欢迎访问作物学报,今天是

作物学报 ›› 2008, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 2010-2018.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.02010

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

用株高旱胁迫系数分析小麦发育中的抗旱性动态

武仙山;王正航;昌小平;景蕊莲   

  1. 国家基因资源与遗传改良重大科学工程 / 农业部作物种质资源与生物技术重点实验室/中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2008-02-29 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-11-13 网络出版日期:2008-09-06
  • 通讯作者: 景蕊莲
  • 基金资助:

    国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2006AA100201);国家科技支撑计划项目(2007BAD69B01-6)

Dynamics of Drought Resistance Based on Drought Stress Coefficient Derived from Plant Height in Wheat Development

WU Xian-Shan,WANG Zheng-Hang,CHANG Xiao-Ping,JING Rui-Lian*   

  1. National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement / Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm and Biotechnology, Ministry of Agriculture / Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2008-02-29 Revised:1900-01-01 Published:2008-11-13 Published online:2008-09-06
  • Contact: JING Rui-Lian

摘要:

以小麦DH群体(旱选10号 × 鲁麦14)为材料,根据雨养(DS)和灌溉(WW)条件下5个年点环境中5个发育时期的株高估算反映材料发育过程中抗旱能力的旱胁迫系数(DS|WW),分析抗旱性的动态关系。结果表明,在不同年点环境间,不同发育时期的条件旱胁迫系数(CDS|CWW)、非条件旱胁迫系数(UDS|UWW)间存在显著差异,但发育中后期的抗旱性在部分年点环境中趋于一致。各个年点不同发育时期DS|WW间的10个相关系数,UDS|UWW间除Ch05环境的5个相关系数不显著外,其他所有相关系数均达显著水平;而CDS|CWW间仅3~6个相关系数显著,相邻发育时段之间的抗旱性关系密切。同时,任一时期的UDS|UWW总与其前面至少一个时段的CDS|CWW呈显著正相关,表明某发育时期的抗旱性可归因于该时期之前的一个或几个时段的抗旱性。通径分析结果表明,出苗至拔节期(CDS1|CWW1)、抽穗至开花期(CDS5|CWW5)的抗旱性对成熟期株高具有重要作用。

关键词: 小麦, 株高, 抗旱性, 发育, 环境

Abstract:

Plant height is a crucial agronomic trait for grain yield in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). To detect changes of drought resistance in wheat development, drought stress coefficient (DS|WW) was calculated in five environments (year &#61620; experimental site) based on plant heights of 150 doubled haploid (DH) lines derived from Hanxuan 10× Lumai 14 at five measuring stages using conditional analysis method. The plant heights were measured every 7 d from jointing to flowering (S1–S5) in both rain-fed (drought stress, DS) and well-watered (WW) conditions in five environments including Fenyang, Shanxi in 2001 (F01), Haidian, Beijing in 2005 (H05) and 2006 (H06), Changping, Beijing in 2005 (Ch05) and 2006 (Ch06). DS|WW is the special responding of plant height to DS condition relative to WW condition. Unconditional drought stress coefficient (UDS|UWW) represents drought resistance before time t, and conditional drought stress coefficient (CDS|CWW) represents drought resistance within the period from time(t-1) to t. In all five environments, the plant heights were significantly lower under DS than under WW at all five stages (P<0.005). The largest plant height difference between under DS and under WW appeared in F01. The differences among environments for both UDS|UWW and CDS|CWW at each developmental stage were significant at P<0.0001. However, the result from multiple comparison analysis showed that part differences between environments in the same experimental site or year after S2 were insignificant, such as UDS3|UWW3 between H06 and Ch06, UDS5|UWW5 between H05 and H06. The significant positive correlations were detected for UDS|UWW between stages except five of ten correlation coefficients in Ch05. Poor correlations were observed for CDS|CWW between stages, however, the correlations between the adjacent stages appeared closer. In all environments, the significant positive correlations were always detected between UDS|UWW at time t and CDS|CWW before time t in one or more periods, indicating that the drought resistance at time t might partially attribute to that before time t. Path analysis suggested that drought resistance before jointing stage (CDS1|CWW1) and from heading to flowering (CDS5|CWW5) might play important roles for plant height at maturity, so, an ample supply of water at these periods are helpful for gaining higher yield.

Key words: Wheat, Plant height, Drought resistance, Development, Environment

[1] 翟胜男, 曹新有, 李豪圣, 李吉虎, 李法计, 刘金栋, 夏先春, 吕莹莹, 马瑞峰, 王颖, 耿洪伟, 刘建军. 小麦Pod-A1、Pod-D1和Pod-2D位点等位变异对籽粒过氧化物酶活性的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1593-1603.
[2] 习千辉, 徐梓瑗, 刘梦梦, 王宏艺, 郎凯琳, 井震海, 陈锋, 赵磊. 小麦籽粒铜含量的全基因组关联分析及候选基因预测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1604-1617.
[3] 毛嘉琦, 黄朋雨, 赵佳佳, 郑兴卫, 武棒棒, 郝宇琼, 屈非, 刘成, 马朋涛, 郑军. 山西小麦品种白粉病抗性评价及抗病基因分子检测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1669-1681.
[4] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[5] 胡川, 赵凯男, 黄修利, 吴金芝, 任开明, 王贺正, 付国占, 黄明, 李友军. 一次灌溉下耕作方式和氮肥用量对旱地小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1830-1846.
[6] 陈雪燕, 何华川, 李政嘉, 董新盼, 李藕琪, 刘小云, 李丹萍, 陈志伟, 刘国霞, 吕胜源, 吴印莹, 赵振东, 曹新有, 万何平. 水培盐碱复合胁迫下‘济麦60’苗期根系有机酸分泌动态变化及其转录调控机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1859-1875.
[7] 高沛阳, 李瑾璇, 董宇奎, 石玉, 张振, 张永丽. 测墒补灌下小麦分蘖发生和成穗对施氮量的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1847-1858.
[8] 唐宽强, 李公允, 宋美毅, 赵雪, 常春玲. 大豆株高性状全基因组关联分析及预测模型构建[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1743-1756.
[9] 张献丰, 郭利建, 李康春, 孔斌雪, 刘玉芳, 车卓, 杨德龙. 小麦ABHD6基因家族鉴定与粒重功能标记开发[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1711-1727.
[10] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[11] 王壮壮, 武紫君, 张永新, 张芯源, 袁丽雪, 陈如雪, 刘世举, 段剑钊, 冯伟, 王同朝, 王永华. 豫东南黏壤潮土区水氮优化协同提高冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1501-1521.
[12] 何万龙, 耿洪伟, 张飞飞, 米克热阿依·阿巴白克热, 罗紫洋, 李鹏程, 周钊宇, 程宇坤. 基于深度学习的小麦重要病害图像识别系统的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1401-1417.
[13] 张曦, 王广恩, 李邵琦, 刘祎, 李俊兰, 钱玉源. 基于转录组测序解析陆海杂交姊妹系马克隆值差异的形成机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1442-1458.
[14] 张振, 冯连杰, 石玉, 于振文, 张永丽. 节水补灌下不同穗型小麦产量形成差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1522-1535.
[15] 侯思宇, 王国璀, 韦金贵, 谢玮欣, 殷文, 樊志龙, 柴强, 胡发龙. 绿肥配施化学氮肥对西北干旱灌区小麦干物质积累及产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1208-1219.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!