局部根区灌溉对裸燕麦光合特征曲线及叶绿素荧光特性的影响

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01062

作物学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (06): 1062-1070.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01062

局部根区灌溉对裸燕麦光合特征曲线及叶绿素荧光特性的影响

林叶春¹，曾昭海¹，任长忠²，李志坚³，郭来春²，杨学超¹，王春龙²，钱欣¹，胡跃高^1,*

1中国农业大学农学与生物技术学院, 北京 100193; 2吉林省白城市农业科学院, 吉林白城 137000; 3东北师范大学草地科学研究所, 吉林长春 130024

收稿日期:2011-11-28 修回日期:2012-02-22 出版日期:2012-06-12 网络出版日期:2012-03-29
通讯作者: 胡跃高, E-mail: huyuegao@cau.edu.cn, Tel: 010-62733847
基金资助:
本研究由中国农业大学“研究生科研创新专项”(KYCX2010031)，国家现代农业产业技术体系建设项目(CARS-08-B-1)和国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(nyhyzx07-009-2)资助。

Effects of Partial Root Zone Irrigation on Leaf Photosynthetic Curves and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters in Naked Oat

LIN Ye-Chun¹,ZENG Zhao-Hai¹,REN Chang-Zhong²,LI Zhi-Jian³,GUO Lai-Chun²,YANG Xue-Chao¹,WANG Chun-Long²,QIAN Xin¹,HU Yue-Gao^1,*

1College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 2Baicheng Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Baicheng 137000, China; 3Institute of Grassland Science, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China

Received:2011-11-28 Revised:2012-02-22 Published:2012-06-12 Published online:2012-03-29
Contact: 胡跃高, E-mail: huyuegao@cau.edu.cn, Tel: 010-62733847

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨局部根区不同灌溉方式下裸燕麦(Avena nuda L.)光合能力下降的生理机制，采用盆栽及渗水盘供水方法，比较了交替根区灌溉(APRI)、固定根区灌溉(FPRI)和常规灌溉(CTRI)下，裸燕麦旗叶相对叶绿素含量(SPAD值)、光合特征曲线及叶绿素荧光动力学特性的差异。与CTRI处理相比，局部根区灌溉(包括APRI和FPRI处理)降低了叶片SPAD值、净光合速率(P_n)和初始羧化速率(CE)，但APRI处理未明显降低初始量子效率(α)、PSII最大量子效率(F_v/F_m)、PSII实际光化学效率(Ф_PSII)、电子传递效率(ETR)和光化学效率 (q_P)。在2种局部根区灌溉模式中，APRI较FPRI显著提高了叶片SPAD值(P<0.05)，而且APRI的叶片最大净光合速率(P_max)、α、光饱和点(LSP)、光能利用率(LUE)、C_i/C_a、CE、CO₂饱和点(C_i,sat)、初始荧光(F_o)、最大荧光(F_m)、Ф_PSII、ETR、q_P和非光化学效率(NPQ)均高于FPRI。APRI和FPRI的光合速率降低与气孔因素有关，FPRI光合速率降低还与PSII结构损伤有关；局部根区灌溉提高了裸燕麦干旱胁迫逆境下的耐受能力，APRI有利于保持更高的光合速率。

关键词: 局部灌溉, 干旱胁迫, 叶绿素荧光参数, 光合曲线, 裸燕麦

Abstract: The objective of this study was to provide experimental evidence for photosynthetic mechanism under drought stress and practical technique of water-saving irrigation in naked oat (Avena nuda L.). In a pot experiment with instrument to control root zone irrigation and water amount, the effects on relative chlorophyll content (SPAD), photosynthetic curves, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were compared among irrigation models of alternative partial root zone irrigation (APRI), fixed partial root zone irrigation (FPRI), and conventional total root zone irrigation (CTRI). Compared to CTRI, partial root zone irrigation, including APRI and FPRI treatments, decreased leaf SPAD, net photosynthetic rate (P_n), and carboxylation efficiency (CE); however, APRI had no obvious effects on reducing initial quantum efficiency (α), maximum photochemical efficiency (F_v/F_m), actual photochemical efficiency of PSII (Ф_PSII), apparent electron transport rate (ETR), and photochemical quenching coefficient (q_P). The leaf SPAD of APRI was significantly enhanced compared to that of FPRI (P<0.05), and the maximum net photosynthetic rate (P_max), α, light saturation point (LSP), light use efficiency (LUE), C_i/C_a, CE, CO₂ saturation point (C_i,sat), F_o, F_m, Ф_PSII, ETR, q_P, and NPQ were all higher in APRI than in FPRI. The reduction of P_n in partial root zone irrigation treatments resulted from stomatal factors, and structural damage of photosynthetic system II (PSII) was found in FPRI treatment. Clearly, partial root zone irrigation can improve the tolerance ability of naked oat against drought stress; particularly, APRI has the effect to maintain higher P_n than FPRI.

Key words: Partial root zone irrigation, Drought stress, Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, Photosynthetic curve, Naked oat

林叶春，曾昭海，任长忠，李志坚，郭来春，杨学超，王春龙，钱欣，胡跃高. 局部根区灌溉对裸燕麦光合特征曲线及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(06): 1062-1070.

LIN Ye-Chun,ZENG Zhao-Hai,REN Chang-Zhong,LI Zhi-Jian,GUO Lai-Chun,YANG Xue-Chao,WANG Chun-Long,QIAN Xin,HU Yue-Gao. Effects of Partial Root Zone Irrigation on Leaf Photosynthetic Curves and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters in Naked Oat[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(06): 1062-1070.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01062

https://zwxb.chinacrops.org/CN/Y2012/V38/I06/1062

参考文献

[1]Rocquigny P J, Entz M H, Gentile R M, Duguid S D. Yield physiology of a semidwarf and tall oat cultivar. Crop Sci, 2004, 44: 2116–2122

[2]Zou C-W(邹朝望), Xue X-Z(薛绪掌), Zhang R-D(张仁铎), Geng W(耿伟), Li S(李邵), Chen F(陈菲). Principle and equipment of negative pressure irrigation. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2007, 23(11): 17–22 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[3]Kang S-Z(康绍忠), Zhang J-H(张建华), Liang Z-S(梁宗锁), Hu X-T(胡笑涛), Cai H-J(蔡焕杰). The controlled alternative irrigation: a new approach for water saving regulation in farmland. Agric Res Arid Areas (干旱地区农业研究), 1997, 15(1): 1–6 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[4]Shi W-J(史文娟), Kang S-Z(康绍忠), Wang Q-J(王全九). Controlled root-split alternate irrigation: a new breakthrough of conventional water-saving irrigation techniques. J Irrig Drainage (灌溉排水学报), 2000, 19(1): 32–35 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5]Sun J-S(孙景生), Kang S-Z(康绍忠), Cai H-J(蔡焕杰), Hu X-T(胡笑涛). Review on research progress of controlled alternate irrigation techniques. Trans CSAE (农业工程学报), 2001, 17(4): 1–5 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6]Du T-S(杜太生), Kang S-Z(康绍忠), Zhang J-H(张建华). Response of cotton growth and water use to different partial root zone irrigation. Sci Agric Sin (中国农业科学), 2007, 40(11): 2546–2555 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[7]Tang L S, Li Y, Zhang J H. Physiological and yield responses of cotton under partial rootzone irrigation. Field Crop Res, 2005, 94: 214-223

[8]Bai X-L(白向历), Qi H(齐华), He P(何萍), Yu G-R(于贵瑞), Zhang Y-L(张耀兰), Li C(李春), Jin L-L(金路路), Ren Z-P(仁志萍). Effect of water stress on the photosynthetic characteristics of the leaf of oats during its grain-filling stage. Rain Fed Crops (杂粮作物), 2006, 26(1): 25–27 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9]Zhang R-H(张仁和), Xue J-Q(薛吉全), Pu J(浦军), Zhao B(赵兵), Zhang X-H(张兴华), Zhang Y-J(郑友军), Bu L-D(卜令铎). Influence of drought stress on plant growth and photosynthetic traits in maize seedlings. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2011, 37(3): 521–528 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10]Kang H-J(康华靖), Tao Y-L(陶月良), Wang L-X(王立新), Ye Z-P(叶子飘), Li H(李红). Estimation of use efficiency in fixation of CO2 and photorespiration for maize (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) under photorespiratory conditions. Acta Agron Sin (作物学报), 2011, 37(11): 2039–2045 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11]Hu W-X(胡文新), Peng S-B(彭少兵), Gao R-F(高荣孚), Ladha J K. Photosynthetic efficiency of a new plant type of rice developed by the international rice research institute. Sci Agric Sin (作物学报), 2005, 38(11): 2205–2210 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[12]Prioul J L, Chartier P. Partitioning of transfer and carboxylation components of intracellular resistance to photosynthetic CO2 fixation: a critical analysis of the methods used. Ann Bot, 1977, 41: 789–800

[13]Marshall B, Biscoe P V. A model for C3 leaves describing the dependence of net photosynthesis on irradiance: I. Derivation. J Exp Bot, 1980, 31: 29–39

[14]Ye Z-P(叶子飘), Yu Q(于强). Acomparison of response curves of winter wheat photosynthesis to flag leaf intercellular and air CO2 concentrations. Chin J Ecol (生态学杂志), 2009, 28(11): 2233–2238 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15]Hui H X, Xu X, Li Q R. Exogenous betaine improves the photosynthesis of Lycium barbarum under salt stress. Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin, 2003, 23: 2137–2422

[16]Cai H-X(蔡海霞), Wu F-Z(吴福忠), Yang W-Q(杨万勤). Effects of drought stress on the photosynthesis of Salix paraqplesia and Hippophae rhamnoides seedlings. Acta Ecol Sin (生态学报), 2011, 31(9): 2430–2436 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[17]Wang L, Zhang T, Ding S Y. Effect of drought and rewatering on photosynthetic physioecological characteristics of soybean. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006, 26: 2073–2078

[18]Zhang Y-Q(张永强), Mao X-S(毛学森), Sun H-Y(孙宏勇), Li W-J(李文杰), Yu H-N(于沪宁). Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence of winter wheat. Chin J Eco-agric (中国生态农业学报), 2002, 10(4): 13–15 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19]Farquhar G D, Sharkey T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Ann Rev Physiol, 1982, 33: 317–345

[20]Walting J R, Press M C, Quick W P. Elevated CO2 induces biochemical and ultranstructural changes in leaves of C4 cereal sorghum. Plant Physiol, 2000, 123: 1143–1152

[21]Zhang J-H(张建华), Jia W-S(贾文锁), Kang S-Z(康绍忠). Partial rootzone irrigation: its physiological consequences and impact on water use efficiency. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin (西北植物学报), 2001, 21(2): 191–197 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22]Erice G, Louahlia S, Irigoyen J J, Díaz M S, Alami I T, Avice J C. Water use efficiency, transpiration and net CO2 exchange of four alfalfa genotypes submitted to progressive drought and subsequent recovery. Environ Exp Bot, 2011, 72: 123–130

[23]Jiao J-Y(焦娟玉), Yin C-Y(尹春英), Chen K(陈珂). Effects of soil water and nitrogen supply on the photosynthetic characteristics of Jatropha curcas seedlings. Chin J Plant Ecol (植物生态学报), 2011, 35(1): 91–99 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[24]Jie Y-L(接玉玲), Yang H-Q(杨洪强), Cui M-G(崔明刚), Luo X-S(罗新书). Relationship between soil water content and water use efficiency of apple leaves. Chin J Appl Ecol (应用生态学报), 2001, 12(3): 387–390 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[25]Jiang G-M(蒋高明). Plant Physioecology (植物生理生态学). Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2004. pp 24–28 (in Chinese)

[26]Ephrath J E. The effects of drought stress on leaf elongation, photosynthesis and transpiration rate in maize leaves. Photosynthetica, 1991, 25: 607–619

[27]Li R H, Guo P G, Baum M, Grando S, Ceccarelli S. Evaluation of chlorophyll content and fluorescence parameters as indicators of drought tolerance in barley. Agric Sci China, 2006, 5: 751–757

[28]Mishra K B, Iannacone R, Petrozza A, Mishra A, Armentano N, Vecchia G L, Trtílek M, Cellini F, Nedbal L. Engineered drought tolerance in tomato plants is reflected in chlorophyll fluorescence emission. Plant Sci, 2012, 182: 79–86

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

局部根区灌溉对裸燕麦光合特征曲线及叶绿素荧光特性的影响

Effects of Partial Root Zone Irrigation on Leaf Photosynthetic Curves and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters in Naked Oat

PDF

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

关于本刊

在线期刊

作者中心

相关单位

联系我们

[1]	杨飚, 杜帅康, 张继旺, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 马铃薯III类POD基因家族的全基因组鉴定及其表达谱分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(2): 405-420.
[2]	胡城祯, 高维东, 孔斌雪, 王建飞, 车卓, 杨德龙, 陈涛. 小麦TaAPC11基因家族鉴定及TaAPC11-5B参与干旱胁迫的生物学功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 148-164.
[3]	王雅致, 杨飚, 季香林, 石瑛, 张丽莉. 二倍体马铃薯抗旱资源鉴定及抗旱基因初步筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 72-84.
[4]	孔娜, 刘涛, 刘文婷, 陈刚, 文利超, 邓智超, 郭梅, 李伟, 郭永峰. 烟草NtCEP7基因克隆及其编码小肽在苗期抗旱中的作用分析[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 249-261.
[5]	刘海波, 张蕾, 王立琦, 石晓丽, 周文莹, 崔国贤, 佘玮. 苎麻BnGCL1基因响应干旱胁迫的功能研究[J]. 作物学报, 2026, 52(1): 14-27.
[6]	何鹏旭, 姚立蓉, 陈远玲, 闫妍, 张宏, 汪军成, 李葆春, 杨轲, 司二静, 孟亚雄, 马小乐, 王化俊. 大麦干旱胁迫萌发生理及分子机理的差异性与相关性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(9): 2412-2432.
[7]	陆雯佳, 汪军成, 姚立蓉, 张宏, 司二静, 杨轲, 孟亚雄, 李葆春, 马小乐, 王化俊. 大麦PRX基因家族全基因组鉴定及其干旱胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(5): 1198-1214.
[8]	王林, 陈晓雨, 张文梦龙, 汪思琦, 程冰云, 程靖秋, 潘锐, 张文英. 大麦HvMYB2分子特性及响应干旱胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(4): 873-887.
[9]	霍如雪, 葛祥菡, 石嘉, 李雪蕊, 戴圣杰, 刘振宁, 李宗芸. 甘薯组氨酸激酶蛋白IbHK5响应干旱和盐胁迫的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(3): 650-666.
[10]	马群, 王志昊, 闫磊, 李瑜娇, 王佳琪, 李钊, 刘巍, 艾鑫, 马迁驰, 王晓光, 钟超, 任婧瑶, 刘喜波, 赵姝丽, 张鹤, 赵新华, 蒋春姬, 王婧, 于海秋. 高油酸和普通花生萌发期抗旱筛选评价体系的建立[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3266-3280.
[11]	魏琦, 何冠华, 张登峰, 李永祥, 刘旭洋, 唐怀君, 刘成, 王天宇, 黎裕, 路运才, 李春辉. 基于抗旱玉米自交系SL001的抗旱优异基因资源挖掘[J]. 作物学报, 2025, 51(12): 3171-3183.
[12]	刘永惠, 沈一, 沈悦, 梁满, 沙琴, 张旭尧, 陈志德. 花生干旱诱导型启动子AhMYB44-11-Pro的克隆与功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(9): 2157-2166.
[13]	李闻娟, 王利民, 齐燕妮, 赵玮, 谢亚萍, 党照, 赵丽蓉, 李雯, 徐晨梦, 王琰, 张建平. 亚麻LuWRI1a在旱盐胁迫响应中的功能分析[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(7): 1750-1761.
[14]	乔志新, 张杰道, 王雨, 郭启芳, 刘燕静, 陈蕊, 胡文浩, 孙爱清. 干旱胁迫下冬小麦不同品种萌发特性差异的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(6): 1568-1583.
[15]	王丽平, 王晓钰, 傅竞也, 王强. 玉米转录因子ZmMYB12提高植物抗旱性和低磷耐受性的功能鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(1): 76-88.