欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (03): 507-510.

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同优势抗虫棉杂交组合不同生育期基因表达差异初探

邢朝柱1 ; 喻树迅1,* ; 赵云雷2; 郭立平1 ; 张献龙2; 苗成朵1 ; 王海林1   

  1. 1中国农业科学院棉花研究所,河南安阳455004;2华中农业大学,湖北武汉430070
  • 收稿日期:2006-02-27 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-03-12 网络出版日期:2007-03-12
  • 通讯作者: 喻树迅

Primary Study on Gene Differential Expression of Pest-resistant Cotton Hybrids between Different Heterosis Crosses

XING Chao-Zhu 1;YU Shu-Xun 1,*; ZHAO Yun-Lei 2; GUO Li-Ping 1;ZHANG Xian-Long 2; MIAO Cheng-Duo 1; WANG Hai-Lin 1   

  1. 1 Cotton Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455004, Henan; 2 Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
  • Received:2006-02-27 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-03-12 Published online:2007-03-12
  • Contact: YU Shu-Xun

摘要:

采用DDRT-PCR技术对3个产量优势差异较大的杂交棉组合及其亲本在4个生育期叶片cDNA进行扩增和差显,结果表明,产量高、中、低优势组合与其亲本基因差异表达比例从蕾期到花铃期总体上呈递减趋势;杂种特异表达在前3个生育期高优势组合高于中或低优势组合,特异表达可能对杂种优势的产生起一定作用;单亲表达一致是基因差异表达中最主要表达模式,但在各生育期高、中、低优势组合之间变化幅度较小,表明此模式可能与杂种优势发挥无明显关系。

关键词: 抗虫杂交棉, 杂种优势, 生育期, 基因差异表达

Abstract:

Leaf cDNA of 3 pest-resistant cotton crosses with remarkable different yield heterosis and their parents in 4 growth stages were amplified by DDRT-PCR (The mRNA Differential Display) with 45 primers combinations. The results were as follows: The proportions of genes differential expression between F1 and their parents were degressive tendency from square stage to boll stage in these crosses. The percentages of genes differential expression in the high heterotic cross were higher than those in the low heterotic crosses in four growth stages, which showing a closely relationship between gene differential expression and heterosis occurrence. The percentages of M3 (bands expressed only F1) in the high heterotic crosses surpassed those in middle or low heterotic crosses at three earlier growing stages, which suggested M3 played an important role in yield heterosis occurrence. M4 (bands expressed in one parent and F1) was the main expression pattern in gene differential expression, but varied within narrow range in four growing stages, which indicated no remarkable correlation between yield heterosis and M4.

Key words: Pest-resistant cotton crosses, Heterosis, Growth stages, Gene differential expression

[1] 闫彩霞, 王娟, 赵小波, 宋秀霞, 姜常松, 孙全喜, 苑翠玲, 张浩, 单世华. 全生育期鉴定筛选耐盐碱花生品种[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(3): 556-565.
[2] 向丽媛,徐凯,苏静,吴超,袁雄,郑兴飞,刁英,胡中立,李兰芝. 基于通路分析剖析水稻农艺性状配合力和杂种优势[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1319-1326.
[3] 万泽花,任佰朝,赵斌,刘鹏,张吉旺. 不同熟期夏玉米品种籽粒灌浆脱水特性和激素含量变化[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9): 1446-1453.
[4] 凌霄霞,张作林,翟景秋,叶树春,黄见良. 气候变化对中国水稻生产的影响研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3): 323-334.
[5] 孙现军,姜奇彦,胡正,张惠媛,徐长兵,邸一桓,韩龙植,张辉. 水稻资源全生育期耐盐性鉴定筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(11): 1656-1663.
[6] 黄聪,李晓方,李定国,林忠旭. 利用陆地棉MAGIC群体定位产量、生育期和株高性状的QTL[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(9): 1320-1333.
[7] 邹应斌,黄敏. 转型期作物生产发展的机遇与挑战[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(6): 791-795.
[8] 王琪月, 孟淑君, 张柯, 张战辉, 汤继华, 丁冬. 玉米雌穗发育杂种优势相关miRNA的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(6): 796-813.
[9] 董婧,逯晓萍,张坤明,薛春雷,张瑞霞. 高丹草杂种及其亲本转录组SNP及等位基因特异性表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(12): 1809-1817.
[10] 万泽花,任佰朝,赵斌,刘鹏,董树亭,张吉旺. 不同熟期夏玉米品种籽粒灌浆与脱水特性及其密度效应[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(10): 1517-1527.
[11] 任佰朝**,高飞**,魏玉君,董树亭,赵斌,刘鹏,张吉旺. 冬小麦–夏玉米周年生产条件下夏玉米的适宜熟期与积温需求特性[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(01): 137-143.
[12] 李永辉,陈琳琳,孙炳剑,王利民,邢小萍,袁虹霞,丁胜利*,李洪连*. 假禾谷镰孢侵染小麦后3种植物激素相关基因的差异表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(11): 1632-1642.
[13] 张征,张雪丽,莫博程,代志军,胡中立,李兰芝,郑兴飞. 籼型杂交水稻农艺性状的配合力研究[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(10): 1448-1457.
[14] 杨慧丽,林亚楠,张怀胜,卫晓轶,丁冬,薛亚东. 玉米开花期性状的QTL及杂种优势位点定位[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(05): 678-690.
[15] 于亚辉,刘郁,李振宇,陈广红,徐正进,唐亮,毛艇,徐海. 亲本籼粳成分与两系杂交粳稻杂种优势的关系及遗传基础[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(05): 648-657.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!