欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (08): 1494-1503.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01494

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同质地土壤下缓释尿素与常规尿素配施对水稻产量及其生长发育的影响

张小翠1,戴其根1,2,*,胡星星1,朱德建3,丁秀文1,马克强1,张洪程1,2,朱聪聪1   

  1. 1 扬州大学 / 江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室,江苏扬州225009;2 扬州大学 / 农业部长江流域稻作技术创新中心,江苏扬州225009;3 姜堰市土肥站,江苏泰州225529
  • 收稿日期:2011-12-15 修回日期:2012-04-16 出版日期:2012-08-12 网络出版日期:2012-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 戴其根, E-mail: qgdai2000@126.com, Tel: 0514-87979220
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(30971732,30671223)资助。

Effects of Slow-Release Urea Combined with Conventional Urea on Rice Output and Growth in Soils of Different Textures

ZHANG Xiao-Cui1,DAI Qi-Gen1,2,*,HU Xing-Xing1,ZHU De-Jian3,DING Xiu-Wen1,MA Ke-Qiang1,ZHANG Hong-Cheng1,2,ZHU Chong-Chong1   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province / Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; 2 Innovation Center of Rice Cultivation Technology in Yangtze Valley, Ministry of Agriculture / Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; 3 Earthy Fertilizer Station of Jiangyan County, Taizhou 225529, China
  • Received:2011-12-15 Revised:2012-04-16 Published:2012-08-12 Published online:2012-06-04
  • Contact: 戴其根, E-mail: qgdai2000@126.com, Tel: 0514-87979220

摘要: 以早熟晚粳南粳44为材料,分别在2种质地的土壤上,研究270 kg hm-2施氮条件下, 2种缓释尿素(硫包衣尿素SCU)单施及与常规尿素(PU)按2种不同比例混配一次性基施对水稻产量及其生长发育的影响。结果表明,与PU分施相比,SCU2单施与SCU1+PU(1∶1)、SCU1+PU(2∶1)及SCU2+PU(2∶1)配施处理水稻产量、生长中后期氮素吸收量、氮素吸收利用率与偏生产力、干物质积累以及茎鞘可用性糖颖花比均显著提高,抽穗后期根系α-萘胺氧化量维持较高水平,下降幅度小;产量、氮素吸收量、氮肥吸收利用率、偏生产力及干物质积累量在黏土上略高于在沙土上;抽穗期与抽穗后10 d根系α-萘胺氧化量在黏土上低于在沙土上,抽穗后20 d、30 d在两种土上差异不大。SCU单施及与PU配施基本上能满足水稻生长需求,SCU1与PU配施效果明显优于单施;SCU2单施效果最佳,SCU2+PU(2∶1)次之,SCU2+PU(1∶1)效果不显著。

关键词: 缓释尿素, 水稻, 产量, 生长发育

Abstract: Public attentions have been increasingly paid to the slow-release fertilizer (sulfur-coated urea, or SCU) which has developed quickly during the last decade. In this research, a field experiment with 270 kg ha-1 N fertilizer application was conducted in two kinds of soil (sandy soil and clay soil) using the early maturing late japonica variety Nanjing44 as materials. The effects of fertilizing with sulfur-coated urea alone and mixing application of SCU and conventional urea (PU) on grain yield and plant growth were examined and compared. Results showed that compared with the treatment of PU applied alone, the treatments of SCU2, SCU2+PU(2:1), SCU1+PU(2:1) and SCU1+PU(1:1) showed significant increase in the rice yield, N accumulation, uptake and use efficiency, dry matter accumulation, ratio of stem-sheath usable carbohydrate to spikelets per panicle, and root α-NA oxidation ability that maintained a high level with a small reduction tendency. The grain yield, N uptake and use efficiency as well as dry matter accumulation in clay soil were slightly higher than those in sandy soil, and the root α-NA oxidation ability at heading and 10 days after heading were lower in clay soil than in sandy soil, while no apparent difference was found at 20 or 30 days after heading.In conclusion, the application of sulfur-coated urea or its combination with normal urea may both meet the basic needs of rice growth. Combination of SCU1 and PU has better effect than either fertilizer applied solely, the treatment of SCU2 has the best outcome, which is followed by treatment of SCU2+PU(2:1), and treatment of SCU2+PU(1:1) does not show a significant effect.

Key words: Slow-release urea, Rice, Grain yield, Growth and development

[1]He W-F(何万福), Liu S-Z(刘逊忠), Chen T-C(陈同聪), Chen Q-Y(陈七一). Effects of single basal application with slow -release fertilizer on rice grain yield and benefit. Mod Agric Sci Technol (现代农业科技), 2011, (10): 285–287 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2]Ling Q-H(凌启鸿). Crop Population Quality(作物群体质量). Beijing: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 2000. pp 44–211 (in Chinese)

[3]Yi W-P(衣文平), Zhu G-L(朱国梁), Wu L(武良), Gu J-L(谷佳林), Li Y-X(李亚星), Xu J-X(许俊香), Shi G-F(史桂芳), Xu Q-M (徐秋明). Application of different release duration controlled release coated urea combined with conventional urea on summer maize. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料), 2010, 16(6): 1497–1502 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4]Ma G-H(马国辉), Zhou J(周静), Long J-R(龙继锐), Chen M(陈敏), Song C-F(宋春芳), Wan Y-Z(万宜珍), Shen H-C(沈洪昌). Effect of slow-released nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield of super hybrid early rice. J Hunan Agric Univ (湖南农业大学学报), 2008, 34(1): 95–99 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5]Yin C-M(尹春梅), Xie X-L(谢小立). Effect of sulfur-coated on yield of super hybrid rice and water N content in soil. J Agro-Envrion Sci (农业环境科学学报), 2010, 29(10): 2011–2016 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Fu J-R(符建荣). Effects of controlled release fertilizer on rice yield and N recovery. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2001, 7(1): 145–152 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Wakimoto K. The utilization of the fertilizer capable of regulating fertilizer efficiency on rice plant cultivation and its subject in the future. Agric Technol, 1997, 52(10) : 466–470 (in Japanese with English abstract)

[8]Tang S-H(唐拴虎), Chen J-S(陈建生), Xu P-Z(徐培智), Zhang F-B(张发宝), Huang X(黄旭). Study on the development and yield of rice as affected by one basal application of growth-regulating controlled-release fertilizer. Guangdong Agric Sci (广东农业科学), 2006, (9): 9–12 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Yang X-D(杨相东), Cao Y-P(曹一平), Jiang R-F(江荣风), Zhang F-S(张福锁). Evaluation of nutrients release feature of coated controlled release fertilizer. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2005, 11(4): 501–507 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Cai W-C(蔡武城), Yuan H-J(袁厚积). Biological Material Used Chemical Analysis Method (生物物质常用化学分析法). Beijing: Science Press, 1982. pp 15–16 (in Chinese)

[11]Plant Physiology Teaching and Research Section of Department of Biology of East China Normal University (华东师范大学生物系植物生理教研室编). Plant Physiology Experiment (植物生理学实验指导). Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, 1980. pp 68–70 (in Chinese)

[12]Yang J-C(杨建昌), Zhu Q-S(朱庆森), Wang Z-Q(王志琴), Lang Y-Z(郎有忠). Photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and its translocatin in intersubspecific hybrid rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1997, 23(1): 82–88 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[13]Chen X-Y(陈贤友), Wu L-H(吴良欢), Li J-X(李金先), Ying J-Y(应金耀). Effects of new controlled release fertilizers on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Chin J Soil Sci (土壤通报), 2010, 41(1): 133–137 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[14]Li S-f(李世发), Liu Y-Y(刘元英), Fan L-C(范立春), Han X(韩旭), Diao Z(刁晫). Effects of slow- release fertilizer on growth and yield of rice. J Northeast Agric Univ (东北农业大学学报), 2008, 39(7): 38–43 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Li F-M(李方敏), Fan X-L(樊小林), Chen W-D(陈文东). Effects of controlled release fertilizer on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2005, 11(4): 494–500

[16]Singh K, Sharma H C, Singh C S, Singh Y, Nishizawa N K, Mori S. Effect of polyolefin resin coated slow release iron fertilizer and its methods of application on rice production in calcareous soil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2004, 50: 1037–1042

[17]Carreres R, Sendra J, Ballesteros R, Valiente E F, Quesada A, Carrasco D, Leganes F, Cuadra J G. Assessment of slow release fertilizers and nitrification inhibitors in flooded rice. Biol Fert Soils, 2003, 39: 80-87

[18]Yasmin N, Blair G, Till R. Effect of elemental sulfur, gypsum, and elemental sulfur coated fertilizers, on the availability of sulfur to rice. J Plant Nutr, 2007, 30: 79–91

[19]Tian Z-H(田智慧), Pan X-H(潘晓华). Effects of nitrogen application and planting density on production and translocation of dry matter in Zhongyou 752. Acta Agric Jiangxi (江西农业学报), 2008, 20(7): 1–6 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20]Jiao X-G(焦晓光), Luo S-G(罗盛国), Wen D-Z(闻大中). Effect of controlled- release urea application on N uptake and rice yield. Chin J Soil Sci (土壤通报), 2003, 34(6): 525–528 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21]Wang Y-L(王余龙), Yao Y-L(姚友礼), Liu B-Y(刘宝玉), Lü Z-L(吕贞龙), Huang J-Y(黄建哗), Xu J-K(徐家宽), Can J-Z(蔡建中). Effect of nitrogen supplying levels and timings on the development of roots in hybrid indica rice. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 1997, 23(6): 699–706 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]Fan J-B(樊剑波), Shen Q-R(沈其荣) , Tan J-Z(谭炯壮), Ye L-T(叶利庭), Song W-J(宋文静), Zhang Y-L(张亚丽). Difference of root physiological and ecological indices in rice cultivars with different N use efficiency. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2009, 29(6): 3052–3058 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23]Paul W U, Thomas C K. Soil compaction and root growth: A review. Agron J, 1994, 86: 759–766

[24]Tang S-H(唐拴虎), Xu P-Z(徐培智), Chen J-S(陈建生), Ai S-Y(艾绍英), Zhang F-B(张发宝), Huang X(黄旭). Effects of single basal application of controlled release fertilizer on root activity and nutrient absorption of rice. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2007, 13(4): 591–596 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[25]Zheng S-X(郑圣先), Nie J(聂军), Dai P-A(戴平安), Zheng Y-J(郑颖俊). Effect of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on the morphological and physiological characteristics and senescence of root system during late growth stages of hybrid rice. Plant Nutr Fert Sci (植物营养与肥料学报), 2006, 12(2): 188–194 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[26]Zhang Y-P(张玉屏), Zhu D-F(朱德峰), Lin X-Q(林贤青), Jiao G-A(焦桂爱), Huang Q(黄群). Roots distribution of rice in field and its relation to soil bulk density. Chin J Rice Sci (中国水稻科学), 2003, 17(2): 141–144 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[27]Yang Q-H(杨青华), Gao E-M(高尔明), Ma X-M(马新明), Wang H-C(王红灿), Sun Z-A(孙治安), Yin F(尹飞), Liu B(刘斌), Ren J(任键), Wang Q(王琪). Study on growing dynamic of maize root system in various soils. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin (华北农学报), 2000, 15(3): 88–93 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[6] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[7] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[8] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[9] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[10] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[11] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[12] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[13] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[14] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[15] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!