欢迎访问作物学报，今天是
作物学报

作物学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (12): 2252-2257.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.02252

• 耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米茎秆糖含量的分布

卞云龙，杜凯，王益军，邓德祥*   

  1. 扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理重点实验室，江苏扬州225009
  • 收稿日期:2009-04-21 修回日期:2009-08-20 出版日期:2009-12-10 网络出版日期:2009-10-13
  • 通讯作者: 邓德祥，Tel: 0514-87979082
  • 基金资助:

    本研究由国家自然科学基金项目（30771353）和江苏省自然科学基金项目（BK2007078）资助。

Distribution of Sugar Content in Corn Stalk

BIAN Yun-Long,DU Kai,WANG Yi-Jun,DENG De-Xiang*   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province，Yangzhou University，Yangzhou 225009，China
  • Received:2009-04-21 Revised:2009-08-20 Published:2009-12-10 Published online:2009-10-13
  • Contact: DENG De-Xiang，Tel: 0514-87979082

PDF

2345

被引次数

19

摘要：

利用手持糖度计(PAL-1)，2年7个时期测定3 种不同基因型玉米茎秆糖含量(Brix %)，以研究玉米不同节间、不同测定时期、不同类型间茎秆糖含量的变化规律。结果表明: (1)从植株基部到顶部各节间糖含量呈现增加趋势，但多以穗位或穗位上下一节间糖含量最高。苏玉16(普通玉米)、05-8(普甜玉米)和扬甜1号(超甜玉米)节间糖含量和节间位置的非线性方程分别为Y = 5.0277 exp(0.020564X - 0.017816X2)、Y = 8.8489exp(0.05949X - 0.006454X2)、Y = 9.6652 exp(0.06944X - 0.009475X2)。(2)随着生育进程的推进，苏玉16(普通玉米)茎秆糖含量表现为低-高-低的变化，而05-8和扬甜1号生育后期茎秆糖含量没有下降反而呈上升趋势，这可能与甜玉米的灌浆特性有关。(3)通过系统分组资料方差分析，3个品种的茎秆糖含量存在极显著差异，且普通玉米＜普甜玉米＜超甜玉米，不同节间、不同测定时期玉米茎秆糖含量差异也达极显著水平。(4)去雌可以显著提高茎秆含糖量，籽粒库容量对茎秆含糖量的分布也有影响。

关键词: 玉米, 茎秆与节间, 糖分含量, 系统分组资料方差分析

Abstract:

Increasing the sugar content in silage corn stalk will improve the forage quality and palatability, the study on which can provide valuable information for silage corn breeding on stalk high sugar content. Three different genotypes, normal corn “Suyu 16”, sweet corn “05-8” and super sweet corn ‘Yangtian 1’, were investigated in this study. The sugar content (Brix values) of corn stalk was evaluated at seven stages using the pocket refractometer PAL-1. Results of two-year experiment were as follows: (1) Sugar content of corn stalk increased with the position of internodes from bottom to top, usually with the highest in ear internode or the internodes immediately above or below it. The relationship between sugar content and internode position varied from different genotypes and were modeled using the following three nonlinear equations: Y = 5.0277 exp(0.020564X - 0.017816X2) for Suyu 16, Y = 8.8489 exp(0.05949X - 0.006454X2) for 05-8 and Y = 9.6652 exp(0.06944X - 0.009475X2) for Yangtian 1, respectively. (2) The stalk sugar content of “Suyu 16” changed in a single peak curve, decreased at late growing stage. However, the stalk sugar content of “05-8” and “Yangtian 1” was increased at late growing stage. The difference of stalk sugar content may be related to the grain filling characteristics of the three genotypes. (3) Results of variance analysis of nested design indicated highly significant variation for sugar content of stalk among three corn genotypes, the total sugar content was the highest in super sweet corn, and the second highest in sweet corn. Moreover, sugar contents significantly varied depending on different internodes and different measurement stages. (4) Removing ear resulted in the increased sugar content in corn stalk. Additionally, the kernel sink-potential may influence the accumulation of sugar in corn stalk.

Key words: Stalk and internodes, Sugar content, Variance Analysis of nested design, Corn

[1] Johnson L M, Harrison J H, Davidson D, Mahanna W C, Shinners K. Corn silage management: effects of hybrid, maturity, inoculation, and mechanical processing on fermentation characteristics. J Dairy Sci, 2003, 86: 287-308
[2] McDonald P, Henderson N, Heron S J E. The Biochemistry ofSilage, 2nd edn. Marlow, United Kingdom: Chalcombe Publications, 1991. pp 70-120
[3] Kleinschmit D H, Schmidt R J, Kung Jr L. The effects of various antifungal additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage. J Dairy Sci, 2005, 88: 2130-2139
[4] Zhang D-Y(张德玉), Li Z-Q(李忠秋), Liu C-L(刘春龙). Progress in the study of infection factors on silage quality.Acta Ecol Anim Domastic (家畜生态学报), 2007, 28(1): 109-112 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5] Froetschel M A, Ely L O, Amos H E. Effects of additives and growth environment on preservation and digestibility of wheat silage fed to Holstein heifers. J Dairy Sci, 1991, 74: 546-556

[6] Bai Q-L(白琪林), Chen S-J(陈绍江), Dai J-R(戴景瑞). Stalk quality traits and their correlations of maize inbred lines in China. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2007, 33(11): 1777-1781 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7] Shi M-L(石明亮), Zhu G-Q(朱国强), Chen G-Y(陈桂银), Xue L(薛林), Hu J-R(胡加如), Yin Z-T(印志同), Chen G-Q(陈国清), Lu H-H(陆虎华). Discussion for objectives and methods of silage maize breeding.Jiangsu Agric Sci (江苏农业科学), 2005, (1): 36-38 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8] Welton F A, Morris V H, Hartzler A J. Distribution of moisture, dry matter and sugars in the maturing corn stem. Plant Physiol, 1930, 5: 555-564

[9] Van Reen R, Singleton W R. Sucrose content in the stalks of maize inbreds. Agron J, 1952, 44: 610-614

[10] Widstrom N W, Carr M E, Bagby M O, Black L T. Distribution of sugar and soluble solids in the maize stalk. Crop Sci, 1988, 28: 861-863

[11] Bian Y L, Yazaki S J, Inoue M K, Cai H W. QTLs for sugar content of stalk in sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Agric Sci China, 2006, 5: 736-744

[12] Hume D J, Campbell D K. Accumulation and translocation of soluble solids in corn stalks. Can J Plant Sci, 1972, 52: 363-368

[13] Sayre J D, Morris V H, Richey F D. The effect of preventing fruiting and of reducing the leaf area on accumulation of sugars in the corn stem. J Am Soc Agron, 1931, 23: 751-753
[14] Li X-T(李向拓), Wu Q-M(吴权明), Mao J-C(毛建昌). Research progress and demanded characters of forage maize breeding. Acta Agric Boreali-Occident Sin (西北农业学报), 2003, 12(2): 36-40 (in Chinese with English abstract)
[1] 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901.
[2] 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801.
[3] 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308.
[4] 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325.
[5] 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500.
[6] 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590.
[7] 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352.
[8] 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364.
[9] 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180.
[10] 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005.
[11] 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021.
[12] 马亮, 马璐, 张舒钰, 章慧敏, 王仁明, 宋旭东, 张振良, 冒宇翔, 陆虎华, 陈国清, 郝德荣, 周广飞. 玉米苞叶数目转录组分析及候选基因鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 790-801.
[13] 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779.
[14] 李新浩, 邢梦柯, 周梓惠, 李思烨, 任昊, 王洪章, 赖华江. 外源褪黑素通过协调光反应与暗反应增强玉米苗期的耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 839-856.
[15] 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
京ICP备15008789号-2