欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (02): 284-291.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

麦秸还田及氮肥管理技术对水稻产量的影响

徐国伟;吴长付;刘辉;王志琴;杨建昌*   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理国家重点实验室培育基地,江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2006-04-28 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-02-12 网络出版日期:2007-02-12
  • 通讯作者: 杨建昌

Effects of Wheat Residue Incorporation and Nitrogen Management Techniques on Formation of the Grain Yield of Rice

XU Guo-Wei,WU Chang-Fu,LIU Hui,WANG Zhi-Qin,YANG Jian-Chang*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2006-04-28 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-02-12 Published online:2007-02-12
  • Contact: YANG Jian-Chang

摘要:

以水稻武香粳14和扬粳9538为材,大田设麦秸还田与不还田、不施氮肥、习惯施肥法(FFP)和基于叶绿素仪(SPAD)测定值的氮肥管理(SSNM)等处理。结果表明,SSNM较FFP氮肥施用量减少40.0%~41.7%,而产量平均增加3.81%。秸秆还田的较秸秆未还田的产量平均增加2.49%。氮肥的农学利用率、吸收利用率和生理利用率均以秸秆还田高于秸秆不还田处理。与秸秆未还田或FFP相比,秸秆还田和SSNM降低了生育前期的分蘖数、叶面积指数和干物质积累(但抽穗及以后差异较小);提高了茎蘖成穗率、结实期叶片光合速率和根系活力。说明秸秆还田和SSNM有利于生育后期群体光合生产和提高物质生产效率。秸秆还田和实地氮肥管理提高了氮收获指数和氮肥利用效率。对秸秆还田和SSNM的产量、生育特性及氮肥利用效率进行了讨论。

关键词: 水稻, 麦秸还田, 习惯施肥法, 实地氮肥管理, 产量, 生育特性, 氮肥利用率

Abstract:

The annual total amount of crop residue straw exceeds billion tons in China. However, about 45%–60 % of them are burnt or discarded, which not only wastes organic fertilizer source, but also pollutes the environment. Meanwhile, heavy use of nitrogen fertilizer has become a serious problem in rice production in this country. The purposes of this study were to investigate the effects of wheat straw incorporation to soil and site-specific nitrogen management (SSNM) on the growth and grain yield of rice. Two mid-season japonica rice cultivars, Wuxiangjing 14 and Yangjing 9538, were field-grown with three nitrogen (N) fertilizer treatments, no nitrogen application, farmers’ fertilizer-N practice (FFP), and SSNM base on chlorophyll measurement meter (SPAD) readings. The results showed that, compared with FFP, SSNM reduced N application by 40.0%–41.7% and increased grain yield by 3.81%, on average. The grain yield in the wheat residue-incorporated treatment was 2.49%, on average, higher than that in the residue-removed treatment. The agronomic efficiency, recovery efficiency and physiological efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer under wheat residue incorporation were higher than those under the residue-removed. In comparison with those under the residue removal and FFP, the number of stems and tillers, leaf area index, and biomass accumulation were less or lower under the residue incorporation and SSNM during the early growth period, but the differences were reduced at heading and thereafter. Both the residue incorporation and SSNM increased the percentage of productive tillers, photosynthetic rate of flag leaves and root activities during grain filling. The results suggest that both the residue incorporation and SSNM benefit the photosynthetic production of rice during the later growth period and an increase in the production efficiency. Wheat residue incorporation and SSNM increased nitrogen harvest index and agronomic efficiency, recovery efficiency, physiological efficiency, and partial factor productivity. Reasons for the characteristics of the grain yield, growth and development and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency under the residue incorporation and SSNM were discussed.

Key words: Rice, Wheat residue incorporation, Farmers’ fertilizer-N practice, Site-specific nitrogen management, Grain yield, Growth and development characteristics, Nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency

[1] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[2] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[3] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[4] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[5] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[6] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[7] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[8] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[9] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[10] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[11] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[12] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[13] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[14] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
[15] 王小雷, 李炜星, 欧阳林娟, 徐杰, 陈小荣, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 周大虎, 贺浩华, 孙晓棠, 朱昌兰. 基于染色体片段置换系群体检测水稻株型性状QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1141-1151.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!