欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (01): 141-148.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00141

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

一种新的符合度算法及其应用

张慧1 ,2，顾世梁1,*，李韬1   

  1. 1扬州大学农学院, 江苏扬州225009; 2桐庐县农业技术推广中心, 浙江杭州311500
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-05 修回日期:2015-09-06 出版日期:2016-01-12 网络出版日期:2015-10-13
  • 通讯作者: 顾世梁, E-mail: slgu@yzu.edu.cn, Tel: 0514-87979358
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心开放课题“小麦育种材料评价研究”项目资助。

A New Algorithm for Conformity and Its Application

ZHANG Hui1,2,GU Shi-Liang1,*,LI Tao1   

  1. 1Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; 2Agricultural Extension Station of Tonglu County, Hangzhou 311500, China
  • Received:2015-02-05 Revised:2015-09-06 Published:2016-01-12 Published online:2015-10-13
  • Contact: 顾世梁, E-mail: slgu@yzu.edu.cn, Tel: 0514-87979358
  • Supported by:

    The study was supported by open project of the National Agricultural Information Engineering Center.

RichHTML

PDF

1701

被引次数

1

摘要：

在总结分析了几种常用综合评价方法的基础上, 提出了一种反映观察值与理论值之间相似性的新算法——符合度。该算法就评价信息个体(观察值)与标准值(期望值)的马氏距离, 再由马氏距离转化为评价对象与标准的接近程度, 即符合度(r)。首先进行指标数(p)、相似度(r)与马氏距离(d)的模拟试验, 再通过曲面拟合的方法找出它们之间的关系模型。通过大量抽样试验, 验证符合度的次数分布与原先设定的符合度的良好对应关系, 说明模型的可行性与可靠性。以小麦RVA性状为指标, 利用该算法分析扬麦系统若干品种之间的接近程度, 并评价多变数复杂效应回归分析模拟试验的结果。符合度算法不需要数据标准化处理, 直接利用原始数据, 减少了计算工作量, 降低了因数据标准化处理方法不同而引起的评价结果差异, 同时由于不需要赋权, 排除了主观性的影响, 保证了信息的完整性以及评价结果的可靠性。

关键词: 符合度, 综合评价, 计算机模拟, 马氏距离

Abstract:

This article proposed a new algorithm of conformity using original data to calculate similarities between the target object and the expected value based on the Mahalanobis distance, providing an objective and reasonable analysis. Firstly, simulation experiments were conducted to obtain Mahalanobis distance (d) related to number (p) of different variables (traits) and similarity (r). Then, a surface fitting method was used to establish the function relationship between conformity (r) and index number (p), as well as Mahalanobis distance (d). Monte Carlo experiment for frequency distribution of conformity verified its good performance of the relationship model. The simulation results fully validated the feasibility and reliability of the model. Conformity algorithm was applied to calculating the similarity of a panel of Yangmai wheat varieties released in recent years referring to RVA parameters. The assessment of simulated multivariate regression for complex effects was also conducted. This study showed that conformity algorithm using raw data directly instead of standardized data reduces the work load and decreases inconsistency in similarity assessment with different data processing methods. In addition, conformity algorithm does not need weight assignment to each trait, thus can eliminate potential subjective impacts on traits or data and guarantee integrity of information and reliability of evaluation results.

Key words: Conformity algorithm, Comprehensive evaluation, Computer simulation, Mahalanobis distance

[1]顾基发. 评价方法综述. 见: 许国志. 科学决策与系统工程——中国系统工程学会第六次年会论文集.北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1990. pp 5–7



Gu J F. Evaluation method review. In: Xu G Z ed. Scientific Decision-Making and System Engineering. Proceedings of 6th Conference of the Systems Engineering Society of China. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 1990. pp 5–7 (in Chinese)



[2]Chen S J, Hwang C L, Hwang F P. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems), Springer-Verlag, 1992. pp 163–287



[3]Hwang C L, Masud A S M. Multiple Objective Decision Making—Methods and Applications. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, Springer-Verlag, 1979. pp 2–325



[4]Yongxing P, Shangzhi Y. The multi-hierarchy integrated evaluation method of enterprise’s credit grade. In: Proceedings of ISAHP, 1999. pp 125–128



[5]Savoy J. Statistical inference in retrieval effectiveness evaluation. Inf Proc & Manag, 1997, 33: 495–512



[6]Yuan Z, Wang H, Liu L Z, Liang T. Researching the comprehensive use of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and Markov chain//IT in Medicine & Education, 2009. ITIME’09. IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 2009. pp 476–479



[7]陈凯华, 张孝远. 模糊综合评价模型的改进及应用. 甘肃科学学报, 2006, 18(3): 111–115



Chen K H, Zhang X Y. Application of the improved fuzzy comprehensive appraisal model. J Gansu Sci, 2006, 18(3): 111–115 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[8]程鹤, 耿双军. 模糊综合评价的改进模型. 统计与决策, 2007, (13): 136–137



Cheng H, Geng S J. The improved model of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation . Stat & Decision, 2007, (13): 136–137(in Chinese)



[9]田钦谟. 模糊综合评价中的若干问题. 模糊系统与数学, 1996, 10(2): 62–69



Tian Q M. Several problems in fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Fuzzy Systand Math, 1996, 10(2): 62–69 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[10]王宗军. 综合评价的方法、问题及其研究趋势. 管理科学学报, 1998, 1(1): 73–79



Wang Z J. On the methods, problems and research trends of comprehensive evaluation. J Manag Sci China, 1998, 1(1): 73–79 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[11]杜栋, 庞庆华. 现代综合评价方法与案例精选. 清华大学出版社有限公司, 2005



Du D, Pang Q H. Modern Comprehensive Evaluation Method and Case Selection. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press Co., LTD, 2005. (in Chinese)



[12]马立平. 现代统计分析方法的学与用(三): 统计数据标准化——无量纲化方法. 北京统计, 2000, (3): 34–35



Ma L P. Learning and using in analysis methods of modern statistical: (3) Statistical data standardization, dimensionless method. J Beijing Stat, 2000, (3): 34-35 (in Chinese)



[13]叶宗裕. 关于多指标综合评价中指标正向化和无量纲化方法的选择. 浙江统计, 2003, (4): 24–25



Ye Z Y. The choice of multi-index comprehensive evaluation index in positive and dimensionless. J Zhejiang Stat, 2003, (4): 24–25(in Chinese)



[14]易平涛, 张丹宁, 郭亚军, 高立群. 动态综合评价中的无量纲化方法. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 30: 889–892



Yi P T, Zhang D N, Guo Y J, Gao L Q. Study on dimensionless methods in dynamic comprehensive evaluation. J Northeastern Univ (Nat Sci), 2009, 30: 889–892 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[15]张卫华, 赵铭军. 指标无量纲化方法对综合评价结果可靠性的影响及其实证分析. 统计与信息论坛, 2005, 20(3): 33–36



Zhang W H, Zhao M J. The influence of undimensionalization on the reliability of comprehensive evaluation results and an empirical analysis. Stat & Inf Forum, 2005, 20(3): 33–36 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[16]孙威武. 评价因素权重向量的确定方法. 统计与决策, 2002 (7): 17–18



Sun W W. The method to determine the weights of evaluation factors vector. Stat & Decision, 2002, (7): 17–18 (in Chinese)



[17]王雪标, 龚兆仁, 郑晓薇. 线性综合评价函数的充要条件及权系数的确定. 系统工程理论与实践, 2000, 20(10): 58–62



Wang X B, Gong Z R, Zheng X W. Linear synthetical evaluation function and the determination of its weighting coefficients. Syst Eng-Theory & Practice, 2000, 20(10): 58–62 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[18]Grabowski M, Wallace W A. An expert system for maritime pilots: Its design and assessment using gaming. Manag Sci, 1993, 39: 1506–1520



[19]Guo Y J, Yao Y, Yi P T. Method and application of dynamic comprehensive evaluation. Syst Eng-Theory & Practice, 2007, 27(10): 154–158 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[20]王大将, 周庆敏, 常志玲, 孙洁. 一种新的多指标综合评价方法. 统计与决策, 2007, (7): 137–138



Wang D J, Zhou Q M, Chang Z L, Sun J. A new method of multi-index comprehensive evaluation. Stat & Decision, 2007, (7): 137–138 (in Chinese)



[21]顾世梁, 万林生, 黄丽娟, 王文平. 曲线和曲面拟合的改进缩张算法. 作物学报, 2007, 33: 583–589



Gu S L, Wan L S, Huang L J, Wang W P. Improved contraction-expansion algorithm for curve and surface fitting. Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33: 583–589 (in Chinese with English abstract)



[22]顾世梁, 惠大丰, 莫惠栋. 非线性方程最优拟合的缩张算法. 作物学报, 1998, 24: 513–519



Gu S L, Hui D F, Mo H D. The optimal fitting of nonlinear equation with contraction-expansion algorithm. Acta Agron Sin, 1998, 24: 513–519 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 马小倩, 秦娜, 代书桃, 秦家范, 李小艳, 王淑婷, 刘忠玲, 李君霞. 175份谷子种质在2种环境下的表型变异分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1757-1773.
[2] 姚术, 郭凯悦, 翟慧慧, 姚佳慧, 邓文琪, 闫玲, 黄驰, 高阳, 俞嫣然, 赵振邦, 李英慧, 王晓波, 李佳佳. 大豆苗期耐低铁综合评价及优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1373-1387.
[3] 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 曹宁, 程斌, 高旭, 李文贞, 王若若, 王磊, 张立异. 397份高粱种质资源在贵州表型多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1073-1087.
[4] 谭文清, 惠荣奎, 张凡丽, 覃磊, 毛舒香, 邓力超, 郭一鸣, 曲亮, 严明理. 油菜耐渍性快速鉴定及耐渍种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1035-1045.
[5] 王雅致, 杨飚, 季香林, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 二倍体马铃薯抗旱资源鉴定及抗旱基因初步筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 72-84.
[6] 胡润慧, 汪军成, 司二静, 张宏, 李兴茂, 马小乐, 孟亚雄, 王化俊, 刘青, 姚立蓉, 李葆春. 小麦苗期耐旱耐盐种质筛选及抗旱耐盐综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2371-2386.
[7] 孟然, 李赵嘉, 冯薇, 陈悦, 刘路平, 杨春燕, 鲁雪林, 王秀萍. 大豆不同生育时期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 1991-2008.
[8] 旺姆, 卓嘎, 扎桑, 西若曲宗, 达瓦顿珠, 郭刚刚, 张京, 卓嘎, 伦珠朗杰. 基于6个表型性状的青稞种质遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1526-1537.
[9] 金欣欣, 宋亚辉, 苏俏, 杨永庆, 李玉荣, 王瑾. 冀花系列高油酸花生抗旱性鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 797-811.
[10] 马群, 王志昊, 闫磊, 李瑜娇, 王佳琪, 李钊, 刘巍, 艾鑫, 马迁驰, 王晓光, 钟超, 任婧瑶, 刘喜波, 赵姝丽, 张鹤, 赵新华, 蒋春姬, 王婧, 于海秋. 高油酸和普通花生萌发期抗旱筛选评价体系的建立[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3266-3280.
[11] 李琰, 李雨晨, 于爱萍, 陈爱萍. 8份无芒雀麦种质资源的草产量与营养品质的综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3377-3386.
[12] 蒋昂辰, 李琰, 李雨晨, 张晶, 陈爱萍. 21份无芒雀麦种质农艺性状及种子产量的综合评价与优异种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2958-2970.
[13] 葛家豪, 雷欣月, 王清明, 韩慧冰, 李少飞, 王琦璇, 冯佰利, 高金锋. 苦荞苗期耐低磷种质筛选及耐低磷综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(11): 2911-2922.
[14] 聂波涛, 刘德泉, 陈健, 崔正果, 侯云龙, 陈亮, 邱红梅, 王跃强. 北方春大豆品种农艺和品质性状分析与综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2248-2266.
[15] 闫锋, 董扬, 李清泉, 赵富阳, 侯晓敏, 刘洋, 李青超, 赵蕾, 范国权, 刘凯. 谷子育成品种萌芽期耐冷性综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2207-2218.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2