作物学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (08): 1415-1422.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01415
冯汉宇,王志敏,孔凡娜,张敏洁,周顺利*
FENG Han-Yu,WANG Zhi-Min,KONG Fan-Na,ZHANG Min-Jie,ZHOU Shun-Li*
摘要: 以郑单958和超试1号为材料,通过控制玉米果穗底部花丝不授粉使顶部籽粒正常结实,比较研究了玉米籽粒早期碳、氮含量动态变化及其与败育的关系。结果表明,控制底部花丝不授粉,提高了顶部穗轴的可溶性糖浓度,增加了对顶部籽粒的物质供应,顶部籽粒的可溶性糖、蔗糖含量提高,淀粉快速积累,顶部籽粒的氮含量增加,籽粒C/N比值提高,籽粒重量快速增加,发育转为正常,表现出与中部籽粒一致的碳、氮变化动态特征以及籽粒生长动态;相反,统一完全授粉处理顶部穗轴的可溶性糖浓度低,顶部籽粒的物质供应少,可溶性糖、蔗糖含量低,淀粉含量提高缓慢,氮含量也较低,籽粒的C/N比值偏低,表现为粒重增加缓慢,最后败育。2个品种表现出一致的规律性。总之,玉米顶部籽粒的正常发育伴随着碳、氮等物质的充足供应,物质供应不足可能是顶部籽粒不能正常发育的根本原因。
| [1]Reed A J, Singletary G W. Roles of carborhydrate supply and phytohormones in maize kernel abortion. Plant Physiol, 1989, 91: 986–921 [2]Mozafar A. Kernel abortion and distribution of mineral elements along the maize ear. Agron J, 1990, 82: 511–514 [3]Jonathan M H, Jones R J. Kernel abortion in maize. Plant Physiol, 1986, 81: 503–510 [4]Wang Z-X(王忠孝), Gao X-Z(高学曾), Xu J-F(许金芳), Liu Y-J(刘玉敬), Luo Y-N(罗瑶年). A study on the grain abortion of maize (Zea mays L.). Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 1986, 19(6): 36–40 (in Chinese with English abstract) [5]Zhang F-L(张风路), Wang Z-M(王志敏), Zhao M(赵明), Wang S-A(王树安), Zhao J-R(赵久然), Guo J-L(郭景伦). Developing characteristic and changes in material of maize kernel abortion. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 1999, 7(1): 59–61 (in Chinese with English abstract) [6]Boyle M G, Boyer J S, Morgan P W. Stem infusion of maize plants. Crop Sci, 1991, 31: 1241–1245 [7]Boyle M G, Boyer J S, Morgan P W. Stem infusion of liquid culture medium prevents reproductive failure of maize at low water potentials. Crop Sci, 1991, 31: 1246–1252 [8]Zinselmeier C, Lauer M J, Boyer J S. Reversing drought-induced losses in grain yield: sucrose maintains embryo growth in maize. Crop Sci, 1995, 35: 1390–1400 [9]Bewley J D, Black M. Seeds: Physiology of Development and Germination, 2nd edn. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1994 [10]Johnson D R, Tanner J W. Calculation of the rate and duration of grain filling in corn (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci, 1972, 12: 485–486 [11]Clore A M, Dannenhoffer J M, Larkins B A. EF-1α is associated with a cytoskeletal network surrounding protein bodies in maize endosperm cells. Plant Cell, 1996, 8: 2003–2014 [12]Schel J H N, Kieft N H, Van Lammeren A A M. Interactions between embryo and endosperm during early developmental stages of maize caryopses (Zea mays L.). Can J Bot, 1984, 62: 2842−2853 [13]Jones R J, Schreiber B M N, Roessler J A. Kernel sink capacity in maize: genotypic and maternal regulation. Crop Sci, 1996, 36: 301–306 [14]Reddy V M, Daynard T B. Endosperm characteristics associated with rate of grain filling and kernel size in corn. Maydica, 1983, 28: 339–355 [15]Douglas C D, Leslie J S, Edwin R D. Gene expression during maize kernel development. Seed Sci Res, 1994, 4: 299–305 [16]NeSmith D S, Ritchie J T. Effects of soil water-deficits during tassel emergence on development and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crops Res, 1992, 28: 251–256 [17]Reed A J, Singletory G W, Schussler J R, Williamson D R, Christy A L. Shading effects on dry matter and nitrogen partitioning, kernel number, and yield of maize. Crop Sci, 1988, 28: 819–825 [18]Setter T L, Flannigan B A. Sugar and starch redistribution in maize in response to shade and ear temperature treatment. Crop Sci, 1986, 26: 575–579 [19]Hu Y-H(胡寅华). The effect of defolliar on ear character and yield of summer maize. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 1996, 4(1): 46–50 (in Chinese with English abstract) [20]Egharevba P N, Horrocks R D, Zuber M S. Dry matter accumulation in maize in response to defoliation. Agron J, 1976, 68: 40–44 [21]Hashemi A M, Herbert S J, Putnam D H. Yield response of corn to crowding stress. Agron J, 2005, 97: 839–846 [22]Sun G-W(孙国伟), Zhang F-L(张凤路), Guo J(郭江), Zhao J-R(赵久然), Guo J-L(郭景伦). Discuss on the cause of maize kernel abotion. J Maize Sci (玉米科学), 2004, 12(S2): 35–37 (in Chinese with English abstract) [23]Ho L C. Metabolism and compartmentation of imported sugars in sink organs in relation to sink strength. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 1988, 39: 355–378 [24]Cheng C Y, Lur H S. Ethylene may be involved in abortion of the maize caryopsis. Physiol Plant, 1996, 98: 245–252 [25]Jonathan M H, Reed A J, Jones R J, McLaren J S. Effect of 1-aminocyclopropane-l-carboxylic acid on maize kernel development in vitro. J Plant Growth Regul, 1990, 9: 89–94 |
| [1] | 刘恩波, 陈静, 李红星, 于宁宁, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 刘鹏, 张吉旺. 遮阴改变源-库平衡和调节碳水化合物代谢进而抑制夏玉米幼穗发育[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1891-1901. |
| [2] | 梁进宇, 尹嘉德, 王红丽, 张国平, 侯慧芝, 董博, 马明生. 基于无人机高光谱和机器学习的旱地饲用玉米叶片氮含量估测[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(6): 1788-1801. |
| [3] | 孙淑凤, 许振南, 黄嘉鑫, 翁建峰, 李新海. 玉米MAPK家族全基因组鉴定及其对拟轮枝镰孢菌感染的响应[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1291-1308. |
| [4] | 张宁宁, 滕雨菲, 任娜娜, 魏兴卓, 闫书豪, 樊可心, 王永宏, 陈文康, 张兴华, 朱万超, 徐淑兔, 薛吉全. 201份玉米自交系抗旱表型评价及可塑性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1309-1325. |
| [5] | 杨欣雨, 崔文涛, 迪力尼格尔·阿力木, 汪凯翔, 吴鹏昊, 任姣姣. 玉米穗上叶片数全基因组关联分析和全基因组选择[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1573-1590. |
| [6] | 韩亚鑫, 何冠华, 张小琼, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 王天宇, 黎裕, 邹华文, 李春辉. 基于RNA-Seq和BSA-Seq联合分析挖掘玉米侧根密度基因资源[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1341-1352. |
| [7] | 张鸿蓉, 王菲儿, 李盼, 仇海龙, 朱静, 赵连豪, 南运有, 何蔚, 樊志龙, 胡发龙, 柴强, 殷文. 减量20%灌水与25%有机肥替代化肥提高青贮玉米产量的光合特性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1487-1500. |
| [8] | 杨扬, 常诗惠, 田红丽, 易红梅, 王璐, 任洁, 范亚明, 刘亚维, 王凤格, 赵久然. 不同生态区国审玉米品种的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(5): 1352-1364. |
| [9] | 蔡宏玮, 于爱忠, 姜科强, 王鹏飞, 王玉珑, 霍建喆, 庞小能, 尹波, 尚永盼. 干旱灌区有机肥替代部分化肥促进甜玉米产量提升的关键机制[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1166-1180. |
| [10] | 田红丽, 杨扬, 范亚明, 易红梅, 郭丹丹, 王凤格, 赵久然. 适于玉米品种鉴定的一套三等位变异SNP新型标记组合[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 993-1005. |
| [11] | 杨亚莉, 徐明睿, 马越飞, 海艺蕊, 刘凯栋, 刘万茂, 孙颖. 玉米根尖及整根响应缺铁的转录组比较研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(4): 1006-1021. |
| [12] | 张超, 郭欢, 李忠玲, 岳淑宁, 赵娜. 基于BSA-seq技术定位玉米籽粒花青素关联基因[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 780-789. |
| [13] | 郭向阳, 涂亮, 王栋, 刘鹏飞, 王安贵, 易强, 任洪, 李刚, 祝云芳, 吴迅, 蒋喻林, 田丰, 陈泽辉. 热带Suwan种质在我国玉米种质改良中的创新与利用[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 655-664. |
| [14] | 孟成, 王哲. 玉米ZmPFK基因家族全基因组鉴定及响应胁迫表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 764-779. |
| [15] | 李新浩, 邢梦柯, 周梓惠, 李思烨, 任昊, 王洪章, 赖华江. 外源褪黑素通过协调光反应与暗反应增强玉米苗期的耐热性[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(3): 839-856. |
|
||