料的系统进化关系，结果表明，ITS1序列长度为204~208 bp，变异位点91个，简约信息位点70个，GC含量为60.40%~69.10%；ITS2序列长度为215~220 bp，变异位点93个，简约信息位点68个，GC含量为66.10%~73.40%；5.8sDNA序列长度为164 bp, 变异位点18个，简约信息位点9个，GC含量为54.1%~58.0%；根据变异位点，简约信息位点占总位点的比例可以看出，ITS序列比5.8sDNA序列变异程度高，其中ITS1序列又较ITS2序列变异丰富。属种间遗传距离表明芒属(Miscanthus)和荻属(Triarrhena)与甘蔗属(Saccharum)的亲缘关系最近，其次为蔗茅属(Erianthus)和河八王属(Narenga)；而莠竹属(Microstegium)、大油芒属(Spodiopogon)、白茅属(Imperata)与甘蔗属亲缘关系较远。根据甘蔗近缘属种的NJ和MP系统发育关系，支持将斑茅(E. arundinaceus)归入蔗茅属，荻属归入芒属的观点；河八王属的河八王(N. porphyrocoma)与滇蔗茅(E. rockii)亲缘关系较近，而与同属的金猫尾(N. fallax)亲缘关系较远；蔗茅属和芒属属种系统进化关系较其他属种复杂；有4份材料被发现鉴定有误，不应用于后续研究。

关键词: 甘蔗, ITS, 系统进化, 甘蔗亚族

Abstract: Sugarcane related genera and species are important germplasm resources for sugarcane breeding and germplasm innovation. To effectively collect these wild resources and utilize them, ITS (Internal Transcribed Spacer) sequence of 120 accessions which belong to eight genera and thirty seven species were used to analyze their genetic relationships and construct phylogentic relationships with P. purpureum as an outgroup. The results showed the sequence lengths of ITS1, ITS2 and 5.8sDNA of all accessions were 204–208 bp, 215–220 bp, and 164 bp respectively, and their variable sites were 91, 93, and 18, the informative sites were 70, 68, and 9, the GC content was 60.4%–69.1%, 66.1%–73.4% and 54.1%–58.0%. According to the ratio of the variable sites and informative sites to all sites, ITS sequence was richer in variances than 5.8sDNA sequence, and the variances of ITS1 sequence were richer than those of ITS2’s. The genetic distance analysis between sugarcane related genera and species indicated that Miscanthus and Triarrhena were the closest to Saccharum, and the closer ones were Erianthus and Narenga, so the species from these genera should be more considered on collecting sugarcane wild resources in the future; Microstegium, Spodiopogon and Imperata represented farther relationships with Saccharum. The sugarcane related genera and species were separated into ten groups according to the phylogenetic tree of neighbor-joining and maximum parsimony. According to their phylogenetic relationships, E. arundinaceus should be separated from Saccharum and clastified as Erianthus species; Triarrhena shoud be included in Miscanthus; the two species of Narenga did not remain in the same group, but N. porphyrocoma and E. rockii were clustered into the same group, and N. fallax did not belong to any groups, so further researches are needed in identifying the two species. These species from Erianthus and Miscanthus were put in different groups, indicating the very complex genetic relationships within Erianthus and Miscanthus, their species possess big genetic differences. Four samples were found error in classifying species, so the application of their ITS sequences should be avoided. 

Key words: Sugarcane, ITS, Phylogeny, Saccharinae

[1]Yu H(于慧), Zhao N-X(赵南先). Geographical distribution of Saccharinae (Gramineae). J Trop Subtrop Bot (热带亚热带植物学报), 2004, 12(1): 29–35 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]Brown J S, Schnell R J, Power E J, Douglas S L, Kuhn D N. Analysis of clonal germplasm from five Saccharum species: S. barberi, S. robustum, S. officinarum, S. sinense and S. spontaneum. A study of inter- and intra species relationships using microsatellite markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2007, 54: 627–648
[3]Mukherjce S K. Origin and distribution of Sacharum. Bot Gaz, 1957, 119: 55–61
[4]Daniels J, Daniels C A. Geographical, historical and cultural aspects of the origin of the Indian and Chinese sugarcanes S. barberi and S. sinense. Sugarcane Breed Newslett, 1975, 36: 4–23
[5]Wen Y(文颖). Intergenetic crossing between Saccharum and related plants and their chromosome behavior. Sugarcane Canesugar (甘蔗糖业), 1998, 3: 1–7 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]Coto O, Cornide M T, Calvo D, Canales E, D’Hont A, de Prada F. Genetic diversity among wild sugarcane germplasm from Laos revealed with markers. Euphytica, 2002, 123: 121–130
[7]Chen H(陈辉), Fan Y-H(范源洪), Xiang-Yu J-G(向余颈攻), Cai Q(蔡青), Zhang Y-P(张亚平). Phylogenetic relationships of saccharum and related species inferred from sequence analysis of the nrDNA ITS region. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2003, 29(3): 379–385 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]Cai Q(蔡青), Fan Y-H(范源洪), Aitken K, Piperidis G, McIntyre C L, Jackson P. Assessment of the phylogenetic relationships within the “Saccharum complex” using AFLP markers. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2005, 31(5): 551–559 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]Selvi A, Nair N V, Noyer J L, Singh N K, Balasundaram N, Bansal K C, Koundal K R, Mohapatra T. AFLP analysis of the phenetic organization and genetic diversity in the sugarcane complex. Saccharum Erianthus. Genet Resour Crop Evol, 2006, 53: 831–842
[10]Nakayama S. Intra-species diversity of interspersed sequences in polyploid cultivated Saccharum species. Genes & Genetic Systems, 2006, 81: 418–418
[11]Besse P, McIntyre C L, Berding N. Ribosomal DNA variations in Erianthus, a wild sugarcane relative ( Andropogoneae-Saccharinae). Theor Appl Genet, 1996, 92: 733–743
[12]Besse P, McIntyre C L, Berding N. Characterisation of Erianthus sect. Ripidium and Saccharum germplasm (Andropogoneae-Saccharinae ) using RFLP markers. Euphytica, 1997, 93: 283–292
[13]Nair N V, Nair S, Sreenivasan T V, Mohan M. Analysis of genetic diversity and phylogeny in Saccharum and related genera using RAPD markers. Genet Res Crop Evol, 1999, 46: 73–79
[14]Pan Y B, Burner D M, Legendre B L. An assessment of the phylogenetic relationship among sugarcane and related taxa based on the nucleotide sequence of 5S rRNA intergenic spacers. Genetica, 2000, 108: 285–295
[15]Zhang Y-W(张云武), Long H-S(龙火生), Fan Y-H(范源洪), Yao Y-G(姚永刚), Cai Q(蔡青), Zhang Y-P(张亚平). Sequence variation of rbcl gene and evolution of Saccharum and related species. Acta Bot Yunnan (云南植物研究), 2002, 24(1): 29–36 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]Chen S-F(陈少风), Dong S-S(董穗穗), Wu W(吴伟), Shi S-H(施苏华), Zhou P-H(周朴华). Phylogenetics of Triarrhena and related genera based on ITS sequence data. J Wuhan Bot Res (武汉植物学研究), 2007, 25(3): 239–244 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K. MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform, 2008, 9: 299–306
[18]Editorial Board of the Flora of China (中国植物志编辑部委员会). Flora of China, Vol. 10, No. 2 (中国植物志第十卷第二分册). Beijing: Science Press, 1997. pp 4–46 (in Chinese)
[19]Heinz K J. Report of the Standing Committee on Germplasm and Breeding. In: Proc. of the XVII Congress of the ISSCT. Philippines, 1980. LIV–LVI
[20]Liu X-L(刘新龙), Cai Q(蔡青), Wang L-P(王丽萍), Ma L(马丽), Lu X(陆鑫), Ying X-M(应雄美), Mao J(毛钧). The advance of sugarcane germplasm resource in genetic diversity and crossing utilization. Sugar Crops China (中国糖料), 2007, (1): 46–49 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]Emily A H,  Stephen P L, Thomas B V, Michael B J, John C B. Miscanthus for renewable energy generation: european union experience and projections for Illinois. Mitigation Adapt Strategies Global Change, 2004, 9: 433–451
[22]Wilfred Vermerris. Genetic Improvement of Bioenergy Crops. New York: Springer Press, 2008. pp 295–308
[23]Lao Z-Z(廖兆周), Lao F-Y(劳方业), Zhou Y-H(周耀辉), Li Q-W(李奇伟), Deng H-H(邓海华), Huang H-N(黄鸿能), Fu C(符城), Hu H-X(胡后祥), Yang Y-H(杨业后), Chen X-W(陈西文). Breeding of drought-tolerant sugarcane lines with E. arundinaceus germplasm. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2002, 28(6): 841–846 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]Wang L-P(王丽萍), Cai Q(蔡青), Fan Y-H(范源洪), Lu X(陆鑫), Aiken K, Ma L(马丽), Liu X-L(刘新龙), Xia H-M(夏红明). Study on the distant hybrid utilization between Saccharum and Erianthus arundinanceus. Southwest China J Agric Sci (西南农业学报), 2007, 20(4): 721–726 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 崔致远, 秦晨展, 刘星雨, 张海, 曾康, 黄国强, 徐景升. 甘蔗类四跨膜蛋白ScTSPAN18与6K2互作应答SCMV侵染研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1618-1630.
[2] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[3] 杨宗桃, 杨婷, 王禹童, 艾静, 李燕烨, 刘家勇, 邓军, 赵勇, 张跃彬. 甘蔗CLC基因家族鉴定与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 722-734.
[4] 景秀清, 蔡永朵, 邓宁, 赵晓东, 翟飞红, 曾群. 藜麦RopGEF家族基因的鉴定及表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 28-43.
[5] 万慧兰, 吴华英, 曾丹, 钱禛锋, 赵昌祖, 廖然超, 何丽莲, 李富生. 蔗茅耐寒相关基因EfWRKY51克隆分析及功能验证[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2048-2059.
[6] 匡博文, 韦妳, 刘金典, 陈美燕, 毛兴洁, 段维兴, 杨细平. 基于甘蔗及其近缘属参考基因组开发SSR标记及数据库[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 103-116.
[7] 李旭娟, 李纯佳, 田春艳, 孔春艳, 徐超华, 刘新龙. 甘蔗硝酸盐转运蛋白1/肽转运蛋白家族6.4基因(ScNPF6.4)克隆及其调控分蘖功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2131-2142.
[8] 玉泉馨, 杨宗桃, 张海, 程光远, 焦文迪, 曾康, 罗廷绪, 黄国强, 王璐, 徐景升. 甘蔗类钙调素ScCML13与SCMV运动蛋白P3N-PIPO的互作研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1855-1866.
[9] 薛丽, 李心怡, 黄勇泰, 欧财篮, 吴小青, 余泽怀, 崔泽田, 张木清, 邓祖湖, 余凡. 甘蔗与斑茅杂交染色体组构成特征研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(3): 633-644.
[10] 田春艳, 边芯, 郎荣斌, 俞华先, 桃联安, 安汝东, 董立华, 张钰, 经艳芬. 甘蔗3个育种性状与SSR标记的关联分析及优异等位变异发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(2): 310-324.
[11] 王恒波, 冯春燕, 张以星, 谢婉婕, 杜翠翠, 吴明星, 张积森. 甘蔗割手密种转录因子NAP亚家族的鉴定及SsNAP2a参与叶片衰老的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 110-125.
[12] 杜翠翠, 吴明星, 张雅婷, 谢婉婕, 张积森, 王恒波. 甘蔗割手密种糖转运蛋白基因SsSWEET11的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2385-2397.
[13] 莫广玲, 余陈静, 梁艳兰, 周定港, 罗俊, 王莫, 阙友雄, 黄宁, 凌辉. 甘蔗ScbHLH13基因的RT-PCR克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2485-2497.
[14] 胡鑫, 罗正英, 李纯佳, 吴转娣, 李旭娟, 刘新龙. 基于二代和三代转录组测序揭示甘蔗重要亲本对黑穗病菌侵染的响应机制[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2412-2432.
[15] 玉泉馨, 杨宗桃, 张海, 程光远, 周营栓, 焦文迪, 曾康, 罗廷绪, 黄国强, 张木清, 徐景升. 甘蔗VAMP相关蛋白ScPVA12与甘蔗花叶病毒P3N-PIPO的互作研究[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2472-2484.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2