欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2007, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (09): 1411-1418.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

辽宁水稻穗型分类及其与产量和品质的关系

徐正进1;陈温福1;韩勇2;邵国军2;张文忠1;马殿荣1   

  1. 1 沈阳农业大学水稻研究所/农业部作物生理生态与遗传育种重点开放实验室/辽宁省北方粳稻育种重点实验室,辽宁沈阳110161;2 辽宁省水稻研究所,辽宁沈阳110101
  • 收稿日期:2007-01-16 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-09-12 网络出版日期:2007-09-12
  • 通讯作者: 徐正进

Classification of Panicle Type and Its Relationship with Grain Yield and Quality of Rice in Liaoning Province

XU Zheng-Jin1,CHEN Wen-Fu1,HAN Yong2,SHAO Guo-Jun2,ZHANG Wen-Zhong1,MA Dian-Rong1   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture/Key Laboratory of Northern Japonica Rice Breeding of Liaoning /Rice Institute of Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, Liaoning; 2 Rice Institute of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110161, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2007-01-16 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2007-09-12 Published online:2007-09-12
  • Contact: XU Zheng-Jin

摘要:

以辽宁省近年来育成的40个水稻品种为试材,研究了穗部性状的品种间差异、穗型分类方法及其与穗部性状、产量和品质的关系。结果表明,调查的13项穗部性状的品种间差异均达到极显著水平;以单穗重、着粒密度、穗直立程度和穗型指数为指标,分别将试材划分为重、中、轻,密、中、稀,直、半、弯,上、中、下4类各3种穗型;总体看重穗型有与密穗型相对应的趋势,共同特点是穗数少而一次枝梗数和每穗粒数多,着粒密度大,二次枝梗粒数及其占每穗粒数的比率(二次粒率)高,结实性特别是二次枝梗结实性差,因而产量潜力较高但是品质较差;直立穗型与重穗型和密穗型的对应关系不如前两者之间明显,在穗数、一次枝梗数、每穗粒数、着粒密度等方面与重穗型和密穗型相似,但是二次粒率低,结实率高,加工品质、外观品质和食味品质都优于重穗型和密穗型;上部优势型在结实性和品质性状上有明显优势,但是产量较低。因此,直立穗型与上部优势型相结合将有利于北方粳稻产量和品质的协调统一。

关键词: 水稻, 穗部性状, 穗型, 产量, 品质

Abstract:

Panicle is one of the important objective for improving the plant type of rice. Studying on the panicle traits were lagged behind compared with studying on the culm and leaf. Recent years, studying on the effect of panicle traits on seed setting ability and yield increased, but little of reports could be found in integrative comparing with the classification in different panicle type and studying on the relationship of panicle type with yield and quality. In this paper, 40 rice cultivars bred during recent years in Liaoning were used to study panicle character differences, panicle type classification and their relationships with grain yield and quality for providing the theoritic basis to improve panicle type. The results showed that 13 panicle traits varied significantly among cultivars. The tested cultivars were classified into heavy panicle type (HPT), middle panicle type (MPT), and thin panicle type (TPT) according to panicle weight; dense panicle type (DPT), semi-dense panicle type (SDPT) and loose panicle type (LPT) according to grains density; erect panicle type (EPT), semi-erect panicle type (SEPT), and curved panicle type (CPT) according to panicle-neck curvature (PNC); superior-on-the-up-part type (SUT), superior-on-the-middle-part type (SMT), and superior-on-the-low-part type (SLT) according to panicle trait index (PTI), respectively. The panicle characters of HPT were similar to those of DPT, with fewer panicles per plant, more grains per panicle, higher grain density, higher ratio of secondary branch grains/total grains, lower seed-setting rate, which resulted in the higher yield and inferior grain quality. Relation of EPT with HPT or DPT was not as significant as that of HPT with DPT. The panicle number, primary branches, grains per panicle, grain density of EPT were similar to those of HPT or DPT. EPT had lower ratio of secondary branch grains to total grains per panicle, but higher seed setting rate, which resulted in that the processing qualities, appearance qualities and eating qualities of erect panicle rice cultivars were superior to those of heavy panicle type and compact panicle type rice cultivars. SUT cultivars had higher seed setting rate and better quality characters, but lower grain yield. Therefore, it may be advantageous for harmonizing yield and quality by combining EPT with SUT.

Key words: Rice, Character of panicle, Panicle type, Yield, Quality

[1] 胡文静, 李东升, 裔新, 张春梅, 张勇. 小麦穗部性状和株高的QTL定位及育种标记开发和验证[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1346-1356.
[2] 田甜, 陈丽娟, 何华勤. 基于Meta-QTL和RNA-seq的整合分析挖掘水稻抗稻瘟病候选基因[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1372-1388.
[3] 郑崇珂, 周冠华, 牛淑琳, 和亚男, 孙伟, 谢先芝. 水稻早衰突变体esl-H5的表型鉴定与基因定位[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1389-1400.
[4] 周文期, 强晓霞, 王森, 江静雯, 卫万荣. 水稻OsLPL2/PIR基因抗旱耐盐机制研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1401-1415.
[5] 郑小龙, 周菁清, 白杨, 邵雅芳, 章林平, 胡培松, 魏祥进. 粳稻不同穗部籽粒的淀粉与垩白品质差异及分子机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1425-1436.
[6] 王丹, 周宝元, 马玮, 葛均筑, 丁在松, 李从锋, 赵明. 长江中游双季玉米种植模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1437-1450.
[7] 王旺年, 葛均筑, 杨海昌, 阴法庭, 黄太利, 蒯婕, 王晶, 汪波, 周广生, 傅廷栋. 大田作物在不同盐碱地的饲料价值评价[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1451-1462.
[8] 颜佳倩, 顾逸彪, 薛张逸, 周天阳, 葛芊芊, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 顾骏飞, 杨建昌, 周振玲, 徐大勇. 耐盐性不同水稻品种对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机制[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1463-1475.
[9] 杨欢, 周颖, 陈平, 杜青, 郑本川, 蒲甜, 温晶, 杨文钰, 雍太文. 玉米-豆科作物带状间套作对养分吸收利用及产量优势的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1476-1487.
[10] 陈静, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 叶面喷施甜菜碱对不同播期夏玉米产量形成及抗氧化能力的调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1502-1515.
[11] 李祎君, 吕厚荃. 气候变化背景下农业气象灾害对东北地区春玉米产量影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(6): 1537-1545.
[12] 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1037-1050.
[13] 石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 周永瑾, 李荣. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297.
[14] 杨德卫, 王勋, 郑星星, 项信权, 崔海涛, 李生平, 唐定中. OsSAMS1在水稻稻瘟病抗性中的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1119-1128.
[15] 朱峥, 王田幸子, 陈悦, 刘玉晴, 燕高伟, 徐珊, 马金姣, 窦世娟, 李莉云, 刘国振. 水稻转录因子WRKY68在Xa21介导的抗白叶枯病反应中发挥正调控作用[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1129-1140.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!