欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (08): 1299-1307.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01299

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学 •    下一篇

利用BC2F2高代回交群体定位水稻籽粒大小和形状QTL

陈冰嬬1;石英尧3;崔金腾1;钱益亮3;刘海燕1;张力科1;王辉1;高用明1,*;朱苓华1;黎志康1,2   

  1. 1 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所, 北京100081; 2 International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box7777, Metro Manila, Philippines; 3 安徽农业大学农学院, 安徽合肥230036
  • 收稿日期:2008-01-24 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-08-12 网络出版日期:2008-08-12
  • 通讯作者: 高用明

QTL Detection of Grain Size and Shape with BC2F2 Advanced Backcross Population of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

CHEN Bing-Xu1,SHI Ying-Yao3,CUI Jin-Teng1,QIAN Yi-Liang3,LIU Hai-Yan1,ZHANG Li-Ke1,WANG Hui1,GAO Yong-Ming1*,ZHU Ling-Hua1,LI Zhi-Kang12   

  1. 1 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 2 International Rice Research Institute, DAPO Box7777, Metro Manila, Philippines; 3 Agricultural College, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, Anhui, China
  • Received:2008-01-24 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-08-12 Published online:2008-08-12
  • Contact: GAO Yong-Ming

摘要: 以我国优良籼稻恢复系蜀恢527为轮回亲本, 以来自菲律宾的Milagrosa为供体亲本, 培育了样本容量为199株的BC2F2高代回交群体。选取85个均匀分布在12条染色体上的多态性SSR标记进行基因型分析, 同时对粒长、粒宽、长宽比和千粒重4种性状进行了表型鉴定。采用性状-标记间的单向和双向方差分析对上述性状进行了QTL定位。单向方差分析(P<0.01)共检测到了10个控制粒长、粒宽、长宽比和千粒重的QTL, 其中有3个具有多效性。由于粒长和长宽比的高度相关性, 控制长宽比的2个QTL均能在粒长QTL中检测到。位于第3染色体着丝粒区域的qgl3b是一个控制粒长、长宽比和千粒重的主效QTL, 它可以分别解释粒长、长宽比和千粒重表型变异的29.37%、26.15%和17.15%。该QTL对于粒长、长宽比和千粒重均表现较大的加性效应(来自蜀恢527的等位基因为增效)和负向超显性。位于第8染色体的qgw8位点是一个控制粒宽的主效QTL, 同时也是控制千粒重的微效QTL, 能解释粒宽表型变异的21.47%和千粒重表型变异的5.16%。该QTL对粒宽和千粒重均具有较大的加性效应(来自蜀恢527的等位基因为增效)和正向部分显性。双向方差分析(P<0.005)共检测到61对显著的上位性互作, 涉及54个QTL, 其中23个是能同时影响2~4个性状的多效位点, 且有8个位点与单向方差分析检测到的相同。控制长宽比的13对上位性互作位点中, 与控制粒长的上位性互作位点完全相同的有8对。以上结果为进一步开展水稻籽粒大小和形状有利基因的精细定位、克隆和分子设计育种奠定了基础。

关键词: 水稻, 粒长, 粒宽, 长宽比, 千粒重, QTL定位

Abstract: The traditional mapping population with complicated genetic backbround is usually derived from a cross between two parents with a lot of unfavorable agronomic traits. The identified QTLs by traditional mapping can not be applied in genetic improvement of crops due to complicated interactions between QTLs and genetic background. The advanced backcross method for QTL mapping with elite variety as recurrent parent could partially eliminate the background effects and integrate QTL mapping with genetic breeding. In present study, using Shuhui 527, an elite indica restorer in China as recurrent parent and Milagrosa from Philippines as donor, the BC2F2 advanced backcross population with 199 individuals was developed. A total of 85 polymorphic SSR markers evenly distributed on 12 chromosomes were applied to genotype the mapping population. The grain length, grain width, ratio of grain length to width and thousand grain weight of the parents and the BC2F2 population were evaluated after har-vesting. The QTL identification of the above traits was conducted by one-way ANOVA (for single QTL) and two-way ANOVA (for digenic epistatic interaction loci). Among ten QTLs for grain length, grain width, ratio of grain length to width and thousand grain weight detected by one-way ANOVA (P<0.01), there were three pleiotropic QTLs. QTLs for ratio of grain length to width could be identified in QTLs for grain length due to highly close relationship between them. The results in present study indicated that qgl3b on chromosome 3 was a major QTL controlling grain length, ratio of grain length to width and thousand grain weight, which explained 29.37%, 26.15%, and 17.15% of phenotypic variation of the three traits and showed large additive effects (posi-tive allele from Shuhui 527) and negative overdominant effects, qgw8 was also a major QTL controlling grain width with 21.47% contribution to phenotypic variation and a minor QTL controlling thousand grain weight with 5.16% contribution to phenotypic variation. It had large additive effects (positive allele from Shuhui 527) and positive partial dominant effects in both traits. Two-way ANOVA (P<0.005) showed 61 pairs of digenic epistatic interactions involved in 54 QTLs among which 23 loci had pleiotropism affecting two to four traits and eight loci were the same as those detected by one-way ANOVA. It was observed that eight of thirteen pairs of digenic epistatic interactions related to ratio of grain length to width could be found in grain length. The results above will lay a good foundation in fine mapping, cloning and designed molecular breeding of favorable genes related to rice grain size and shape.

Key words: Rice (Oryza sativa L.), Grain length, Grain width, Ratio of length and width, Thousand grain weight, QTL detection

[1] 郑玉珍, 齐飞艳, 孙子淇, 刘华, 秦利, 石磊, 王娟, 汪蒙蒙, 韩锁义, 徐静, 苗利娟, 黄冰艳, 董文召, 郑峥, 张新友. 花生籽仁总超长链脂肪酸和7种脂肪酸组分的QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1646-1657.
[2] 胡赵, 钱润, 谢丰璞, 应素平. 水稻SPX基因家族鉴定及响应磷处理的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1902-1912.
[3] 邹仪妹, 徐敏, 汪海洋, 姚辉, 王加峰, 刘浩, 任代胜. 两系不育系水稻幼苗根系响应盐胁迫的转录因子调控网络鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1728-1742.
[4] 闫安, 蒋昆炜, 王蓉圆, 田林, 张璐, 王韵, 徐建龙. 水稻剑叶小维管束数基因SVN7的鉴定与克隆[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1364-1372.
[5] 陈伟, 卫万娟, 赵其兵, 常东伟, 余凌波, 翟鹏飞, 冯志明, 陈宗祥, 任仰涛, 杨鹏, 刘海浪, 李珍富, 杨永乐, 金彦刚, 左示敏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9编辑Hd6基因创制优质早熟水稻新种质[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1046-1056.
[6] 石少阶, 刘凯, 陈姿夷, 王卉颖, 李三和, 周雷, 游艾青. 水稻矮化多分蘖基因DMT1的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1022-1034.
[7] 覃奕琰, 付瑶, 苏畅, 李娜, 徐静茹, 程笑然, 张琪, 赵明辉. OsST41调控水稻苗期耐盐性的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 802-812.
[8] 刘长友, 王珅, 时会影, 沈颖超, 孙蕾, 王彦, 张志肖, 苏秋竹, 田静, 范保杰. 基于饭豆基因资源的小豆远缘杂交群体抗豆象QTL定位[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 936-944.
[9] 叶凡, 李帅, 李思宇, 陈云, 窦超银, 刘立军. 不同节水灌溉方式对东北稻区水稻产量和群体质量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 895-907.
[10] 王婵, 吴莹莹, 李文奇, 李霞, 王芳权, 周彤, 杨杰. 基于HRM技术开发水稻抗条纹叶枯病基因STV11功能标记[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2547-2556.
[11] 陈惠莹, 何嘉欣, 朱斌, 黄士轩, 周星佑, 伍君权, 杨美艳. 水稻黄单胞菌噬菌体vB_XaS_HDB2的全基因组分析和生物学特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(8): 2087-2099.
[12] 胡蒙, 沙丹, 张晟瑞, 谷勇哲, 张世碧, 李静, 孙君明, 邱丽娟, 李斌. 大豆分枝数QTL定位及候选基因筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1747-1756.
[13] 邵顺伟, 陈卓, 兰振东, 蔡兴奎, 邹华芬, 李晨曦, 唐景华, 朱熙, 张彧, 董建科, 金辉, 宋波涛. 基于BSA-seq技术的块茎芽眼深度QTL定位分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1725-1735.
[14] 杨海洋, 吴林宣, 李博纹, 石翰峰, 袁禧龙, 刘金朝, 蔡海荣, 陈诗怡, 郭涛, 王慧. 基于QTL定位发现的OsWRI3调控水稻种子的落粒性[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(7): 1712-1724.
[15] 雷松翰, 范骏扬, 车艳奕, 代永东, 郑雨萌, 田维江, 桑贤春, 王晓雯. 水稻内卷叶突变体acl3的鉴定及调控基因的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(6): 1467-1479.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!