作物学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (02): 175-186.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00175
• 综述 • 下一篇
潘映红
PAN Ying-Hong
摘要:
植物表型分析是理解植物基因功能及环境效应的关键环节,随着植物功能基因组学和作物分子育种研究的深入,传统的表型观测已经成为制约其发展的主要瓶颈,而高通量的植物表型组分析技术和植物表型组学研究是解决这一困境的有效途径。虽然植物表型组分析正在成为国内外研究的热点,相关概念仍然较为模糊,阻碍了这一新兴学科的发展。本文分析了植物表型组和植物表型组学的相关概念和范畴,引入了准表型组、可辨识性状、映射性状、植物表型的遗传和环境包容性等新概念,将植物表型组定义为“受基因组和环境因素决定或影响的,反映植物结构及组成、植物生长发育过程及结果的全部物理、生理、生化特征和性状”,将植物表型组学定义为“对植物表型组信息及相关环境参数的综合控制、完整采集和系统分析”,并提出了植物表型组学的研究范围、研究方向和顶层设计原则。
| [1]Schork N J. Genetics of complex disease—Approaches, problems, and solutions. Am J Resp Crit Care, 1997, 156: S103–S109 [2]Davis B D. The isolation of biochemically deficient mutants of bacteria by means of Penicillin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1949, 35: 1–10[3]Soule M. Phenetics of natural populations I. Phenetic relationships of insular populations of the side-blotched lizard. Evolution, 1967, 21: 584–591[4]Conrad M, Rizki M M. The artificial worlds approach to emergent evolution. BioSystems, 1989, 23: 247–258[5]Mahner M, Kary M. What exactly are genomes, genotypes and phenotypes? And what about phenomes? J Theor Biol, 1997, 186: 55–63[6]Varki A, Wills C, Perlmutter D, Woodruff D, Gage F, Moore J, Semendeferi K, Bernirschke K, Katzman R, Doolittle R. Great ape phenome project? Science, 1998, 282: 239–240[7]Strohman R C. Linear genetics, non-linear epigenetics: complementary approaches to understanding complex diseases. Integr Phys Beh Sci, 1995, 30: 273–282 [8]Dulbecco R. A turning point in cancer research: sequencing the human genome. Science, 1986, 231: 1055–1056[9]Schilling C H, Edwards J S, Palsson B O. Toward metabolic phenomics: analysis of genomic data using flux balances. Biotechnol Prog, 1999, 15: 288–295[10]Kelsoe J R, Niculescu A B. Finding genes for bipolar disorder in the functional genomics era: from convergent functional genomics to phenomics and back. CNS Spectr, 2002, 7: 215–226 [11]Bader G D, Heilbut A, Andrews B, Tyers M, Hughes T, Boone C. Functional genomics and proteomics: charting a multidimensional map of the yeast cell. Trends Cell Biol, 2003, 13: 344–356[12]Sauer U. High-throughput phenomics: experimental methods for mapping fluxomes. Curr Opin Biotech, 2004, 15: 58–63[13]Joy T, Hegele R A. Genetics of metabolic syndrome: is there a role for phenomics? Curr Atheroscler Rep, 2008, 10: 201–208[14]Whiteley A R, Derome N, Rogers S M, St-Cyr J, Laroche J, Labbe A, Nolte A, Renaut S, Jeukens J, Bernatchez L. The phenomics and expression quantitative trait locus mapping of brain transcriptomes regulating adaptive divergence in lake whitefish species pairs (Coregonus sp.). Genetics, 2008, 180: 147–164[15]Bilder R M, Sabb F W, Cannon T D, London E D, Jentsch J D, Parker D S, Poldrack R A, Evans CFreimer N B. Phenomics: the systematic study of phenotypes on a genome-wide scale. Neuroscience, 2009, 164: 30–42[16]Lanktree M B, Hassell R G, Lahiry P, Hegele R A. Phenomics: expanding the role of clinical evaluation in genomic studies. J Invest Med, 2010, 58: 700–706[17]Houle D, Govindaraju D R, Omholt S. Phenomics: the next challenge. Nat Rev Genet, 2010, 11: 855–866[18]Maddatu T P, Grubb S C, Bult C J, Bogue M A. Mouse phe-nome database (MPD). Nucl Acids Res, 2012, 40(D1): D887–D894 [19]Yang L, Wei G, Tang K, Nardini C, Han J D. Understanding human diseases with high-throughput quantitative measurement and analysis of molecular signatures. Sci China Life Sci, 2013, 56: 213–219[20]Weckwerth W, Kahl G. The Handbook of Plant Metabolomics. Weinheim: Wiley-Blackwell Press, 2013. pp 1–100[21]Hancock J M. Introduction to “Phenomics”. In: Hancock J M, ed. Phenomics. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014. pp 1–7[22]Pieruschka R, Poorter H. Phenotyping plants: genes, phenes and machines Introduction. Funct Plant Biol, 2012, 39: 813–820 [23]Tester M, Langridge P. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science, 2010, 327: 818–822[24]Yang W, Duan L, Chen G, Xiong L, Liu Q. Plant phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: accelerating rice functional genomics using multidisciplinary technologies. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2013, 16: 180–187[25]Dhondt S, Wuyts N, Inze D. Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: the best is yet to come. Trends Plant Sci, 2013, 18: 433–444[26]White J W, Andrade-Sanchez P, Gore M A, Bronson K F, Coffelt T A, Conley M M, Feldmann K A, French A N, Heun J T, Hunsaker D J, Jenks M A, Kimball B A, Roth R L, Strand R J, Thorp K R, Wall G W, Wang G Y. Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research. Field Crops Res, 2012, 133: 101–112 [27]Johannsen W. The genotype conception of heredity. Am Nat, 1911, 45: 129–159[28]Baylin S B, Gazdar A F, Minna J D, Bernal S D, Shaper J H. A unique cell-surface protein phenotype distinguishes human small-cell from non-small-cell lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1982, 79: 4650–4654[29]Jimenez-Marin D, Dessauer H C. Protein phenotype variation in laboratory populations of Rattus norvegicus. Comp Bio-chem Phys B: Comp Biochem, 1973, 46: 487-488[30]Pringle C, Duncan I, Stevenson M. Isolation and characteri-zation of temperature-sensitive mutants of vesicular stomatitis virus, New Jersey serotype. J Virol, 1971, 8: 836–841[31]Frey T K, Youngner J S. Novel phenotype of RNA synthesis expressed by vesicular stomatitis virus isolated from persistent infection. J Virol, 1982, 44: 167–174[32]Parsons P. The behavioral phenotype in mice. Am Nat, 1974, 108: 377–385[33]De C B, Lefebvre V, Nakashima K. Regulatory mechanisms in the pathways of cartilage and bone formation. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2001, 13: 721–728[34]Reintanz B, Lehnen M, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J, Kowalczyk M, Sandberg G, Godde M, Uhl R, Palme K. Bus, a bushy Arabidopsis CYP79F1 knockout mutant with abolished synthesis of short-chain aliphatic glucosinolates. Plant Cell, 2001, 13: 351–367[35]Okusu H, Ma DNikaido H. AcrAB efflux pump plays a major role in the antibiotic resistance phenotype of Escherichia coli multiple-antibiotic-resistance (Mar) mutants. J Bacteriol, 1996, 178: 306–308[36]Fiorani F, Schurr U. Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2013, 64: 267–291[37]Geissler T, Wessjohann L A. A whole-plant microtiter plate assay for drought stress tolerance-inducing effects. J Plant Growth Regul, 2011, 30: 504–511[38]Appels R. Plant phenome to genome: a mini-review. Funct Plant Biol, 2012, 39: 3–8[39]Poorter H, Niinemets U, Walter A, Fiorani F, Schurr U. A method to construct dose-response curves for a wide range of environmental factors and plant traits by means of a meta-analysis of phenotypic data. J Exp Bot, 2010, 61: 2043–2055[40]Cobb J N, DeClerck G, Greenberg A, Clark R, McCouch S. Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement. Theor Appl Genet, 2013, 126: 867–887[41]Brown T B, Cheng R, Sirault X R, Rungrat T, Murray K D, Trtilek M, Furbank R T, Badger M, Pogson B J, Borevitz J O. TraitCapture: genomic and environment modelling of plant phenomic data. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2014, 18: 73–79[42]Rengel D, Arribat S, Maury P, Martin-Magniette M L, Hourlier T, Laporte M, Vares D, Carrere S, Grieu P, Balzergue S, Gouzy J, Vincourt P, Langlade N B. A gene-phenotype network based on genetic variability for drought responses reveals key physiological processes in controlled and natural environments. PloS One, 2012, 7: e45249[43]Zamir D. Where have all the crop phenotypes gone? PloS Biol, 2013, 11: e1001595[44]Kohler S, Doelken S C, Mungall C J, Bauer S, Firth H V, Bailleul-Forestier I, Black G C M, Brown D L, Brudno M, Campbell J, FitzPatrick D R, Eppig J T, Jackson A P, Freson K, Girdea M, Helbig I, Hurst J A, Jahn J, Jackson L G, Kelly A M, Ledbetter D H, Mansour S, Martin C L, Moss C, Mumford A, Ouwehand W H, Park S M, Riggs E R, Scott R H, Sisodiya S, Van Vooren S, Wapner R J, Wilkie A O M, Wright C F, Vulto-van Silfhout A T, de Leeuw N, de Vries B B A, Washingthon N L, Smith C L, Westerfield M, Schofield P, Ruef B J, Gkoutos G V, Haendel M, Smedley D, Lewis S E, Robinson P N. The Human Phenotype Ontology project: linking molecular biology and disease through phenotype data. Nucl Acids Res, 2014, 42(D1): D966–D974[45]Mungall C J, Gkoutos G V, Smith C L, Haendel M A, Lewis S E, Ashburner M. Integrating phenotype ontologies across multiple species. Genome Biol, 2010, 11: R2[46]Hu H, Zhang J Z, Sun X Y, Zhang X M. Estimation of leaf chlorophyll content of rice using image color analysis. Can J Remote Sens, 2013, 39: 185–190[47]Rousseau C, Belin E, Bove E, Rousseau D, Fabre F, Berruyer R, Guillaumes J, Manceau C, Jacques M A, Boureau T. High throughput quantitative phenotyping of plant resistance using chlorophyll fluorescence image analysis. Plant Methods, 2013, 9: 17[48]Feher-Juhasz E, Majer P, Sass L, Lantos C, Csiszar J, Turoczy Z, Mihaly R, Mai A, Horvath G V, Vass I, Dudits D, Pauk J. Phenotyping shows improved physiological traits and seed yield of transgenic wheat plants expressing the alfalfa aldose reductase under permanent drought stress. Acta Physiol Plant, 2014, 36: 663–673[49]Matsuda O, Tanaka A, Fujita T, Iba K. Hyperspectral imaging techniques for rapid identification of Arabidopsis mutants with altered leaf pigment status. Plant Cell Physiol, 2012, 53: 1154–1170[50]De S N. Machines learn phenotypes. Nat Methods, 2013, 10: 38–38 |
| [1] | 蔡兆琴, 何观咏, 何文, 阮丽霞, 梁振华, 李永珍, 李恒锐, 陈会鲜. 木薯分枝发育过程的动态转录组分析与关键基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1430-1441. |
| [2] | 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801. |
| [3] | 王婷, 段武丽, 王蕊, 刘海岚. 植物胆碱单加氧酶基因家族的进化与表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 44-55. |
| [4] | 杨姝, 白伟, 蔡倩, 杜桂娟. 玉米‖紫花苜蓿间作群体光分布特征及对植物性状和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2514-2526. |
| [5] | 沈傲, 刘敏, 倪迪安, 刘炜. 谷子m6A甲基转移酶基因SiMTA1的启动子序列特征和基因表达模式分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1969-1978. |
| [6] | 宋松泉, 唐翠芳, 程红焱, 王程亮, 袁良兵, 左胜. 谷类作物的胚乳发育及其对种子休眠与萌发的作用[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1133-1155. |
| [7] | 苏畅, 满福原, 王镜博, 冯晶, 姜思旭, 赵明辉. 铝胁迫下水稻osalr3突变体对外源有机酸和植物生长调节物质的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 676-686. |
| [8] | 赵黎明, 段绍彪, 项洪涛, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰, 沈雪峰. 干湿交替灌溉与植物生长调节剂对水稻光合特性及内源激素的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 174-188. |
| [9] | 谢章书, 谢学方, 屠小菊, 刘爱玉, 董合忠, 周仲华. 植物激素对棉花蕾铃脱落的调控研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(1): 1-29. |
| [10] | 李旭娟, 李纯佳, 田春艳, 孔春艳, 徐超华, 刘新龙. 甘蔗硝酸盐转运蛋白1/肽转运蛋白家族6.4基因(ScNPF6.4)克隆及其调控分蘖功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8): 2131-2142. |
| [11] | 张慧, 张欣雨, 袁旭, 陈伟达, 杨婷. 烟草叶片响应镉胁迫的差异表达基因鉴定及分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(4): 944-956. |
| [12] | 段凌凤, 王新轶, 王治昊, 耿泽栋, 卢运瑞, 杨万能. 基于改进Pix2Pix-HD网络的多品种水稻生长可视化预测方法[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(12): 3083-3095. |
| [13] | 张馨月, 秦阳, 李瑞, 黄全生, 王逸茹, 郑军. 玉米穗发芽突变体vp2的基因克隆及功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(11): 2712-2719. |
| [14] | 宋松泉, 唐翠芳, 雷华平, 姜孝成, 王伟青, 程红焱. 种子休眠与萌发调控的研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 1-15. |
| [15] | 王菲菲, 张胜忠, 胡晓辉, 崔凤高, 钟文, 赵立波, 张天雨, 郭进涛, 于豪谅, 苗华荣, 陈静. 比较转录组分析花生种子休眠调控网络[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(9): 2446-2461. |
|
||