欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (05): 678-690.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.00678

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米开花期性状的QTL及杂种优势位点定位

杨慧丽1,林亚楠1,张怀胜1,卫晓轶2,丁冬1,薛亚东1,*   

  1. 1 河南农业大学农学院,河南郑州450002;2 河南省新乡市农业科学院,河南新乡453003
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-04 修回日期:2016-11-02 出版日期:2017-05-12 网络出版日期:2016-11-25
  • 通讯作者: 薛亚东, E-mail: yadongxue@aliyun.com, Tel: 0371-63558122
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目(31271732)和国家重大基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2014CB138203)资助。

Mapping of QTLs and Heterotic Loci for Flowering Time-related Traits in Maize

YANG Hui-Li1,LIN Ya-Nan1,ZHANG Huai-Sheng1,WEI Xiao-Yi2,DING Dong1,XUE Ya-Dong1,*   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China; 2 Xinxiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453003, China
  • Received:2016-06-04 Revised:2016-11-02 Published:2017-05-12 Published online:2016-11-25
  • Contact: Xue Yadong, E-mail: yadongxue@aliyun.com, Tel: 0371-63558122
  • Supported by:

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271732) and the National Key Basic Research Program (2014CB138203).

摘要:

开花期是玉米进化和适应过程中的重要性状,明确开花期杂种优势的遗传机制对培育适应不同生态区的优良玉米品种具有重要的意义。本研究利用以许178为受体,综3为供体构建的包含203个SSSL的单片段代换系群体及其与许178的测交群体,通过2年3个试点玉米开花期性状(散粉期、吐丝期和散粉至吐丝间隔) QTL和杂种优势位点(HL)分析,分别鉴定出40个开花期相关性状的QTL和37个开花期相关性状的HL。其中6个QTL和4个HL在3个地点被同时检测到。在所检测到的染色体区段中,11个区段同时包含调控开花期的QTL和HL。该研究为进一步解析玉米开花期遗传机制和开花期杂种优势的遗传机制提供了基础。

关键词: 玉米, 单片段代换系, 开花期, QTL, 杂种优势

Abstract:

Flowering is an important trait in maize evolution and adaptation. Dissecting the genetic basis of heterosis of flowering will promote the selection for elite hybrids adapted to different ecosystems. In this study, a panel of 203 single segment substitution lines (SSSLs) and its testcross population derived from an elite inbred line Xu178 as recipient parent and inbred line Zong3 as donor parent, were applied for mapping flowering time-related traits in maize. Flowering time-related traits, including days to anthesis (DTA), days to silk (DTA) and anthesis-to-silking interval (ASI), were scored in the two populations at three locations in two years. A total of 40 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and 37 heterosis loci (HLs) for flowering-related traits were detected. Of them, six QTLs and four HLs were detected at the three locations simultaneously. Of all detected chromosomal regions, there were 11 regions in which the genes affected both flowering time-related QTLs and HLs.

Key words: Maize, Single segment substitution line, Flowering time, QTL, Heterosis

[1]Birchler J A, Yao H, Chudalayandi S, Vaiman D, Veitia R A. Heterosis. Pant Cell, 2010, 22: 2105–2112 [2]Zhou G, Chen Y, Yao W, Zhang C, Xie W, Hua J, Xing Y, Xiao J, Zhang Q. Genetic composition of yield heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2012, 109: 15847–15852 [3]Guo X, Guo Y, Ma J, Wang F, Sun M, Gui L, Zhou J, Song X, Sun X, Zhang T. Mapping heterotic loci for yield and agronomic traits using chromosome segment introgression lines in cotton. J Integr Plant Biol, 2013, 55: 759–774 [4]Stuber C W, Lincoln S E, Wolff D W, Helentjaris T, Lander E S. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics, 1992, 132: 823–839 [5]Lariepe A, Mangin B, Jasson S, Combes V, Dumas F, Jamin P, Lariagon C, Jolivot D, Madur D, Fiévet J, Gallais A, Dubreuil P, Charcosset A, Moreau L. The genetic basis of heterosis: multiparental quantitative trait loci mapping reveals contrasted levels of apparent overdominance among traits of agronomical interest in maize (Zea mays L.). Genetics, 2012, 190: 795–811 [6]Lu H, Romero-Severson J, Bernardo R. Genetic basis of heterosis explored by simple sequence repeat markers in a random-mated maize population. Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 107: 494–502 [7]Tang J, Ma X, Teng W, Yan J, Wu W, Dai J, Li J. Detection of quantitative trait loci and heterotic loci for plant height using an immortalized F2 population in maize. Chin Sci Bull, 2007, 52: 477–483 [8]Tang J, Yan J, Ma X, Teng W, Wu W, Dai J, Dhillon B S, Melchinger A E, Li J. Dissection of the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite maize hybrid by QTL mapping in an immortalized F2 population. Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 120: 333–340 [9]Melchinger A E, Utz H F, Piepho H P, Zeng Z B, Schon C C. The role of epistasis in the manifestation of heterosis: A systems-oriented approach. Genetics, 2007, 177: 1815–1825 [10]Groszmann M, Greaves I K, Albertyn Z I, Scofield G N, Peacock W J, Dennis E S. Changes in 24-nt siRNA levels in Arabidopsis hybrids suggest an epigenetic contribution to hybrid vigor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2011, 108: 2617–2622 [11]Li A, Zhou Y, Jin C, Song W, Chen C, Wang C. LaAP2L1, a heterosis-associated AP2/EREBP transcription factor of Larix, increases organ size and final biomass by affecting cell proliferation in arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol, 2013, 54: 1822–1836 [12]Guo M, Rupe M A, Wei J, Winkler C, Goncalves-Butruille M, Weers B P, Cerwick S F, Dieter J A, Duncan K E, Howard R J, Hou Z L, L?ffler C M, Cooper M, Simmons C R. Maize ARGOS1 (ZAR1) transgenic alleles increase hybrid maize yield. J Exp Bot, 2014, 65: 249–260 [13]Zhang Y, Ni Z, Yao Y, Nie X, Sun Q. Gibberellins and heterosis of plant height in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Genet, 2007, 8(1): 40 [14]Ni Z, Kim E D, Ha M, Lackey E, Liu J, Zhang Y, Sun Q, Chen Z J. Altered circadian rhythms regulate growth vigour in hybrids and allopolyploids. Nature, 2009, 457: 327–331 [15]Atwell S, Huang Y S, Vilhjálmsson B J, Willems G, Horton M, Li Y, Meng D, Platt A, Tarone A M, Hu T T, Jiang R, Muliyati N W, Zhang X, Amer M A, Baxter I, Brachi B, Chory J, Dean C, Debieu M, de Meaux J, Echker J R, Faure N, Kniskern J M, Jones J D, Michael T, Nemri A, Roux F, Salt D E, Tang C, Todesco M, Traw M B, Weigel D, Marjoram P, Borevitz J O, Bergelson J, Nordborg M. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature, 2010, 465: 627–631 [16]Buckler E S, Holland J B, Bradbury P J, Acharya C B, Brown P J, Browne C, Ersoz E, Flint-Garcia S, Garcia A, Glaubitz J C, Goodman M M, Harjes C, Guill K, Kroon D E, Larsson S, Lepak N K, Li H H, Mitchell S E, Pressoir G, Peiffer J A, Rosas M O, Rocheford T R, Romay M C, Romero S, Salvo S, Villeda H S, Silva H S, Sun Q, Tian F, Upadyayula N, Ware D, Yates H, Yu J, Zhang Z W, Kresovich S, McMullen M D. The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science, 2009, 325: 714–718 [17]Colasanti J, Yuan Z, Sundaresan V. The indeterminate gene encodes a zinc finger protein and regulates a leaf-generated signal required for the transition to flowering in maize. Cell, 1998, 93: 593–603 [18]Muszynski M G, Dam T, Li B, Shirbroun D M, Hou Z, Bruggemann E, Archibald R, Ananiev E V, Danilevskaya O N. Delayed flowering1 encodes a basic leucine zipper protein that mediates floral inductive signals at the shoot apex in maize. Plant Physiol, 2006, 142: 1523–1536 [19]Salvi S, Sponza G, Morgante M, Tomes D, Niu X, Fengler K A, Meeley R, Ananiev E V, Svitashev S, Bruggemann E, Li B, Hainey C F, Radovic S, Zaina G, Rafalski J A, Tingey S V, Miao G H, Phillips R L, Tuberosa R. Conserved noncoding genomic sequences associated with a flowering-time quantitative trait locus in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 11376–11381 [20]Coles N D, McMullen M D, Balint-Kurti P J, Pratt R C, Holland J B. Genetic control of photoperiod sensitivity in maize revealed by joint multiple population analysis. Genetics, 2010, 184: 799–812 [21]Miller T A, Muslin E H, Dorweiler J E. A maize CONSTANS-like gene, conz1, exhibits distinct diurnal expression patterns in varied photoperiods. Planta, 2008, 227: 1377–1388 [22]Bomblies K. Pleiotropic effects of the duplicate maize FLORICAULA/LEAFY genes zfl1 and zfl2 on traits under selection during maize domestication. Genetics, 2005, 172: 519–531 [23]Meng X, Muszynski M G, Danilevskaya O N. The FT-Like ZCN8 gene functions as a floral activator and is involved in photoperiod sensitivity in maize. Plant Cell, 2011, 23: 942–960 [24]Krieger U, Lippman Z B, Zamir D. The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nat Genet, 2010, 42: 459–463 [25]Jiang K, Liberatore K L, Park S J, Alvarez J P, Lippman Z B. Tomato yield heterosis is triggered by a dosage sensitivity of the florigen pathway that fine-tunes shoot architecture. PLoS Genet, 2013, 9(12): e1004043 [26]Xue W Y, Xing Y Z, Weng X Y, Zhao Y, Tang W J, Wang L, Zhou H J, Yu S B, Xu C G, Li X H, Zhang Q F. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet, 2008, 40: 761–767 [27]张向歌. 基于玉米单片段代换系测交群体的植株性状杂种优势分析. 河南农业大学硕士学位论文, 河南郑州, 2014 Zhang X G. Analysis of Heterotic Loci for Plant Architecture Characters using the Testcross Population of SSSLs in Maize. MS Thesis of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China, 2014 (in Chinese with English abstract) [28]潘家驹. 作物育种学总论. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1994 Pan J J. Crop Breeding. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1994 (in Chinese) [29]Yu S B, Li J X, Xu C G, Tan Y F, Gao Y J, Li X H, Zhang Q, Maroof M A S. Importance of epistasis as the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94: 9226–9231 [30]Causse M A, Fulton T M, Cho Y G, Ahn S N, Chunwongse J, Wu K, Xiao J, Yu Z, Ronald P C, Harrington S E, Second G, McCouch S R, Tanksley S D. Saturated molecular map of the rice genome based on an interspecific backcross population. Genetics, 1994, 138: 1251–1274 [31]Zhu L, Chen J, Li D, Zhang J, Huang Y, Zhao Y, Song Z, Liu Z. QTL mapping for stalk related traits in maize (Zea mays L.) under different densities. J Integr Agric, 2013, 12: 218–228 [32]Li Q C, Li Y X, Yang Z Z, Li Y. QTL mapping for plant height and ear height by using multiple related RIL populations in maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39: 1521–1529 (in Chinese with English abstract) [33]Koester R P, Sisco P H, Stuber C W. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling days to flowering and plant height in two near isogenic lines of maize. Crop Sci, 1993, 33: 1209–1216 [34]Zhang S, Feng L, Xing L, Yang B, Gao X, Zhu X, Zhang T, Zhou B. New QTLs for lint percentage and boll weight mined in introgression lines from two feral landraces into Gossypium hirsutum acc TM-1. Plant Breed, 2016, 135: 90–101 [35]Lu M Y, Li X H, Shang A L, Wang Y M, Xi Z Y. Characterization of a set of chromosome single-segment substitution lines derived from two sequenced elite maize inbred lines. Maydica, 2011, 56: 399–407 [36]毛克举. 玉米染色体单片段代换系的构建与株型和开花期性状的QTL定位. 河南农业大学硕士学位论文, 河南郑州, 2013 Mao K J. Construction of Single Segment Substitution Lines in Maize and QTL Mapping for Flowering Time-related Traits. MS Thesis of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China, 2013 (in Chinese with English abstract) [37]Hua J, Xing Y, Wu W, Xu C, Sun X, Yu S, Zhang Q. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 2574–2579 [38]Qi H H, Huang J, Zheng Q, Huang Y Q, Shao R X, Zhu L Y, Zhang Z X, Qiu F Z, Zhou G C, Zheng Y L, Yue B. Identification of combining ability loci for five yield-related traits in maize using a set of testcrosses with introgression lines. Theor Appl Genet, 2013, 126: 369–377 [39]Liu G, Zhu H, Zhang G, Li L, Ye G. Dynamic analysis of QTLs on tiller number in rice (Oryza sativa L.) with single segment substitution lines. Theor Appl Genet, 2012, 125: 143–153 [40]王智权, 江玲, 尹长斌, 王晓玲, 雷建国, 肖宇龙, 刘喜, 刘世家, 陈明亮, 余传元, 万建民. 水稻产量相关农艺性状杂种优势位点的定位. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27: 569–576 Wang Z Q, Jiang L, Yin C B, Wang X L, Lei J G, Xiao Y L, Liu X, Liu S J, Chen M L, Yu C Y, Wan J M. QTL mapping of heterotic loci for yield-related traits in rice. Chin J Rice Sci, 2013, 27: 569–576 (in Chinese with English abstract) [41]郭战勇, 吕盼晴, 张向歌, 孙高阳, 王洪秋, 李卫华, 付志远, 汤继华. 利用单片段代换系的测交群体定位玉米籽粒性状杂种优势位点. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49: 621–631 Guo Z Y, Lyu P Q, Zhang X G, Sun G Y, Wang H Q, Li W H, Fu Z Y, Tang J H. Identification of heterotic loci for kernel-related traits using a maize introgression lines test population. Sci Agric Sin, 2016, 49: 621–631 (in Chinese with English abstract) [42]彭倩, 薛亚东, 张向歌, 李慧敏, 孙高阳, 李卫华, 谢慧玲, 汤继华. 利用单片段代换系测交群体定位玉米产量相关性状的杂种优势位点. 作物学报, 2016, 42: 482–491 Peng Q, Xue Y D, Zhang X G, Li H M, Sun G Y, Li W H, Xie H L, Tang J H. Identification of heterotic loci for yield and ear traits using t SSSLs test population in maize. Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42: 482–491 (in Chinese with English abstract) [43]Wei X, Wang B, Peng Q, Wei F, Mao K, Zhang X, Sun P, Liu Z, Tang J. Heterotic loci for various morphological traits of maize detected using a single segment substitution lines test-cross population. Mol Breed [Internet], 2015, [cited 2016 Mar 8] 35(3) Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11032-015-0287-4 [44]李卓坤, 谢全刚, 朱占玲, 刘金良, 韩淑晓, 田宾, 袁倩倩, 田纪春. 基于QTL 定位分析小麦株高的杂种优势. 作物学报, 2010, 36: 771–778 Li Z K, Xie Q G, Zhu Z L, Liu J L, Han S X, Tian B, Yuan Q Q, Tian J C. Analysis of plant height heterosis based on QTL mapping in wheat. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36: 771–778 (in Chinese with English abstract) [45]Wei X, Lu X, Zhang Z, Xu M, Mao K, Li W, Wei F, Sun P, Tang J. Genetic analysis of heterosis for maize grain yield and its components in a set of SSSL testcross populations. Euphytica [Internet], 2016, [cited 2016 Jun 4] Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10681-016-1695-1 [46]Sch?n C C, Dhillon B S, Utz H F, Melchinger A E. High congruency of QTL positions for heterosis of grain yield in three crosses of maize. Theor Appl Genet, 2010, 120: 321–332 [47]Schnable P S, Springer N M. Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2013, 64: 71–88 [48]Shen G, Zhan W, Chen H, Xing Y. Dominance and epistasis are the main contributors to heterosis for plant height in rice. Plant Sci, 2014, 215/216: 11–18

[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 彭佳泺, 李颖, 李丹丹, 杨军宁, 郭学峰, 张文姣, 俞晓雪, 周亚荣, 王振玉, 王彩香, 马雄风, 宿俊吉. 陆地棉I类LBD家族成员鉴定及GhLBD6调控开花期的功能和单倍型分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1682-1697.
[3] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[4] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[5] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[6] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[7] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[8] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[9] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[10] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[11] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[12] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[13] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[14] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[15] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!