欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 10-17.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84072

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄麻全基因组SSR鉴定与特征分析

姚嘉瑜1(),张立武1,2(),赵捷1,徐益1,2,祁建民1,张列梅1,*()   

  1. 1福建农林大学作物遗传育种与综合利用教育部重点实验室 / 福建省作物设计育种重点实验室 / 作物科学学院, 福建福州 350002
    2福建农林大学海峡联合研究院基因组与生物技术中心, 福建福州 350002
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-18 接受日期:2018-08-20 出版日期:2018-09-14 网络出版日期:2018-09-14
  • 通讯作者: 张列梅
  • 基金资助:
    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31771369);国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-19-E06);农业部东南黄红麻实验观测站(农科教发2011)和福建省麻类种质资源共享平台资助(2010N2002)

Evaluation and characteristic analysis of SSRs from the whole genome of jute (Corchorus capsularis)

Jia-Yu YAO1(),Li-Wu ZHANG1,2(),Jie ZHAO1,Yi XU1,2,Jian-Min QI1,Lie-Mei ZHANG1,*()   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops of Ministry of Education / Fujian Key Laboratory for Crop Breeding by Design / College of Crop Science, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, China
    2 Center for Genomics and Biotechnology of Haixia Institute of Science and Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, China
  • Received:2018-05-18 Accepted:2018-08-20 Published:2018-09-14 Published online:2018-09-14
  • Contact: Lie-Mei ZHANG
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31771369);the China Agriculture Research System(CARS-19-E06);the Experiment Station of Jute and Kenaf in Southeast China (Nongkejiaofa 2011), and the Construction of Germplasm Resources Platform for Bast Fiber Crops in Fujian, China.(2010N2002)

摘要:

黄麻是世界上重要的天然韧皮部纤维作物之一。然而, SSR标记的缺乏限制了黄麻的遗传改良。本研究从圆果种黄麻测序品种CVL-1的基因组、基因、CDS和cDNA中挖掘SSR信息, 利用SSR Primer软件查找SSR位点, 并分析其分布特征。结果表明, 基于基因组序列共开发了153,242个基因组SSR, 平均密度为467.20个SSR Mb -1; 基于cDNA序列开发了10,747个SSR, 平均密度为260.85 SSR Mb -1。大部分重复基元为二至四核苷酸, 占76.91%, 其中cDNA序列SSR中三核苷酸重复基元数量较多而基因组SSR中二核苷酸重复基元数量较多。对于不同类型的SSR重复基元, 随着重复单元数量的增加, 其基因组和cDNA的SSR分布频率呈现逐步降低特征。黄麻全基因组SSR标记鉴定, 不仅可以丰富黄麻分子标记的数量, 而且为剖析黄麻重要农艺性状的遗传机制奠定基础。

关键词: 黄麻, 基因组, cDNA, SSR

Abstract:

Jute is one of the most important natural bast fiber crops worldwide. However, the lack of SSR markers limits the genetic improvement of jute. In this study, simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were identified from the genome, genes, CDS and cDNA of CVL-1, a sequenced variety in Corchorus capsularis. SSR loci was called using SSR Primer software and the characteristics of SSR loci were analyzed. The 153,242 genomic SSRs were called based on the genomic sequence with an average density of 467.20 SSRs Mb -1. Based on the cDNA sequence, we called 10,747 SSRs were developed with an average density of 260.85 SSRs Mb -1. The majority of repeat types were di- to tetra-nucleotides, accounting for 76.91%. Among them, the tri-nucleotide repeat types were the highest abundance repeat types in the cDNA_SSRs while the di-nucleotide repeat types were the highest abundance repeat types in the genomic SSRs. For different SSR repeat types, the genomic and cDNA-SSR frequency decreased dramatically as repeat times increased. Identification of SSR markers in the whole genome can not only enrich the number of molecular markers, but also lay a foundation for the analysis of genetic basis of important agronomic traits in jute.

Key words: jute (Corchorus capsularis), genome, cDNA, SSRs

表1

黄麻SSR的分布特征"

序列类型
Sequence type
大小
Size
(Mb)
GC含量
GC content (%)
I类SSR Class I SSR II类SSR Class II SSR 总SSR Total SSR
数目
Number
密度
Density
(SSR Mb-1)
数目
Number
密度
Density
(SSR Mb-1)
数目
Number
密度
Density
(SSR Mb-1)
cDNA 41.20 57.79 1251 30.36 9496 230.49 10747 260.85
CDS 29.80 59.33 592 19.87 4862 163.15 5454 183.02
Gene 96.30 54.39 7865 81.67 28428 295.20 36293 376.87
Genome 330.00 54.03 38917 118.65 114325 348.55 153242 467.20

图1

黄麻SSR重复序列长度的频率分布"

图2

黄麻基因组、基因、CDS和cDNA的SSR重复基元的频率分布"

图3

黄麻基因组和cDNA的SSR重复基元及平均重复序列长度的频率分布"

表2

黄麻与不同物种间SSR重复类型的频率分布比较"

序列类型
Sequence type
黄麻
Jute
其他植物物种的SSR密度
Density of SSRs in other plant species (SSR Mb-1)
识别SSR数
Number of SSRs
identified
相对频率
Relative
frequency
(%)
平均重复次数
Mean repeat number
密度
(SSR Mb-1)
水稻
Oryza sativa (Os)
高粱
Sorghum bicolor (Sb)
拟南芥Arabidopsis thaliana (At) 黄瓜
Cucumis sativus (Cs)
葡萄
Vitis
vinifera
(Vv)
cDNA
Di- 1082 10.07 7.99 26.26 57.9 52.1 54.8 40.7
Tri- 5862 54.55 5.12 142.28 485.7 366.3 179.7 108.4
Tetra- 1674 15.58 3.47 40.63 107.3 125.5 69.3 53.3
Penta- 729 6.78 3.56 17.69 41.6 44.1 23.3 17.4
Hexa- 1400 13.03 3.64 33.98 44.6 56.5 36.1 22.1
Total/mean 10747 100.00 23.78 260.85 737.1 644.5 363.2 241.9
Genome
Di- 40863 26.67 10.38 124.58 100.1 51.6 78.7 146.0 117.2
Tri- 36836 24.04 5.35 112.30 220.1 108.5 146.6 141.1 115.8
Tetra- 40144 26.20 3.61 122.39 132.7 105.4 93.2 164.2 171.3
Penta- 18098 11.81 3.61 55.18 45.8 22.5 32.0 54.4 58.0
Hexa- 17301 11.29 3.64 52.75 27.4 27.5 13.6 31.0 29.3
Total/mean 153242 100.00 26.59 467.20 526.1 315.5 364.1 536.7 491.6

图4

黄麻SSR二核苷酸和三核苷酸序列的优势重复基元的频率分布"

[1] 熊和平 . 麻类作物育种学. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2008. pp 208-296.
Xiong H P. Breeding Sciences of Bast and Leaf Fiber Crops. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2008. pp 208-296(in Chinese).
[2] 祁建民, 李维明, 吴为人 . 黄麻的起源与进化研究. 作物学报, 1997,23:677-682.
Qi J M, Li W M, Wu W R . Studies on origin and evolution of jute. Acta Agron Sin, 1997,23:677-682 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[3] Islam M S, Saito J A, Emdad E M, Ahmed B, Islam M M, Halim A, Hossen Q M M, Hossain M Z, Ahmed R, Hossain M S, Kabir S M T, Khan M S A, Khan M M, Hasan R, Aktar N, Honi U, Islam R, Rashid M M, Wan X H, Hou S B, Haque T, Azam M S, Moosa M M, Elias S M., Hasan A M M, Mahmood N, Shafiuddin M, Shahid S, Shommu N S, Jahan S, Roy S, Chowdhury A, Akhand A I, Nisho G M, Uddin K S, Rabeya T, Hoque S M E, Snigdha A R, Mortoza S, Matin S A, Islam M K, Lashkar M Z H, Zaman M, Yuryev A, Uddin M K, Rahman M S, Haque M S, Alam M M, Khan H, Alam M . Comparative genomics of two jute species and insight into fibre biogenesis. Nat Plants, 2017,3:16223-16230.
doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.223 pmid: 28134914
[4] Basu A, Ghosh M, Meyer R, Powell W, Basak S L, Sen S K . Analysis of genetic diversity in cultivated jute determined by means of SSR markers and AFLP profiling. Crop Sci, 2004,44:678-685.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2004.6780
[5] Nishat S, Haseena K, Nadim A, Sharkar M T K . Construction of an intraspecific linkage map of jute. Asian J Plant Sci, 2006,5:758-762.
doi: 10.3923/ajps.2006.758.762
[6] Das M, Banerjee S, Dhariwal R, Vyas S, Mir R, Topdar N, Kundu A, Khurana J, Tyagi A, Sarkar D, Sinha M, Balyan H, Gupta P . Development of SSR markers and construction of a linkage map in jute. J Genet, 2012,91:21-31.
doi: 10.1007/s12041-012-0151-9
[7] Biswas C, Dey P, Karmakar P G, Satpathy S . Discovery of large-scale SNP markers and construction of linkage map in a RIL population of jute (Corchorus capsularis). Mol Breed, 2015,35:1-10.
doi: 10.1007/s11032-015-0311-8
[8] Kundu A, Chakraborty A, Mandal N, Das D, Karmakar P G, Singh N K, Sarkar D . A restriction-site-associated DNA (RAD) linkage map, comparative genomics and identification of QTL for histological fibre content coincident with those for retted bast fibre yield and its major components in jute (Corchorus olitorius L., Malvaceae s. l.). Mol Breed, 2015,35:1-17.
doi: 10.1007/s11032-015-0249-x
[9] Tao A, Huang L, Wu G, Afshar R K, Qi J M, Xu J T, Fang P P, Lin L H, Zhang L W, Lin P Q . High-density genetic map construction and QTLs identification for plant height in white jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) using specific locus amplified fragment (SLAF) sequencing. BMC Genomics, 2017,18:355-376.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3712-8 pmid: 28482802
[10] Zhang L W, Li S P, Chen L, Yang G S . Identification and mapping of a major dominant quantitative trait locus controlling seeds per silique as a single Mendelian factor in Brassica napus L. Theor Appl Genet, 2012,125:695-705.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1861-3 pmid: 22487878
[11] Temnykh S, DeClerck G, Lukashova A, Lipovich L, Cartinhour S, McCouch S . Computational and experimental analysis of microsatellitess in rice (Oryza sativa L.): frequency, length variation, transposon associations, and genetic marker potential. Genome Res, 2001,11:1441-1452.
[12] Russell J, Fuller J, Macaulay M, Hatz B, Jahoor A, Powell W, Waugh R . Direct comparison of levels of genetic variation among barley accessions detected by RFLPs, AFLPs, SSRs and RAPDs. Theor Appl Genet, 1997,95:714-722.
doi: 10.1007/s001220050617
[13] Pejic I, Ajmone-Marsan P, Morgante M, Kozumplick V, Castiglioni P, Taramino G, Motto M . Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs and AFLPs. Theor Appl Genet, 1998,97:1248-1255.
doi: 10.1007/s001220051017
[14] Cheng X, Xu J, Xia S, Gu J, Yang Y, Fu J, Qian X, Zhang S C, Wu J S, Liu K . Development and genetic mapping of microsatellite markers from genome survey sequences in Brassica napus. Theor Appl Genet, 2009,118:1121-1131.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-0967-8 pmid: 19190889
[15] Li H, Chen X, Yang Y, Xu J S, Gu J X, Fu J, Qian X J, Zhang S C, Wu J S, Liu K . Development and genetic mapping of microsatellite markers from whole genome shotgun sequences in Brassica oleracea. Mol Breed, 2010,28:585-596.
doi: 10.1007/s11032-010-9509-y
[16] Xu J, Qian X, Wang X, Li R, Cheng X, Yang Y, Fu J, Zhang S C, King G J, Wu J S, Liu K . Construction of an integrated genetic linkage map for the A genome of Brassica napus using SSR markers derived from sequenced BACs in B. rapa. BMC Genomics, 2010,11:594-603.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-594 pmid: 3091739
[17] Karaoglu H, Lee C M Y, Meyer W . Survey of simple sequence repeats in completed fungal genomes. Mol Biol Evol, 2005,22:639-649.
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi057 pmid: 15563717
[18] 张立武, 袁民航, 何雄威, 徐建堂, 祁建民, 刘星, 方平平, 林荔辉, 陶爱芬 . 基于GenBank黄麻EST-SSR标记的开发及其通用性评价. 作物学报, 2014,40:1028-1034.
Zhang L W, Yuan M H, He X W, Xu JT, Qi J M, Liu X, Fang P P, Lin L H, Tao A F . Development and universality evaluation of EST-SSR markers in jute (Corchorus spp.) from GenBank database. Acta Agron Sin, 2014,40:1028-1034.
[19] Hong C, Piao Z, Kang T, Batley J, Yang T, Hur Y K, Bhak J, Park B S, Edwards D, Lim Y P . Genomic distribution of simple sequence repeats in Brassica rapa. Mol Cells, 2007,23:349-356.
[20] Goff S, Ricke D, Lan T, Presting G, Wang R, Dunn M, Glazebrook J, Sessions A, Oeller P, Varma H, Hadley D, Hutchison D, Martin C, Katagiri F, Lange M, Moughamer T, Xia Y, Budworth P, Zhong J, Miguel T, Paszkowski U, Zhang S, Colbert M, Sun W, Chen L, Cooper B, Park S, Charles T, Mao L, Quail P, Wing R, Dean R, Yu Y, Zharkikh A, Shen R, Sahasrabudhe S, Thomas A, Cannings R, Gutin A, Pruss D, Reid J, Tavtigian S, Mitchell J, Eldredge G, Scholl T, Miller R M, Bhatnagar S, Adey N, Rubano T, Tusneem N, Robinson R, Feldhaus R, Macalma T, Oliphant A, Briggs S . A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science, 2002,296:92-100.
[21] Morgante M, Hanafey M, Powell W . Microsatellites are preferentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in plant genomes. Nat Genet, 2002,30:194-200
doi: 10.1063/1.363554 pmid: 11799393
[22] Huo N, Lazo G, Vogel J, You F M, Ma Y, Hayden D M, Coleman-Derr D, Hill A, Dvorak J, Anderson O D, Luo M C, Gu Y Q . The nuclear genome of Brachypodium distachyon: analysis of BAC end sequences. Funct Integr Genom, 2008,8:135-147.
[1] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[2] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[3] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[4] 张颖星, 宋裕祯, 王跃, 曹越, 曹晓宁, 王瑞云. EMS诱导糜子优异性状突变体的筛选及表型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1388-1400.
[5] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[6] 谷春苗, 王润风, 黄璐, 刘浩, 鲁清, 李海芬, 李少雄, 何双呈, 洪彦彬, 陈小平, 谭斌, 余倩霞. 花生WOX基因家族的全基因组分析及不定芽再生候选基因的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1326-1340.
[7] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[8] 田立涛, 丁宁, 王树林, 齐恩芳, 张荣, 王蕊蕊, 马利雯, 李建武, 杨江伟. 马铃薯Argonaute基因家族鉴定及晚疫病诱导表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1116-1126.
[9] 田春艳, 陆鑫, 吴才文, 徐超华, 刘家勇, 边芯, 桃联安. 基于荧光SSR的甘蔗创新种质遗传多样性分析及育种潜力评估[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1057-1072.
[10] 鲁雅妮, 丁超杰, 张煜, 杜习军, 齐学礼, 胡琳, 许为钢. 河南省200份小麦品种苗期茎基腐病抗性鉴定与全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 363-375.
[11] 李诗晴, 王茜, 王素华, 张耀文, 王丽侠. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及相关基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 376-388.
[12] 姬炫彤, 卞春松, 金黎平, 李森, 秦军红, 李广存. 不同耐旱型马铃薯根际微生物对干旱的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 165-177.
[13] 李云香, 郭千纤, 侯万伟, 张小娟. 引进ICARDA小麦苗期根系抗旱性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2387-2398.
[14] 李璐琪, 程宇坤, 白斌, 雷斌, 耿洪伟. 小麦叶片气孔相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2266-2284.
[15] 蔡金珊, 李超男, 王景一, 李宁, 柳玉平, 景蕊莲, 李龙, 孙黛珍. 小麦幼苗根系性状全基因组关联分析及TaSRL-3B优异等位基因发掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2020-2032.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!